Mr. Speaker, I congratulate my colleague from Victoria for her speech and the passion she has for this issue.
Before asking her a question, I would just like to get back to her tone when she accused the Bloc Québécois of siding with the Conservatives on the question of voting to get back to the orders of the day. She said we had voted 36 times. The only two times we voted to get back to the orders of the day had to do with following procedure. Both times, it was because the NDP had pulled the rug out from under the Conservative Party during its opposition day. There is a matter of principle at play here.
The report came out in June 2023. If my colleague was so keen on debating it, I do not see why the NDP waited so long before putting it back on the agenda. What is more, our NDP colleagues also have an opposition day this week. We voted to get back to the orders of the day because we are not engaging in these sorts of tactics, even though, when it comes to the subject at hand, I admit that we find this debate far more worthwhile than the one proposed by the Conservatives during their opposition day. I think the subject is important enough for us not to get embroiled in petty politics, as seems to be the case here. This is very unlike my colleague from Victoria. I just wanted to point that out.
Now, as for the subject at hand, there is something that concerns me. Canada is contributing financially to support developing countries.
Does my colleague think that Canada should ensure, because this is not entirely the case, that the developing countries it supports have values and should provide their citizens access to sexual and reproductive rights and to care, such as abortion? Should Canada include that as a prerequisite to receiving financial support?