House of Commons Hansard #386 of the 44th Parliament, 1st session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.) The word of the day was conservatives.

Topics

line drawing of robot

This summary is computer-generated. Usually it’s accurate, but every now and then it’ll contain inaccuracies or total fabrications.

Oral Questions—Speaker's Ruling The Speaker clarifies the rules of Question Period, emphasizing questions must relate to the government's administrative responsibility, not attack the opposition, to maintain government accountability. 900 words.

Public Accounts Members debate report 8 of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, specifically regarding "Pandemic Preparedness, Surveillance, and Border Control Measures". The focus is on border control, with Conservatives raising concerns about fentanyl and opioid trafficking and immigration visa issues. The Liberals defend their record, pointing to increased funding and staffing for border services, and accuse the Conservatives of hypocrisy and of amplifying false narratives that damage Canada's trade relationship with the U.S. The NDP accuse the Conservatives of cutting border positions while in power and of undermining Canada to benefit Donald Trump. 25200 words, 3 hours.

Industry and Technology Members debate splitting Bill C-27, arguing that separating the privacy and AI components would allow for better scrutiny and faster progress. The NDP proposes the split due to concerns that the bill, in its current form, compromises Canadians' privacy for consumer interests and undermines the Privacy Commissioner. The Liberal Party opposes splitting the bill, emphasizing a holistic approach and highlighting investments in AI safety. 6200 words, 45 minutes.

Statements by Members

Question Period

The Conservatives focus heavily on the Liberal government's fiscal management, repeatedly questioning the growing deficit and claiming the Prime Minister has lost control of spending. They highlight the finance minister's promise to keep the deficit under $40 billion, alleging tensions between her and the Prime Minister over spending. They accuse the Liberals of breaking promises and driving the country towards a "fiscal cliff" due to inflationary spending.
The Liberals focus on defending their government's actions, particularly on the economic front, highlighting Canada's strong fiscal position and promising a forthcoming fall economic statement. They champion their commitment to Canadians through initiatives like a temporary GST tax break and investments in dental care and child care. They repeatedly criticize the Conservatives for opposing these measures and for not supporting Canadians. They also touch on topics like border security and Arctic foreign policy.
The Bloc questions the federal government's handling of deportations of asylum seekers with criminal records and criticizes the Canada Border Services Agency for failures with the CARM app and past issues. They also challenge federal ministers' comments on Quebec secularism.
The NDP criticize corporate tax cuts while opposing GST relief. They raise the healthcare crisis and renter exploitation by corporate landlords using AI for price fixing. They also oppose coal mining in the Rockies and airline junk fees.

Access to Parliamentary Precinct MP Gazan responds to accusations from the Conservative MP for Thornhill, refuting claims of organizing a demonstration and breaching parliamentary privilege, defending her support for Jewish protesters against genocide in Gaza, and criticizing attempts to stifle dissent. 1000 words, 10 minutes.

Opposition Motion—Repeal of Bill C-5 Members debate Conservative leader Poilievre's motion calling for action to address the fentanyl crisis. The debate focuses on Bill C-5 and its impact on drug-related crime, border security, mandatory minimum sentences, and harm reduction strategies. The NDP proposed an amendment to the motion which was not agreed to. 12900 words, 2 hours.

Supplementary Estimates (B), 2024-25 First reading of Bill C-79. The bill grants sums of money to the federal public administration for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2025; it passes through first reading, second reading, committee of the whole, concurrence, and third reading. 400 words, 10 minutes.

Adjournment Debates

Border security and immigration Kevin Vuong questions why the Prime Minister is allegedly protecting individuals involved with Chinese foreign interference, and describes inadequacies with border security. Paul Chiang defends the government's border security measures, highlighting collaborative efforts and comprehensive screening processes. Vuong reiterates that safeguards are not effective.
Oil and gas emissions cap Jeremy Patzer raises concerns about the government's proposed emissions cap and its effects on the economy, energy security, and cost of living. Adam van Koeverden defends the emissions cap as an essential tool to combat pollution while allowing for increased production, and accuses the Conservatives of spreading misinformation about the policy's effects.
Was this summary helpful and accurate?

Opposition Motion—Repeal of Bill C-5Business of SupplyGovernment Orders

5:50 p.m.

Some hon. members

No.

Opposition Motion—Repeal of Bill C-5Business of SupplyGovernment Orders

5:50 p.m.

The Speaker Greg Fergus

[Chair read text of motion to House]

If a member participating in person wishes that the motion be carried or carried on division, or if a member of a recognized party participating in person wishes to request a recorded division, I would invite them to rise and indicate it to the Chair.

Opposition Motion—Repeal of Bill C-5Business of SupplyGovernment Orders

5:55 p.m.

Liberal

Kevin Lamoureux Liberal Winnipeg North, MB

Mr. Speaker, we would request a recorded vote, please.

Opposition Motion—Repeal of Bill C-5Business of SupplyGovernment Orders

5:55 p.m.

The Speaker Greg Fergus

Following discussions among representatives of parties in the House, I understand that there is an agreement for the bells to ring for not more than 15 minutes.

Call in the members.

(The House divided on the motion, which was negatived on the following division:)

Vote #918

Business of SupplyGovernment Orders

6:25 p.m.

The Speaker Greg Fergus

I declare the motion lost.

Concurrence in Vote 1—Canadian HeritageSupplementary Estimates (B), 2024-25Government Orders

6:25 p.m.

The Speaker Greg Fergus

The next question is on opposed Vote No. 1. Pursuant to order made Wednesday, February 28, the motion is deemed moved and seconded. Furthermore, the question is deemed put and a recorded division is deemed requested. The question is as follows:

That Vote 1b, in the amount of $10,725,771, under Department of Canadian Heritage — Operating expenditures, in the Supplementary Estimates (B) for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2025, be concurred in.

(The House divided on Motion No. 1, which was agreed to on the following division:)

Vote #919

Supplementary Estimates (B), 2024-25Government Orders

6:35 p.m.

The Speaker Greg Fergus

I declare the motion carried.

Supplementary Estimates (B), 2024-25Government Orders

6:35 p.m.

Oakville Ontario

Liberal

Anita Anand LiberalPresident of the Treasury Board

moved:

That the Supplementary Estimates (B) for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2025, except any vote disposed of earlier today, be concurred in.

Supplementary Estimates (B), 2024-25Government Orders

6:35 p.m.

The Speaker Greg Fergus

If a member participating in person wishes that the motion be carried or carried on division, or if a member of a recognized party participating in person wishes to request a recorded division, I would invite them to rise and indicate it to the Chair.

Supplementary Estimates (B), 2024-25Government Orders

6:35 p.m.

Liberal

Kevin Lamoureux Liberal Winnipeg North, MB

Mr. Speaker, we would request a recorded vote.

(The House divided on the motion, which was agreed to on the following division:)

Vote #920

Supplementary Estimates (B), 2024-25Government Orders

6:50 p.m.

The Speaker Greg Fergus

I declare the motion carried.

The hon. member for Surrey Centre on a point of order.

Supplementary Estimates (B), 2024-25Government Orders

6:50 p.m.

Liberal

Randeep Sarai Liberal Surrey Centre, BC

Mr. Speaker, I ask for unanimous consent to have, in the second vote, my nay changed to yea.

Supplementary Estimates (B), 2024-25Government Orders

6:50 p.m.

The Speaker Greg Fergus

Is it agreed?

Supplementary Estimates (B), 2024-25Government Orders

December 10th, 2024 / 6:50 p.m.

Some hon. members

Agreed.

Bill C-79 Supplementary Estimates (B), 2024-25Government Orders

6:50 p.m.

Liberal

Anita Anand Liberal Oakville, ON

Bill C-79 Supplementary Estimates (B), 2024-25Government Orders

6:50 p.m.

Liberal

Anita Anand Liberal Oakville, ON

moved that the bill be read the second time and referred to a committee of the whole.

Bill C-79 Supplementary Estimates (B), 2024-25Government Orders

6:50 p.m.

Liberal

Ruby Sahota Liberal Brampton North, ON

Mr. Speaker, I believe that if you seek it, you will find unanimous consent to apply the results of the previous vote to this vote, with the Liberal members voting in favour.

Bill C-79 Supplementary Estimates (B), 2024-25Government Orders

6:50 p.m.

Conservative

Chris Warkentin Conservative Grande Prairie—Mackenzie, AB

Mr. Speaker, Conservatives agree to apply the vote, with Conservatives voting against.

Bill C-79 Supplementary Estimates (B), 2024-25Government Orders

6:50 p.m.

Bloc

Kristina Michaud Bloc Avignon—La Mitis—Matane—Matapédia, QC

Mr. Speaker, the Bloc Québécois agrees to apply the vote and will be voting in favour.

Bill C-79 Supplementary Estimates (B), 2024-25Government Orders

6:50 p.m.

NDP

Heather McPherson NDP Edmonton Strathcona, AB

Mr. Speaker, the NDP agrees to apply the vote and will be voting in favour.

Bill C-79 Supplementary Estimates (B), 2024-25Government Orders

6:50 p.m.

Green

Mike Morrice Green Kitchener Centre, ON

Mr. Chair, the Green Party agrees to apply the result of the previous vote and is voting in favour.

Bill C-79 Supplementary Estimates (B), 2024-25Government Orders

6:50 p.m.

Independent

Kevin Vuong Independent Spadina—Fort York, ON

Mr. Speaker, I agree to apply the vote, voting nay.