Mr. Speaker, the member suggests I may have the record for moving the most reports for concurrence of any member. I want to thank him very much for those kind words. It is very gracious of him to acknowledge my work in that regard. I am very proud of having had the opportunity to put important motions on substantive policy issues before the House.
In this particular case, I spent my entire speech talking about the issue, which is double-dipping. We could end this right now. The government could commit to ending all double-dipping. The government also does not seem to like the debate over the privilege issue. We could end that right away if it would just agree to hand over the documents.
This is a minority Parliament. If we have a majority of the House wanting to see something, ordering the government to do something, the majority of the House should have its way. When the majority of the House says that it wants to see the documents, those documents need to be handed over. When we have the majority of the House saying that the government should end this double-dipping, the government should comply with that.
We end up with a deadlock in the House when the government, which is representing a minority of the seats, and a very small minority in public opinion, nonetheless insists on defying the wishes of the House and of the people of Canada. That is where we are right now, and the member needs to reflect on how his government is refusing to listen to Parliament and the people. If it did listen to Parliament and the people, if it ended double-dipping and handed over the documents that were ordered, then it would be a straightforward matter of proceeding on to the next order of business.