Madam Speaker, I am not too sure where I was when I was interrupted. This is only about the tenth time I've made reference to it.
Anyway, I would suggest to the member opposite that she really think about her answer. When other leaders of political parties and experts are saying that her leader's arguments are absolutely nonsense, it is a reflection on the member's arguments. It makes no sense unless, of course, the leader of the Conservative Party has something to hide, something he is not telling Canadians, something that would not allow him to get the security clearance. I believe that is the case.
Why will the leader not do what other leaders have done and get the security clearance? Does he not think the issue is serious enough?