Madam Speaker, if the member would like to avoid answering my question and talk about Bitcoin and what he perceives the Conservative policy to be around that, I would encourage him to do that.
On two occasions, the member said that there had never even been a compromise, that nobody even offered a compromise. The Speaker literally is telling us what the compromise is. The Speaker, through a ruling, has said to send this to PROC so that PROC can study it and figure out the best way to do this. It is as though he does not even know what is going on in here. The compromise is in the direction from the Speaker, yet the member has no concept of that. I do not think he knows that, because he just comes in here and goes on and on about how there is no compromise, but, literally, it is on the table.
Could he please tell us about Bitcoin?