House of Commons Hansard #251 of the 44th Parliament, 1st session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.) The word of the day was ukraine.

Topics

line drawing of robot

This summary is computer-generated. Usually it’s accurate, but every now and then it’ll contain inaccuracies or total fabrications.

Prohibition of the Export of Horses by Air for Slaughter Act Second reading of Bill C-355. The bill C-355 seeks to ban the export by air of horses for slaughter. Proponents cite animal welfare concerns during transport and public support. Opponents argue existing regulations are adequate, question the bill's narrow focus, and warn of negative impacts on other industries including equestrian events and breeders. 9000 words, 1 hour.

Government Business No. 30—Proceedings on Bill C‑56 Members debate a government motion to limit debate on Bill C-56, which proposes a GST rebate for new rental housing and amendments to the Competition Act. Liberals and NDP support the motion to speed up passage, citing affordability concerns and criticizing Conservative delays. Conservatives oppose the motion, arguing the bill is weak and the process is undemocratic, while proposing an amendment. Bloc Québécois criticizes the time limit and raises concerns about the bill's housing impact and the CEBA loan deadline. 17100 words, 2 hours.

Statements by Members

Question Period

The Conservatives blame government spending and the carbon tax for rising interest rates and mortgage payments, impacting the cost of living and housing. They call for a plan to balance the budget and criticize Liberal scandals including ArriveCAN and SDTC spending.
The Liberals defend their plan to help Canadians and the economy, highlighting efforts to address affordability and the cost of living. They focus on their strategy to build more homes, support small businesses, strengthen border security, and invest in sectors like Canadian content and electric vehicles. They also defend their fiscal record and the price on pollution.
The Bloc calls for CEBA loan extensions for small businesses and funding for school meal programs. They raise concerns about Mexican cartels exploiting border security issues and demand control of borders. They also seek a military aircraft competition to include Bombardier.
The NDP highlight the affordability crisis and housing crisis, urging the government to tackle CEO greed, fund social housing, and provide requested funding for Nunavut and Winnipeg. They also raise concerns about temporary foreign workers at the Stellantis-LG plant.

Oral Questions—Speaker's Ruling The Speaker rules that questions during Oral Questions must hold the government accountable within its jurisdiction, quickly link to its responsibility, and not attack members unable to respond. The Chair will not rule on political agreements. 1300 words.

Petitions

Canada-Ukraine Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act, 2023 Second reading of Bill C-57. The bill implements the 2023 Canada-Ukraine Free Trade Agreement, modernizing the existing deal. Conservatives support Ukraine and free trade but question the timing and new "woke clauses", particularly the environment chapter, and advocate for "exporting Canadian LNG". Liberals and NDP support the bill as crucial for Ukraine's economy and future rebuilding, questioning Conservative hesitation. 10400 words, 1 hour.

Adjournment Debate - Carbon Pricing Tom Kmiec questions Adam van Koeverden on the fairness and legality of the carbon tax carve-out for home heating oil. Kmiec suggests the carve-out undermines the government's legal arguments for the tax's constitutionality. Van Koeverden defends the policy and attacks Kmiec's party for opposing climate action. Cheryl Gallant accuses the government of "climate socialism". 3200 words, 15 minutes.

Was this summary helpful and accurate?

Questions Passed as Orders for ReturnsRoutine Proceedings

4 p.m.

Winnipeg North Manitoba

Liberal

Kevin Lamoureux LiberalParliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons

Madam Speaker, furthermore, if the government's response to Questions Nos. 1748 to 1752, 1754 to 1756, 1759 to 1761, 1763 to 1765, 1767, 1772 to 1776, 1782, 1783, 1787, 1788, 1795 to 1797, 1799, 1800 and 1802 could be made orders for return, these returns would be tabled in an electronic format immediately.

Questions Passed as Orders for ReturnsRoutine Proceedings

4 p.m.

Questions Passed as Orders for ReturnsRoutine Proceedings

4 p.m.

Some hon. members

Agreed.

Question No.1748—Questions Passed as Orders for ReturnsRoutine Proceedings

4 p.m.

NDP

Heather McPherson NDP Edmonton Strathcona, AB

With regard to the government’s participation in negotiations for a pandemic instrument or treaty: (a) what is Canada’s current position on the pandemic treaty, specifically with regard to equitable access to medical countermeasures such as drugs and vaccines, in particular (i) why Canada has proposed that technology transfers to enable other countries to manufacture their own drugs and vaccines only occur on “voluntary and mutually agreed terms” with pharmaceutical companies, even when those drugs and vaccines were developed with public funding from the government, (ii) what Canada proposes to do in situations where pharmaceutical companies do not enter into voluntary agreements, as it frequently did not happen during the COVID-19 pandemic and previous global public health crises such as HIV, (iii) how will Canada ensure that investments of public funds, including those by Canadian taxpayers, in pharmaceutical research, development, and manufacturing, delivers affordable and globally-accessible drugs, vaccines, and other health technologies to Canadians and people worldwide; (b) how is the government implementing the recommendations from the Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Development vaccine equity report entitled “Overcoming the Barriers to Global Vaccine Equity and Ending the Pandemic” during its participation in negotiations for the pandemic instrument, and will the government follow the report’s recommendation 8 that it “ensure that its agreements to provide research and development funding include clauses that allow intellectual property resulting from that funding – including vaccines, therapeutics, and diagnostics – to be easily licensed to manufacturers serving low- and middle income countries”;

(c) how are the positions articulated by civil society during the Pandemic Instrument Partner and Stakeholder Engagement Forum reflected in Canada’s own positions in negotiation of the pandemic instrument; (d) which of the strategies and actions recommended by participants and contained in the government’s report on the Pandemic Instrument Partner and Stakeholder Engagement Forum does the government agree with; (e) which of the strategies and actions recommended by participants and contained in the government’s report on the Pandemic Instrument Partner and Stakeholder Engagement Forum does the government disagree with and why; and (f) how many meetings, emails and phone calls, and on what dates, have officials from (i) Global Affairs Canada, (ii) the Public Health Agency of Canada, (iii) Health Canada, (iv) the Privy Council Office, (v) Public Services and Procurement Canada, (vi) Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada, (vii) the Office of the Prime Minister, had with (A) Innovative Medicines Canada, (B) pharmaceutical company representatives, (C) Canadian and international not-for-profit or charitable organizations, on the subject of pandemic instrument and the revision of the International Health Regulations?

(Return tabled)

Question No.1749—Questions Passed as Orders for ReturnsRoutine Proceedings

November 20th, 2023 / 4 p.m.

NDP

Heather McPherson NDP Edmonton Strathcona, AB

With regard to the government’s procurement of vaccines during the COVID-19 pandemic: (a) what price did Canada negotiate per vaccine from each manufacturer, and what was the final price paid per vaccine for each manufacturer; (b) what were the amounts, in Canadian dollars, broken down by vaccine product and company, of advance payments made by the government to pharmaceutical companies to guarantee vaccine shipments; (c) what confidentiality and indemnification clauses did Canada agree to in order to exempt companies from legal liability; (d) were pharmaceutical companies exempted from the obligation to give full refunds if deliveries were delayed or cancelled; (e) what clauses, if any, did the vaccine purchase contracts signed by Canada include relating to the ability of Canada to donate vaccine doses from those contracts to low- and middle-income countries, humanitarian organizations, Gavi, the World Health Organization, or any other organization for use outside of Canada;

(f) when Canada’s Chief Public Health Officer indicated, in October 2021, that initial agreements between Canada and the manufacturers of mRNA vaccines (e.g. Moderna and Pfizer/BioNTech) did not allow for doses to be donated but that new arrangements had been made to permit donations, what were the original conditions and the subsequently agreed conditions, respectively; (g) what is the total value, in Canadian dollars, of funding provided by the government, broken down by department or agency, to support the research, development, or manufacture of vaccines, drugs, or diagnostic tests for COVID-19 between 2020 and 2023; (h) for any of the funding provided during this time to companies, universities, not-for-profits, or other research, development, or manufacturing entities, did any of the funding agreements or contracts contain clauses or stipulations that would secure a pricing structure for the final product for Canadians or for people living in low- and middle-income countries; (i) did Canada attempt to use its leverage as an investor in these technologies to secure fair or affordable pricing of the final products for Canadians or for people living in low and middle income countries; and (j) did Canada attempt to use its leverage as an investor in these technologies to ensure access to the final products for Canadians or for people living in low and middle income countries, for example by requiring the products to be registered for use in Canada or in low and middle income countries?

(Return tabled)

Question No.1750—Questions Passed as Orders for ReturnsRoutine Proceedings

4 p.m.

Conservative

Ed Fast Conservative Abbotsford, BC

With regard to Correctional Service Canada: what is the breakdown by security classification of the facility of how many dangerous offenders are currently in each type of facility, including those on parole or conditional release?

(Return tabled)

Question No.1751—Questions Passed as Orders for ReturnsRoutine Proceedings

4 p.m.

Conservative

Ed Fast Conservative Abbotsford, BC

With regard to Correctional Service Canada: what is the breakdown by security classification of the facility of how many offenders serving life sentences for multiple murders are currently in each type of facility, including those on parole or conditional release?

(Return tabled)

Question No.1752—Questions Passed as Orders for ReturnsRoutine Proceedings

4 p.m.

Conservative

Ed Fast Conservative Abbotsford, BC

With regard to the government’s response to drones being used in the proximity of penitentiaries or other correctional facilities, within the past five years: (a) has the government tested or used technology to jam or nullify mobile phone or drone use in relation to any penitentiary or correctional facility, and, if so, what are the details of what was done, including, for each action, the (i) date, (ii) summary of what was done; and (b) has the government consulted or sought external advice related to the drones being used to smuggle items into penitentiaries or correctional facilities, and, if so, what are the details, including the (i) name of the individual or firm, (ii) date, (iii) value of the contract, if applicable, (iv) description of the parameters for the advice or consultation sought, (v) description of the advice or information received?

(Return tabled)

Question No.1754—Questions Passed as Orders for ReturnsRoutine Proceedings

4 p.m.

Conservative

Dane Lloyd Conservative Sturgeon River—Parkland, AB

With regard to the upcoming tenth session of the Conference of the Parties (COP10) to the World Health Organization Framework Convention on Tobacco Control, from November 10 to 25, 2023, and the third session of the Meeting of Parties (MOP3) to the Protocol to Eliminate Illicit Trade in Tobacco Products, from November 27 to 30, 2023: (a) how many individuals will be part of the government's delegation and what are their names and titles; (b) what is the overall budget for the government's COP10 and MOP3 participation, broken down by (i) accommodations, (ii) meals or per diems, (iii) hospitality; (c) what are the government's key priorities or action items for both the COP10 and MOP3; and (d) has the government been assigned any specific agenda items or resolutions for both the COP1O and MOP3, and, if so, what are they?

(Return tabled)

Question No.1755—Questions Passed as Orders for ReturnsRoutine Proceedings

4 p.m.

Conservative

Warren Steinley Conservative Regina—Lewvan, SK

With regard to the Canada Child Benefit, during the most recent round of payments: (a) how many and what percentage of families who received payments got (i) the maximum payment amount for each child, (ii) a decreased payment amount due to the adjusted family net income level; and (b) of the families in (a) who received a decreased amount, what was the number and percentage of recipients that had their payments reduced by (i) less than 25 percent, (ii) 25 to 50 percent, (iii) more than 50 percent to 75 percent, (iv) more than 75 percent?

(Return tabled)

Question No.1756—Questions Passed as Orders for ReturnsRoutine Proceedings

4 p.m.

NDP

Gord Johns NDP Courtenay—Alberni, BC

With regard to workplace and work-related injuries in the public sector, broken down by department and fiscal year since 2015-16: (a) what is the total number of public sector workers who experienced (i) physical injuries in the workplace, (ii) injuries to their mental health or mental well-being in the workplace; (b) how many of the workers in (a) experienced injuries that resulted in the worker being unable to work either (i) temporarily, (ii) permanently, (iii) to the full extent of their job duties prior to their injury; (c) how many of the workers in (a) experienced injuries that resulted in a leave of work of (i) less than one month, (ii) one to three months, (iii) three to six months, (iv) six to 12 months, (v) 12 months or more; (d) of the workers who experienced injuries in (a), how many saw reduced or modified job duties for (i) less than one month, (ii) one to three months, (iii) three to six months, (iv) six to 12 months, (v) more than 12 months; and (e) how many workers in (a) were (i) permanently unable to work, (ii) unable to work in the same role, (iii) required to change work place or job title?

(Return tabled)

Question No.1759—Questions Passed as Orders for ReturnsRoutine Proceedings

4 p.m.

Conservative

Frank Caputo Conservative Kamloops—Thompson—Cariboo, BC

With regard to contraband items seized in federal penitentiaries, broken down by year for each of the last five years: what is the breakdown of the items seized, including the volume of each type of item seized, in total and broken down by correctional institution?

(Return tabled)

Question No.1760—Questions Passed as Orders for ReturnsRoutine Proceedings

4 p.m.

Conservative

Arpan Khanna Conservative Oxford, ON

With regard to the government’s response to drug addiction: (a) what are the government’s estimates on the number of Canadians who are addicted to illicit drugs, broken down by substance; (b) for each substance in (a), what is the government’s strategy to get those addicted into treatment and recovery, or to otherwise stop the addiction; (c) how much funding is being provided for the treatment and recovery strategy, broken down by year for the next five years; and (d) what are the government’s targets on how many fewer people will be addicted to each substance in (a), broken down by substance and year for the next five years?

(Return tabled)

Question No.1761—Questions Passed as Orders for ReturnsRoutine Proceedings

4 p.m.

Conservative

Colin Carrie Conservative Oshawa, ON

With regard to Health Canada and the Public Health Agency of Canada: (a) was each COVID-19 vaccine approved for use in Canada tested for safety against placebo prior to licensing, and, if not, which ones were exempted from the testing and why; (b) what specific ongoing studies and clinical trials is the government monitoring to compare the COVID vaccines against placebo, and what are the citations for each clinical trial; (c) which studies is the government monitoring to determine all-cause mortality after vaccination for COVID-19 and if there are any findings of correlation or causation as it relates to the COVID-19 vaccination campaign; and (d) what are the citations for each study in (c)?

(Return tabled)