Madam Speaker, I want to go back to the very beginning of the member's speech, 20 minutes ago, when he admitted that he was one of the people who said no to the unanimous consent motion that the NDP put forward. Importantly, that unanimous consent motion was for every leader of a political party to get a security clearance within 30 days. The member said he said no to that. That is how he started off his speech.
Can the member inform the House why he said no to that motion? Why does he believe that the Leader of the Opposition, the leader of his Conservative Party, should not have a security clearance?