Mr. Speaker, I note that I have mere seconds to respond, which gives me a difficult challenge to be able to respond fully.
I welcome the opportunity to talk to the member anytime in more detail. However, I will say that the chiefs of police, and the police more broadly, have spoken very clearly to the public safety imperativeness. During the course of my speech, I have tried to explain, very specifically, the reasons why these measures are required.
What we hear from members opposite is vague obfuscations about there not being any answers, but they do not provide any specifics in terms of what exactly their objection is to what is in the bill. That is my contention with what they are purporting to put forward.
I look forward to clause-by-clause. We begin that tomorrow, and hopefully it will be a more productive debate.