Mr. Speaker, this issue is incredibly important. This is why the ethics committee has called for that Liberal minister from Edmonton to come back before the ethics committee to see if we can get a third version of his truth, or maybe get to the facts of the matter. It is a real problem when we have a minister come before a parliamentary committee and we have to bring them back because we have learned that evidence demonstrates what they said at committee was not true.
We have to hear from the minister at committee, and, of course, we need to have Mr. Anderson come before the House to answer questions and to answer for his contempt. This is a scandal that goes right to the Prime Minister's Office. The Prime Minister is supporting that Liberal minister from Edmonton who has an ongoing involvement in this business venture. Today, the National Post wrote an article entitled, “Cabinet minister’s firm shared mailing address with person named in cocaine busts”.
While at the cabinet table, that same minister's business, which he owned a 50% share in, won government contracts. It won a contract with Elections Canada. What an advantage he gets. If claiming he was indigenous for indigenous-only contracts when he is not was not enough of an advantage to him, and a disadvantage to Canadians, he is also sitting at the cabinet table. I wonder if it weighs into anyone's decisions in government when they are deciding which vendor to pick, if one of the vendors sits around the cabinet table.