Madam Speaker, I have a two-part question for the member for Perth—Wellington.
In the Auditor General's report, she noted that one in six projects that were approved by the board for the slush fund monies were completely ineligible for any of the funding. Projects had nothing to do with green technology but only enriching Liberal cronies. For the first part, would he comment on that issue? I think it is incredibly important.
The second part is a bit more specific to the member for Perth—Wellington. Will he confirm to the House that, in fact, his Ph.D. dissertation was written on the Thursday question?