Mr. Speaker, I am actually confused about something after listening to the member's speech.
The member talked about the subamendment that we are currently on, which is to add more witnesses. She explained why the Conservatives wanted to add more witnesses, which is why we have a subamendment. However, other Conservatives have fully admitted that they do not want to vote for this motion at all, and they are refusing to vote for the motion until their demands are met. At that point, the motion would be moot.
I just do not understand why they would openly admit that they are against the motion and will refuse to let it go to committee but, at the same time, put forward a motion to add more witnesses when it gets to committee. Why even put forward a subamendment to add more witnesses if the Conservatives never even really had the intention of voting on anything? Is it just because a subamendment gave them the opportunity to reset the speaking order so that everybody could speak again? That is the way it looks to me.