House of Commons Hansard #339 of the 44th Parliament, 1st session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.) The word of the day was survivors.

Topics

line drawing of robot

This summary is computer-generated. Usually it’s accurate, but every now and then it’ll contain inaccuracies or total fabrications.

Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities Members debate a committee report recognizing Canada's housing crisis and need for urgent action to end homelessness. Conservatives blame the Liberal government for worsening conditions and propose tying infrastructure funding to housing builds. Liberals defend their investments, blaming previous Conservative inaction. Bloc members advocate for federal transfers to Quebec/provinces without conditions and prioritizing social housing. NDP members critique both parties' records and call for increased co-op housing and support for non-profits. 23700 words, 3 hours in 2 segments: 1 2.

Petitions

Military Justice System Modernization Act Second reading of Bill C-66. The bill seeks to modernize the military justice system, primarily by giving civilian courts exclusive jurisdiction over criminal sexual offences committed in Canada, implementing recommendations from Justice Arbour and Fish reports. Members debate the bill's scope, _government delays_ in addressing military sexual misconduct, the need for culture change, and ensuring _survivor voices are heard_ during committee study. Concerns are raised about _civilian court capacity_ and potential ministerial interference. 18500 words, 2 hours in 2 segments: 1 2.

Statements by Members

Question Period

The Conservatives criticize the "costly coalition" of the Liberals and NDP, accusing the NDP leader selling out Canadians for his pension and voting for the carbon tax 24 times. They also attack the Bloc Québécois supporting the Liberals, calling them the "Liberal Bloc". They demand a "carbon tax election" so Canadians can choose, and raise concerns about "carbon tax Carney".
The Liberals defend their record on social programs like dental care, child care, and seniors' benefits, while criticizing Conservative cuts. They also defend the price on pollution as benefiting families and the environment, and highlight efforts on energy affordability.
The Bloc demands the Liberals increase Old Age Security for seniors aged 65-74 to end age discrimination. They also criticize the handling of asylum seekers, accusing the Liberals of having no plan and other provinces of not sharing the load.
The NDP voice concerns about health care privatization and worker shortages, criticizing the focus on "elites" instead of working Canadians. They highlight the indigenous housing crisis and demand mental health resources, while also objecting to insults and offensive language in the House.

Alleged Failure of Government to Produce Documents Conservative MP Andrew Scheer argues the Liberal government is in contempt of Parliament for failing to provide unredacted documents on Sustainable Development Technology Canada by a House deadline, refuting Liberal claims about the order's jurisdiction, redactions, and process for challenging the order's validity or addressing non-compliance. 3500 words.

Foreign Interference and Alleged Reputational Harm to Members of Parliament Andrew Scheer discusses foreign interference findings in the NSICOP report, criticizing the Liberal government's alleged inaction on briefing MPs and calling for parliamentarians who allegedly aided foreign powers to be named. 700 words.

National Framework for a Guaranteed Livable Basic Income Act Second reading of Bill C-223. The bill proposes a national framework for a guaranteed livable basic income. Supporters argue it is needed to combat poverty and inequality and should be studied. Opponents raise concerns about cost, provincial jurisdiction, work disincentives, and prefer targeted aid. 8400 words, 1 hour.

Adjournment Debates

Federal carbon tax effects Tracy Gray argues the carbon tax increases costs for Canadians, while Adam van Koeverden defends it as effective and beneficial, noting British Columbia's success with carbon pricing and that most Canadians receive more back through rebates. Gray insists Canadians can't afford the tax, while van Koeverden accuses Conservatives of misrepresenting food bank positions.
Canada, Israel, and Iran Kevin Vuong asks if the government will condemn Iran's attacks on Israel and support Israel's right to defend itself, now that the Liberals are less reliant on the NDP. Adam van Koeverden restates Canada's condemnation of the attacks, reaffirms commitment to a two-state solution, and emphasizes the need for peace.
Funding for Indigenous Languages Gord Johns says the government is cutting funding for First Nations language programs in British Columbia. Adam van Koeverden says the government is committed to supporting Indigenous languages, and points to the Indigenous Languages Act and a funding agreement with the First Peoples' Cultural Council. Johns argues the current funding is inadequate.
Was this summary helpful and accurate?

Carbon PricingOral Questions

2:35 p.m.

Conservative

Andrew Scheer Conservative Regina—Qu'Appelle, SK

Mr. Speaker, Canadian seniors are cutting back because of the government's cost of living crisis. They are cutting back on food and home heating because of the carbon tax and inflation that the government caused.

Let us go back to the NDP leader. He had a really dramatic show this summer in which he pretended to rip up the agreement. However, he would never commit to actually voting non-confidence and giving Canadians the carbon tax election they so desperately want. It was all just a show.

My question is simple. During all those meetings between the Prime Minister and the leader of the NDP, was the Prime Minister just giving him acting lessons?

Carbon PricingOral Questions

2:35 p.m.

Gatineau Québec

Liberal

Steven MacKinnon LiberalMinister of Labour and Seniors

Mr. Speaker, it is very interesting to hear my friend from Regina—Qu'Appelle, who was around in those days. In fact, he was sitting right where you are sitting, Mr. Speaker, when Prime Minister Harper went to, yes, Davos. As a reminder for some members in the back, that is the World Economic Forum. He went there to do what? He went there to tell Canadian seniors that their retirement age was moving to 67 from 65.

How dare the member for Regina—Qu'Appelle stand in the House and talk to us about pensions?

Carbon PricingOral Questions

September 19th, 2024 / 2:35 p.m.

Conservative

Tracy Gray Conservative Kelowna—Lake Country, BC

Mr. Speaker, after nine years under the NDP-Liberals, taxes are up, costs are up, crime is up and time is up. The Liberals and the NDP believe in quadrupling the carbon taxes to 61¢ a litre. This is at a time when two million Canadians a month are going to food banks, seniors are turning down their heat and people are living in RVs at truck stops. Canadians cannot afford this costly coalition.

When will Canadians have a carbon tax election so they can decide between the costly NDP-Liberal coalition and common-sense Conservatives?

Carbon PricingOral Questions

2:35 p.m.

North Vancouver B.C.

Liberal

Jonathan Wilkinson LiberalMinister of Energy and Natural Resources

Mr. Speaker, it would be nice if people actually used facts in the House. At the end of the day, a price on pollution is actually an affordability mechanism. To get rid of the carbon rebate would actually make people who live on modest incomes poorer. At the same time, it would imperil the future of our children, abandoning them to a future where we have runaway climate change. It is so ridiculous that, after 300 economists have said it and the Leader of the Opposition refuses to talk to any one of them, that Conservatives can get up and make up these fairy tales.

Carbon PricingOral Questions

2:40 p.m.

Conservative

Tracy Gray Conservative Kelowna—Lake Country, BC

Mr. Speaker, it is not a fairy tale that people cannot afford to feed themselves in Canada. The NDP leader has voted 24 times for the carbon tax. The NDP members talk a big talk, but they cannot be trusted to do what is best for Canadian families. The NDP-Liberals tax people's food, punish their work, take their money, double their housing costs and unleash crime and drugs in their communities. Common-sense Conservatives will axe the tax, build the homes, fix the budget and stop the crime. Time is up.

When will we have a carbon tax election so Canadians can choose their future?

Carbon PricingOral Questions

2:40 p.m.

Laurier—Sainte-Marie Québec

Liberal

Steven Guilbeault LiberalMinister of Environment and Climate Change

Mr. Speaker, setting aside the fact that both the Parliamentary Budget Officer and 300 economists have said that eight out of 10 Canadians get more money than they pay in carbon pricing, we have a report today from the independent organization, the Climate Institute, which shows that emissions were down again in Canada in 2023. The report also shows that, without our plan, emissions would be 41% higher. The Conservative Party of Canada has a non-plan. It would be the equivalent, in terms of pollution, of an added 60 million vehicles on our road. That is what we are talking about here.

FinanceOral Questions

2:40 p.m.

Conservative

Eric Melillo Conservative Kenora, ON

Mr. Speaker, after nine years of the NDP-Liberal government, taxes are up, costs are up, crime is up and now time is up. The Liberals have ballooned costs and driven up taxes to the point where people are struggling to feed, heat and house themselves. It is why Canadians deserve a carbon tax election, where they would be able to choose between our common-sense plan to axe the tax or the NDP-Liberal plan to quadruple the tax.

Why is the NDP continuing to sell Canadians out by supporting the Liberal government?

FinanceOral Questions

2:40 p.m.

Kanata—Carleton Ontario

Liberal

Jenna Sudds LiberalMinister of Families

Mr. Speaker, I appreciate the opportunity that the Conservatives have given me to speak about what is up. Do members know what is up? The number of child care spaces available for families across this country is up. In addition, women's participation in the workforce is at an all-time high. Because of our investments in the early childhood educator workforce, we have also seen that wages have gone up for this workforce. One more thing is that the Canada child benefit was raised in the summer, going up.

FinanceOral Questions

2:40 p.m.

Conservative

Eric Melillo Conservative Kenora, ON

Mr. Speaker, that is cold comfort to the people struggling to fill their gas tanks, put food on the table and afford simple basic necessities. We know the NDP members will only pretend to stand up for Canadians if they can be assured that they have the backing of the Bloc to keep this tired and corrupt government in power. In fact, 24 times the NDP voted in favour of the carbon tax while Canadians struggled just to get by. Once again, this is why we need a carbon tax election: so that Canadians can choose between our plan and the NDP-Liberal plan.

Why are they so afraid to give Canadians a choice at the ballot box?

FinanceOral Questions

2:40 p.m.

The Speaker Greg Fergus

Some voices are more distinct than others. The hon. member knows whom I mean. I just remind all members to keep their voices down unless they are recognized.

The hon. member for Shefford.

SeniorsOral Questions

2:40 p.m.

Bloc

Andréanne Larouche Bloc Shefford, QC

Mr. Speaker, let us not forget that seniors are watching us. They have had it with evasive answers. It is time for decisions.

All year, I have been meeting with seniors throughout Quebec, and they are unanimous. The Liberals have to increase old age security for people aged 65 to 74, just like they did for people 75 and older. It is urgent. There is no justification for creating two classes of seniors.

Will the Liberals end this by raising old age security by 10% starting at age 65?

SeniorsOral Questions

2:40 p.m.

Gatineau Québec

Liberal

Steven MacKinnon LiberalMinister of Labour and Seniors

Mr. Speaker, I know that it is painful. I know that they do not like to hear this, but actions and votes have consequences. The Bloc Québécois voted against the national dental care program that is currently under way in the member's riding. I recently had the pleasure of visiting Bromont in the Eastern Townships with my colleague. I met one of her constituents, who is one of the 14,000 people in that riding who are currently receiving dental care. She expressed her thanks.

My colleague voted against that.

SeniorsOral Questions

2:45 p.m.

Bloc

Andréanne Larouche Bloc Shefford, QC

Mr. Speaker, the Liberals have a choice: Either they put an end to the two classes of seniors that they created or they go to the polls to keep those two classes of seniors.

The Bloc Québécois has made its choice. We choose the side of all seniors, the side of equity and justice. It is time for the Liberals to make a choice. They can choose to do away with age discrimination or they can choose to promote this unjustifiable discrimination.

What will it be?

SeniorsOral Questions

2:45 p.m.

Gatineau Québec

Liberal

Steven MacKinnon LiberalMinister of Labour and Seniors

Mr. Speaker, once again, the member is raising the spectre of an unnecessary election instead of taking concrete action, like voting to help Quebec seniors, which is something she has not done since she arrived here. She voted against increasing the guaranteed income supplement. She voted against the dental care plan that 14,000 people in her own riding have signed up for. Still, the member claims to speak on behalf of seniors.

The government that is getting things done for our seniors is a Liberal government.

SeniorsOral Questions

2:45 p.m.

Some hon. members

Oh, oh!

SeniorsOral Questions

2:45 p.m.

The Speaker Greg Fergus

Once again, loud voices are being heard. I know the member knows who I mean. I therefore ask members not to speak until they are recognized by the Chair.

The hon. member for Jonquière.

SeniorsOral Questions

2:45 p.m.

Bloc

Mario Simard Bloc Jonquière, QC

Mr. Speaker, not only are the Liberals discriminating against seniors, but they are even going so far as to cut funding to the organizations that support them. For months, they have been depriving community organizations of funding from the age well at home initiative because they refuse to come to an agreement with Quebec. This is yet another cynical attempt to encroach upon Quebec's jurisdictions at the expense of seniors.

Quebec's intergovernmental affairs minister said, “That is disgusting”. Those are his words, not mine.

When will the Liberals come to an agreement with Quebec and stop holding seniors hostage?

SeniorsOral Questions

2:45 p.m.

Gatineau Québec

Liberal

Steven MacKinnon LiberalMinister of Labour and Seniors

Mr. Speaker, we do in fact have a very important pilot project that is helping seniors live well in their own homes. We are receiving some excellent projects, including one from the Centre communautaire l'entraide plus de Chambly. We have another project called Ancrage. Thanks to a growing pool of volunteers, this project proposes to expand and add more assisted living services for vulnerable low-income seniors in mostly rural areas.

That is where the Government of Quebec is blocking things. What my colleague should do is talk to the Government of Quebec to get the money flowing.

Carbon PricingOral Questions

2:45 p.m.

Conservative

Warren Steinley Conservative Regina—Lewvan, SK

Mr. Speaker, after nine years of this costly coalition, taxes are up, costs are up, crime is up and time is up. The NDP-Liberal government's reckless policies have forced two million people to food banks. Its destructive carbon tax has made it almost impossible for farmers to make affordable food to put on the tables of Canadians.

Canadians want and deserve a carbon tax election. They can decide between the costly coalition and a common-sense Conservative government that will axe the tax, build the homes, fix the budget and stop the crime.

When will the lame-duck Prime Minister call a carbon tax election so that Canadians can have their say?

Carbon PricingOral Questions

2:45 p.m.

The Speaker Greg Fergus

I will remind members to be careful about making comments about specific members of Parliament.

The hon. Minister of Justice and Attorney General.

Carbon PricingOral Questions

2:45 p.m.

Parkdale—High Park Ontario

Liberal

Arif Virani LiberalMinister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada

Mr. Speaker, let us review the facts about the carbon price for a moment. The carbon price reduces pollution and puts money back into the pockets of Canadians. In fact, eight out of 10 families receive more money back than they pay with an increasing price on pollution. It is the single best market mechanism known to reduce carbon footprints. We used to have a lot of parties in this chamber supporting that price. Unfortunately, we have seen a flip by virtue of the leader of the NDP's position. What that does is it signals voter cynicism. However, it also signals to progressives, including those in my riding of Parkdale—High Park, that if we want a party that is going to fight against climate change, our only choice is the Liberal Party of Canada.

Carbon PricingOral Questions

2:50 p.m.

Conservative

Warren Steinley Conservative Regina—Lewvan, SK

Mr. Speaker, when a single mother is deciding whether to put milk in the fridge or gas in the car for their children, that answer is going to give them no comfort this winter. The NDP has sold out Canadians, and for what? It is time to know the truth.

Will the NDP stand with Canadians and make sure there is the carbon tax election that they want? Otherwise, is it true that the leader of the NDP cares more about his pension than what Canadians want?

Carbon PricingOral Questions

2:50 p.m.

The Speaker Greg Fergus

The hon. member for Dauphin—Swan River—Neepawa.

Carbon PricingOral Questions

2:50 p.m.

Conservative

Dan Mazier Conservative Dauphin—Swan River—Neepawa, MB

Mr. Speaker, after nine years of the NDP-Liberals, taxes are up, costs are up, crime is up and time is up, but instead of fighting for Canadians, the NDP leader sold out workers by voting to increase the carbon tax to 61¢ a litre. In fact, he voted for the carbon tax 24 times. We know that the NDP leader is keeping the Prime Minister in power to secure his own pension.

Will the Prime Minister listen to Canadians and call a carbon tax election?

Carbon PricingOral Questions

2:50 p.m.

The Speaker Greg Fergus

I am trying to provide members with as much leeway as possible, knowing that some questions come around and end up being relevant to the administration of government. This is an important time for us to seek accountability from the government. It is important, then, to ask questions that are germane to the administration of the government as opposed to questions that are better directed in a private conversation or in a public declaration, not at question period, because it is not relevant to the administration of government.

The hon. member from Vancouver Kingsway.