House of Commons Hansard #366 of the 44th Parliament, 1st session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.) The word of the day was documents.

Topics

line drawing of robot

This summary is computer-generated. Usually it’s accurate, but every now and then it’ll contain inaccuracies or total fabrications.

Assistance Animals Framework for Veterans Act First reading of Bill C-417. The bill establishes a framework for animal-assisted services for veterans, standardizing training, protecting veterans from scams, harmonizing access rules, and opening the door for more VAC funding. 300 words.

Employment Insurance Act First reading of Bill C-418. The bill proposes measures to reform the Employment Insurance Act, including changing eligibility, benefit duration and amounts, and expanding coverage to protect more workers, such as seasonal, non-standard, and pregnant workers. 400 words.

Public Accounts Members debate a report on Canada's climate record, noting its poor G7 ranking on emissions since 2015. Conservatives argue the government's carbon tax causes economic pain without reducing emissions, citing rising food bank use and housing issues. Liberals defend their policies, stating the carbon price and rebate help households and emissions are decreasing, while accusing the opposition of misinformation and filibustering. Bloc and NDP members criticize oil subsidies and call for a just transition, while also highlighting the need for adaptation funding for municipalities. 24800 words, 3 hours.

Petitions

Reference to Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs Members debate allegations of corruption and mismanagement in the Sustainable Development Technology Canada program, dubbed the "green slush fund," citing Auditor General findings of conflicts of interest. Conservatives demand the government provide documents ordered by the House, alleging a cover-up of taxpayer money misuse and linking it to other scandals and the cost of living crisis. Liberals argue the motion is flawed and could interfere with an RCMP investigation, while other parties also weigh in on the need for transparency and past spending issues. 18100 words, 2 hours in 2 segments: 1 2.

Request for Witness to Attend at the Bar of the House Members debate an ethics probe into the Minister of Employment over allegations he violated conflict rules by being involved in a past business, potentially being "Randy" in alleged fraud. 1000 words.

Statements by Members

Question Period

The Conservatives criticize the Liberal government's economic record, citing lower Canadian incomes and investment compared to the US due to tax hikes. They highlight failed US trade relations on softwood lumber and Buy America. To address the housing crisis, they propose removing the GST on new homes and call for an election.
The Liberals repeatedly question why the Conservative leader won't get security clearance for briefings. They defend their record on trade, investments (like the housing accelerator fund), and programs like child care, contrasting them with Conservative proposals. They also highlight support for veterans and capping oil and gas emissions.
The Bloc criticize the weak plan for capping greenhouse gas emissions. They push to pass Bill C-282 to protect supply management and lament the failure to deliver EI reform, proposing their own bill.
The NDP criticize predatory private healthcare practices and advocate for veterans, including proper recognition for women veterans. They also call for the government to repay Windsor for border costs and restore federal funding cuts in B.C.

Resumption of Debate on Amendment Members debate the Liberal government's handling of the Sustainable Development Technology Canada (SDTC) fund, referred to as the "green slush fund". Concerns are raised about alleged mismanagement and corruption, including conflicts of interest and funds going to insiders. The debate centres on the government's refusal to release unredacted documents, defying a Speaker's order, which opposition members call contempt of Parliament. 7700 words, 1 hour.

Adjournment Debates

Supporting small businesses Brad Vis criticizes Liberal spending and obstruction of Parliament, blaming them for economic struggles. Bryan May defends the government's support for small businesses through tax cuts, programs, and agreements with Visa and Mastercard. Vis argues for broader economic changes, while May insists on the Liberal commitment.
Canada disability benefit Mike Morrice presses the government to improve the Canada disability benefit, citing its inadequacy and barriers to access. Sameer Zuberi defends the program, emphasizing its historic importance and commitment to supporting persons with disabilities. Morrice urges reflection, while Zuberi questions Conservative support for the benefit.
Debate over the carbon tax Warren Steinley questions the carbon tax's cost to Canadians, citing rising grocery costs and broken promises. Chris Bittle defends the carbon tax with rebates, calling it a necessity to fight climate change. Steinley challenges Bittle to discuss the efficacy of the carbon tax with farmers in Saskatchewan.
Was this summary helpful and accurate?

Public AccountsCommittees of the HouseRoutine Proceedings

12:10 p.m.

Liberal

Mark Gerretsen Liberal Kingston and the Islands, ON

Mr. Speaker, I was absolutely floored when listening to the response the member gave when he tried to justify that the NDP stepped away from the current price on pollution with the rebate mechanism we have. The member voted in favour of it 24 times. On June 4 of this year, the member justified the policy by saying in the House, “On April 1 of last year, the Prime Minister increased the carbon tax by three cents. Conservatives say this is bad, but Danielle Smith increased it by four cents and that is not even with a rebate.”

Can the member please just come clean and say the New Democrats stepped away from this because they were feeling the political pressure and could not stand up to the Leader of the Opposition?

Public AccountsCommittees of the HouseRoutine Proceedings

12:10 p.m.

NDP

Blake Desjarlais NDP Edmonton Griesbach, AB

Mr. Speaker, the member would do right by having more serious concern for this issue. Young people are watching. I have given a very clear example of where the Liberals have failed on this. I will not bring up the personal record of the member, but to be serious, the Liberals cannot tell one region that it is exempt for political reasons to save their party and then tell the rest of the country to pay.

Public AccountsCommittees of the HouseRoutine Proceedings

12:10 p.m.

Liberal

Mark Gerretsen Liberal Kingston and the Islands, ON

Mr. Speaker, on a point of order, could the member tell us what region that was?

Public AccountsCommittees of the HouseRoutine Proceedings

12:10 p.m.

The Deputy Speaker Chris d'Entremont

That is getting into debate. We will move on to the next speaker.

I am happy to recognize the hon. member for Aurora—Oak Ridges—Richmond Hill.

Public AccountsCommittees of the HouseRoutine Proceedings

12:10 p.m.

Liberal

Leah Taylor Roy Liberal Aurora—Oak Ridges—Richmond Hill, ON

Mr. Speaker, I am going to be sharing my time with my colleague, the member for Kingston and the Islands.

I am proud to rise to speak in this place on behalf of the constituents of Aurora—Oak Ridges—Richmond Hill. However, I am not proud of the behaviour of the members of the official opposition, who are wasting taxpayer money on filibusters, feigning concern for issues they otherwise dismiss, such as environmental progress, and preventing real progress on issues that matter to Canadians. I will try to address some of the disinformation that has been put forward by them as they use up the time available in this place to avoid doing the real work that needs to be done for Canadians.

Let me start with one fundamental flaw in the Conservatives' arguments, and they do it repeatedly. It has been done since I have been in this place. They have an inability to understand the difference between correlation and causality. This is from a first-year statistics course that perhaps they missed. They continue to say that because something happened during the same period of time as something else, it was caused by that. We know that is not the case. Many things happen during the same period of time but are not caused by that thing.

Today, we heard a member opposite state that Canada's economic challenges are caused by the price on pollution program. The Conservatives constantly state that food prices are higher because of the carbon levy. It is simply not true. The misinformation they continue to spread has turned many Canadians against fighting the great fight against climate change, an existential threat.

Young people are discouraged. They hear us talk in this place in a way that does not address the concerns that are giving them great anxiety. Trevor Toombs, an economist, the Bank of Canada and many independent studies have indicated that this program is not responsible for the high inflation we have experienced. At most, it accounts for 1%, and much less by most studies.

Economists know and I believe the Conservative Party knows that the COVID pandemic, the post-COVID economy, supply chain issues and the conflicts around the world have caused global inflation. The inflation we saw was not just in Canada, but around the world. Although I wish that every country around the world had a price on pollution program, that is not the case.

Public AccountsCommittees of the HouseRoutine Proceedings

12:15 p.m.

The Deputy Speaker Chris d'Entremont

We have a point of order from the hon. member for Cypress Hills—Grasslands.

Public AccountsCommittees of the HouseRoutine Proceedings

12:15 p.m.

Conservative

Jeremy Patzer Conservative Cypress Hills—Grasslands, SK

Mr. Speaker, we know the member opposite is from the “have a yacht” club. I am wondering if she could talk more about people who have not—

Public AccountsCommittees of the HouseRoutine Proceedings

12:15 p.m.

The Deputy Speaker Chris d'Entremont

I would remind everyone to stay relevant to the topic at hand.

The hon. member for Aurora—Oak Ridges—Richmond Hill.

Public AccountsCommittees of the HouseRoutine Proceedings

12:15 p.m.

Liberal

Leah Taylor Roy Liberal Aurora—Oak Ridges—Richmond Hill, ON

Mr. Speaker, that was a personal attack. It had nothing to do with what I was talking about. I would like to see some rulings about the Conservatives attacking people personally as opposed to talking about politics—

Public AccountsCommittees of the HouseRoutine Proceedings

12:15 p.m.

Liberal

Mark Gerretsen Liberal Kingston and the Islands, ON

Mr. Speaker, I rise on a point of order. I fully understand that during proceedings of the House, from time to time, somebody will stand up on a point of order and use what is potentially not a point of order as an opportunity to make a political statement. I realize that I do that sometimes and that others do that, and you let people get away with it. However, what we just saw there was an intentional personal attack on a member who is speaking, and I think—

Public AccountsCommittees of the HouseRoutine Proceedings

12:15 p.m.

The Deputy Speaker Chris d'Entremont

That is why I cut it off.

The hon. deputy House leader.

Public AccountsCommittees of the HouseRoutine Proceedings

12:15 p.m.

Liberal

Mark Gerretsen Liberal Kingston and the Islands, ON

My point of order, Mr. Speaker, is that you should be asking the member to apologize for that.

Public AccountsCommittees of the HouseRoutine Proceedings

12:15 p.m.

An hon. member

Debate.

Public AccountsCommittees of the HouseRoutine Proceedings

12:15 p.m.

The Deputy Speaker Chris d'Entremont

We get into a lot of crazy debates in the House, and I want to make sure that we move on to the topic at hand. That was a little off topic. I would suggest that everyone stay on the topic at hand. If there is a real point of order to be brought up, I am more than happy to hear it.

The hon. Member for Aurora—Oak Ridges—Richmond Hill.

Public AccountsCommittees of the HouseRoutine Proceedings

12:15 p.m.

Liberal

Leah Taylor Roy Liberal Aurora—Oak Ridges—Richmond Hill, ON

I would like a ruling on this, Mr. Speaker, because this is not the first time this has happened to me in the House. The Conservatives are making a point of attacking me personally about things that have nothing to do with the business of the House. Personal attacks are not permitted in this place.

Public AccountsCommittees of the HouseRoutine Proceedings

12:15 p.m.

NDP

Blake Desjarlais NDP Edmonton Griesbach, AB

Mr. Speaker, I rise on a point of order. The member for Kingston and the Islands rose on a point of order to note that we should utilize points of order for valid points of order. Less than five minutes ago, he interrupted you and the proceedings of this place, so if you are going to apply a ruling to this, I hope it is applied equally and fairly to all members, including the Liberals.

Public AccountsCommittees of the HouseRoutine Proceedings

12:15 p.m.

Liberal

Mark Gerretsen Liberal Kingston and the Islands, ON

Mr. Speaker, on that point of order, in my most recent intervention, when I rose on a point of order about this very serious matter, I did acknowledge that this happens and that I do it from time to time. However, let us not distract from the fact that the member is being personally attacked by the Conservatives right now on a personal level.

Public AccountsCommittees of the HouseRoutine Proceedings

12:15 p.m.

Conservative

Warren Steinley Conservative Regina—Lewvan, SK

You do that to us every day.

Public AccountsCommittees of the HouseRoutine Proceedings

12:15 p.m.

Liberal

Mark Gerretsen Liberal Kingston and the Islands, ON

There is tons of policy—

Public AccountsCommittees of the HouseRoutine Proceedings

12:15 p.m.

The Deputy Speaker Chris d'Entremont

Let us not talk across. Personal attacks are not allowed in the House—

Public AccountsCommittees of the HouseRoutine Proceedings

November 5th, 2024 / 12:15 p.m.

Liberal

Mark Gerretsen Liberal Kingston and the Islands, ON

I am sorry if you take that personally.

Public AccountsCommittees of the HouseRoutine Proceedings

12:15 p.m.

The Deputy Speaker Chris d'Entremont

Mark, we are not allowed personal attacks in the House.

I am going to ask the hon. member for Cypress Hills—Grasslands to retract that and apologize.

Public AccountsCommittees of the HouseRoutine Proceedings

12:15 p.m.

Conservative

Jeremy Patzer Conservative Cypress Hills—Grasslands, SK

Mr. Speaker, I apologize.

Public AccountsCommittees of the HouseRoutine Proceedings

12:15 p.m.

Liberal

Leah Taylor Roy Liberal Aurora—Oak Ridges—Richmond Hill, ON

Mr. Speaker, on a point of order, I did not hear the retraction. I am sorry, but it is important. I just heard an apology.

Public AccountsCommittees of the HouseRoutine Proceedings

12:15 p.m.

The Deputy Speaker Chris d'Entremont

A retraction and an apology are the same thing. He apologized; that means he retracted it.

The hon. member for Aurora—Oak Ridges—Richmond Hill has the floor.