House of Commons Hansard #199 of the 44th Parliament, 1st session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.) The word of the day was guns.

Topics

line drawing of robot

This summary is computer-generated. Usually it’s accurate, but every now and then it’ll contain inaccuracies or total fabrications.

Statements by Members

Question Period

The Conservatives criticize the government's economic mismanagement, pointing to massive deficits and the finance minister's inability to state debt interest payments. They demand to cut the carbon tax and oppose the proposed second carbon tax, which will increase costs for Canadians. They also push for stronger bail reform and highlight the housing crisis.
The Liberals defend their strong fiscal position, emphasizing investments in health care, child care, and the grocery rebate. They prioritize building a clean economy for jobs, acknowledging severe wildfires, and strengthening bail laws and fighting gun violence. They also address foreign interference and homelessness.
The Bloc raises concerns about an ecological and safety crisis in Kanesatake, criticizes the clarity of new CSIS directives on foreign interference, demands increased funding for graduate scholarships, and questions Governors general's clothing expenses.
The NDP highlights the skyrocketing cost of rent and broader housing crisis, calling for action on inflation and corporate excess profits. They also advocate for WestJet pilots' collective bargaining rights and demand the government protect 2SLGBTQ rights.

Protecting Young Persons from Exposure to Pornography Act First reading of Bill S-210. The bill restricts young persons' online access to sexually explicit material, aiming to protect children, recognize impacts on women, and deter organizations providing such content. .

Petitions

Criminal Code Third reading of Bill C-21. The bill C-21 aims to strengthen firearms control by implementing a national handgun freeze, increasing penalties for illegal gun smuggling, and addressing ghost guns. It also introduces red-flag and yellow-flag laws to remove firearms in domestic violence situations. Amendments removed the proposed prohibition of airsoft guns and included a non-derogation clause for Indigenous rights. Conservatives argue the bill targets law-abiding firearm owners instead of criminals, citing concerns about future bans via an advisory committee. 52400 words, 6 hours in 2 segments: 1 2.

Criminal Code Second reading of Bill C-314. The bill [/debates/2023/5/17/ed-fast-1/] proposes to indefinitely exclude persons whose sole underlying medical condition is a mental disorder from being eligible for medical assistance in dying (MAID). Conservatives argue that the bill would [/debates/2023/5/17/ed-fast-1/] protect vulnerable Canadians, while the Liberal government opposes it, citing [/debates/2023/5/17/gary-anandasangaree-1/] a temporary exclusion until March 2024 and progress toward readiness. The NDP highlights the struggle [/debates/2023/5/17/alistair-macgregor-1/] between individual autonomy and protecting the vulnerable. 7800 words, 1 hour.

Was this summary helpful and accurate?

Bill C-21 Sitting ResumedCriminal CodeGovernment Orders

11:50 p.m.

Conservative

Rob Moore Conservative Fundy Royal, NB

Madam Speaker, it is an honour to close out debate this evening on Bill C-21, and it is an honour, as always, to stand in this House and represent the constituents from the great riding of Fundy Royal who elected me. Many of those constituents enjoy hunting, farming and sport shooting and maybe have inherited a firearm from a relative. Hunting in my riding certainly is something many people like to partake in and enjoy.

What is the problem we are trying to go after? It is gun violence. What the facts tell us is that 80% of the firearms used in violent crime are illegal. What are some of the figures? Violent crime is up 32% in Canada in the last eight years. Gang-related violent crime, the stuff Canadians are talking about, seeing in the news and hearing about in their local newspaper, is up almost 100% in the last eight years. What about crimes that are committed with firearms? Eighty per cent of the firearms used in violent crime are obtained illegally. We have an illegal firearms problem in Canada.

What is the solution when we have an illegal firearms problem? We should go after the illegal firearms. The last thing we should do is spend valuable resources going after law-abiding, licensed firearms owners in this country. However, we should not be surprised that this is the approach the government took. We have to remember this is the same Liberal government that brought in Bill C-68, or the long gun registry, and that spent, according to the Auditor General, over $1 billion registering the firearms of law-abiding Canadians while having no impact on crime.

It is the same government that brought in Bill C-5. What did Bill C-5 do? I mentioned that we have a problem with illegal firearms. Bill C-5, which was introduced and passed under the current government, repealed mandatory prison penalties for many firearms offences. They include robbery with a firearm, extortion with a firearm and weapons trafficking. These are the types of offences that Canadians would expect someone convicted to go to jail for. Unfortunately, Bill C-5 removed mandatary jail sentences for those crimes, so we are not going after the illegal guns and we are not going after the criminals.

The figures should get the attention of all members, no matter what side of the aisle they are on. In Toronto alone, one half of murder suspects this year are out on some type of release. In 17 of 44 homicides in Toronto last year, the individual was out on bail. We have a major problem in this country when it comes to gang-related violence and firearms violence with the revolving door, the catch-and-release, of our bail system.

The government had an opportunity with this bill to tackle some of those things. Instead, what it did is went after everyday, law-abiding Canadians, the type of Canadians I represent in my riding of Fundy Royal.

As parliamentarians, we need to take the issues that confront us in this country seriously. This bill does not do that. The government showed its hand when it brought it an amendment that would have banned all kinds of hunting rifles, rifles that have been in families for generations. These are not the problem. Law-abiding Canadians are not the problem. Licensed firearms owners are not the problem. Spending billions of dollars of taxpayers' money to buy back and confiscate firearms from law-abiding citizens is not the solution.

When this bill is fully implemented, Canadians will not be one bit safer. Until we have the courage to tackle the revolving door of catch-and-release bail and until we have the courage to say that those who do serious crimes are going to get a jail sentence, we will continue to have these problems in Canada. We need to leave law-abiding people alone and go after the bad guys, and that is what the Conservatives will do.

Bill C-21 Sitting ResumedCriminal CodeGovernment Orders

11:55 p.m.

The Assistant Deputy Speaker (Mrs. Alexandra Mendès) Alexandra Mendes

It being 11:59 p.m., pursuant to order made on Tuesday, May 9, it is my duty to interrupt the proceedings and put forthwith every question necessary to dispose of the third reading stage of the bill now before the House.

The question is on the amendment.

If a member of a recognized party present in the House wishes that the amendment be carried or carried on division or wishes to request a recorded division, I would invite them to rise and indicate it to the Chair.

Bill C-21 Sitting ResumedCriminal CodeGovernment Orders

May 18th, Midnight

Liberal

Chris Bittle Liberal St. Catharines, ON

Madam Speaker, we request a recorded division.

Bill C-21 Sitting ResumedCriminal CodeGovernment Orders

May 18th, Midnight

The Assistant Deputy Speaker (Mrs. Alexandra Mendès) Alexandra Mendes

Pursuant to order made on Thursday, June 23, 2022, the division on the amendment stands deferred until Thursday, May 18, at the expiry of the time provided for Oral Questions.

It being 12:01 a.m., the House stands adjourned until later this day at 10 a.m., pursuant to Standing Order 21(1).

(The House adjourned at 12:01 a.m.)