House of Commons Hansard #132 of the 44th Parliament, 1st session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.) The word of the day was public.

Topics

line drawing of robot

This summary is computer-generated. Usually it’s accurate, but every now and then it’ll contain inaccuracies or total fabrications.

Petitions

Division of Bill C-27 for the Purpose of Voting Peter Julian raises a point of order regarding Bill C-27, arguing it should be divided for voting. He contends the bill improperly combines unrelated acts concerning consumer privacy and data protection with artificial intelligence regulation. 900 words.

Public Complaints and Review Commission Act Second reading of Bill C-20. The bill establishes a Public Complaints and Review Commission to provide independent civilian oversight for the Royal Canadian Mounted Police and the Canada Border Services Agency. It aims to enhance transparency, accountability, and public trust by creating a mechanism for public complaints, establishing response timelines, and requiring annual reports on actions taken. Members discuss the bill's importance in addressing systemic racism in policing and ensuring fair treatment, particularly for Indigenous and racialized people. 45600 words, 6 hours in 2 segments: 1 2.

Statements by Members

Question Period

The Conservatives criticize the Liberal government for the cost of living crisis, driven by inflationary deficits and the failed carbon tax. They demand the government axe the carbon tax on home heating, especially for Atlantic Canadians, and highlight Canada's poor climate action performance. Concerns are also raised about rising crime and alleged foreign election interference.
The Liberals highlight their plan to support Canadians, including help for first-time homebuyers, eliminating student loan interest, and doubling the GST credit. They defend their climate action, noting emissions reductions and climate incentive payments for most families. The party also focuses on protecting democracy from foreign interference, strengthening gun control, and advancing official languages legislation.
The Bloc raises concerns about China's election interference and government transparency. They criticize Canada's poor climate action at COP27, specifically preventing the phasing out of fossil fuels and allowing oil exploration in protected areas. They also highlight the government's failure to protect French.
The NDP criticize corporate greed by grocery chains, demand action on the housing crisis, and oppose health care privatization. They also push for stronger climate action and address wrongful convictions and FIFA's OneLove ban.

Division of Bill C-27 for the Purpose of Voting Members debate a point of order on Bill C-27, arguing that its Part 3, concerning artificial intelligence, should receive a separate vote from Parts 1 and 2, which deal with privacy protections, under Standing Order 69.1 due to unrelated content. 1400 words, 10 minutes.

Pension Protection Act Third reading of Bill C-228. The bill aims to protect private sector workers' pensions by requiring annual solvency reports, providing mechanisms for companies to keep funds solvent, and giving [st/n6bZxt] pension funds priority over other creditors in bankruptcy. Proponents argue it corrects an injustice, [st/Iaonpf] incentivizes proper funding, and ensures workers receive their earned benefits, while addressing concerns about impact on business lending. 6500 words, 1 hour.

Adjournment Debates

Listing the IRGC as terrorist Garnett Genuis asks why the IRGC has not been listed as a terrorist organization. Pam Damoff cites actions already taken, including sanctions under the Special Economic Measures Act and inadmissibility to Canada under the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act. Genuis says the government's actions do not go far enough. Damoff insists the government is committed to human rights.
AEDs in RCMP vehicles Scott Reid inquires about progress on equipping RCMP vehicles with AEDs, highlighting the lives that could be saved. Pam Damoff cites the need for a detailed proposal due to climate and operational considerations, while reiterating her willingness to collaborate with Reid. Reid notes that other police forces have overcome weather storage issues.
Illegal cannabis shops Kevin Vuong raises concerns about illegal cannabis shops in his riding that target children with advertising and copycat edibles. Adam van Koeverden responds that the Cannabis Act aims to protect Canadians and displace the illegal market, and that the government works with provinces and territories on enforcement.
Was this summary helpful and accurate?

CannabisAdjournment Proceedings

7:10 p.m.

Milton Ontario

Liberal

Adam van Koeverden LiberalParliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Health and to the Minister of Sport

Madam Speaker, I would like to thank the member for his conscientious concern on this issue and his consistency and advocacy on behalf of his constituent Izabela, whom I have also heard from on Twitter. I would also like to take a moment to thank Izabela for her community advocacy and her concern, particularly for youth and their health in Toronto.

The Cannabis Act is there to protect the health and safety of Canadians while serving as a flexible legislative framework that adapts and responds to the ongoing and emerging needs of Canadians and helps displace the illegal cannabis market. The act also established a national framework to strictly regulate and to restrict youth access to cannabis in Canada, and under the Cannabis Act, federal, provincial and territorial governments share responsibility for overseeing cannabis production, distribution and sale in Canada.

It is the responsibility of the provinces and territories to determine how cannabis is distributed and sold in their jurisdictions. This includes establishing rules concerning how cannabis can be sold, the location of stores, the eligibility conditions for working in cannabis distribution and cannabis retail outlets.

The government shares the concerns regarding illegal cannabis sales, which is why the Cannabis Act contains strict penalties for those who sell illegal cannabis, which includes the sale of cannabis to minors. Individuals convicted of illegally selling or distributing cannabis are subject to sanctions, including those set out in the act, which range from fines to imprisonment for up to 14 years.

Government departments across Canada are working closely together to address illegal cannabis sales. Federal, provincial and territorial governments and law enforcement agencies all work closely together to disrupt the illegal cannabis market and inform Canadians about the health risks of these unregulated products.

Law enforcement plays a critical role in directly supporting the purposes of the act. The act provides law enforcement with the authority to take action against illegal cannabis retail sales and hold those who operate outside the legal framework accountable. We have invested in public education campaigns to educate Canadians about the risks of illegal cannabis and how to recognize the difference between legal and illegal cannabis, including the packaging. The government launched the “Reduce your risk: Choose legal cannabis” campaign in May 2022.

Additionally, in response to reports of the accidental ingestion of illegal edible cannabis products by children, Health Canada has issued two advisories to raise public awareness of the dangers associated with illegal cannabis products. The most recent advisory included images of illegal cannabis products to show Canadians how similar some of the products look to popular name-brand snack foods, and tips for recognizing legally sourced cannabis. We also provided guidance on how to store cannabis securely to prevent access by children and youth.

The government will continue to support its provincial and territorial partners, as well as law enforcement agencies in the fight against the illegal sale of cannabis.

We remain determined to take measures to prevent young people from having access to cannabis, to protect the health and safety of Canadians from untested and unregulated products and to eliminate the illegal cannabis market.

I would like to thank the member for his attention to this important concern and underscore that this is fundamentally a matter of shared jurisdiction across all levels of government, in this case municipally with the Toronto Police Service, provincially with the OPP and provincial licensure of sales licences, and of course federally as I have laid out today in this response.

CannabisAdjournment Proceedings

November 22nd, 2022 / 7:10 p.m.

Independent

Kevin Vuong Independent Spadina—Fort York, ON

Madam Speaker, I want to share one more example of what is happening on the ground in my community.

These illegal pot shops actually enticed children into their illegal dispensaries with popcorn during Halloween. They are plastering promotions throughout the neighbourhood. Without any fear of the authorities, they are targeting children with their ads. Canada prohibits tobacco and alcohol ads that target minors.

Would my hon. colleague agree that targeting ads used by illegal cannabis shops to attract children should also be prohibited?

CannabisAdjournment Proceedings

7:15 p.m.

Liberal

Adam van Koeverden Liberal Milton, ON

Madam Speaker, before I continue my rebuttal, of course I am opposed to any illegal advertisement. If the advertisements are indeed illegal, then they are contrary to all of our laws. If they are an illegal product, then advertising an illegal product in an illegal means is clearly an infraction of the law.

At this point, the government's priority continues to be protecting young people from the health risks of cannabis.

That is why, in addition to complying with all the provisions of the act, cannabis licence holders must comply with strict requirements under the cannabis regulations, which include using child resistant packaging and using plain packaging and labelling that is not appealing to youth.

Absolutely, all of the concerns that my colleague has laid out tonight demonstrate a wilful opposition to the laws. In addition, I am happy to continue this conversation at some other time with my colleague. I know we are running short on time this evening. I want to thank him again for his attention to this important matter.

CannabisAdjournment Proceedings

7:15 p.m.

The Assistant Deputy Speaker Carol Hughes

The motion that the House do now adjourn is deemed to have been adopted. Accordingly, the House stands adjourned until tomorrow at 2 p.m. pursuant to Standing Order 24(1).

(The House adjourned at 7:16 p.m.)