Mr. Speaker, we go back to June 10 on the issue, when the original motion was put forward. We are still waiting for documents to be produced. Why is that? The situation could end tomorrow. We could be speaking about issues, such as, for example, border control. We could purchase a lot of border control with $400 million.
We are building a new infrastructure, a $400-million waste treatment facility in Niagara Falls that is needed for the burgeoning growth anticipated there. The figure would cover those costs. We are building a brand new hospital in Niagara that will cost at least $400 million.
Instead of talking about such issues, we are talking about why the government is so concerned with not presenting documents that could get to the bottom of the issue. What is it trying to hide? Why is it trying to protect the individuals in question? The government knew that the person it appointed to the board was in a position of conflict of interest, yet it still appointed her. What does that say about its credibility, and what does that talk about in terms of its judgment with regard to accountability and transparency?