Madam Speaker, it is a bit much to hear the member be disrespectful to the RCMP. I will quote a letter from the RCMP about the games or tactics the Conservative Party is using: “There is significant risk that the Motion could be interpreted as a circumvention of normal investigative processes and Charter protections.” That is from the commissioner of the RCMP, and the Conservatives say, “Who cares?” They have their political agenda at hand and completely disregard what the RCMP is saying.
The member says this is all about political Liberals lining the pockets of Liberals. However, the chairperson was an adviser to Brian Mulroney, a Progressive Conservative; Stephen Harper, a far-right Conservative; and Jim Flaherty, another Conservative. She donates thousands of dollars to the Conservative Party, yet the member calls her a Liberal. The Conservative Party makes absolutely no sense on this issue. It feeds into the incompetence of the leader when he puts the interests of the Conservative Party ahead of the interests of Canadians.
Will the member opposite encourage his leader to do the right thing, be respectful, listen to Canadians, put Canadians' interests ahead of the Conservative Party and the leader's interests, and get a security clearance so he is better able to deal with the issue of foreign interference? Will the member give his leader the advice to get a security clearance?