House of Commons Hansard #336 of the 44th Parliament, 1st session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.) The word of the day was regard.

Topics

line drawing of robot

This summary is computer-generated. Usually it’s accurate, but every now and then it’ll contain inaccuracies or total fabrications.

Combating Motor Vehicle Theft Act Second reading of Bill C-379. The bill amends the Criminal Code regarding motor vehicle theft, proposing increasing minimum sentences for repeat offenders, preventing conditional sentences, and adding organized crime as an aggravating factor. Parties agree auto theft is a serious issue but debate the bill's approach, particularly the use of mandatory minimum sentences and the need for broader measures like port security and prevention programs. 7200 words, 1 hour.

Alleged Failure of Government to Produce Documents Conservatives raise a question of privilege alleging the government failed to comply with a House order to provide unredacted Sustainable Development Technology Canada documents for the RCMP. They argue the government's refusal and redactions constitute a contempt of Parliament, citing the House's absolute power to order papers and past precedents. Other parties reserve comment. 5100 words, 30 minutes.

Citizenship Act Second reading of Bill C-71. The bill amends the Citizenship Act to restore citizenship to "lost Canadians" and modify citizenship by descent rules following a court ruling. It replaces the first-generation limit with a substantial connection test (three cumulative years in Canada) for those born abroad, addressing issues the Ontario Superior Court found unconstitutional. Liberals say it fixes past Conservative wrongs. Conservatives oppose the bill as written, citing concerns about security and administrative burden, while NDP and Bloc support sending it to committee. 33900 words, 4 hours in 2 segments: 1 2.

Statements by Members

Question Period

The Conservatives criticize the Liberal government for increasing taxes, costs, and crime after nine years, particularly highlighting the harmful effects of the carbon tax. They question the Finance Minister's role with Mark Carney's involvement and address issues in the forestry and fisheries sectors, repeatedly calling for a carbon tax election.
The Liberals focus on delivering solutions for Canadians and contrast their record on climate action and social programs with the Conservatives' approach. They highlight positive economic indicators, investments in jobs, and efforts in healthcare, safety, and fisheries, while criticizing the opposition's personal attacks and calls for austerity.
The Bloc prioritizes increasing old age security for seniors aged 65-74, citing discrimination, and pushes their Bill C-319. They urge harmonizing the Criminal Code with Quebec's MAID law and defend Quebec's jurisdiction.
The NDP criticize the government for inaction on the housing crisis, rising costs, and issues like healthcare fees and the GIS clawback affecting seniors. They also raise concerns about funding for First Nations youth.
The Green Party calls for a federal environmental assessment of the Northvolt plant due to potential pollution concerns.

Promotion of Safety in the Digital Age Act First reading of Bill C-412. The bill modernizes criminal laws to protect Canadians, particularly minors, from online harm like harassment and non-consensual intimate images (including AI), while safeguarding civil liberties. 200 words.

Petitions

Recent Deaths of First Nations People by Police Forces NDP MP Lori Idlout requests an emergency debate on the recent deaths of six First Nations people at the hands of police, citing systemic racism and calling for immediate action to save Indigenous lives. 400 words.

Recent Deaths of First Nations People During Police Interventions Members debate the recent deaths of six First Nations people during police interventions, highlighting systemic racism in policing. They discuss past reports and recommendations from the TRC and MMIWG, calling for tangible action and Indigenous-led solutions, including recognizing Indigenous policing as an essential service with adequate funding. Concerns are raised about lack of government follow-through and accountability. 45300 words, 6 hours.

Was this summary helpful and accurate?

Question No.2745—Questions Passed as Orders for ReturnsRoutine Proceedings

3:40 p.m.

Conservative

Ted Falk Conservative Provencher, MB

With regard to the procurement, review and contents of the contract for the Pfizer COVID-19 mRNA vaccine signed by the former Minister of Public Services and Procurement in 2020: (a) when did the former Minister of Public Services and Procurement, the former Minister of Health and Health Canada initially receive the Pfizer contract; (b) which entities and agencies reviewed the contents of the Pfizer contract and who performed the review in each entity and agency; (c) which entities and agencies approved the final terms of the Pfizer contract and who signed the approval in each entity and agency; (d) did the contract specify whether their product was serialized by the manufacturer; (e) what is the purpose of product serialization by any drug manufacturer; (f) if the answer to (d) is negative, why not; (g) did the Pfizer contract provide unequivocal confirmation that their product was studied for its (i) efficacy to prevent infection of SARS-CoV-2, (ii) efficacy to prevent serious illness, (iii) efficacy to prevent hospitalization, (iv) efficacy to prevent death, (v) long-term side effects, (vi) ability to stop transmission of SARS-CoV-2, (vii) known adverse effects; (h) did the contract state that the mRNA vaccine was tested for its ability to stop transmission of SARS-CoV-2 to others; (i) with respect to the responses to (g) and (h), when was (i) Dr. Howard Njoo, (ii) Dr. Theresa Tam, (iii) Dr. Supriya Sharma, (iv) Dr. Caroline Quach-Thanh, (v) the Prime Minister, (vi) the Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Finance, (vii) the former Minister of Health, (viii) the former Minister of Transport, provided this information; (j) with respect to the responses to (g)(i) to (g)(vii), when was the Office of the Prime Minister informed about the limitations of the vaccine as listed in the Pfizer contract and who informed them; and (k) who approved the communications plan after the contract was received and analyzed in early 2021 that would inform Canadians that the Pfizer product was "safe and effective" and prevented transmission of SARS-CoV-2 to others?

(Return tabled)

Question No.2746—Questions Passed as Orders for ReturnsRoutine Proceedings

3:40 p.m.

NDP

Leah Gazan NDP Winnipeg Centre, MB

With regard to federal funding in the constituency of Winnipeg Centre, between November of 2019 and May of 2024: (a) what applications for funding have been received, including, for each, (i) the name of the organization, (ii) the department, (iii) the program and sub-program under which they applied for funding, (iv) the date of the application, (v) the amount applied for, (vi) whether funding has been approved or not, (vii) the total amount of funding, if funding was approved; (b) what funds, grants, loans, and loan guarantees has the government issued through its various departments and agencies in this constituency that did not require a direct application from the applicant, including, for each, the (i) name of the organization, (ii) department, (iii) program and sub-program under which they received funding, (iv) total amount of funding, if funding was approved; and (c) what projects have been funded in this constituency by organizations tasked with subgranting government funds (e.g. Community Foundations of Canada), including, for each, the (i) name of the organization, (ii) department, (iii) program and sub-program under which they received funding, (iv) total amount of funding, if funding was approved?

(Return tabled)

Question No.2748—Questions Passed as Orders for ReturnsRoutine Proceedings

3:40 p.m.

Conservative

Len Webber Conservative Calgary Confederation, AB

With regard to government projects announced since November 4, 2015, with an initial projected cost of over $5,000,000, that were completed within their original projected timeline and at or below the cost originally announced: (a) what are the details of all such projects, including, for each, the (i) location, (ii) project description, (iii) date of the first project announcement, (iv) cost originally announced, (v) originally announced completion date, (vi) actual project cost, (vii) actual completion date, (viii) website address where the original announcement or press release can be found; and (b) how many and what percentage of such projects were completed (i) on time, (ii) at or below the originally announced cost?

(Return tabled)

Question No.2749—Questions Passed as Orders for ReturnsRoutine Proceedings

3:40 p.m.

Conservative

Scott Aitchison Conservative Parry Sound—Muskoka, ON

With regard to government involvement, including the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation, in the creation of rental housing in Canada, including through both direct investments and bilateral agreements, between February 1, 2006, and November 4, 2015, broken down by program, province or territory, and by year for each part of the question: (a) how many new units were built as a result of federal funding; (b) how much funding was provided to support the construction of non-profit or community housing and how many units were built; (c) how much federal funding was provided to support the construction of cooperative housing and how many units were built; and (d) how much federal funding was provided to support the construction of purpose-built rental housing and how many units were built with that funding?

(Return tabled)

Question No.2750—Questions Passed as Orders for ReturnsRoutine Proceedings

3:40 p.m.

Conservative

Scott Aitchison Conservative Parry Sound—Muskoka, ON

With regard to Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation's (CMHC) programs, CMHC's Affordable Housing Centre, and all other CMHC initiatives, between February 1, 2006, and October 1, 2015: (a) how many new units were developed as a result of CMHC funding; (b) how much funding was provided to support the construction of non-profit or community housing and how many units were developed; (c) how much CMHC funding was provided to support the construction of cooperative housing and how many units were developed; and (d) how much CMHC funding was provided to support the construction of purpose-built rental housing and how many units were developed?

(Return tabled)

Question No.2751—Questions Passed as Orders for ReturnsRoutine Proceedings

3:40 p.m.

Conservative

Scott Aitchison Conservative Parry Sound—Muskoka, ON

With regard to government involvement, including the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation, in the creation of rental housing in Canada, including through both direct investments and bilateral agreements, between February 1, 2006, and November 4, 2015, broken down by program, province or territory, and by year for each part of the question: (a) how many new units were developed as a result of federal funding; (b) how much funding was provided to support the construction of non-profit or community housing and how many units were developed; (c) how much federal funding was provided to support the construction of cooperative housing and how many units were developed; and (d) how much federal funding was provided to support the construction of purpose-built rental housing and how many units were developed with that funding?

(Return tabled)

Question No.2752—Questions Passed as Orders for ReturnsRoutine Proceedings

3:40 p.m.

Conservative

Scott Aitchison Conservative Parry Sound—Muskoka, ON

With regard to Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation's (CMHC) programs, CMHC's Affordable Housing Centre, and all other CMHC initiatives, between February 1, 2006, and October 1, 2015: (a) how many new units were built as a result of CMHC funding; (b) how much funding was provided to support the construction of non-profit or community housing and how many units were built; (c) how much CMHC funding was provided to support the construction of cooperative housing and how many units were built; and (d) how much CMHC funding was provided to support the construction of purpose-built rental housing and how many units were built?

(Return tabled)

Question No.2754—Questions Passed as Orders for ReturnsRoutine Proceedings

3:40 p.m.

NDP

Peter Julian NDP New Westminster—Burnaby, BC

With regard to the Canada Housing Benefit, broken down by province or territory and fiscal year: (a) how many households received the benefit; (b) how many seniors aged 65 or older received the benefit; (c) how many people living with disabilities received the benefit; and (d) how many Indigenous peoples received the benefit, broken down by identity such as (i) Inuit, (ii) Métis, (iii) First Nation?

(Return tabled)

Question No.2755—Questions Passed as Orders for ReturnsRoutine Proceedings

3:40 p.m.

Conservative

Arnold Viersen Conservative Peace River—Westlock, AB

With regard to temporary resident permits specific to victims of human trafficking, since November 4, 2015: (a) how many applications have been received; (b) how many permits have been issued; (c) how many permits were denied; (d) what is the breakdown of (a) to (c) by (i) year, (ii) month, (iii) gender, (iv) source country; (e) for permits in (b), what is the breakdown based on ministerial instructions 1(1), 1(2) and 2; and (f) what is the average wait time for an individual who applies for a temporary resident permit specific to victims of human trafficking?

(Return tabled)

Question No.2758—Questions Passed as Orders for ReturnsRoutine Proceedings

3:40 p.m.

Conservative

Cheryl Gallant Conservative Renfrew—Nipissing—Pembroke, ON

With regard to the Climate Action Incentive Payment or the Canada Carbon Rebate, broken down by province or territory and by fiscal year, since the introduction of the carbon tax: (a) how many individual tax filers opted in to receive the rural supplement; and (b) how many individual tax filers were eligible to receive the rural supplement?

(Return tabled)

Question No.2759—Questions Passed as Orders for ReturnsRoutine Proceedings

September 16th, 2024 / 3:40 p.m.

Conservative

Rosemarie Falk Conservative Battlefords—Lloydminster, SK

With regard to government involvement, including the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation, in the creation of rental housing in Canada, including through both direct investments and bilateral agreements, between February 6, 2006, and November 4, 2015: how many new units were (i) built, (ii) developed, as a result of federal funding?

(Return tabled)

Question No.2761—Questions Passed as Orders for ReturnsRoutine Proceedings

3:40 p.m.

Conservative

Tom Kmiec Conservative Calgary Shepard, AB

With regard to Immigration and Refugee Board hearings on refugee claims, in 2023: (a) for accepted written hearings, (i) what is the total number of persons on all applications, (ii) what is the amount of applications that had one person's name attached, (iii) what is the amount of applications that had more than one person's name attached, (iv) what is the amount of applications that had a marital partner's name attached, (v) what is the amount of applications that had one or more children's names attached, (vi) what is the amount of applications that had a dependent other than a marital spouse or a child attached, (vii) what is the total amount of persons' names on all applications; (b) of the total amount of persons' names accepted through written hearings, (i) what is the number broken down by country of origin, (ii) what is the amount of people for each age, broken down by age from 0 to 100 years old, (iii) what is the amount of people broken down by gender, (iv) what is the amount of people showing English language proficiency, (v) what is the amount of people showing French language proficiency, (vi) what is the amount of people showing both English and French language proficiency?

(Return tabled)

Question No.2763—Questions Passed as Orders for ReturnsRoutine Proceedings

3:40 p.m.

Conservative

Jamie Schmale Conservative Haliburton—Kawartha Lakes—Brock, ON

With regard to performance audits or similar types of assessments related to passport processing times, which were ongoing or have been conducted since May 1, 2022: what are the details of each audit or assessment, including, for each, the (i) start and end dates of the time period audited or assessed, (ii) summary and scope of the audit or assessment, (iii) findings, (iv) recommended changes to improve processing times, if applicable, (v) changes that were implemented, (vi) entity responsible for conducting the audit or assessment?