House of Commons Hansard #253 of the 44th Parliament, 1st session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.) The word of the day was ukraine.

Topics

line drawing of robot

This summary is computer-generated. Usually it’s accurate, but every now and then it’ll contain inaccuracies or total fabrications.

Statements by Members

Question Period

The Conservatives focus on the cost of living, criticizing high inflation and interest rates driven by government spending. They attack the carbon tax, especially its impact on farmers and food prices, pushing for Bill C-234. They question the battery plant deal, alleging it funds foreign replacement workers.
The Liberals addressed the serious border incident at Niagara. They highlighted measures in the fall economic statement to build more homes, support the economy, and invest in battery plants and Indigenous housing. They strongly criticized the Conservatives for voting against the Canada-Ukraine free trade agreement, linking it to climate action and abandoning Ukraine.
The Bloc criticizes the economic statement as lacking substance, offering no immediate help for the housing crisis, seniors, or businesses. They also address defence procurement.
The NDP address the Niagara border incident, criticize the government on affordable housing and the Indigenous housing crisis and poverty funding. They also press on the emissions cap, the Mirabel expropriation, and condemn pejorative language.
The Green Party stresses funding for infrastructure, evacuation, and fire preparedness in the North due to climate change and wildfires.

Petitions

Infrastructure Gap for Indigenous Peoples NDP MP Lori Idlout requests an emergency debate on the critical infrastructure gap and underfunding for Indigenous peoples across Canada, citing suffering, expiring programs, and the government's lack of commitment to address the crisis. 300 words.

Canada Labour Code Second reading of Bill C-58. The bill prohibits replacement workers in federally regulated workplaces to improve labour relations and bargaining balance. Supporters cite successful provincial models. Critics question the 18-month implementation delay and potential loopholes. Conservatives raise concerns about the bill's scope and foreign workers in government-funded contracts. 12700 words, 2 hours.

Health of Animals Act Third reading of Bill C-275. The bill amends the Health of Animals Act to make unauthorized entry onto farms illegal if it could expose animals to disease or toxic substances. Supporters say it enhances biosecurity, protects farmers from trespassers, and addresses mental health impacts. Concerns include potential impacts on whistle-blowers and jurisdictional issues, but the bill aims to balance protection with the right to peaceful protest. 6100 words, 45 minutes.

Foreign Affairs and International Development Members debate a report on Russia's war against Ukraine, focusing heavily on the updated Canada-Ukraine free trade agreement. Conservatives oppose the deal, citing a carbon pricing clause and lack of provisions for munitions and energy security. Liberals and NDP criticize the Conservative vote, calling it a betrayal of Ukraine despite Ukrainian support for the deal. Conservatives propose an amendment to include expanded munitions production. 9700 words, 1 hour.

Adjournment Debates

ArriveCAN app controversy Garnett Genuis questions who authorized the hiring of GC Strategies for the ArriveCAN app, citing inflated costs and fraudulent resumes. Charles Sousa responds that the RCMP and CBSA are investigating, and the government will act on any findings. Genuis repeats his question, but Sousa does not provide a specific answer.
Canadian LNG exports to Europe Michael Kram questions why Canada isn't exporting LNG to Europe, citing Germany's deals with Middle Eastern dictators. Marc Serré defends the government's approach, emphasizing clean energy and hydrogen exports, while accusing the Conservatives of climate denialism. Kram reiterates his questions about the government's position, and Serré criticizes the Conservatives' opposition to Bill C-49.
Canada disability benefit funding Mike Morrice urges the government to fund the Canada disability benefit, noting the lack of urgency compared to funding child care. Sameer Zuberi says the government is committed, is consulting with stakeholders, and that the process must be done properly. Morrice reiterates the need for immediate action.
Was this summary helpful and accurate?

FinanceOral Questions

3 p.m.

Outremont Québec

Liberal

Rachel Bendayan LiberalParliamentary Secretary to the Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Finance

Mr. Speaker, yesterday, we did table the fall economic statement, which is the next step in our plan to build more homes right across the country and to build them faster, to crack down on short-term rentals and Airbnbs by supporting municipalities and their own regulations, and, of course, to strengthen competition laws in this country in order to stabilize prices.

That was our plan, and it took only minutes for the Conservative leader to call it “disgusting”. What is actually disgusting is that the Conservative leader refuses to tell Canadians what he is going to cut.

Automotive IndustryOral Questions

3 p.m.

Carleton Ontario

Conservative

Pierre Poilievre ConservativeLeader of the Opposition

Mr. Speaker, it has come to light that the Prime Minister will spend 15 billion tax dollars, which is $1,000 for every single family in Canada, on a grant that will pay for 1,600 replacement workers to come in and displace union jobs in Windsor, in a battery plant there.

The Prime Minister is desperately claiming that he had no choice in the matter. Why does he not open up the contract so all Canadians can see whether there were any guarantees that this massive $15-billion grant would actually lead to Canadian and not foreign paycheques?

Automotive IndustryOral Questions

3 p.m.

Edmonton Centre Alberta

Liberal

Randy Boissonnault LiberalMinister of Employment

Mr. Speaker, this is a little bit rich coming from a political party that not only does not stand for auto workers and does not stand for Canadian workers at all, but also has no interest in a green economic plan like we have. The Conservatives have not been with workers. They have not been with the auto sector. We are building battery plants in parts of this country. We are building a green economic plan.

Let us look at the facts: One temporary foreign worker has been approved.

Automotive IndustryOral Questions

3 p.m.

Carleton Ontario

Conservative

Pierre Poilievre ConservativeLeader of the Opposition

Mr. Speaker, yes, and there are 1,600. That is 1,599 more, at least, foreign replacement workers who will be coming to use the 15 billion tax dollars that the Prime Minister is making Canadians pay for a single plant. In fact, here I have an advertisement for a position as an electrode quality engineer that states that the skills required include being bilingual in English and Korean. That is true of countless of the job advertisements.

Will the Prime Minister release the contract on this $15-billion deal to see whether any of the money is going to go to Canadian workers or whether it is all going to foreign replacement workers?

Automotive IndustryOral Questions

3 p.m.

Edmonton Centre Alberta

Liberal

Randy Boissonnault LiberalMinister of Employment

Mr. Speaker, the leader of the official opposition's misinformation cannot hide the transformational nature of this investment and investments like it across the country. Let us be extremely clear and focus on the facts, which are that there are 2,500 permanent jobs in the Windsor area to operate the plant and 2,300 Canadian jobs to construct the plant. Those are the facts.

He is risky and reckless, and he is just dealing in pure misinformation.

Automotive IndustryOral Questions

3 p.m.

The Speaker Greg Fergus

I would like to remind members to use language that does not impugn the member's use of information.

The hon. Leader of the Opposition.

Automotive IndustryOral Questions

3 p.m.

Carleton Ontario

Conservative

Pierre Poilievre ConservativeLeader of the Opposition

Mr. Speaker, my information comes from the Windsor police, who had a visit from the South Korean ambassador to set up the arrival of 1,600 South Korean replacement workers who will displace union workers in Windsor. Unions are up in arms as the government is displacing their workers to bring in replacement workers from abroad.

If anything I am saying is wrong, why does the government not just announce that it will release the contract to show any guarantees there are that the jobs will go to Canadians?

Automotive IndustryOral Questions

3:05 p.m.

Edmonton Centre Alberta

Liberal

Randy Boissonnault LiberalMinister of Employment

Mr. Speaker, let us look at the facts and let us look at an authority in this matter. Dave Cassidy, president of Unifor Local 444, called out the disinformation from the Conservative Party as absolutely false and baseless. There is simply no justification for what the ambassador of South Korea has suggested. Instead, the facts are that there are 2,500 Canadian jobs to operate this plant and 2,300 Canadian jobs to construct this plant. Those are the facts. Those are the investments.

We are building for the future. Everything else is just risk and recklessness from the Conservatives.

Automotive IndustryOral Questions

3:05 p.m.

Carleton Ontario

Conservative

Pierre Poilievre ConservativeLeader of the Opposition

Mr. Speaker, what is risky and reckless is to spend $15 billion, which works out to $1,000 for every family in Canada, for a project that will employ foreign replacement workers. Those workers will displace our union jobs in this country, in other words, our money for foreign workers. That is according to the police from Windsor and the local Windsor municipal government.

Those are the facts, and if the Prime Minister has any other facts he would like to share, why will he not just give us the contract?

Automotive IndustryOral Questions

3:05 p.m.

Whitby Ontario

Liberal

Ryan Turnbull LiberalParliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Innovation

Mr. Speaker, let us get real. The Conservatives have never been for workers. They do not understand that the fight against climate change creates prosperity for generations to come. These once-in-a-generation investments in a Nexstar facility are bringing 2,500 permanent jobs to Windsor, which is bringing back the auto industry. It is beyond me how the Conservatives can somehow spin this negatively—

Automotive IndustryOral Questions

3:05 p.m.

Some hon. members

Oh, oh!

Automotive IndustryOral Questions

3:05 p.m.

The Speaker Greg Fergus

I will ask all members, please, to take the floor only when they are recognized by the Speaker, so we can make sure we have order in the House.

The hon. member for Joliette.

HousingOral Questions

3:05 p.m.

Bloc

Gabriel Ste-Marie Bloc Joliette, QC

Mr. Speaker, the economic update proves once again that the Prime Minister does not understand the word “emergency”. The housing crisis is an emergency. Nevertheless, not only will the new funding be inadequate, but there is not a single new measure that will take effect before 2025, in other words, after the next election. The only thing the Prime Minister is offering is money starting in 2025 if people vote in a Liberal government.

When will he understand that what we need today is money for housing, not election promises?

HousingOral Questions

3:05 p.m.

Central Nova Nova Scotia

Liberal

Sean Fraser LiberalMinister of Housing

Mr. Speaker, I disagree with my hon. colleague, and I would encourage him to read the entirety of the fall economic statement. There are a number of measures that take effect very quickly, some in the next number of weeks and some in the next number of months. He must be referring to our recapitalization, though, of certain programs that are actually helping get homes built now.

We continue to have funds on the table. In fact, just last week, we landed agreements worth $4 billion that are going to see nearly 12,000 new homes constructed right across this country at prices that ordinary people can actually afford. We are now locking in long-term investments that are going to provide certainty to builders so they can continue to build the homes that are necessary to defeat the housing crisis.

HousingOral Questions

3:05 p.m.

Bloc

Gabriel Ste-Marie Bloc Joliette, QC

Mr. Speaker, I would encourage him to have a look at the tables that say “zero” for this year and “zero” for next year.

People had better brace themselves, because this winter is going to be very long. It is going to be long for anyone who cannot find housing, because there is no new money for housing until 2025. It is going to be long for anyone who becomes part of the 5% increase in homelessness, because there is no emergency funding. It is going to be long for media workers who are faced with job losses, because there is no emergency funding for them either. It is going to be long for our SMEs, which will not survive the winter if the deadline for repayment of the Canada emergency business account is not pushed back from January.

The time to take care of these people is now. It is not in the spring, and certainly not in 2025. What is the Prime Minister waiting for?

HousingOral Questions

3:05 p.m.

Central Nova Nova Scotia

Liberal

Sean Fraser LiberalMinister of Housing

Mr. Speaker, I agree with the member. Investments are necessary to address the housing crisis. On top of the new measures included in yesterday's document are other investments that our government has already announced.

For example, we signed an agreement with the Province of Quebec to the tune of $1.8 billion just to support investments in affordable housing. We will continue making the investments necessary to end the housing crisis across the country.

Carbon PricingOral Questions

3:10 p.m.

Carleton Ontario

Conservative

Pierre Poilievre ConservativeLeader of the Opposition

Mr. Speaker, the Prime Minister had a chance yesterday to cancel his plan to quadruple the carbon tax. It is important to understand how much he wants to raise taxes on Canadians. He wants to raise the carbon tax to 61¢ a litre. That will raise the cost of heat and gas, and also of food, because when we tax the farmers who make the food and the truckers who ship the food, we tax all who buy the food.

Will the Prime Minister finally tell us how much it will cost the average family when he quadruples the tax, and will he call an election on the carbon tax so Canadians can decide for themselves?

Carbon PricingOral Questions

3:10 p.m.

Milton Ontario

Liberal

Adam van Koeverden LiberalParliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Environment and Climate Change and to the Minister of Sport and Physical Activity

Mr. Speaker, the agri-food sector is affected probably more than any other sector by climate change. In a year when we saw increased floods, more frequent storms, soil erosion, sporadic and unpredictable rainfall, and fires across this country that devastated rural communities, driving people out of their homes and causing destruction, it is really disappointing that the Conservatives still do not believe in climate change.

All of those impacts result from climate change, and a price on pollution is working to reduce our emissions and fight the fight.

Carbon PricingOral Questions

3:10 p.m.

Carleton Ontario

Conservative

Pierre Poilievre ConservativeLeader of the Opposition

Mr. Speaker, it is not working. The Liberals have missed every emissions target but one in the year that the economy was entirely locked down. The Liberal government ranks 58th out of 63 in the world, and its own environment commissioner says it will not meet its emissions targets, yet the Liberals still go ahead with the carbon tax, which has proven not to work. They want to quadruple the tax, including on farmers, who have no other choice than to use traditional hydrocarbons to power their machinery, their barns and their drying.

Once again, how much will the carbon tax cost the average Canadian farmer when the Prime Minister quadruples it?

Carbon PricingOral Questions

3:10 p.m.

Burlington Ontario

Liberal

Karina Gould LiberalLeader of the Government in the House of Commons

Mr. Speaker, if the Conservatives were concerned about the cost of food and the cost of fuel, they would stand in solidarity with the people of Ukraine, because it is Russia's illegal war of aggression that is driving up global food prices and global fuel prices. However, they are ideologically committed to ignoring climate change and doing anything they could to possibly fight it, so much so that they threw Ukraine under the bus and voted against the very agreement that the Ukrainian government has asked Canada to support. Conservatives need to give their heads a shake and stand with the people who are fighting for freedom around the world.

Carbon PricingOral Questions

3:10 p.m.

Carleton Ontario

Conservative

Pierre Poilievre ConservativeLeader of the Opposition

Mr. Speaker, this is the minister who stood and had a photo taken with a Nazi that helped Russian propaganda all around the world.

The question was about the carbon tax cost on the average Canadian farmer. I have here a power bill from Enbridge for a farm in my riding that has $11,000 in carbon taxes alone. That is today. Now the Prime Minister wants to quadruple the tax on Canadian farmers, which will drive up the cost of production, drive food growth out of this country and drive prices up for everyday Canadian families.

Once again, how much will the average farmer pay in carbon taxes once the Prime Minister implements his plan to quadruple the tax?

Carbon PricingOral Questions

3:10 p.m.

Burlington Ontario

Liberal

Karina Gould LiberalLeader of the Government in the House of Commons

Mr. Speaker, what is unbelievable is that the Leader of the Opposition, who claims to stand for freedom and who claims to stand for democracy, will do everything he can to ideologically oppose fighting climate change, including not standing with Ukrainians, who are facing an illegal war of aggression by Russia that is driving up food and fuel prices around the world.

If he truly cared about supporting Canadian families and Canadian farmers, he would support the Canada-Ukraine free trade agreement and would not abandon them in their time of need.

HousingOral Questions

3:10 p.m.

Liberal

Patricia Lattanzio Liberal Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel, QC

Mr. Speaker, in yesterday's economic statement, the government announced measures to support housing co-operatives. There are 1,130 co-ops in Quebec, representing more than 22,000 housing units. The Leader of the Opposition referred to co-ops as Soviet-style housing. That shows his contempt for this type of housing.

Can the minister explain to Canadians the impact that yesterday's measures will have on housing co-ops across the country?

HousingOral Questions

November 22nd, 2023 / 3:15 p.m.

Edmonton Centre Alberta

Liberal

Randy Boissonnault LiberalMinister of Employment

Mr. Speaker, I thank the member for Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel for her hard work and her question.

People need more housing, and co-ops are part of the solution. That is why we announced yesterday that the GST will be removed from new co-op rental housing. We also announced that we will be strengthening the co-operative housing development program. Unlike the Leader of the Opposition, who despises co-ops, we support them and the people who live in them.

Carbon PricingOral Questions

3:15 p.m.

Carleton Ontario

Conservative

Pierre Poilievre ConservativeLeader of the Opposition

Mr. Speaker, the Prime Minister's tax on the farmers who produce the food and on the truckers who transport the food is a tax on everyone who eats food. The Bloc Québécois wants to radically increase taxes on farmers. There will be more costs for farmers in Quebec.

How much will the second carbon tax cost each farmer in Quebec?