Mr. Speaker, I will comment on the previous question. Debating whether the House of Commons should have voted for the original opposition motion is the old debate. Liberals are debating something that has already been pronounced on by the House. What we are debating now is the actual issue of the breach of privilege.
In his speech, the member talked about the accusation that it is the opposition paralyzing Parliament. The government could just table the documents and have this debate over with. We would rather deal with the actual problem than study it. Furthermore, I agree with the member: I do not want to debate new government bills that are going to continue on the same agenda that has wrought so much destruction to the Canadian economy. Does he agree?