House of Commons Hansard #316 of the 44th Parliament, 1st session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.) The word of the day was quebec.
This summary is computer-generated. Usually it’s accurate, but every now and then it’ll contain inaccuracies or total fabrications.
Opposition Motion—Federal Intrusions in the Exclusive Jurisdictions of Quebec and the Provinces Members debate a Bloc motion condemning the federal government's repeated intrusion into the exclusive jurisdictions of Quebec, the provinces and the territories and demanding the right to opt out unconditionally with full compensation. The Bloc argues this centralizes power and leads to failures. Liberals defend their collaborative approach and national programs like dental care and child care, arguing they benefit citizens. Conservatives agree on respecting jurisdictions but criticize the Bloc for supporting Liberal spending. The NDP supports co-operative federalism and federal social programs helping Quebeckers. 45300 words, 6 hours in 2 segments: 1 2.
Respect for the Authority of the Chair Members debate a point of order concerning Conservative MPs' tweets about events on April 30, where two Conservative MPs were named and expelled. Andrew Scheer argues the Speaker lacks jurisdiction over statements made outside the chamber and criticizes public comments by the Speaker's spokesman regarding the events. The Speaker will consider the arguments. 1600 words, 10 minutes.
Criminal Code Report stage of Bill S-224. The bill amends the Criminal Code regarding human trafficking, aiming to remove the requirement for victims to prove fear to align with international standards. Supporters argue this is needed to increase low conviction rates, while opponents say it may hinder prosecutions. The bill was amended in committee, prompting motions to restore its original text. 8300 words, 1 hour.
Department of Justice—Main Estimates, 2024-25 Members debate Department of Justice estimates. Conservatives point to rising crime rates, particularly auto theft, blaming Liberal policies like bail reform and questioning the Minister's record. Liberals defend their actions on crime, including new auto theft laws and increased judicial appointments, while criticizing Conservative opposition and their leader's stance on the notwithstanding clause. Other topics include legal aid funding, online harms legislation, MAID advance requests, drug decriminalization, and victims' rights. 38400 words, 4 hours.
Department of Justice—Main Estimates, 2024-25Business of SupplyGovernment Orders
Conservative
Gérard Deltell Conservative Louis-Saint-Laurent, QC
Mr. Speaker, what was it that led the former minister of justice, Mr. Lametti, to order another trial? Can the minister answer me?
Arif Virani Liberal Parkdale—High Park, ON
Mr. Speaker, what I can say is that it is not up to the minister to decide the guilt or innocence of someone who—
Department of Justice—Main Estimates, 2024-25Business of SupplyGovernment Orders
Department of Justice—Main Estimates, 2024-25Business of SupplyGovernment Orders
Conservative
Gérard Deltell Conservative Louis-Saint-Laurent, QC
Mr. Speaker, the minister referred to a miscarriage of justice.
Does the current minister respect Canada's Criminal Conviction Review Group, yes or no?
Arif Virani Liberal Parkdale—High Park, ON
Mr. Speaker, under the current process, the minister relies on a recommendation from the Criminal Conviction Review Group. That is the system we have now.
Department of Justice—Main Estimates, 2024-25Business of SupplyGovernment Orders
Conservative
Gérard Deltell Conservative Louis-Saint-Laurent, QC
Mr. Speaker, the Criminal Conviction Review Group did not find that any miscarriages of justice had occurred. However, Minister Lametti ordered another trial, citing a miscarriage of justice.
Does the minister believe that Minister Lametti did the right thing, yes or no?
Arif Virani Liberal Parkdale—High Park, ON
Mr. Speaker, it may be up to the minister to refer a case, but it is up to a new court to decide whether a person is guilty or not. It is not up to the minister to make the final decision. The decision—
Department of Justice—Main Estimates, 2024-25Business of SupplyGovernment Orders
Department of Justice—Main Estimates, 2024-25Business of SupplyGovernment Orders
Conservative
Gérard Deltell Conservative Louis-Saint-Laurent, QC
Mr. Speaker, did Minister Lametti seek other opinions to determine whether he was going to make his decision, apart from that of the Criminal Conviction Review Group?
Arif Virani Liberal Parkdale—High Park, ON
Mr. Speaker, with regard to the process followed, it was the existing group that was involved—
Department of Justice—Main Estimates, 2024-25Business of SupplyGovernment Orders
Department of Justice—Main Estimates, 2024-25Business of SupplyGovernment Orders
Conservative
Gérard Deltell Conservative Louis-Saint-Laurent, QC
Mr. Speaker, he asked for two independent opinions.
Has the minister read these opinions?
Arif Virani Liberal Parkdale—High Park, ON
Mr. Speaker, once again, as I see it, the Delisle case underscores the importance of changing the process to look for more—
Department of Justice—Main Estimates, 2024-25Business of SupplyGovernment Orders
Department of Justice—Main Estimates, 2024-25Business of SupplyGovernment Orders
Conservative
Gérard Deltell Conservative Louis-Saint-Laurent, QC
Mr. Speaker, does the current minister want the two opinions that Minister Lametti solicited to be made public, yes or no?
Arif Virani Liberal Parkdale—High Park, ON
Mr. Speaker, Mr. Delisle's situation highlights the fact that we need to change the process and avoid—
Department of Justice—Main Estimates, 2024-25Business of SupplyGovernment Orders
Department of Justice—Main Estimates, 2024-25Business of SupplyGovernment Orders
Conservative
Gérard Deltell Conservative Louis-Saint-Laurent, QC
Mr. Speaker, is the minister aware that the fact that Minister Lametti was asked for two opinions and he never made them public has undermined the credibility of the justice system? Is he aware of that?
Arif Virani Liberal Parkdale—High Park, ON
Mr. Speaker, the situation we are talking about right now, like any other situation, includes private details that are still confidential and protected by the—
Department of Justice—Main Estimates, 2024-25Business of SupplyGovernment Orders
Department of Justice—Main Estimates, 2024-25Business of SupplyGovernment Orders
Conservative
Gérard Deltell Conservative Louis-Saint-Laurent, QC
Mr. Speaker, does the minister know who the director of criminal and penal prosecutions, or DCPP, in Quebec is? Does he know who that is?
Arif Virani Liberal Parkdale—High Park, ON
Mr. Speaker, we follow the guidelines that fall under our jurisdiction at the federal level when it comes to a miscarriage of justice such as this.
Department of Justice—Main Estimates, 2024-25Business of SupplyGovernment Orders
Conservative
Gérard Deltell Conservative Louis-Saint-Laurent, QC
Mr. Speaker, the director of criminal and penal prosecutions spoke out about Mr. Lametti's action, saying that he and his staff did not even know these opinions existed and that this does not help them understand. On the contrary, it makes the minister's decision to order a new trial even harder to understand.
Does the minister agree with Mr. Michel?
Department of Justice—Main Estimates, 2024-25Business of SupplyGovernment Orders
The Speaker Greg Fergus
Before the minister answers the question, I would like to make sure that everyone waits until they are recognized by the Chair before speaking.
Arif Virani Liberal Parkdale—High Park, ON
Mr. Speaker, I want to note that it is up to a minister, whether that is me or my predecessor, to make the decision to refer a case. Nonetheless, the final decision is always made by a court, whether it is a lower court or a court of appeal.