Mr. Speaker, I do agree with one thing the member opposite says: They do know how to act. They act constantly when they say those slogans and put them out there.
I would like to understand this: The member was talking about NSICOP, but I believe the motion being debated in the House is actually regarding the SDTC. I am wondering if the member opposite is confused. On the documents that the Conservatives are asking to be released, both the Auditor General and the RCMP have asked us not to release those, and the Speaker ruled that this should go to PROC to be discussed. I understand that the Conservative leader has said that he would use the notwithstanding clause in order to override Canadians' rights and freedoms. However, we are worried about Canadians' rights and freedoms, and we want to make sure we are doing this correctly.
Could the member opposite address why he feels that it is okay to override Canadians' rights and freedoms and to not be careful that we protect those essential rights?