Madam Speaker, on the first point, the fact that one out of six projects was indeed ineligible is a concern. In addition, of equal or perhaps even greater concern is the number of conflicted projects in the sample that the Auditor General looked at. This means that the board members themselves were voting specifically on matters they ought not to have been voting on. They were voting on enriching their own pockets by voting in favour.
To the second point, I need to correct the member. I have not finished my doctoral dissertation. It was an article I wrote on the Thursday question, not my dissertation, which is a long-languishing project. Perhaps we can get into what the actual topic of my dissertation is another time; it may be slightly out of the scope of this debate. However, I thank the member for his important question.