House of Commons Hansard #213 of the 44th Parliament, 1st session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.) The word of the day was families.

Topics

line drawing of robot

This summary is computer-generated. Usually it’s accurate, but every now and then it’ll contain inaccuracies or total fabrications.

Statements by Members

Question Period

The Conservatives demand the Public Safety Minister's resignation for allegedly misleading Canadians about the Paul Bernardo transfer, arguing his office knew for months. They criticize his pattern of deception on issues like Beijing-run police stations and hunting rifle bans. They also question the government's investment in the Beijing-controlled Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank.
The Liberals address the Paul Bernardo transfer, with the Public Safety Minister clarifying he was informed on May 30 and is issuing new instructions to prioritize victims' rights and family notification. They announce an immediate review of Canada's involvement in the AIIB and commit to defending the right to choose. They also highlight the new environmental protection act and liberalized visa policy.
The Bloc demands an independent public inquiry into Chinese interference, criticizing government delays and ambiguity. They also question ministers' awareness of critical intelligence like threats to an MP, implying departmental dysfunction.
The NDP criticize the Public Safety Minister's awareness of the Paul Bernardo transfer and urge ministers to read emails. They blame greedflation for high grocery prices, demand electoral reform, and seek emergency funding for wildfire communities.
The Green Party criticizes the government's funding of unproven carbon capture technology and the influence of oil and gas executives on climate policy.

Corrections and Conditional Release Act First reading of Bill C-342. The bill amends the Corrections and Conditional Release Act to require dangerous offenders or those convicted of multiple first-degree murders to be assigned maximum-security classification and confined in maximum-security penitentiaries. 200 words.

Petitions

Alleged Obstruction of Member for South Surrey—White Rock Conservative MP Kerry-Lynne Findlay raises a question of privilege regarding an alleged "offensive and unparliamentary gesture" made by the Parliamentary Secretary to the Government House Leader (Liberal MP for Kingston and the Islands) during a debate. Findlay states the Liberal MP gave her the middle finger, calling it contemptuous and misogynistic bullying. She argues his apology is insufficient. The Deputy Speaker will review the incident for a ruling. 1700 words, 15 minutes.

Canada Disability Benefit Act Members debate Senate amendments to Bill C-22, the Canada Disability Benefit Act, aimed at reducing poverty for persons with disabilities. The House accepts most changes, but the Liberal government disagrees with an amendment on clawbacks by insurers, citing constitutional concerns. Opposition parties raise concerns about the bill's vagueness, implementation timeline, and lack of legislative protection against benefit clawbacks. The NDP also calls for an immediate interim benefit. 8500 words, 1 hour in 2 segments: 1 2.

Canadian Environmental Bill of Rights Second reading of Bill C-219. The bill, C-219, aims to enact a Canadian Environmental Bill of Rights, expanding on existing federal environmental protection by recognizing the right to a healthy environment for all Canadians. It seeks to provide legal tools and accountability processes, allowing citizens to demand investigations and take action if the government fails to uphold environmental laws. While the Liberal Party acknowledges the importance of environmental rights, the Conservative Party expresses concern that the bill gives too much power to the judiciary. The Bloc Québécois supports the bill, provided it does not infringe on Quebec's environmental sovereignty, and also points out a mistranslation of the "precautionary principle". 7600 words, 1 hour.

Canada Early Learning and Child Care Act Third reading of Bill C-35. The bill establishes a national early learning and child care system, aiming for affordable, accessible, high-quality services. Liberals and NDP highlight significant fee reductions, new spaces, and economic benefits, crediting NDP's push for permanent legislation. Conservatives criticize the bill for lacking choice, excluding private operators, and failing to address soaring waitlists and workforce shortages, calling it a "marketing plan." The Bloc supports it while warning against federal "predatory federalism" and potential future funding cuts. 40300 words, 4 hours.

Adjournment Debates

Victims of immigration fraud Garnett Genuis describes how international students were given fake acceptance letters, were admitted to Canada, and now face deportation due to the government's error. Marie-France Lalonde says the government is creating a task force and will issue temporary resident permits to the students.
Foreign interference by China Kevin Vuong questions the government's handling of foreign interference, particularly regarding Chinese police stations. Marie-France Lalonde outlines the government's actions and investments to combat foreign interference, while Vuong insists that these actions are not working and demands more concrete results. Lalonde says investigations are ongoing.
Was this summary helpful and accurate?

Question No.1464—Questions Passed as Orders for ReturnsRoutine Proceedings

5 p.m.

NDP

Gord Johns NDP Courtenay—Alberni, BC

With regard to the communities which comprise the federal electoral district of Courtenay-Alberni, since fiscal year 2018-19: (a) what are the federal infrastructure investments, including direct transfers to municipalities and First Nations, for the communities of (i) Tofino, (ii) Ucluelet, (iii) Port Alberni, (iv) Parksville, (v) Qualicum Beach, (vi) Cumberland, (vii) Courtenay, (viii) Deep Bay, (ix) Dashwood, (x) Royston, (xi) French Creek, (xii) Errington, (xiii) Coombs, (xiv) Nanoose Bay, (xv) Cherry Creek, (xvi) China Creek, (xvii) Bamfield, (xviii) Beaver Creek, (xix) Beaufort Range, (xx) Millstream, (xxi) Mt. Washington Ski Resort, broken down by fiscal year, total expenditure, and project; (b) what are the federal infrastructure investments transferred to the regional districts of (i) Comox Valley Regional District, (ii) Nanaimo Regional District, (iii) Alberni-Clayoquot Regional District, (iv) Powell River Regional District, broken down by fiscal year, total expenditure, and project; (c) what are the federal infrastructure investments transferred to the Island Trusts of (i) Hornby Island, (ii) Denman Island, (iii) Lasquetti Island, broken down by fiscal year, and total expenditure; (d) what are the federal infrastructure investments transferred to the (i) Ahousaht First Nation, (ii) Hesquiaht First Nation, (iii) Huu-ay-aht First Nation, (iv) Hupacasath First Nation, (v) Tla-o-qui-aht First Nations, (vi) Toquaht First Nation, (vii) Tseshaht First Nation, (viii) Uchucklesaht First Nation, (ix) Ucluelet First Nation, (x) K'omoks First Nation, broken down by fiscal year, total expenditure, and project; (e) what is the infrastructure funding of Pacific Rim National Park, broken down by fiscal year, total expenditure, and project; (f) what is the funding of highways, including, but not limited to, (i) Highway 4, (ii) Highway 19, (iii) Highway 19a, (iv) Bamfield Road, broken down by fiscal year, total expenditure, and project; and (g) what other infrastructure investments are provided through the funding of national parks, highways, the Building Canada Fund, Infrastructure Canada, the Gas Tax Fund, Small Crafts and Harbours, BC Ferries, etc., broken down by fiscal year, total expenditure, and project?

(Return tabled)

Question No.1468—Questions Passed as Orders for ReturnsRoutine Proceedings

5 p.m.

Conservative

Shelby Kramp-Neuman Conservative Hastings—Lennox and Addington, ON

With regard to the government's executive vehicle fleet for ministers, since January 1, 2019: (a) what is the make and model assigned to each minister; (b) were there any changes to the assigned vehicle for each minister, and, if so, on what date did it change; and (c) what was the mileage driven on each vehicle, broken down by year?

(Return tabled)

Question No.1469—Questions Passed as Orders for ReturnsRoutine Proceedings

5 p.m.

Conservative

Shelby Kramp-Neuman Conservative Hastings—Lennox and Addington, ON

With regard to polling conducted by or on behalf of the Privy Council Office since January 1, 2022: what are the details of all such polling, including, for each poll, (i) who conducted the poll, (ii) the start and end dates, (iii) the number of participants, (iv) the complete results of the poll, including the questions asked and the responses received, (v) the type of poll, (vi) the value of the contract related to the poll?

(Return tabled)

Questions Passed as Orders for ReturnsRoutine Proceedings

5 p.m.

Liberal

Kevin Lamoureux Liberal Winnipeg North, MB

Mr. Speaker, I would ask that all remaining questions be allowed to stand at this time, please.

Questions Passed as Orders for ReturnsRoutine Proceedings

5 p.m.

The Deputy Speaker Chris d'Entremont

Is that agreed?

Questions Passed as Orders for ReturnsRoutine Proceedings

5 p.m.

Some hon. members

Agreed.

Motions for PapersRoutine Proceedings

5 p.m.

Winnipeg North Manitoba

Liberal

Kevin Lamoureux LiberalParliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons

Mr. Speaker, once again I would ask that all notices of motions for the production of papers also be allowed to stand at this time, please.

Motions for PapersRoutine Proceedings

5 p.m.

The Deputy Speaker Chris d'Entremont

Is that agreed?

Motions for PapersRoutine Proceedings

5 p.m.

Some hon. members

Agreed.

Motions for PapersRoutine Proceedings

5 p.m.

The Deputy Speaker Chris d'Entremont

Before we go to orders of the day, I believe the hon. member for South Surrey—White Rock is standing on a question of privilege.

Alleged Obstruction of Member for South Surrey—White RockPrivilegeRoutine Proceedings

5 p.m.

Conservative

Kerry-Lynne Findlay Conservative South Surrey—White Rock, BC

Yes, Mr. Speaker, I am rising on a question of privilege concerning the offensive and unparliamentary gesture the Parliamentary Secretary to the government House leader, Senate, made toward me last evening during private members' hour. The facts are well known already. Put bluntly, he gave me the finger.

It is my belief that this constitutes a prima facie contempt and should be taken up by the House as such. Hansard shows the sequence of events and comments that led to the incident during the debate on Bill C-311, the violence against pregnant women act.

I argued that the government had lost credibility on the matter of women's rights, in part because it had failed to stand up for the victims of Paul Bernardo. As members know, this killer and serial rapist targeted female teenagers and traumatized our nation. In my speech, I referenced a unanimous consent motion that the member for Niagara Falls brought to the House. The motion reads as follows:

...that the House call for the immediate return of vile serial killer and rapist Paul Bernardo to a maximum security prison, that all court-ordered dangerous offenders and mass murderers be permanently assigned a maximum security classification, that the least-restrictive-environment standard be repealed and that the language of necessary restrictions that the previous Conservative government put in place be restored.

In my remarks, I stated that the member for Kingston and the Islands was a member who denied consent.

Alleged Obstruction of Member for South Surrey—White RockPrivilegeRoutine Proceedings

5:05 p.m.

Liberal

Kevin Lamoureux Liberal Winnipeg North, MB

Mr. Speaker, I rise on a point of order. I think it is really important, when the member is rising on a question of privilege, to understand what actually took place yesterday, and the member is talking about a dispute over—

Alleged Obstruction of Member for South Surrey—White RockPrivilegeRoutine Proceedings

5:05 p.m.

Conservative

Raquel Dancho Conservative Kildonan—St. Paul, MB

This is debate.

Alleged Obstruction of Member for South Surrey—White RockPrivilegeRoutine Proceedings

5:05 p.m.

Conservative

Kerry-Lynne Findlay Conservative South Surrey—White Rock, BC

I am speaking to that.

Alleged Obstruction of Member for South Surrey—White RockPrivilegeRoutine Proceedings

5:05 p.m.

Liberal

Kevin Lamoureux Liberal Winnipeg North, MB

I was being respectful for the member—

Alleged Obstruction of Member for South Surrey—White RockPrivilegeRoutine Proceedings

5:05 p.m.

The Deputy Speaker Chris d'Entremont

Order. Order. Let us please get to the point of order that we are trying to hear.

Alleged Obstruction of Member for South Surrey—White RockPrivilegeRoutine Proceedings

5:05 p.m.

Liberal

Kevin Lamoureux Liberal Winnipeg North, MB

Mr. Speaker, I would argue that the member is talking about a dispute over the facts, and she is misrepresenting what actually was said by the member for Kingston and the Islands.

Alleged Obstruction of Member for South Surrey—White RockPrivilegeRoutine Proceedings

5:05 p.m.

Some hon. members

Oh, oh!

Alleged Obstruction of Member for South Surrey—White RockPrivilegeRoutine Proceedings

5:05 p.m.

The Deputy Speaker Chris d'Entremont

Order. I will let the hon. whip for the Conservatives speak, and I will go to the hon. parliamentary secretary afterward.

The hon. member for South Surrey—White Rock.

Alleged Obstruction of Member for South Surrey—White RockPrivilegeRoutine Proceedings

5:05 p.m.

Conservative

Kerry-Lynne Findlay Conservative South Surrey—White Rock, BC

Mr. Speaker, in my remarks, I stated that the member for Kingston and the Islands was the member who denied consent. I did so because I was in the House when unanimous consent was asked for. I sat directly across from the member and heard him deny consent, as did many other House officers and members near me. I recognize that the member has every right to defend himself and can dispute me in the course of debate. However, his response went far beyond debate. He said, “This member should apologize, because she is lying right now.” He then walked out of the House. This remark caused significant disorder.

I immediately rose on a point of order to file my objection to his use of an unparliamentary term. The member returned during my remarks, and he proceeded to shout over me, making it difficult to express my point of view. He then offered a half-hearted and insincere apology. I say “half-hearted and insincere” because his next action was to make a face at me and give me the middle finger. At that point, he walked out of the House again.

His aggressive gesture is representative of language that is strictly forbidden in the House. Many members saw this aggression. Notably, the member for Vancouver Kingsway and the member for Prince George—Peace River—Northern Rockies confirmed that they saw this action in their own points of order. I took the floor again to call for the member to be sanctioned in the strongest way possible, including being ejected from the House.

The Chair informed the House that he did not see the gesture in question and would review the tapes. That step is no longer necessary, because the member for Kingston and the Islands returned to the House again, admitted that he made the gesture and then followed that with another insufficient apology for what he described as “displaying [his] frustration”. He did not adequately take—

Alleged Obstruction of Member for South Surrey—White RockPrivilegeRoutine Proceedings

5:05 p.m.

The Deputy Speaker Chris d'Entremont

There is a point of order from the hon. member for Waterloo.

Alleged Obstruction of Member for South Surrey—White RockPrivilegeRoutine Proceedings

5:05 p.m.

Liberal

Bardish Chagger Liberal Waterloo, ON

Mr. Speaker, I do not want to take away from the opposition whip's time, but I want to acknowledge, as the member just stated, that the member for Kingston and the Islands did apologize. In this place, we have a tradition where we take members at their word and—