Madam Speaker, as I was saying earlier, my colleague from St. Albert—Edmonton is raising red flags to point out things that might not work, and that is fine. He is also making generalizations to suggest that we are headed down a slippery slope.
Could my colleague tell all of our colleagues that access to care is not a problem considering that a diagnosis is required? If a person has a diagnosis, it means they are already receiving care.
Could he also tell us about the solemn moment when the doctor and medical team sit down with the patient who, in front of two witnesses, specifies the criteria establishing his or her tolerance limit?