Madam Speaker, there has been a lot of discussion in the debate on this privilege motion about the ruling of the Speaker and the motion going to the procedure committee. Why do we not just let it go there and let the committee determine whether there was a procedure breach? We heard the parliamentary secretary to the government House leader say this many times. In fact, I do not think he or the government understands what the motion says. The motion does not say to refer it to the committee to determine a breach; the Speaker already determined that. The motion is about going to the committee to determine what to do about the government's failure to abide by the motion passed by the House and the reluctance to do that.
Could the member tell me why he thinks the Liberals are trying to divert the purpose of the motion and why they would have an interpretation that is actually different from what the motion would do?