House of Commons Hansard #385 of the 44th Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.) The word of the day was indigenous.

Topics

Indigenous and Northern AffairsCommittees of the HouseRoutine Proceedings

4:20 p.m.

Conservative

Scott Aitchison Conservative Parry Sound—Muskoka, ON

Madam Speaker, before I begin, I just want to take a moment at the top to acknowledge the good folks of Parry Sound—Muskoka, particularly on the south end of Muskoka, who have endured a pretty brutal welcome to winter. It is my first opportunity to do this in this place. Not last week, but the weekend before, the area of Gravenhurst received just over five feet of snow in two days. It was a pretty tough time. Highway 11 is the main corridor in and out of the eastern side of Muskoka, and it was closed both northbound and southbound for more than 24 hours.

I just want to take a moment to thank all those frontline workers. We had Muskoka paramedics, the OPP, the fire department, Hydro One workers and municipal operations crews, who were all on the front lines. We did not lose a soul, which is amazing. The mayor, Heidi Lorenz, had to declare a state of emergency in Gravenhurst. They got through it. It is still snowing a bit, but it is a little more manageable now. I think we are going to get through it. I just wanted to give that quick shout-out to all those frontline workers. I know we appreciate them in all of our ridings; they can quite literally save lives. They certainly did over the last few days in Parry Sound—Muskoka.

During this study on indigenous peoples, indigenous people shared some pretty alarming experiences related to housing in their communities. They emphasized the housing shortage. Its effects are well known. Numerous studies have been conducted and we keep studying the issue, even though the situation is one in which we need action. This is a pretty common theme with the government, really. After nine years under the Prime Minister, housing problems are fairly well known, not just on first nations but also across the country. Rents, mortgages and house prices have doubled, and indigenous peoples are still suffering from inadequate housing. We see it all over the place. Here we are: Let us have another study and see how bad the situation is.

I do not think we need any more studies. We need action. I think back to the good folks in Muskoka and just imagine if, in the face of those horrible weather events, we decided to do a study instead of acting. This is a crisis. In crises, we act, but we are not acting. We need action on housing.

In March, the Auditor General released a report covering housing in first nations communities. They found that, overall, since 2018, the government has supported only 4,379 completed housing units. That is about 700 per year. Here are some headlines, some real key quotes from the report: “Indigenous Services Canada and the [CMHC] had not provided the [housing] support needed by First Nations” and “Indigenous Services Canada and the [CMHC] have made little progress in improving housing conditions in First Nations communities.” Here is another one: “The department and the corporation were not on track to meet the government's commitment to close the housing gap by 2030.” Another finding was that indigenous services and the CMHC have made little progress in supporting first nations to improve housing conditions in their community.

This sounds awfully familiar in terms of what we have been hearing at our HUMA committee over the last little while, as well as from MPs all over the country. We have heard back that the CMHC is really difficult to work with. It is a broken institution. It is a lot of paperwork and a lot of bureaucracy, and it takes forever to get responses. In many cases, particularly for smaller community groups that have their ducks in a row, they go to the CMHC and just give up. In many cases, the CMHC seems to be the place where projects go to die. We heard that the government does not have a strategy.

Another quote from the report said, “We found that Indigenous Services Canada and the [CMHC] accepted the Assembly of First Nations' 2021 estimate of the housing gap. However, the department and the corporation did not have a strategy to support First Nations in closing the housing gap by 2030.”

There was a lack of collaboration between the department and the CMHC. We heard from this report that there are 13 programs at the CMHC alone and that this cumbersome application process continues to be a problem. This is not only for the small community groups we hear from in our ridings but also, certainly, for first nations. Another quote from the report says, “We found that a significant challenge for First Nations communities in general was navigating the different application and reporting requirements of the many programs”.

This is a pattern with the government. The bureaucracy put in place by the government has been expanded dramatically. It obstructs homebuilding.

Many MPs have heard from organizations in their communities that are trying to get housing built. It is often impossible to get an answer. There is so much red tape and bureaucracy that they often give up, and it is no different in first nations communities. The CMHC has also created a whole new consulting class, it seems, of high-priced consultants who are hired to fill out these applications. People need a degree in filling out government applications to get answers. Sometimes, organizations spend years stuck at the CMHC, waiting for an answer to their applications; sometimes, the rules change partway through the process.

Conservatives have a different approach. We will reform the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation from a bureaucracy of policy, paperwork and painfully slow approaches to a “get homes built” corporation. We will do it by putting executive bonuses and salaries on the chopping block unless a 60-day response requirement is met. People will get a response in 60 days.

Another thing we heard about in this report was that housing on reserve may not be built according to building codes. Here is another important bit of information: “Indigenous Services Canada and the [CMHC] did not have assurance that all housing units built and repaired with the support of their funding programs met applicable building code standards.”

This is another interesting one. We have heard at HUMA as well that, in some cases, CMHC forces builders, community groups and housing providers to go above and beyond the national and provincial building codes. This often comes in the form of additional energy efficiency requirements. The cost can be as high as $30,000 per door. Of course, this means Canadians are paying that price. In this case, the housing that was constructed may not have met the current building codes, never mind going beyond.

There can be no doubt that we need building code reform in this country. Our building code has been developed over decades without any consideration of affordability. However, at the same time as we need that reform, we have to be sure that the homes Canadians live in are safe. That is certainly true for first nations communities as well. Indigenous communities have incredible potential to really drive the change that they need to see. Indigenous people are the leaders in their community, and they know what they need.

I have met with Justin Marchand, the CEO of Ontario Aboriginal Housing Services. He has become a good friend, and we have met a number of times. Just recently, we met in my office, and he was telling me that OAHS has expanded; it now manages 3,000 units. That is an asset base of about $320 million. This makes it one of the premier indigenous housing providers in this country. When Mr. Marchand was in my office the other day with one of his other team members, we talked about how burdensome and painful the red tape at the federal level can be in terms of getting housing built. Interestingly enough, he also spoke quite favourably about the Conservative plan to make available 15% of the federal real estate portfolio to get housing built and get it built quickly.

He pointed out that his group would prefer, instead of some kind of lease, to own the land. There are a couple of reasons for that. The first one is that, as he pointed out, indigenous people do not need some bureaucrat here in Ottawa to tell them how to do things and get things done, and all the red tape and conditions are the last things they need. The other point is that if the OAHS owns the land, then it can use the asset to leverage the asset and leverage the projects it builds to get the next ones built. It could actually get more units built, which makes complete sense. Ontario Aboriginal Housing Services has demonstrated it can do that and do it very well. Mr. Marchand pointed out that, in some cases, the best thing for aboriginal people is to get the government out of the way. We really see that across the country; there are lots of statistics and data about what is going on. What we see in this report is a mirror of what is going on in the rest of the country; of course, in many ways, it is worse.

We have talked a lot about housing. The government members have talked a lot about their national housing strategy. It is an $80-billion strategy that, in the end, has had precisely the opposite effect of what we needed to have. It cannot be this way any longer. It takes Canadians too much of their hard-earned money to buy or rent a home. When 30% of the cost of every new home in this country is government, that is a problem. Nobody makes more money on housing than governments. One of the most effective ways we can get the cost of housing down is to get government out of the way. Conservatives would actually do that by reforming the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation; however, most importantly, we would eliminate the federal sales tax on the sale of homes under $1 million, which could save Canadians $50,000.

Indigenous and Northern AffairsCommittees of the HouseRoutine Proceedings

4:30 p.m.

Liberal

Francis Scarpaleggia Liberal Lac-Saint-Louis, QC

Madam Speaker, the member's speech did not deal specifically with this, but the previous member's speech did. The bill by the Leader of the Opposition on housing was discussed in an article in The Globe and Mail not long ago by Campbell Clark. The headline was about a town in my riding. It was, “Pointe-Claire demonstrates the nonsense in [the Leader of the Opposition]'s housing formula”.

Under the Leader of the Opposition's bill, a municipality where the housing stock rose by 15% vis-à-vis the previous year would get some kind of bonus, but one where the rate of increase did not exceed 15% would be penalized. The problem is that it really hurts municipalities that have built a lot of homes in the previous year because they have to exceed that by so much more. There is an example in the article, in which they talk about the city of Kirkland. This is a small municipality next to the city of Pointe-Claire that only built one unit in 2022. This means that Kirkland only has to build two homes the following year to get the incentive, whereas a bigger city would have to build so many more homes to get the incentive or not be penalized. I would like to hear the hon. member's views on that.

Indigenous and Northern AffairsCommittees of the HouseRoutine Proceedings

4:30 p.m.

Conservative

Scott Aitchison Conservative Parry Sound—Muskoka, ON

Madam Speaker, I guess there was not really a question, but the language around that is designed to identify areas in this country where it is particularly expensive and slow to get homes built. Our point in this discussion is that, right now, governments make too much money on housing. They charge too much and, at the local level, they take far too long to approve the development of new housing.

When it can take six years to get a piece of property zoned to precisely what is on either side, it costs money. In the real world, time is money, and that makes housing more expensive. That is not the case around here, of course; this place is ridiculous.

The fact of the matter is that we need to reduce the cost of government on every new home. The way we are going to do that is not by shovelling more money out the door and hoping municipalities do better; there have to be consequences.

Indigenous and Northern AffairsCommittees of the HouseRoutine Proceedings

4:30 p.m.

Bloc

Andréanne Larouche Bloc Shefford, QC

Madam Speaker, this is an interesting debate. Housing in indigenous communities is a real problem. Several of the Standing Committee on the Status of Women's reports on housing mention it, particularly how housing issues disproportionately affect indigenous women and girls and prevent them from escaping the cycle of violence.

That said, I would like to talk to my colleague about a very simple solution. Along with other members of the Bloc Québécois, I had the opportunity to meet with representatives of the Yänonhchia' initiative. Basically, those representatives are asking for $150 million. The initiative has been tested in certain communities, and it works. It has been a resounding success. It is a model where indigenous people meet their own needs.

I would like my colleague to tell us about that. Does he agree that the Yänonhchia' initiative needs that $150 million?

Indigenous and Northern AffairsCommittees of the HouseRoutine Proceedings

4:35 p.m.

Conservative

Scott Aitchison Conservative Parry Sound—Muskoka, ON

Madam Speaker, I am sorry; I did not really understand what the question was. I was listening, but I did not quite catch the program the member was speaking of specifically, so I cannot answer the question. I am happy to talk about it, but I do not know what she was saying.

Indigenous and Northern AffairsCommittees of the HouseRoutine Proceedings

4:35 p.m.

NDP

Matthew Green NDP Hamilton Centre, ON

Madam Speaker, I recognize the hon. member as the former mayor of Huntsville. His party's leader has gone on the record calling mayors incompetent and saying that they are the major roadblock for housing.

Could the hon. member please rise and share whether he agrees that small-town mayors like himself are the problem and that their incompetence led to this housing crisis?

Indigenous and Northern AffairsCommittees of the HouseRoutine Proceedings

4:35 p.m.

Conservative

Scott Aitchison Conservative Parry Sound—Muskoka, ON

Madam Speaker, in many cases they are. The fact of the matter is municipalities charge way too much and take too long.

Indigenous and Northern AffairsCommittees of the HouseRoutine Proceedings

4:35 p.m.

An hon. member

Oh, oh!

Indigenous and Northern AffairsCommittees of the HouseRoutine Proceedings

4:35 p.m.

Conservative

Scott Aitchison Conservative Parry Sound—Muskoka, ON

Madam Speaker, the hon. member for Kingston and the Islands should probably be quiet, so he can actually hear the answer. It is a fact that municipalities take too long to get things approved and that they keep raising charges at the local level. When I was a mayor in Huntsville, yes, I made sure that we kept things moving along and we made sure development—

Indigenous and Northern AffairsCommittees of the HouseRoutine Proceedings

4:35 p.m.

An hon. member

Oh, oh!

Indigenous and Northern AffairsCommittees of the HouseRoutine Proceedings

4:35 p.m.

NDP

The Assistant Deputy Speaker NDP Carol Hughes

I would ask the hon. member for Kingston and the Islands to hold off. If he has questions and comments, there is an appropriate time for that.

Indigenous and Northern AffairsCommittees of the HouseRoutine Proceedings

4:35 p.m.

An hon. member

Oh, oh!

Indigenous and Northern AffairsCommittees of the HouseRoutine Proceedings

4:35 p.m.

NDP

The Assistant Deputy Speaker NDP Carol Hughes

Order.

The hon. member for Parry Sound—Muskoka. We are out of time, but I will let him wrap up.

Indigenous and Northern AffairsCommittees of the HouseRoutine Proceedings

4:35 p.m.

Conservative

Scott Aitchison Conservative Parry Sound—Muskoka, ON

Madam Speaker, when I was a mayor, we got things done because I moved applications along and did not wait for the NIMBYs to delay things. We made things happen. Now we need to make things happen even faster because the crisis is worse today than it has been in generations in this country, and doing things the old way, as the government likes to do, is not going to work.

Indigenous and Northern AffairsCommittees of the HouseRoutine Proceedings

4:35 p.m.

NDP

The Assistant Deputy Speaker NDP Carol Hughes

It is my duty pursuant to Standing Order 38 to inform the House that the question to be raised tonight at the time of adjournment is as follows: the hon. member for Kitchener Centre, Housing.

Indigenous and Northern AffairsCommittees of the HouseRoutine Proceedings

4:35 p.m.

Winnipeg North Manitoba

Liberal

Kevin Lamoureux LiberalParliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons

Madam Speaker, I have a number of thoughts I would like to share with members, particularly with members opposite.

However, before I do that, I wanted to highlight, and I used the word earlier today in a member's statement, the hypocrisy. The degree to which the Conservatives will say one thing and vote in a different direction surprises me. Quite often, they say things that really just do not make sense.

Now, let us think about this. We have the Conservative Party saying that we need to do more on indigenous housing, but one of their major policy election platform issues for 2025 is to get rid of the housing accelerator. Now, one would think that they would have looked at some of the recipients who are receiving the benefits of the housing accelerator fund.

Indigenous and Northern AffairsCommittees of the HouseRoutine Proceedings

4:35 p.m.

An hon. member

That requires a little work.

Indigenous and Northern AffairsCommittees of the HouseRoutine Proceedings

4:35 p.m.

Liberal

Kevin Lamoureux Liberal Winnipeg North, MB

Madam Speaker, as my colleague says, that requires a little work. Well, obviously, they are not working on the other side. The number of recipients that are benefiting through the housing accelerator fund is truly amazing. It is a very long list. Let us remember, the Conservative government would cut it. Conservatives have made that very clear. They actually mock it.

In fairness, not all of the Conservative members of Parliament oppose it, even though they have been told that they are supposed to oppose it, and they have kind of held back on their comments on it. At the end of the day, the Grand Poobah, the leader of the Conservative Party says, “accelerator fund, bad. We are going to vote against it, and if we are ever in government, we are going to get rid of it.”

I have done a little homework. There is a long list, and I am going to run out of time, but the number of first nations is fairly significant. Let me give a couple of examples where these are Conservative-held ridings, where the accelerator fund is there to support indigenous communities: Skowkale First Nation in Chilliwack—Hope and the Sioux Valley Dakota Nation in Manitoba. There is a very lengthy list of individuals, cities and indigenous groups that are receiving significant amounts of money through the housing accelerator fund.

The Conservatives will say that it is not building homes. It is not simply here is a plot of land, build a house. There are all forms of things that need to be done, like infrastructure. There is some red tape out there. We have a federal government that has recognized that we can play a role in providing supports through the accelerator fund to get more homes built.

If the Conservatives did their homework on this file, they would find that indigenous housing would benefit from this program, the very same program that they are saying they are going to cut. On the other hand, today, they are saying that we are not doing enough. I will get back into some more comments on the accelerator fund shortly.

This is the first time that I have seen an opposition party introduce a concurrence motion on its very own opposition day. I have been trying to think why the Conservative Party would do that, and I think I might have figured it out. Apparently, last week, the leader of the Conservative Party was embarrassed because he was all primed and pumped, and ready to deliver a speech here on the floor of the House of Commons, and the NDP outmaneuvered him by moving concurrence on a committee report. That was an embarrassing moment for the leader of the Conservative Party.

The Conservatives played a game on Friday. They are trying to pay back, but I guess they learned something from that and they wanted to be able to talk about housing today. After all, that is what their opposition motion is on. They dug up a report on housing to move concurrence on, so they could prevent the NDP from potentially bringing in a concurrence motion. That would spoil the Conservatives' day because they did not like the concurrence motion the NDP brought in last week.

That is the only thing I can think of, in regard to why the Conservatives raised this particular report, because it is a game to the Conservative Party. What surprises me is that the Conservatives have an opposition day and I would have thought, as a Conservative Party, that they would have been following issues like trade, given what has taken place with the new president-elect, that trade would have been a hot discussion within the Conservative Party. It would have been a very productive day to have a discussion on trade. The Conservatives could have drawn some sort of a motion that would actually be voted on, which would have told Canadians exactly what they would be dealing with on that issue.

It is important. In fact, just this last five or six days, I participated in a trade mission in the Philippines with our Minister of International Trade. It was an incredible experience. We had arguably one of the largest delegations in Manila; even President Marcos made reference to it. It was like speed dating among businesses between Canada and the Philippines, trying to make connections, and we had some wonderful announcements. An exploratory discussion is taking place soon on coming up with a trade agreement between Canada and the Philippines. Air Canada came forward and talked about increasing the number of direct flights between Vancouver and Manila: four coming up in April.

Trade matters. As a government, we recognize that. As an opposition party, the Conservatives are found wanting. Today would have been a good opportunity to have that discussion because the last time, outside of an emergency debate, was when the Conservatives actually voted against the first-ever trade agreement, the Ukraine trade agreement. I would have thought the Conservative Party would deal with something of that nature, and that is not to take anything away from housing. Yes, they are the official opposition. They get to choose the issue, so they have chosen housing.

On the housing file, no government in generations has done more for Canadians than the current Prime Minister and government, in terms of dollars and real, tangible results. We recognize the federal government has a role to play. I contrast that to the leader of the Conservative Party, who, when he was the minister responsible for housing, did absolutely nothing, nothing at all. I should not say that; he actually managed to build six houses, I am told. I have no idea where those houses are, but I am told he built a half-dozen homes, but nothing else, and now he wants us to listen to what the Conservatives have to say about housing. We have heard that story before.

The Leader of the Opposition had an opportunity, and had he done his job when he was the minister of housing, maybe we would not have the shortages we have today. It is not like a house appears out of nowhere. There is a planning component to it. Has anyone ever heard the leader of the Conservative Party stand in this place and talk about what he did as minister of housing for indigenous people, or for Canadians as a whole, beyond those six hidden houses? Who knows where they are.

There is a lot of room for improvement. Our government is the first in generations to put forward a housing strategy for Canadians. It is more than just words. We are talking about hundreds of millions of dollars, going into billions of dollars. It is a housing strategy that deals with affordable housing and ensures someone could have ongoing income supports, where rent is based on a percentage of one's income in non-profit housing units. The government has invested in different ways.

Ironically, the Liberals made a commitment for purpose-built rentals. Members will recall that from a couple of years back. That was actually taking away GST on new builds. The Conservatives voted against it: GST forgiveness for purpose-built rentals and the Conservatives did not support that. For every housing initiative by the government, the Conservatives have avoided any accountability on housing, and they vote against it. Does anyone wonder why? I would suggest we know the reason.

I wanted to get what I find to be an absolutely delightful quote. At the end of the day, everything is driven through the leader of the official opposition's office. When we think of the quotes the leader of the Conservative Party uses, and we have already witnessed it today, he likes to reward Conservatives who say the slogans or the bumper sticker words. If they do that, they get rewarded with gold stars. I figure they have individuals in the back who keep track and say, “Oh, so-and-so said it three times: three stars for the day.”

There are some Conservatives who get offside, like the 15 or 17 members of Parliament who wrote to the Minister of Housing to say how wonderful the housing accelerator fund was. Obviously, it was because they were asking for support in their communities. That was offside. They were not supposed to do that, so they might have lost some stars. If a Conservative member does not do what they are being told to do, they lose stars. It is frowned upon.

It is amazing. I cannot give an exact quote, but later I can table a document if the Conservatives will let me. If they want to come and talk to a Liberal MP, that is considered a bad thing. They are not supposed to fraternize with—

Indigenous and Northern AffairsCommittees of the HouseRoutine Proceedings

4:45 p.m.

Some hon. members

Oh, oh!

Indigenous and Northern AffairsCommittees of the HouseRoutine Proceedings

4:50 p.m.

NDP

The Assistant Deputy Speaker NDP Carol Hughes

There are members on both sides of the House who are trying to intervene during the member's speech. I would ask members to please wait. There will be 10 minutes for questions and comments. I would ask members to please hold off until then. They can jot their ideas down.

The hon. member still has five minutes and 20 seconds left.

Indigenous and Northern AffairsCommittees of the HouseRoutine Proceedings

4:50 p.m.

Liberal

Kevin Lamoureux Liberal Winnipeg North, MB

Madam Speaker, in this situation, Conservatives are supposed to support whatever the leader of the Conservative Party says; they do not really have a choice in that matter. The member for Abbotsford is one of the individuals who went a little offside and we all know what happened with him.

The housing accelerator fund has benefited communities in every region of the country, including indigenous communities. There is so much potential with that program and looking at the expansion of housing co-ops. Last month, I was at a press conference hosted by Raising the Roof. Funding was provided by the federal government to Raising the Roof, an organization based in Ontario and now in Manitoba, to remodel and revitalize a home on Mountain Avenue. The house was dilapidated and the organization turned it into a wonderful rental. It is a great example of how the federal government, whether through the accelerator fund or other programs, is working with different municipalities, indigenous leaders and others.

It is something that is very local, involving many different stakeholders. Raising the Roof went to Manitoba, found a project on Mountain Avenue and went to Purpose Construction. Purpose Construction is a social enterprise that has done phenomenal work in hiring individuals, increasing their skill sets and showing them, in many ways, the benefits of the construction industry. They are the ones who did the work on Mountain Avenue.

Then if we look at the tenants, Siloam Mission, another non-profit organization, is the filter. It provides homes for two families and possibly a third individual, such as a student or something of that nature, of indigenous background. As a government, we have the national housing strategy, we have been working with the different levels of government on programs like the housing accelerator fund, and we have been working with different non-profit stakeholders like Habitat for Humanity, Raising the Roof and others that encourage and promote housing co-ops.

The federal government and the Prime Minister have been focused on the housing issues of Canadians. Let us contrast that to likely the worst minister of housing in Canada's history, the current leader of the Conservative Party. I love the contrast on that file, and I hope members will reflect on it.

Therefore, I move:

That the question be now put.

Indigenous and Northern AffairsCommittees of the HouseRoutine Proceedings

4:55 p.m.

NDP

The Assistant Deputy Speaker NDP Carol Hughes

The motion is in order.

Questions and comments, the hon. member for Barrie—Innisfil. Thank you,

Indigenous and Northern AffairsCommittees of the HouseRoutine Proceedings

4:55 p.m.

Conservative

John Brassard Conservative Barrie—Innisfil, ON

Madam Speaker, the hon. member was airing a lot of grievances, apparently, about the Conservatives. I am wondering if he can comment on the threats that were made by the member for Surrey—Newton to a member of his caucus, the member for Nepean.

Indigenous and Northern AffairsCommittees of the HouseRoutine Proceedings

4:55 p.m.

Liberal

Kevin Lamoureux Liberal Winnipeg North, MB

Madam Speaker, given it is kind of a free-for-all, let me comment on Patrick Brown's testimony, which clearly demonstrates that the leadership of the Conservative Party was heavily influenced by foreign interference. I would suggest that is one of the reasons the Conservatives do not want to have an opposition day on foreign interference.

I believe the leader of the Conservative Party still needs to get the security clearance, but we are beginning to understand why he does not want it, and it is because he is hiding something. It is a lot more than the leadership race he went through with individuals like Patrick Brown and the issue of foreign interference. There are a lot of questions that need to be answered. I appreciate the question posed by the member.

Indigenous and Northern AffairsCommittees of the HouseRoutine Proceedings

4:55 p.m.

Bloc

Andréanne Larouche Bloc Shefford, QC

Madam Speaker, we learned today that there will be an economic statement on December 16. I would like to ask my colleague if he is aware that a letter was sent to the Minister of Finance and Deputy Prime Minister about the Yänonhchia' project.

It is a really wonderful project, and all this group is asking for is a $150‑million investment to facilitate access to affordable capital and expand the model, which has already been proven effective in Quebec and could be spun out to five other regions of Canada. The interesting thing is that this could help increase the number of available housing units while giving indigenous peoples some responsibility for their housing projects. We would be giving their power back to them.

Does my colleague agree that the $150 million should be allocated in the next economic update, as requested by the Yänonhchia' project proponents? It is a great, easy solution for housing in indigenous communities.