Mr. Speaker, I thank the member for that correction: a former minister. We cannot even seem to get members of the House who potentially have information to go before committee. My point is, as it relates to this report, that there is this double standard that Conservatives seem to be placing. On the one hand, they are saying we absolutely need to get this minister appearing before committee. That is what this whole report is about. I apologize to my colleague from the Conservatives if she feels I am not staying on topic. This is literally just two sentences that we are debating. That is what this is.
We are debating whether the minister should be dragged before committee. We just had to drag Patrick Brown to the public safety committee; he has to be there before December 10. All I am saying is maybe that should be extended to the member for Calgary Nose Hill, too, because she seems to have some information that I would bet the committee wants to get down to. I am sure my colleagues from the Conservatives are equally concerned about the member for Calgary Nose Hill, as they are in this motion they tabled today in the House.
I end with where I started: I believe this is nothing more than an attempt by Conservatives to drag people who have already stated their position and admitted they are going to remove themselves from the position they are in, in order to clear their name. We have to let that process unfold. I am content with how it has been dealt with.
I feel there is an opportunity for the former minister to provide his position on what has transpired. Then, I believe, is the best time for everyone to judge him.