That is a point of debate, and the hon. member knows full well that he should not say indirectly what he cannot say directly.
Sometimes during debate, words are used or context is put. Again, it is an interpretation, and that is the case in this instance.
To the hon. member for Skeena—Bulkley Valley, it is not unusual for others to raise points of order in an attempt to clarify what was said. I indicated I would review the video and Hansard, which I did. I happen to have it. It says that the member voted in favour of soft-on-crime legislation, so it was about the legislation itself. As I indicated, this has caused disorder in the House, so I would ask members to please be judicious in what they say.
Again, as I indicated, this is based on the additional information that was provided to clarify what was said. I always try to take what members say they have heard. In this instance, it is an interpretation.
The hon. member for Timmins—James Bay is rising on a point of order. I hope it is not to challenge the Chair.