House of Commons Hansard #285 of the 44th Parliament, 1st session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.) The word of the day was workers.
This summary is computer-generated. Usually it’s accurate, but every now and then it’ll contain inaccuracies or total fabrications.
Amendments to Bill C-318 at Committee Stage—Speaker's Ruling The Speaker rules amendments to Bill C-318 inadmissible. They extended benefits for Indigenous child placements beyond the bill's scope and infringed on the Crown's financial initiative by requiring a royal recommendation, thus are null and void. 1300 words.
Criminal Code Report stage of Bill S-205. The bill amends the Criminal Code regarding intimate partner violence, aiming to strengthen victim protection. It would require `consulting victims` before releasing an accused and allows judges to order `electronic monitoring` and specific `peace bond` conditions. Debate centres on `committee amendments`, with Conservatives arguing the bill was weakened, while others support the changes and the overall goal of protecting victims. 7000 words, 1 hour.
Government Business No. 35—Extension of Sitting Hours and Conduct of Extended Proceedings Members debate a government motion to change House rules, proposing extended sitting hours for more debate and modifying voting rules to prevent all-night sessions. Supporters argue it's necessary to counter Conservative obstruction and pass legislation like child care. Opponents call it an admission of government failure, limiting opposition tools and ignoring issues like the cost of living. 14500 words, 2 hours.
Canada Labour Code Second reading of Bill C-58. The bill proposes banning replacement workers during strikes and lockouts in federally regulated sectors to strengthen collective bargaining. It includes exceptions for health, safety, property, or environmental damage. Supporters argue it boosts workers' rights and economic stability, noting precedents in Quebec and BC. Critics question its scope and raise concerns about essential services and supply chains, while many parties debate the proposed 18-month implementation delay. 16600 words, 2 hours.
Premature Disclosure of Bill C-63 Andrew Scheer raises a question of privilege arguing that leaks of Bill C-63 details to the media before tabling constitute contempt of the House. 900 words.
Jonathan Wilkinson LiberalMinister of Energy and Natural Resources
Mr. Speaker, what do we call someone who says one thing and does the other?
We would say they are acting hypocritically.
Jonathan Wilkinson Liberal North Vancouver, BC
Mr. Speaker, we would say that they are acting hypocritically.
The Conservative Party says it has principles, and if we do not like them, it has other principles.
In the 2021 Conservative platform, on which every one of those members of Parliament was elected, the platform said:
We recognize that the most efficient way to reduce our emissions is to use pricing mechanisms.
The Conservatives' position is not only devoid of facts, but their position is the height of hypocrisy. How can Canadians believe anything these folks say?
John Williamson Conservative New Brunswick Southwest, NB
Mr. Speaker, let us remember, these Liberals promised they would never increase the carbon tax by more than $50 a tonne. It is skyrocketing, up to $270 a tonne. It is going to go up again on April 1.
Voters in my district see that every day when they cross the line to buy gas in Maine. It is 50¢ a litre cheaper. On top of that, the Liberals are now collecting the HST and the GST on gasoline and energy, another $5 billion.
When are these Liberals going to stop punishing Canadians and give Canadians a break?
Steven MacKinnon LiberalLeader of the Government in the House of Commons
Mr. Speaker, my colleague, the Minister of Energy and Natural Resources just asked this minister, the member a question.
Carbon PricingOral Questions
Steven MacKinnon Liberal Gatineau, QC
Mr. Speaker, in the category of “God forbid”. The member, like all of his colleagues, every single person who has asked a question in Question Period today, went to their constituents' doorsteps with a brochure that said, “Elect us, we will have a price on carbon.”
How do those members now stand up, with a serious face, in front of Canadians, and say that they are not misleading them today?
Alexis Brunelle-Duceppe Bloc Lac-Saint-Jean, QC
Mr. Speaker, the government already owed Quebec $470 million for services rendered to asylum seekers. Its debt has just climbed to $1 billion. These are not projections, these are the bills incurred for guaranteeing the asylum seekers quick access to social assistance, temporary housing, health care and schooling. Ottawa's refusal to pay Quebec what it owes is sabotaging our capacity to not only integrate these asylum seekers, but also serve the entire population.
When will the government reimburse Quebeckers?
Immigration, Refugees and CitizenshipOral Questions
Ville-Marie—Le Sud-Ouest—Île-des-Soeurs Québec
Liberal
Marc Miller LiberalMinister of Immigration
Mr. Speaker, as the member knows full well, since 2015, we have paid Quebec $5.2 billion under the arrangement we have with the Government of Quebec, the Canada-Quebec accord.
We are prepared to do more. We are prepared to sit down and work with Quebec. Ideally, we do not do that in public. It should be known that we have a good relationship with Quebec. We are currently working with our officials to determine what is our responsibility and what is Quebec's responsibility.
Alexis Brunelle-Duceppe Bloc Lac-Saint-Jean, QC
It is a great relationship, Mr. Speaker.
For months, the minister has been repeating that he is at the negotiating table with Quebec, but there are no negotiations going on. The Quebec immigration minister confirmed that on Thursday, when she said that the federal government has been wasting Quebec's time for two years.
Fortunately, we know that the premiers will be meeting in the coming weeks. I would like to remind the House that Quebec's budget will be tabled on March 12 and that we are talking about $1 billion here.
Will the government announce today that it will pay back Quebeckers?
Immigration, Refugees and CitizenshipOral Questions
February 26th, 2024 / 2:45 p.m.
Ville-Marie—Le Sud-Ouest—Île-des-Soeurs Québec
Liberal
Marc Miller LiberalMinister of Immigration
Mr. Speaker, guess who is not at the negotiating table and never will be? It is the Bloc Québécois.
It is strange to hear such a statement. We met with officials from Quebec the very Monday that this statement was made. We are talking. We are discussing. We are negotiating. It is important that both sides work together to know who is doing what. We will do that with Quebec. We have a good relationship and we will maintain it.
Alexis Brunelle-Duceppe Bloc Lac-Saint-Jean, QC
Mr. Speaker, that just goes to show that just because a person is six foot, three inches tall does not mean they are able to take the high road.
The federal government also needs to ensure that asylum seekers are spread out among the provinces. Everyone has to put in their share of the efforts. The federal government finally started spreading out the influx last year. However, the last time we asked it to start doing this again, the minister accused us of wanting to deport people, which is a crime against humanity.
Were the Liberals guilty of a crime against humanity when they were spreading out asylum seekers last year? Obviously not, so why are they not getting to work now, before Quebec's public services collapse?
Immigration, Refugees and CitizenshipOral Questions
The Speaker Greg Fergus
Before the minister responds, I would like to ask every member to choose their words carefully, to ensure that their comments do not target the individual.
Immigration, Refugees and CitizenshipOral Questions
Ville-Marie—Le Sud-Ouest—Île-des-Soeurs Québec
Liberal
Marc Miller LiberalMinister of Immigration
Mr. Speaker, it is very nice of the member to say I am six feet, three inches tall when I am actually only six feet, one inch and a hair.
Given his line of questioning, it seems to me that the Bloc Québécois is still looking to pick a fight with the federal government. However, that is not enough for it. Now it is looking for a fight with the Quebec government, and it has found one.
It is clear that the Bloc Québécois is not looking for relevant answers or reasonable solutions. It is just looking to pick fights.
Luc Berthold Conservative Mégantic—L'Érable, QC
Mr. Speaker, the common-sense Conservatives will axe the tax, build the homes, fix the budget and stop the crime. After eight years, this Prime Minister is not worth the cost or the crime of corruption.
The leader of the Bloc Québécois has just shown his true colours. Not only does he want to keep this Prime Minister in office for a long time to come, but he voted eight times to send more money to corrupt arrive scam companies for an app that he knew should only have cost $80,000. Even so, he and the Bloc Québécois voted for $24 million in additional spending. Voting for the Bloc Québécois is costly.
Will the Prime Minister admit that he and the Bloc Québécois are just not worth the cost?
Jean-Yves Duclos LiberalMinister of Public Services and Procurement
Mr. Speaker, once again, we appreciate the question, which has already been answered several times.
I would add this: If my Conservative colleagues are running out of ideas, they could ask why Canada had the highest vaccination rate of all comparable countries; why Canada emerged with one of the strongest economies in the G7; why Canada has added more than one million new jobs since the COVID-19 pandemic ended; or why the child poverty rate in Canada drops by 40% every month because of the Canada child benefit.
Luc Berthold Conservative Mégantic—L'Érable, QC
Mr. Speaker, can the minister tell me why this Prime Minister, with the support of the leader of the Bloc Québécois, has put the country deeper into debt than all the other prime ministers before him combined?
The leader of the Bloc Québécois chose to vote in favour of spending $24 million on the Prime Minister's arrive scam. I am not the one saying so. It was the leader of the Bloc Québécois who said, “We are not going to scrutinize everything the government spends”. They told the government to go ahead and spend the money.
It is like listening to the Liberal Minister of Finance. Voting for the Bloc Québécois is very, very costly.
Does the Prime Minister realize that he and the Bloc Québécois are costing Quebeckers too much and that they are not worth the cost or the corruption?
François-Philippe Champagne LiberalMinister of Innovation
Mr. Speaker, when Quebeckers and Canadians across the country watch us on television, they surely realize what the Conservatives are up to. The Conservative attitude is to dismiss the investments that this government has delivered to make Canada the envy of the world.
Just last Friday, I was at the opening of Moderna's first plant in Canada. This plant will manufacture 100 million vaccines to ensure the health and safety of Canadians for generations to come.
Canada is making a name for itself internationally. Our workers are doing an outstanding job, and we will continue to invest in this country.
Gérard Deltell Conservative Louis-Saint-Laurent, QC
Mr. Speaker, we knew that, unfortunately, the Bloc Québécois wanted to drastically increase the carbon tax.
Now, we have learned that it does not want to do its job as an opposition party. It voted eight times to increase the ArriveCAN budget. When caught in the act, the leader of the Bloc Québécois said that they were not going to scrutinize everything the government spends. That is exactly the opposite of what an opposition party should do.
The Premier of Quebec asked what the point of the Bloc Québécois is. I am putting the question to the Liberal Prime Minister or the immigration minister. What is the point of the Bloc Québécois?
Public Services and ProcurementOral Questions
The Speaker Greg Fergus
As I have already said twice, questions must pertain to the administration of government or committee business. The Chair is having a very hard time seeing how that question deals with the administration of government, but I see that the Minister of Public Services and Procurement is willing to answer it. I would like all members to keep their questions focused on the administration of government.
The hon. minister.
Jean-Yves Duclos LiberalMinister of Public Services and Procurement
Mr. Speaker, it is no surprise that you are confused, since my very experienced colleague seems to be having a little trouble finding the right person to answer the right question.
However, I have a question for my colleague from the Quebec City area.
We know that people in the Quebec City area do not care for the politics of hate, harassment and insult. Will he come to the city council meeting next week to explain to Quebec City and all its partners why his Conservative leader insulted everyone by calling them incompetent?
Bonita Zarrillo NDP Port Moody—Coquitlam, BC
Mr. Speaker, everyone deserves fair pay and to be treated with respect by their employer, yet flight attendants have to work up to 40 hours a month with no pay. That is three months a year. All of this is while the CEOs of Canada's biggest airlines rake in millions of dollars, plus bonuses. The Liberals are doing nothing about it, letting CEOs get rich off the backs of unpaid work.
Will the government stop the exploitation of workers and address unpaid work in the airline industry?
Terry Sheehan LiberalParliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Labour and Seniors
Mr. Speaker, we have been there from the get-go for Canada's workers. In fact, we have introduced legislation, in concert with the NDP, on replacement workers. We will continue to be there for workers every single step of the way.
We have continued to change the legislation to make sure there is a level playing field, and we will continue to address the issues the member just brought up, as well as a whole slew of other issues.