Madam Speaker, I took a great deal of time in my speech talking about how this personally affects each and every one of us and that we all have very emotional stories about what end of life looks like and the importance it plays in the perspective here.
The member mentioned the government's lawyer providing advice about what to appeal and what not to appeal. Certainly, that very point emphasizes some of the challenges we are faced with here, the fact there is a wide divergence of opinions. Moreover, the former attorney general, who is an independent member of the House, had a very different perspective on this issue than the current Attorney General. It is that divergence of opinions that actually is important to ensure that we get this right, because it is so important that we do get it right.
Does the member believe that this divergence of opinions is important to ensure that we are able to get this legislation right?