All those opposed will please say nay.
House of Commons Hansard #274 of the 42nd Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.) The word of the day was agreed.
House of Commons Hansard #274 of the 42nd Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.) The word of the day was agreed.
Concurrence in Vote 1—Correctional Service of CanadaGovernment Orders
Concurrence in Vote 1—Correctional Service of CanadaGovernment Orders
Some hon. members
Nay.
Concurrence in Vote 1—Correctional Service of CanadaGovernment Orders
The Assistant Deputy Speaker Carol Hughes
In my opinion the yeas have it.
And five or more members having risen:
Concurrence in Vote 5—Correctional Service of CanadaGovernment Orders
Kings—Hants Nova Scotia
Liberal
Scott Brison LiberalPresident of the Treasury Board
moved:
That Vote 5, in the amount of $47,285,431, under Correctional Service of Canada — Capital expenditures, in the Interim Estimates for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2019, be concurred in.
Concurrence in Vote 5—Correctional Service of CanadaGovernment Orders
The Assistant Deputy Speaker Carol Hughes
The question is on Motion No. 43. Is it the pleasure of the House to adopt the motion?
Concurrence in Vote 5—Correctional Service of CanadaGovernment Orders
Some hon. members
Agreed.
No.
Concurrence in Vote 5—Correctional Service of CanadaGovernment Orders
Concurrence in Vote 5—Correctional Service of CanadaGovernment Orders
Some hon. members
Yea.
Concurrence in Vote 5—Correctional Service of CanadaGovernment Orders
Concurrence in Vote 5—Correctional Service of CanadaGovernment Orders
Some hon. members
Nay.
Concurrence in Vote 5—Correctional Service of CanadaGovernment Orders
The Assistant Deputy Speaker Carol Hughes
In my opinion the nays have it.
And five or more members having risen:
Concurrence in Vote 1—Courts Administration ServiceGovernment Orders
Kings—Hants Nova Scotia
Liberal
Scott Brison LiberalPresident of the Treasury Board
moved:
That Vote 1, in the amount of $16,558,290, under Courts Administration Service—Program expenditures, in the Interim Estimates for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2019, be concurred in.
Concurrence in Vote 1—Courts Administration ServiceGovernment Orders
The Assistant Deputy Speaker Carol Hughes
The question is on Motion No. 44. Is it the pleasure of the House to adopt this motion?
Concurrence in Vote 1—Courts Administration ServiceGovernment Orders
Some hon. members
Agreed.
No.
Concurrence in Vote 1—Courts Administration ServiceGovernment Orders
Concurrence in Vote 1—Courts Administration ServiceGovernment Orders
Some hon. members
Yea.
Concurrence in Vote 1—Courts Administration ServiceGovernment Orders
Concurrence in Vote 1—Courts Administration ServiceGovernment Orders
Some hon. members
Nay.
Concurrence in Vote 1—Courts Administration ServiceGovernment Orders
The Assistant Deputy Speaker Carol Hughes
In my opinion the yeas have it.
And five or more members having risen: