Mr. Speaker, it is clearly the member opposite who does not understand the situation. When this benefit was first constructed, it was an estimate of the reduction in earnings the payments were based on. The following year, when those numbers were clear, it was then clear they were not eligible for that money. This is not a clawback; it was the arrangement. It was understood from the beginning that it would be based on the actual reduction and not the projected reduction.
I want to say that I support the fishers and their communities and we will continue working to do that.