Mr. Speaker, I have noticed that over the last number of weeks, Conservatives like to talk about scandals. They have come up with a number of different types of them. However, what they always avoid talking about is the record of their own leader of the Conservative Party, when he in fact sat around the cabinet table, directly involved in scandals himself, let alone being in contempt of Parliament. There are so many other things.
There is a booklet I often refer to, Stephen Harper, Serial Abuser of Power. It talks of scandals, corruption and abuse of power. It does not even have the ETS scandal in it. It is a pretty good-sized book, with lots of pages.
Would my colleague across the way not agree that behaviour from the past is a good way to reflect on what the leader of the Conservative Party would really be like if he were Prime Minister, given the number of scandals he was directly involved in, such as trying to prevent people from being able to vote?