House of Commons Hansard #304 of the 44th Parliament, 1st session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.) The word of the day was industry.

Topics

line drawing of robot

This summary is computer-generated. Usually it’s accurate, but every now and then it’ll contain inaccuracies or total fabrications.

Notification of Members Following Foreign Interference Members raise a question of privilege regarding a 2021 cyber-attack by a PRC state-backed group targeting 18 Canadian parliamentarians involved with IPAC. A Conservative MP argues the government's failure to inform MPs about the attack, known since 2022, is a breach of their parliamentary privilege. A Liberal MP agrees on the seriousness and asks why they were not notified. The government commits to reviewing the matter. 2800 words, 15 minutes.

Amendments to the Standing Orders Members debate a Conservative motion to amend the Standing Orders, aiming to prevent governments from unilaterally changing the rules of the House, particularly by prohibiting the use of closure or time allocation on such motions. Proponents argue that changing the Standing Orders should require consensus among parties, not the tyranny of the majority. The motion proposes referral to committee for study. 8400 words, 1 hour.

Notification of Members Following Foreign Interference MP Heather McPherson raises concerns about potential Beijing-linked cyber-attacks targeting MPs, criticizing the government for allegedly withholding information and arguing it breaches parliamentary privilege. 400 words.

Financial Statement of Minister of Finance Members debate the government's budget, focusing on its impact on affordability, housing, and social programs like pharmacare, dental care, and the disability benefit. Liberals defend the budget as fair and progressive, highlighting investments and economic performance. Conservatives criticize the spending, debt, and carbon tax, arguing it worsens affordability. The Bloc Québécois denounces federal interference in provincial jurisdictions and criticizes the budget's lack of regional support and limited climate action. The NDP supports some measures but criticizes the disability benefit amount. 33400 words, 4 hours in 2 segments: 1 2.

Statements by Members

Question Period

The Conservatives focus on the high cost of living and economic hardship, attributing it to the government's out-of-control spending, often supported by the Bloc Québécois. They heavily criticize the government's drug decriminalization policies, blaming them for increased overdose deaths and public drug use, calling for an end to the "deadly experiment." Crime and auto theft are also raised.
The Liberals defend their budget promoting fairness for every generation, investing in housing, dental care, and the disability benefit, noting Canada's strong fiscal record. They discuss the toxic drug supply and overdose crisis, emphasizing harm reduction and criticizing Conservative cuts. They also attack the Conservative leader for associating with extremist groups and highlight investments in the auto sector.
The Bloc slams federal jurisdictional interference, demanding opt out with compensation. They decry the crisis for asylum seekers from federal delays/Quebec's burden, and the scrapped Port of Valleyfield expansion.
The NDP criticize the insufficient disability benefit and call for more government action. They condemn Canada's hosting of an Israeli weapons company used to kill Palestinian children and demand an arms embargo. They also address the toxic drug crisis, advocating for safe consumption sites.

Petitions

Opioids Conservative MPs request an emergency debate on British Columbia's drug decriminalization policy, citing concerns about increased overdose deaths and the provincial government's request for federal permission to recriminalize drugs in public spaces. 1000 words.

Decorum in the House NDP MP Peter Julian raises a point of order arguing Conservative MPs use "false titles" like "NDP-Liberal government," violating House rules on decorum and truthfulness. Conservative MP Michael Barrett defends the language. The Speaker will rule. 1100 words, 10 minutes.

Food and Drugs Act Second reading of Bill C-368. The bill aims to reverse changes made via Bill C-47 that included natural health products under parts of Vanessa's Law. Supporters argue the C-47 changes, enacted without consultation, impose excessive fees and regulations, harming the industry and consumer access. Opponents contend the C-47 changes are necessary for Health Canada to ensure the safety of natural health products, citing adverse reactions and misleading products. 8200 words, 1 hour.

Adjournment Debates

Cornwall housing affordability Eric Duncan argues the Liberal government's housing strategy has failed, citing rising home prices and rents in Cornwall. Pam Damoff defends the government's approach, highlighting the Housing Accelerator Fund and agreements with municipalities. Duncan calls for performance-based funding, while Damoff asserts the Fund already includes targets.
Military housing funding Kevin Vuong criticizes the government's defence policy, pointing to zero dollars allocated for military housing in 2024-2025, while soldiers live in tents. Annie Koutrakis defends the policy, citing investments in military housing, a housing strategy, and support for military families, plus a housing allowance.
Government Spending and Debt Cathay Wagantall criticizes Liberal spending and debt, saying it harms Canadians' future. Annie Koutrakis defends the government's investments in programs like childcare and pharmacare as fiscally responsible measures that benefit all generations, while highlighting Canada's strong economic position compared to other G7 nations.
Was this summary helpful and accurate?

Immigration, Refugees and CitizenshipOral Questions

2:40 p.m.

Bloc

Alexis Brunelle-Duceppe Bloc Lac-Saint-Jean, QC

Mr. Speaker, I think that maybe three months is all in his head.

We are talking about the same families that are lining up at the overrun food banks in Parc-Extension and elsewhere. These families are enduring years of hardship because federal government delays are preventing them from working and from focusing on their asylum claims.

I want to quote what Frantz André from the Comité d'action des personnes sans statut had to say about these people. He said, “They live in a constant state of anxiety, which creates mental health problems. They want an answer as quickly as possible, even if it is negative.”

Is it possible to have a little more humanity and fewer bureaucratic delays?

Immigration, Refugees and CitizenshipOral Questions

2:40 p.m.

Ville-Marie—Le Sud-Ouest—Île-des-Soeurs Québec

Liberal

Marc Miller LiberalMinister of Immigration

Mr. Speaker, to answer the member of the Bloc Québécois, over the past few months, we have shortened existing wait times, and we can do even better.

From what I am hearing, the member wants to move toward regularization, so I expect the Bloc's support when we introduce a bill to regularize people who are here in Canada who should be Canadians.

Immigration, Refugees and CitizenshipOral Questions

2:40 p.m.

Bloc

Alexis Brunelle-Duceppe Bloc Lac-Saint-Jean, QC

Mr. Speaker, that means he would have to listen, not just read off a sheet of paper.

This morning, Quebec's immigration minister said that Quebec is still taking in too many asylum seekers and that the federal government needs to spread them out across Canada.

First of all, Quebec has exceeded its integration capacity. Second, the federal immigration department is racking up delays in processing files. Consequently, families are finding themselves destitute because of the federal government's incompetence when it comes to immigration. These are human beings, not numbers.

Will the minister do his job?

Immigration, Refugees and CitizenshipOral Questions

2:45 p.m.

Ville-Marie—Le Sud-Ouest—Île-des-Soeurs Québec

Liberal

Marc Miller LiberalMinister of Immigration

Mr. Speaker, this is the height of absurdity. It is typical of a Bloc Québécois member to stand up and read from a sheet, accusing other people of reading from a sheet even though they were not reading from a sheet.

That is the Bloc, through and through.

Carbon PricingOral Questions

2:45 p.m.

Conservative

John Barlow Conservative Foothills, AB

Mr. Speaker, after nine years of the current Prime Minister, Canadians are skipping meals, and food banks are overwhelmed. Eighty-three per cent of Canadians are paying $80 more a month for food than they were just six months ago. According to Second Harvest, more than half of the food banks in the Toronto area cannot meet demand, and they are putting families on wait-lists. Families cannot afford to put food on the table, and the crisis is getting worse as the Liberal-NDP government increases the carbon tax by 23%.

Will the Prime Minister reverse his decision to increase the carbon tax, and pass Bill C-234 in its original form so Canadians do not have to dumpster dive for their dinner?

Carbon PricingOral Questions

2:45 p.m.

Gatineau Québec

Liberal

Steven MacKinnon LiberalLeader of the Government in the House of Commons

Mr. Speaker, as the member well knows, Bill C-234 is in the hands of the Conservative House leader. The member should speak to him.

Carbon PricingOral Questions

2:45 p.m.

Conservative

John Barlow Conservative Foothills, AB

Mr. Speaker, the NDP-Liberal government is not worth the cost of food. While Canadians are skipping meals, the minister who is in charge of lowering food costs for Canadians is rubbing shoulders with Hollywood celebrities and political elites at the most expensive dinner imaginable. He is dining out at the White House on the taxpayer dime. After nine years, the current Prime Minister is out to lunch and the ministers are out of touch.

Will the champagne coalition and caviar caucus lower food costs for Canadians and pass Bill C-234 in its original form?

Carbon PricingOral Questions

2:45 p.m.

University—Rosedale Ontario

Liberal

Chrystia Freeland LiberalDeputy Prime Minister and Minister of Finance

Mr. Speaker, two weeks ago we presented our budget to deliver fairness for every generation, because right now a nurse or a carpenter can pay taxes at a higher marginal rate than a multi-millionaire. That is not fair, and we are changing it, but the Conservatives have said that they are opposed to our budget. That is because the only thing they know how to do is cut, cut, cut; impose austerity; and quietly keep on delivering tax breaks to their rich friends.

Carbon PricingOral Questions

2:45 p.m.

Conservative

Lianne Rood Conservative Lambton—Kent—Middlesex, ON

Mr. Speaker, “Food banks in Canada are being pushed to the brink with high demand and donations not keeping pace”. After nine years of the NDP-Liberal government, that was this morning's headline. Canadian families cannot afford to buy food, and our farmers who grow food face punishment, not progress. No farms means no food.

From high cost to empty store shelves, the Prime Minister and his costly carbon tax are not worth the cost, so will the Prime Minister finally axe the carbon tax so our farm families can stay in business and Canadian families are not forced to use food banks?

Carbon PricingOral Questions

2:45 p.m.

University—Rosedale Ontario

Liberal

Chrystia Freeland LiberalDeputy Prime Minister and Minister of Finance

Mr. Speaker, our government believes in fairness for every generation, especially younger Canadians. That is why we are investing in building more homes faster. We are investing in making life more affordable with programs such as early learning and child care and dental care. We are investing in jobs and growth, and we are paying for it by asking those at the top to contribute a bit more, but the Conservatives are opposed to our plan. The only thing they believe in is austerity and quietly giving tax breaks to their rich friends.

Foreign AffairsOral Questions

2:45 p.m.

NDP

Lindsay Mathyssen NDP London—Fanshawe, ON

Mr. Speaker, last week The Maple revealed that the Canadian government is hosting test sessions with an Israeli company, Smart Shooter, whose technology is used to kill Palestinian children. The company is even eligible for a prize. Its CEO boasted that the war is good for business. As Palestinians continue to be killed, Canada's support of this company is inhumane and shows a shocking lack of judgment.

Why is the government showcasing weapons in Canada that are killing kids?

Foreign AffairsOral Questions

2:45 p.m.

Scarborough Southwest Ontario

Liberal

Bill Blair LiberalMinister of National Defence

Mr. Speaker, I would simply remind the member opposite that Canada has one of the most rigorous military export regimes in the world, and we are vigilant in ensuring that all military technology being shared with any other foreign country rigorously meets the standards that have been set for us.

Foreign AffairsOral Questions

2:45 p.m.

NDP

Heather McPherson NDP Edmonton Strathcona, AB

Mr. Speaker, Israeli arms are being tested in Canada, in Alberta. Canadians do not want to be complicit in Netanyahu's crimes against Palestinian children. Canada should not be buying from these companies and should not be selling to the Israeli government.

The minister promised the House that he would issue a notice to exporters on March 18, six weeks ago. Where is the notice to exporters, and when will Canada finally impose a two-way arms embargo?

Foreign AffairsOral Questions

2:50 p.m.

Ahuntsic-Cartierville Québec

Liberal

Mélanie Joly LiberalMinister of Foreign Affairs

Mr. Speaker, our position when it comes to arms export permits is well known and absolutely clear.

When it comes to what is happening in the Middle East, we have been clear: The violence must stop. We need a ceasefire now. Hostages must be released, and we need to make sure that humanitarian aid gets into Gaza. At the end of the day, what we need is a two-state solution where the State of Israel can live side by side in peace and security with a Palestinian state.

I have been in contact with my U.S., U.K. and many Arab countries counterparts over the weekend, working hard on bringing back peace to the Middle East.

Automotive IndustryOral Questions

2:50 p.m.

Liberal

Majid Jowhari Liberal Richmond Hill, ON

Mr. Speaker, our government has shown great success in attracting historic investment in our auto industry. Can the minister highlight the recent investment from Honda and what it means for building our EV supply chain and growing Canadian jobs?

Automotive IndustryOral Questions

2:50 p.m.

Saint-Maurice—Champlain Québec

Liberal

François-Philippe Champagne LiberalMinister of Innovation

Mr. Speaker, I thank my colleague for his leadership. That was a good question.

Last week we witnessed a $15.7-billion investment by Honda. This is the largest investment in Honda's history. It is the largest investment in our auto sector, and it is one of the largest investments by a private company in this country. This is great news for our workers across the nation. This is great news for our auto sector. This is great news for Canada. Let us celebrate as Canada becomes a hub for green manufacturing in the 21st century.

FinanceOral Questions

2:50 p.m.

Conservative

Pierre Paul-Hus Conservative Charlesbourg—Haute-Saint-Charles, QC

Mr. Speaker, this morning the Journal de Montréal reported that 25% of Quebeckers cannot afford to live with dignity, and that even working 50 hours a week is not enough to ensure they do not end up in a precarious situation. This is what we have come to, after nine years of this government. The statistics are clear.

The Bloc Québécois claims to promote the interests of Quebec, but voted with the Liberals on every budget allocation to support this exorbitant, inflationary spending.

Do the government and the Bloc Québécois have the courage to admit that they have failed Quebeckers and must stop their out-of-control spending?

FinanceOral Questions

2:50 p.m.

Gatineau Québec

Liberal

Steven MacKinnon LiberalLeader of the Government in the House of Commons

Mr. Speaker, last week we saw the Leader of the Opposition, once again, encourage supporters of white supremacy, anarchy and misogyny. This has been a regular occurrence. He draws the admiration of people who dismiss the slaughter of children in schools.

The Leader of the Opposition now has 30 seconds to speak to this House and to Canadians, once I sit down. I ask him to clearly disavow the views of these dangerous people. Will he do that?

FinanceOral Questions

April 29th, 2024 / 2:50 p.m.

Conservative

Pierre Paul-Hus Conservative Charlesbourg—Haute-Saint-Charles, QC

Mr. Speaker, meanwhile, what are we to make of the $54.1 billion that Canadians and Quebeckers have to pay in interest to banks in London and New York because of this government's out-of-control spending supported by the Bloc Québécois, which has voted in favour of all budget allocations for the past nine years?

Let us think about it: The Bloc Québécois voted for every budget allocation, which means that today we are stuck paying interest equivalent to all the health transfers for all the provinces. We could do so much more with that money.

Will the government stop its out-of-control spending and will the Bloc Québécois stop supporting it?

FinanceOral Questions

2:50 p.m.

Gatineau Québec

Liberal

Steven MacKinnon LiberalLeader of the Government in the House of Commons

Mr. Speaker, last week, the Conservative leader showed his true colours when he refused to denounce certain views. He is still refusing to do it. I wonder to what extent the Quebec caucus of the Conservative Party supports his words and actions.

The Leader of the Opposition is speaking without conviction or clarity on what should be a very simple issue. His silence speaks volumes. That is not leadership.

FinanceOral Questions

2:50 p.m.

Conservative

Richard Martel Conservative Chicoutimi—Le Fjord, QC

Mr. Speaker, after nine years under this government, too many Quebeckers and Canadians have been forced into poverty. According to the Journal de Montréal, 25% of Quebeckers do not have a livable income. Let us think about this. Working 50 hours a week is no longer enough for people to meet their needs.

Despite all that, the Bloc Québécois continues to support the Liberals by voting in favour of the estimates. My goodness, it is costly to vote for the Bloc Québécois.

When will the government finally listen to us and stop its out-of-control spending?

FinanceOral Questions

2:55 p.m.

Saint-Maurice—Champlain Québec

Liberal

François-Philippe Champagne LiberalMinister of Innovation

Mr. Speaker, I thank my colleague for his question. I have a great deal of respect for him.

I am sure he noticed that the Minister of Finance's recent budget focuses on intergenerational equity. This budget gives every generation a chance by investing in the priorities of Quebeckers. It focuses on housing and the cost of living, but also on growth.

I am sure my colleagues from Quebec saw our announcement last week regarding a record investment from IBM in Bromont. This will help Quebec and Canada become a leader in the semiconductors sector.

A confident nation is a nation that invests. That is exactly what we are doing.

FinanceOral Questions

2:55 p.m.

Conservative

Richard Martel Conservative Chicoutimi—Le Fjord, QC

Mr. Speaker, after nine years under this government, the Prime Minister is not worth the cost. The cost of living keeps going up. An article in La Presse reports that despite the government's spending on helping the less fortunate, recent data from Statistics Canada show that these vulnerable people are still struggling to put food on the table. Let us not forget that the Bloc Québécois voted in favour of a $500-billion budget.

When will the Liberals, supported by the Bloc Québécois, stop their out-of-control spending?

FinanceOral Questions

2:55 p.m.

University—Rosedale Ontario

Liberal

Chrystia Freeland LiberalDeputy Prime Minister and Minister of Finance

Mr. Speaker, the last time the Conservative leader was in power he tried to change the age of retirement to 67. It was the Liberal government who reversed that.

When we lowered taxes for the middle class and increased taxes for the 1%, they voted against our plan. Today, when we are investing for Canadians through a tax on the wealthiest Canadians, they still oppose our plan.

Canada Border Services AgencyOral Questions

2:55 p.m.

Bloc

Claude DeBellefeuille Bloc Salaberry—Suroît, QC

Mr. Speaker, this morning's edition of La Presse revealed that the federal government has scrapped the Port of Valleyfield expansion. On the pretext of a lack of resources, the Canada Border Services Agency is taking away the operator's right to handle containers at this port, which is of vital importance to the region's economy. The mayor of Salaberry‑de‑Valleyfield and the director of economic development have both strongly condemned this senseless decision.

Will the Minister of Public Safety intervene and ask the CBSA to continue to do its job instead of undermining the future of the Port of Valleyfield?