House of Commons Hansard #301 of the 44th Parliament, 1st session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.) The word of the day was firth.

Topics

line drawing of robot

This summary is computer-generated. Usually it’s accurate, but every now and then it’ll contain inaccuracies or total fabrications.

Statements by Members

Question Period

The Conservatives focus on the cost of living, criticizing $50-billion inflationary spending, high debt interest payments, and the carbon tax. They highlight the housing affordability crisis, particularly doubled rents, and call government plans failures. A significant portion addresses the ArriveCAN scandal, including GC Strategies' payments and the witness's RCMP raid.
The Liberals focus on their new budget, emphasizing [fairness for every generation] by [asking the wealthiest to pay more] to fund [investments in Canadians]. They highlight efforts to address the [housing crisis], support [young people], and fund programs like [dental care] and [child care], contrasting their approach with Conservative austerity.
The Bloc criticizes the federal government's interference in Quebec's jurisdictions, accusing them of abusing the fiscal imbalance. They heavily scrutinize the ArriveCAN scandal, focusing on GC Strategies' payments, procurement flaws, apparent collusion, and gifts to public servants.
The NDP focuses on the cost of living, blaming corporate greed and criticizing government handouts to corporations while demanding an increased Canada disability benefit. A major focus is the ArriveCAN scandal, scrutinizing procurement flaws, restricted criteria, the witness's testimony about meetings with officials, value for money, and questioning commissions and personal earnings.
The Green Party addresses the inadequacy of disability benefits and funding disparities. They heavily scrutinize the ArriveCAN scandal, focusing on GC Strategies' procurement failures and witness testimony, questioning if he is ashamed or acknowledged misleading Parliament.

Protection Against Extortion Act Second reading of Bill C-381. The bill amends the Criminal Code regarding extortion, proposing mandatory minimum sentences. Supporters argue it combats rising crime and soft-on-crime policies by targeting organized crime and using arson as an aggravating factor. Opponents contend mandatory minimums are ineffective, disproportionate, and hinder efforts to prosecute organized crime leaders, while the Bloc suggests alternatives. 7900 words, 1 hour.

Adjournment Debates

Carbon Tax on Farmers Pat Kelly accuses the government of increasing food costs by taxing farmers. Élisabeth Brière defends the carbon tax as essential for fighting climate change, noting rebates offset costs for most families. Kelly maintains farmers don't get rebates, and Brière reiterates the government's commitment to sustainability and affordability.
Canada disability benefit Mike Morrice criticizes the proposed Canada disability benefit of $200/month as inadequate and performative, citing disappointment from the disability community. Iqra Khalid defends the benefit as a first step and highlights the government's investments and commitment, while acknowledging the need for further progress and continued consultation.
Impact of the carbon tax Jeremy Patzer criticizes the carbon tax, arguing that it increases costs for farmers and municipalities, ultimately burdening ratepayers. Élisabeth Brière defends carbon pricing, stating that it contributes only a small amount to inflation and that the Canada carbon rebate helps families. Patzer says the tax still drives up grocery prices.
Was this summary helpful and accurate?

Sitting ResumedHouse of CommonsOral Questions

5:20 p.m.

Partner

Kristian Firth

Mr. Speaker, yes, I will.

Sitting ResumedHouse of CommonsOral Questions

5:20 p.m.

Conservative

Garnett Genuis Conservative Sherwood Park—Fort Saskatchewan, AB

Mr. Speaker, why did the government go to GC Strategies for this sort of advice?

How did GC Strategies become a favoured contractor and adviser regarding RFPs to the Government of Canada?

Sitting ResumedHouse of CommonsOral Questions

5:20 p.m.

Partner

Kristian Firth

Mr. Speaker, I got my first contract in 2011 and have done that subsequently by just responding to RFPs. It is flattering to be a recognized person who can provide requirements and help for the federal government.

Sitting ResumedHouse of CommonsOral Questions

5:20 p.m.

Conservative

Garnett Genuis Conservative Sherwood Park—Fort Saskatchewan, AB

Mr. Speaker, it is very flattering indeed. According to committee testimony, Mr. Firth received $2,600 per hour spent working on ArriveCAN. That is substantially more than the earnings of an average NHL player. It is very flattering that they came to him for advice. It is very flattering that he was paid so much.

Does he see this as a reasonable rate of compensation for what he did?

Sitting ResumedHouse of CommonsOral Questions

April 17th, 2024 / 5:20 p.m.

Partner

Kristian Firth

Mr. Speaker, again, in the testimony, they were quoting hours towards ArriveCAN. We had 22 other departments and 20 other contracts we were working on at the same time. It is impossible for me to spend 250 hours on one contract when I have to service and maintain other projects with other clients.

Sitting ResumedHouse of CommonsOral Questions

5:20 p.m.

Conservative

Garnett Genuis Conservative Sherwood Park—Fort Saskatchewan, AB

Mr. Speaker, is the witness involved with any other companies?

Sitting ResumedHouse of CommonsOral Questions

5:20 p.m.

Partner

Kristian Firth

Mr. Speaker, just my holdco, which is the 50% owner of GC Strategies.

Sitting ResumedHouse of CommonsOral Questions

5:20 p.m.

Conservative

Garnett Genuis Conservative Sherwood Park—Fort Saskatchewan, AB

Mr. Speaker, what is that holdco, and does it do business with the Government of Canada?

Sitting ResumedHouse of CommonsOral Questions

5:20 p.m.

Partner

Kristian Firth

Mr. Speaker, my holdco is a numbered company that was used to register the name GC Strategies.

Sitting ResumedHouse of CommonsOral Questions

5:20 p.m.

Conservative

Garnett Genuis Conservative Sherwood Park—Fort Saskatchewan, AB

Mr. Speaker, does it do business with the Government of Canada directly?

Sitting ResumedHouse of CommonsOral Questions

5:20 p.m.

Partner

Kristian Firth

Mr. Speaker, it does not.

Sitting ResumedHouse of CommonsOral Questions

5:20 p.m.

Conservative

Garnett Genuis Conservative Sherwood Park—Fort Saskatchewan, AB

Mr. Speaker, the witness discussed the health of contracts outside the office with Paul Girard, Treasury Board CIO.

Did he discuss replacing resources or increasing resources at that time?

Sitting ResumedHouse of CommonsOral Questions

5:25 p.m.

Partner

Kristian Firth

Mr. Speaker, I have had many conversations with Paul Girard. I cannot remember every single one of them.

Sitting ResumedHouse of CommonsOral Questions

5:25 p.m.

Conservative

Garnett Genuis Conservative Sherwood Park—Fort Saskatchewan, AB

Mr. Speaker, did he discuss new contracts? Since he claims to be unable to answer that question, will he respond to it in writing as well?

Sitting ResumedHouse of CommonsOral Questions

5:25 p.m.

Partner

Kristian Firth

Mr. Speaker, sorry, I thought I did answer the question.

Sitting ResumedHouse of CommonsOral Questions

5:25 p.m.

The Speaker Greg Fergus

I am going to ask the hon. member for Sherwood Park—Fort Saskatchewan to rephrase the question.

Sitting ResumedHouse of CommonsOral Questions

5:25 p.m.

Conservative

Garnett Genuis Conservative Sherwood Park—Fort Saskatchewan, AB

Mr. Speaker, in meetings outside the office with Paul Girard, did they discuss replacing resources or increasing resources? Did they discuss new contracts? If the witness is unable to answer that question, will he provide a response in writing?

Sitting ResumedHouse of CommonsOral Questions

5:25 p.m.

Partner

Kristian Firth

Mr. Speaker, I will respond in writing. I do not have every conversation with Mr. Girard catalogued.

Sitting ResumedHouse of CommonsOral Questions

5:25 p.m.

Bloc

Alain Therrien Bloc La Prairie, QC

Mr. Speaker, the witness said earlier that he had altered two resumés, but only after contracts were awarded. Is that correct?

Sitting ResumedHouse of CommonsOral Questions

5:25 p.m.

Partner

Kristian Firth

Mr. Speaker, I do not think I said that earlier.

Sitting ResumedHouse of CommonsOral Questions

5:25 p.m.

Bloc

Alain Therrien Bloc La Prairie, QC

Mr. Speaker, I am sure he said that. I was there, I heard him. I do not understand why he is claiming that he did not say it.

Earlier, a Conservative asked him if he had altered two resumés and he said yes, but after he was awarded contracts. Did I mishear that?

Sitting ResumedHouse of CommonsOral Questions

5:25 p.m.

Partner

Kristian Firth

Mr. Speaker, I did not say I doctored two résumés. I said that the business was already won. I did not amend any résumés to win any contracts, and the résumés were for a task authorization that was already won business.

Sitting ResumedHouse of CommonsOral Questions

5:25 p.m.

Bloc

Alain Therrien Bloc La Prairie, QC

Mr. Speaker, so he did not say that he altered the resumés after the contracts were awarded?

Sitting ResumedHouse of CommonsOral Questions

5:25 p.m.

Partner

Kristian Firth

Mr. Speaker, I have never amended a contract.

Sitting ResumedHouse of CommonsOral Questions

5:25 p.m.

Bloc

Alain Therrien Bloc La Prairie, QC

Mr. Speaker, the witness told us earlier that public servants received all kinds of compensation, but only after contracts were awarded. That is what he told us.