Mr. Speaker, I am also of the opinion that Bill C-23 should be sent to committee so that we can make any necessary changes.
My colleague ended his speech by talking about the challenges with this bill. Even just looking at clause 2, the definitions, I do not see a clear definition of what constitutes a person or place of national historic significance or national interest.
I also do not see, in subclause 24(1), how much time the minister has to support a request for designation from the Historic Sites and Monuments Board of Canada.
Does my colleague see the same challenges? What other challenges does he see?