House of Commons Hansard #383 of the 44th Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.) The word of the day was women.

Topics

HousingOral Questions

3:15 p.m.

Green

Mike Morrice Green Kitchener Centre, ON

Mr. Speaker, affordable housing dollars should go toward building truly affordable homes, yet that is not the case most of the time. It is all because CMHC does not use any affordability criteria for the majority of units it funds. Even when it does, it rarely use its own definition of affordable housing.

It is why I have introduced a motion that follows the calls of housing experts like Dr. Carolyn Whitzman to require income-based definitions across all affordable housing programs.

Will the minister listen to these experts and take up this important call?

HousingOral Questions

3:15 p.m.

Central Nova Nova Scotia

Liberal

Sean Fraser LiberalMinister of Housing

Mr. Speaker, I have great respect for my hon. colleague, as I do Dr. Whitzman, whom I have had the opportunity to benefit from on a number of occasions when it comes to receiving her advice.

The majority of our grant programs that deliver cash subsidies to affordable housing projects are designed to support social housing, non-profit housing and housing for low-income families. We do have a range of other programs, including financing that delivers market-based housing with certain affordability criteria, to make sure we can build more middle-class homes as well.

I look forward to continuing to work with the member and other members of the House who want to advance these important conversations and get more homes built, including in places like Kitchener.

HousingOral Questions

3:15 p.m.

Liberal

Jaime Battiste Liberal Sydney—Victoria, NS

Mr. Speaker, I believe you will find unanimous consent for the following motion, that notwithstanding any—

HousingOral Questions

3:15 p.m.

Some hon. members

No.

HousingOral Questions

3:20 p.m.

Conservative

Andrew Scheer Conservative Regina—Qu'Appelle, SK

Mr. Speaker, I am rising on a point of order. I am seeking consent for a motion for the House to recognize that everyone living in first nations communities should have access to safe, clean drinking water and condemn the Liberal government, which has failed after—

HousingOral Questions

3:20 p.m.

Some hon. members

No.

The House resumed consideration of the motion.

Foreign Affairs and International DevelopmentCommittees of the HouseRoutine Proceedings

3:20 p.m.

Liberal

The Speaker Liberal Greg Fergus

It being 3:21 p.m., the House will now proceed to the taking of the deferred recorded division on the previous question to the motion to concur in the 20th report of the Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Development.

Call in the members.

(The House divided on the motion, which was agreed to on the following division:)

Vote #911

Committees of the HouseRoutine Proceedings

3:30 p.m.

Conservative

The Deputy Speaker Conservative Chris d'Entremont

I declare the motion carried.

The next question is on the motion to concur in the 20th report of the Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Development.

If a member participating in person wishes that the motion, as amended, be carried or carried on division, or if a member of a recognized party participating in person wishes to request a recorded division, I would invite them to rise and indicate it to the Chair.

Committees of the HouseRoutine Proceedings

3:35 p.m.

Liberal

Sherry Romanado Liberal Longueuil—Charles-LeMoyne, QC

Mr. Speaker, I request a recorded division.

(The House divided on the motion, which was agreed to on the following division:)

Vote #912

Committees of the HouseRoutine Proceedings

3:45 p.m.

Conservative

The Deputy Speaker Conservative Chris d'Entremont

Motion agreed to

I declare the motion carried.

I wish to inform the House that because of deferred recorded divisions, the time provided for Government Orders will be extended by 23 minutes.

Committees of the HouseRoutine Proceedings

3:45 p.m.

Liberal

Jenica Atwin Liberal Fredericton, NB

Mr. Speaker, I am rising on a point of order because I believe when the member for Sydney—Victoria was raising his point of order there may have been filming taking place in the chamber. I wonder if you could take the opportunity to remind all members that when the mace is on the table, that is unacceptable.

Committees of the HouseRoutine Proceedings

3:45 p.m.

Conservative

The Deputy Speaker Conservative Chris d'Entremont

I will simply say ditto; that is the rule. When the mace is on the table, there is no other recording to be happening in the chamber.

The hon. parliamentary secretary is rising on a point of order.

Committees of the HouseRoutine Proceedings

3:45 p.m.

Liberal

Stéphane Lauzon Liberal Argenteuil—La Petite-Nation, QC

Mr. Speaker, regarding the situation my colleague just reported, I would like it if the cameras could be checked to ensure that, if photos or videos were taken, they will be deleted from any devices belonging to the House of Commons. We know that filming or taking photos in the House is not permitted.

Is it possible to ensure that photos or videos will be deleted?

Committees of the HouseRoutine Proceedings

3:45 p.m.

Conservative

The Deputy Speaker Conservative Chris d'Entremont

We will look into that and come back to the House if we see that something has happened.

Business of the HouseRoutine Proceedings

3:45 p.m.

Conservative

Andrew Scheer Conservative Regina—Qu'Appelle, SK

Mr. Speaker, I heard the Minister of Labour saying “Please, give a speech.” I will maybe go beyond my normal short interventions. Honestly, I think most members of Parliament would like to know if the government House leader can update the House on the business of next week, should her government survive the confidence vote on Monday.

We know there are mixed messages coming from the NDP. We have put forward a common-sense motion agreeing with the NDP leader's words when he said the government was “too selfish and too beholden to corporate” greed to protect the rights of workers.

We expect the NDP will support that, that they would not swallow themselves whole and demonstrate to Canadians the heights of their hypocrisy. We expect the government will fall on Monday, counting on the NDP to declare confidence in its leader by agreeing with his words.

Should that not be the case, and the NDP members turn out to be flip-floppers and hypocrites, we would like to know what the government would be calling for the rest of the week.

Business of the HouseRoutine Proceedings

3:45 p.m.

Burlington Ontario

Liberal

Karina Gould LiberalLeader of the Government in the House of Commons

Mr. Speaker, despite what the Conservatives might think, I do not actually think Canadians want them door-knocking at Christmas. What I can say is we are very much looking forward to being here next week.

We are already into December, which means there are less than two weeks left before the House is scheduled to adjourn for the holidays.

I am very proud that, last week, our government passed Bill C‑78, a very important government initiative that will deliver substantial savings to Canadians through GST and HST relief across the country.

I am quite sure that indeed all hon. colleagues in this place are well aware that tomorrow, Monday and Tuesday will be opposition days. On Tuesday night, members of Parliament will have the opportunity to vote on the supplementary estimates (B), which includes funding on important issues for Canadians such as dental care, housing, indigenous reconciliation, the national school food program and much more.

Lastly, I would like to inform the House that the Minister for Women and Gender Equality and Youth will deliver a ministerial statement tomorrow to commemorate the tragic 35th anniversary of the massacre at the Polytechnique.

The House resumed consideration of the motion.

Opposition Motion—Confidence in the Prime Minister and the GovernmentBusiness of SupplyGovernment Orders

3:50 p.m.

Gatineau Québec

Liberal

Steven MacKinnon LiberalMinister of Labour and Seniors

Mr. Speaker, I fear my friends across the aisle will not enjoy the rest of my speech.

When I left off, I was talking about the abject hypocrisy of the Leader of the Opposition when it comes to working people, unions and the labour movement in this country. I am going to quote a few things here. The Conservative leader said union contracts that pay workers a decent wage result in a pointless, unnecessary inflation of costs, and that non-union firms with lower wages are good for competition. He also said he simply cannot comprehend that union firms can, in fact, be competitive with non-union ones.

That is the Leader of the Opposition prancing around talking about workers in the House. He is determined to deny them their historic, decades-long, hard-fought rights. The Government of Canada is committed to promoting safe, healthy, fair and inclusive working conditions. As of December 15, 2023, federally regulated employers are required to provide sanitary products to all female employees in the workplace.

For years, replacement workers have been a distraction to the collective bargaining process, and those days are coming to an end. That is because on June 20, Bill C-58, An Act to amend the Canada Labour Code and the Canada Industrial Relations Board Regulations, 2012, received royal assent. When it comes into force on June 20, 2025, it will ban replacement workers in federally regulated sectors.

Dealing with pregnancy loss can be very difficult. That is why the government instituted a new leave for pregnancy loss for employees in federally regulated private sectors. This leave will help support them during this difficult time. Adoptive parents and parents of children conceived through surrogacy need time to welcome their children home. That is why we have also instituted a new 16-week leave to support adoptive parents and parents of children conceived through surrogacy.

Technology is changing rapidly, and with it, so will the workforce. Increased availability of mobile technologies led to 20% of Canadians primarily working from home in 2023. In 2016, it was only 7%. However, remote workers are often required to be constantly available, which can lead to stress and burnout, ultimately impacting their mental health. We passed legislation to bring a right to disconnect into this new world of work. This measure will help restore the balance for nearly 500,000 federally regulated employees.

The Government of Canada is fully committed to pay equity as part of its overall goal of creating fair, safe and inclusive workplaces. It is not only the right thing to do, it is the smart thing to do. When Canadians are able to count on equal pay for work of equal value, our economy benefits. That is the purpose of Canada's Pay Equity Act, which took effect in 2021. Since then, the government has been taking steps to ensure that everyone receives equal pay for work of equal value.

These are real accomplishments. Canadians watching this debate can see the cynical ploys of the Conservative Party of Canada. They must ask themselves, which one of these dozen or more tangible, real, legislative accomplishments for working Canadians would the Leader of the Opposition have brought in? The answer is none. The answer is the Conservative Party would not have initiated any pro-worker or progressive reforms to the Canada Labour Code that help Canadians in their jobs, in their lives and to achieve the kind of balance we all seek in these very complicated times. The answer is the Conservatives would have done none of that.

What we have is a Conservative leader and a Conservative Party trying to gaslight Canadians into thinking Conservatives are friends of workers. They are not, and the facts speak for themselves. In his own words, the leader of the Conservative Party has called into question the very basis and structure of labour unions, claiming union dues are forced on workers, and has called into question the role of workers in collective bargaining in Canada.

He complains, “The union has the power to shut down a workplace.... These legal powers give the union a state-enforced monopoly on labour”. Those were the words of the member for Carleton on May 29, 2012, in the House of Commons. The Conservative leader has attacked union jobs and union wages as “fattened union contracts”.

My colleagues and I are proud that we have turned back this movement and proud of the significant progress we have made over the years, and we are not going back. We will keep listening and working alongside unions, other parties in the House and progressive Canadians everywhere to make sure we continue to be there for working Canadians and continue to provide the things, the reforms and the guarantees that we know they are entitled to and that Conservatives, cynically, would take away.

This motion deserves to be defeated. It is a cynical ploy. The Conservative Party is not pro-worker. It is anti-worker.

I encourage every member of the House to vote against this motion.

Opposition Motion—Confidence in the Prime Minister and the GovernmentBusiness of SupplyGovernment Orders

3:55 p.m.

Conservative

Greg McLean Conservative Calgary Centre, AB

Mr. Speaker, I heard the speech from the member on the other side. This is a motion that really just says that if a member says something in the House of Commons, says something to the Canadian people, says something to their electoral base, then they have to be held to account for that.

We are actually siding with the NDP on this motion and asking them to put their motions where their mouth is, out on the hustings here, and vote the government out because the government clearly, according to what the NDP's words have indicated, does not deserve to be in power, is beholden to special interests and should be voted out.

Will the member acknowledge that at least when the NDP is saying this, it is saying it against the government and perhaps that should be weighed in the House of Commons?

Opposition Motion—Confidence in the Prime Minister and the GovernmentBusiness of SupplyGovernment Orders

3:55 p.m.

Liberal

Steven MacKinnon Liberal Gatineau, QC

Mr. Speaker, here is what needs to be weighed by the member and all members of this House of Commons: The Conservatives are asking the New Democratic Party to vote for a leader who says, “The union has the power to shut down a workplace.... These legal powers give the union a state-enforced monopoly on labour”. Those are the exact words of the member for Carleton, the leader of that member's party. The Leader of the Opposition has said these are “fattened union contracts” and a “state-enforced monopoly on labour”. That is what the member is asking all members of the House to vote for. That is ridiculous.

Opposition Motion—Confidence in the Prime Minister and the GovernmentBusiness of SupplyGovernment Orders

3:55 p.m.

Bloc

Denis Trudel Bloc Longueuil—Saint-Hubert, QC

Mr. Speaker, as usual, as the holidays draw near, when a Liberal minister or member rises in the House to boast about the Liberal record, we suddenly find ourselves in a fantasy world. It is as though they are talking about some perfect place where all manner of great things happened in recent years. Unfortunately, that is not the reality.

I would like the minister to address a very specific point. Something has been growing under the Liberal government in recent years: homeless tent cities throughout Quebec and Canada. I have seen them pop up in my riding, Longueuil—Saint-Hubert, and I imagine that every member in the House has also noticed tent cities popping up in their ridings. That is the reality.

However, the only Liberal program to fight homelessness is the reaching home program, which in recent years has been slashed by 3%. How can we allow the government to make a 3% cut to such an important program?

Opposition Motion—Confidence in the Prime Minister and the GovernmentBusiness of SupplyGovernment Orders

4 p.m.

Liberal

Steven MacKinnon Liberal Gatineau, QC

Mr. Speaker, I am very pleased that the member is talking about the government's track record. This member will never have a track record, because his party will never form the government. However, he is talking about a very serious situation: homelessness. That is why, yes, we are investing record amounts in housing. We are investing $110 billion in the national housing strategy, which includes the reaching home program.

We are also working with Quebec. That will help in Gatineau, in my colleague's riding and across the province. We invested $50 million in one-time aid to support Quebeckers. I hope that my colleague will join me in telling the Government of Quebec to accept our offer, double that amount and help the homeless in Quebec.