Madam Speaker, I am not a lawyer, and I think these issues are best decided in the courts.
The Supreme Court, which studied the Carter decision originally, said there had to be an irremediable condition with a reasonably foreseeable death. Although there is definitely suffering in the situation described by the member, it does not seem like death was reasonably foreseeable, so it would not have met the Supreme Court's decision.
Until the Supreme Court has a chance to weigh in on the Quebec court's decision, it would be unrealistic for a person who is not a lawyer to weigh in.