House of Commons Hansard #70 of the 45th Parliament, 1st session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.) The word of the day was mou.

Topics

line drawing of robot

This summary is computer-generated. Usually it’s accurate, but every now and then it’ll contain inaccuracies or total fabrications.

Petitions

Opposition Motion—Pipeline Construction Members debate a Conservative motion supporting a new oil pipeline from Alberta to the British Columbia coast for export to Asian markets, alongside an adjustment to the Oil Tanker Moratorium Act. Conservatives urge the Liberal government to unblock investment and expedite construction. Liberals support the full Canada-Alberta MOU, which includes environmental and Indigenous consultation conditions. The Bloc Québécois and NDP oppose, citing economic non-viability, climate betrayal, and lack of Indigenous consent. 47800 words, 6 hours in 2 segments: 1 2.

Statements by Members

Question Period

The Conservatives criticize the government's obstruction of pipelines to the Pacific, alleging the Prime Minister flip-flopped on his promises. They heavily blame the industrial carbon tax and inflationary spending for skyrocketing grocery prices and increased food bank usage, urging the Prime Minister to cut these taxes and address the $1,000 annual increase families face.
The Liberals defend their MOU with Alberta as a comprehensive plan including industrial carbon pricing and methane regulations to build a strong, sustainable economy. They assert the carbon price doesn't raise food costs, attributing increases to climate change. They highlight investments in affordability, good jobs, child care, dental care, and infrastructure, aiming for the strongest economy in the G7.
The Bloc criticizes the government's environmental rollback with Alberta and questions the PM on religious exemptions. They focus on dangerous Driver Inc. practices, alleging Liberal lobbying and donations compromise road safety.
The NDP questions the government's inconsistent messaging on pipeline consent and its commitment to climate goals and B.C.'s coast.
The Greens question a Bill C-15 section allowing ministerial exemptions from Canadian law without public oversight.

Supplementary Estimates (B), 2025-26 First reading of Bill C-17. The bill grants sums of money to His Majesty for federal public administration for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2026, and is passed through all stages of the House. 100 words.

Ukrainian Heritage Month Act Second reading of Bill S-210. The bill proposes to designate September as Ukrainian Heritage Month in Canada to recognize the contributions of Ukrainian Canadians to the country's economic, political, cultural, and social life. Members from various parties support the bill, emphasizing the importance of celebrating Ukrainian heritage, especially given the ongoing conflict in Ukraine, and to educate Canadians about Ukrainian culture and history. 7800 words, 1 hour.

Adjournment Debates

Executive bonuses and deficits Mike Lake questions the Liberal government's decision to award bonuses to Via Rail and CMHC executives amid high deficits, citing broken promises. Kevin Lamoureux defends the government, pointing to Canada's high ranking in quality of life and arguing that Conservative governments also awarded bonuses. Lake says his questions were fair, not "potshots."
Prime Minister's offshore tax havens Michael Cooper accuses the Prime Minister of being a hypocrite and a tax dodger for his involvement with Brookfield's use of offshore tax havens. Kevin Lamoureux defends the Prime Minister, arguing that he meets all ethical requirements and that the Conservative Party is engaging in character assassination.
Corporate Profits and Affordability Gord Johns accuses corporations of price gouging, citing record profits for large companies. Kevin Lamoureux defends the government's actions, mentioning tax cuts and initiatives like pharmacare. Johns dismisses Lamoureux's explanations. Lamoureux insists that the government advocates for consumers via measures like Competition Act amendments.
Was this summary helpful and accurate?

Official LanguagesRoutine Proceedings

10 a.m.

Brampton—Chinguacousy Park Ontario

Liberal

Shafqat Ali LiberalPresident of the Treasury Board

Mr. Speaker, pursuant to Standing Order 32(2) of the House of Commons and subsection 85(1) of the Official Languages Act, I have the honour to table, in both official languages, the draft of the proposed regulations for advancing the equality of status and use of English and French. Pursuant to Standing Order 32(5), the proposed regulation should be referred to the Standing Committee on Official Languages.

Mr. Speaker, pursuant to Standing Order 32(2) of the House of Commons and section 48 of the Official Languages Act, I have the honour to table, in both official languages, the 2023–24 “Annual Report on Official Languages”. Pursuant to Standing Order 32(5), the report should be referred to the Standing Committee on Official Languages.

Building a Green Prairie Economy ActRoutine Proceedings

10 a.m.

Edmonton Centre Alberta

Liberal

Eleanor Olszewski LiberalMinister of Emergency Management and Community Resilience and Minister responsible for Prairies Economic Development Canada

Mr. Speaker, pursuant to Standing Order 32(2) I have the honour to table, in both official languages, the first progress report on the Building a Green Prairie Economy Act. This report is part of the legacy of the late Hon. Jim Carr, who sponsored the Building a Green Prairie Economy Act, which is the foundation for the framework.

Victims of CrimeRoutine Proceedings

10 a.m.

Central Nova Nova Scotia

Liberal

Sean Fraser LiberalMinister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada and Minister responsible for the Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency

Mr. Speaker, pursuant to Standing Order 32(2) I have the honour of tabling, in both official languages, the 2023-2024 annual report from the office of the federal ombudsperson for victims of crime.

Bill C-16 Protecting Victims ActRoutine Proceedings

10 a.m.

Central Nova Nova Scotia

Liberal

Sean Fraser LiberalMinister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada

Status of WomenCommittees of the HouseRoutine Proceedings

10 a.m.

Conservative

Marilyn Gladu Conservative Sarnia—Lambton—Bkejwanong, ON

Mr. Speaker, I have the honour to present, in both official languages, the second report of the Standing Committee on the Status of Women, entitled “Gender-Based Violence and Femicides in Canada”. Pursuant to Standing Order 109, the committee requests that the government table a comprehensive response to this report.

Femicides are up; a woman in Canada dies every other day. We do need to address this national crisis, and the recommendations would go a long way to helping that.

Agriculture and Agri-FoodCommittees of the HouseRoutine Proceedings

10:05 a.m.

Liberal

Michael Coteau Liberal Scarborough—Woburn, ON

Mr. Speaker, I have the distinct honour to present, in both official languages, the first report of the Standing Committee on Agriculture and Agri-Food, entitled “Unleashing the Potential of the Canadian Agriculture and Agri-Food Sector through Regulatory Reform”. Pursuant to Standing Order 109, the committee requests that the government table a comprehensive response to this report.

We know that agriculture is one of the most important sectors here in Canada, and we have to keep looking for ways to support farmers and the sector to build it so it continues to add to economic growth.

National Fire AdministrationPetitionsRoutine Proceedings

10:05 a.m.

NDP

Gord Johns NDP Courtenay—Alberni, BC

Mr. Speaker, it is an honour today to table petition e-6745, which was signed by 747 Canadians.

Petitioners cite that Canada has around 3,200 fire departments, of which approximately 80% rely solely on volunteer firefighters; that the scale and complexity of events Canadian fire services are expected to respond to have increased dramatically in recent years, and that trend is anticipated to continue; that all levels of government in Canada are involved in aspects of fire and emergency management; that collaboration and strategic coordination are necessary to prepare for major emergencies and ensure efficient use of resources; and that there is a need to integrate a fire and emergency management perspective into policy and into decision-making for other issues, including but not limited to housing, green technology, transportation, tariffs, first responder mental health, and defence.

The petitioners call on the government to support motion M-12 to create an office of the national fire administration or a fire liaison. This is supported by the Canadian Association of Fire Chiefs. I hope all members will support the petition.

Scallop FisheryPetitionsRoutine Proceedings

10:05 a.m.

Conservative

Clifford Small Conservative Central Newfoundland, NL

Mr. Speaker, I rise today to present a petition on behalf of constituents of mine in the Coast of Bays area who signed it. They want to be able to use mechanical scallop haulers. There is discrimination against elderly people and against people who have disabilities and other physical constraints. Rakes, with scallops and rocks, are very heavy to haul up, and this presents a safety danger.

In addition, the petition calls for commercial harvesters to be allowed to fish scallops recreationally.

FirearmsPetitionsRoutine Proceedings

10:05 a.m.

Conservative

Brad Vis Conservative Mission—Matsqui—Abbotsford, BC

Mr. Speaker, today I rise to present three petitions.

The first is on behalf of residents in Mission—Matsqui—Abbotsford regarding the gun confiscation program that will cost Canadian taxpayers hundreds of millions of dollars. They feel it unfairly targets law-abiding firearms owners, and the petitioners note the Parliamentary Budget Officer estimates the cost to compensate firearm owners alone will exceed $750 million. Even the public safety minister, petitioners mention, has serious doubts as to the effectiveness and validity of the program.

The residents call upon the Government of Canada to rescind the program and to prioritize public safety with change to our bail laws.

Safe Consumption SitePetitionsRoutine Proceedings

10:05 a.m.

Conservative

Brad Vis Conservative Mission—Matsqui—Abbotsford, BC

Mr. Speaker, the second petition I would like to present is on behalf angered parents who are again calling upon the Government of Canada to enforce its agreement with British Columbia and not allow for a safe consumption site across the street from a school track. Parents are calling for the Government of Canada to cease all funding to BC Housing until it comes to its senses and finds a more suitable location for supportive housing.

Public SafetyPetitionsRoutine Proceedings

10:05 a.m.

Conservative

Brad Vis Conservative Mission—Matsqui—Abbotsford, BC

Mr. Speaker, third, I would like to present a petition today on extortion.

Petitioners are concerned about daylight shootings, murders and violence, which underscore a broader public safety issue. The residents are calling upon the Government of Canada to reinforce the process of public reporting so Canadians can clearly see how federal, provincial and local governments are working together to prevent further increases in violent organized crime.

Petitioners raise this in honour of Darshan Sahsi, who was murdered outside his home in my riding.

Religious FreedomPetitionsRoutine Proceedings

10:10 a.m.

Conservative

Andrew Lawton Conservative Elgin—St. Thomas—London South, ON

Mr. Speaker, it is a great honour to present a petition on behalf of Canadians alarmed that Liberal-Bloc amendments to Bill C-9 would be used to criminalize passages of the Bible, the Quran, the Torah and other sacred texts. A lot of this concern emanates from the fact that the man who is now the Minister of Canadian Identity and Culture said that prosecutors should be able to “press charges” for people citing scripture the government finds objectionable.

The petitioners believe that the state has no place in religious texts or teachings of any faith community and that the House must stand firm and protect freedom of expression and freedom of religion. Petitioners call on the Liberal government to protect these fundamental freedoms and reject any incursions on them in Bill C-9 or any other legislation.

Natural Health ProductsPetitionsRoutine Proceedings

10:10 a.m.

Conservative

Cathay Wagantall Conservative Yorkton—Melville, SK

Mr. Speaker, I am standing today on behalf of people who are calling for freedom of choice in health care, which is becoming increasingly curtailed and further threatened by legislation and statutory regulations of the Government of Canada.

It is a fundamental right of individuals to be able to choose how to prevent illness or how to address illness or injury in their own body. Canadians want the freedom to decide how they will prevent illness and how they will address that illness or injury in their own body. They are competent and able to make their own health care decisions without state interference.

Therefore petitioners call upon the government to guarantee the right of every Canadian to health freedom by enacting the charter of health freedom, drafted by the Natural Health Product Protection Association on September 4, 2008.

Registered Disability Savings PlanPetitionsRoutine Proceedings

10:10 a.m.

Liberal

Bardish Chagger Liberal Waterloo, ON

Mr. Speaker, petitioners raise an issue of equity and dignity, as well as of basic autonomy, for people with disabilities and their families.

The RDSP is meant to secure a person's long-term financial future, yet petitioners raise that the current rules create unnecessary barriers that prevent many people from even opening a plan. When qualifying members lose their ability to act after 2026, and when only a narrow set of relatives are permitted, people will be left without support and could be forced into costly and intrusive legal processes that undermine their rights and independence.

Petitioners calls on Parliament to extend and expand access so trusted supporters chosen by the individual can assist without delay, and to ensure that these practices are consistent across Canada.

At its core, the petition, initiated by Amy Ross and Sue Simpson from the riding of Waterloo, is about respecting people's self-determination and ensuring that no one is denied financial security because of outdated rules.

Public SafetyPetitionsRoutine Proceedings

10:10 a.m.

Conservative

Sukhman Gill Conservative Abbotsford—South Langley, BC

Mr. Speaker, it is an honour to rise today on behalf of residents of Abbotsford—South Langley who are deeply concerned about the increasing prevalence of organized crime, extortion and intimidation in our community of Abbotsford. Recent daylight shootings, homicides and other violent incidents underscore a broader systemic public safety crisis within our country.

The petitioners mourn the death of Darshan Singh Sahsi.

Residents call upon the Government of Canada to reinforce the process of public reporting so Canadians can clearly see how the federal, municipal and provincial governments work together to further prevent increases in violent and organized crime.

Questions on the Order PaperRoutine Proceedings

10:10 a.m.

Winnipeg North Manitoba

Liberal

Kevin Lamoureux LiberalParliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons

Mr. Speaker, I would ask that all questions be allowed to stand.

Questions on the Order PaperRoutine Proceedings

10:10 a.m.

The Speaker Francis Scarpaleggia

Is it agreed?

Questions on the Order PaperRoutine Proceedings

10:10 a.m.

Some hon. members

Agreed.

Questions on the Order PaperRoutine Proceedings

10:10 a.m.

The Speaker Francis Scarpaleggia

[For text of questions and responses, see Written Questions website]

Opposition Motion—Pipeline ConstructionBusiness of SupplyGovernment Orders

10:10 a.m.

Conservative

Tim Uppal Conservative Edmonton Gateway, AB

moved:

That the House:

(a) take note of the Memorandum of Understanding between Canada and Alberta of November 27, 2025; and

(b) support the construction of one or more pipelines enabling the export of at least one million barrels a day of low-emission Alberta bitumen from a strategic deep­water port on the British Columbia coast to reach Asian markets, including through an appropriate adjustment to the Oil Tanker Moratorium Act, while respecting the duty to consult Indigenous peoples.

Opposition Motion—Pipeline ConstructionBusiness of SupplyGovernment Orders

10:10 a.m.

The Speaker Francis Scarpaleggia

Since today is the final allotted day for the supply period ending December 10, 2025, the House will go through the usual procedures to consider and dispose of the supply bill. Do hon. member agree that the bill be distributed now?

Opposition Motion—Pipeline ConstructionBusiness of SupplyGovernment Orders

10:10 a.m.

Some hon. members

Agreed.

Opposition Motion—Pipeline ConstructionBusiness of SupplyGovernment Orders

10:15 a.m.

Conservative

Tim Uppal Conservative Edmonton Gateway, AB

Mr. Speaker, I will be splitting my time with the great member for Skeena—Bulkley Valley.

Today, the House of Commons will debate and vote on a Conservative motion calling for a new oil pipeline to the Pacific coast, overriding the tanker ban on shipping bitumen to Asia.

Just eight months ago, the Prime Minister told Canadians that his government would build things previously thought impossible at speeds we have not seen in generations, and that he would build Canada into an energy superpower. When announcing his memorandum of understanding with Alberta, he said, “At the core of the agreement, of course, is a priority to have a pipeline to Asia. That is going to make Canada stronger, more independent, more resilient, more sustainable”. The language in today's motion comes directly from the Prime Minister's own MOU with Alberta. It states:

That the House:

(a) take note of the Memorandum of Understanding between Canada and Alberta of November 27, 2025; and

(b) support the construction of one or more pipelines enabling the export of at least one million barrels a day of low-emission Alberta bitumen from a strategic deepwater port on the British Columbia coast to reach Asian markets, including through an appropriate adjustment to the Oil Tanker Moratorium Act, while respecting the duty to consult Indigenous peoples.

Canadians cannot afford any more delays. A pipeline to the Pacific coast, shipping a million barrels of oil a day to Asia at world prices, would mean stronger take-home pay for Canadians and a resilient, self-reliant economy. A pipeline is what Canada needs now, not more broken Liberal promises and not more bait-and-switch tactics from the government, yet the government continues to stall and stand in the way of this pipeline.

The government promised one thing to Alberta and another thing to British Columbia. Even its own Liberal caucus is divided. Some Liberal MPs insist that a pipeline must have B.C.'s consent and, specifically, that it must have the consent of the Premier of British Columbia. They say that without it, there will be no pipeline.

The constitutional reality is that British Columbia does not have a veto over an interprovincial pipeline. Only the federal government has that authority. That is a good thing, because the B.C. NDP premier has been clear that he is against a pipeline, saying, “it will never be built”.

Conservatives brought forward this motion today because the Prime Minister's MOU does not promise that a pipeline will be built. Instead, it only commits that seven months from now, a proposal will be referred to a federal office for two more years of study, while the B.C. premier will still effectively have a veto on this pipeline.

Why, then, do the Liberals refuse to assert federal jurisdiction, choosing instead to allow political obstruction to continue while Canadians struggle to pay their bills? Energy workers deserve better. Families deserve better. Canada deserves better. The Liberals need to do just one thing for a pipeline to happen: Get out of the way. That means repealing the industrial carbon tax, granting a permit for a pipeline and unblocking the billions of dollars in private sector energy investment that is ready to build.

For an entire decade, the government has treated Canada's energy workers and energy-producing regions not as a national strength, but as a problem to be solved. It has blocked pipelines, cancelled projects, imposed punishing regulations and created a climate of uncertainty that has driven investment out of this country at record speed.

It is no wonder that Canadians no longer trust the Liberals' promises and announcements, which so rarely result in anything. For 10 years, their policies have not just harmed the energy sector; they have hurt everyday Canadians who rely on affordable fuel, good jobs and a strong economy to support their families. Across the country, people are working harder, paying more and getting less. Groceries, housing and basic essentials keep rising in price, while paycheques stretch thinner and thinner. Monthly food bank visits keep smashing records, and people who once donated to their community food banks are now lining up for help for their families.

When investment flees Canada, workers pay the price. When pipelines are blocked, paycheques shrink. When energy costs rise, the price of groceries, heating and housing rises with them. Good energy jobs that once sustained entire communities are leaving our country, and when that investment leaves, opportunity leaves with it.

For years now, business after business has concluded that Canada is no longer a place where major projects can get approved, built or completed. Even the Prime Minister has admitted that Liberal laws make it impossible to get anything built. From Bill C-69, the “no new pipelines” law, and Bill C-48, the west coast shipping ban, to the oil and gas emissions cap and the punitive industrial carbon tax, these Liberal policies have sent thousands of Canadian jobs straight to the United States.

Canada should be a country of big dreams and big projects. We should be attracting investment, not driving it away, but under the Liberal anti-investment agenda, over $500 billion in private sector investment has vanished. That is not an abstract number. That means thousands of paycheques that never went out, mortgages that became unaffordable and careers that were cut short. Instead of supporting workers and the industries that sustain them, the Liberals have spent a decade blocking major infrastructure, stalling resource projects and creating uncertainty that chases investment to other countries.

Instead of supporting Canada's world-class energy industry, the Liberals have undermined it at every turn. Just this year alone, from May to September, nearly $54 billion of investment left Canada. This is in addition to more than $500 billion lost under Liberal governments. That is money that could have gone to jobs, wages and opportunities for Canadian families.

The energy sector is a major employer, with nearly a million workers, and it contributes to $1 billion in revenue for the government. This is money that should have been building pipelines, supporting workers, strengthening communities and lowering costs for Canadians, not building prosperity in other countries and lining the pockets of dictators around the world.

Liberal policies and energy production caps are projected to reduce oil and gas production by nearly 5%, cut GDP by $20 billion annually and eliminate over 54,000 full-time jobs by 2032, yet the Liberals are still committed to the same anti-growth policies that drove investment away.

Today, the House of Commons has an opportunity to turn things around and give our country a brighter future. Members will vote on our Conservative motion to build a new pipeline to the Pacific coast and ship a million barrels a day to Asia at world prices, not the discount prices we see today. This motion today is about putting more money in the pockets of Canadian workers and raising paycheques across the country. This pipeline from Alberta to the Pacific coast would mean stronger take-home pay, lower long-term energy costs, billions of dollars of private investment and a more self-reliant, secure Canadian economy.

The path forward is straightforward. If the Liberals truly want to build this pipeline, they must do just one thing: Get out of the way. Canada does not need more announcements or studies; Canada needs action, Canada needs jobs and Canada needs lower costs for struggling families. Conservatives will fight for stronger paycheques. We will fight to make energy, food and housing affordable and we will fight to rebuild a self-reliant, secure, sovereign Canadian economy.

It is time to build that pipeline, it is time to restore Canada's economic strength and it is time to bring home Canadian prosperity.

Opposition Motion—Pipeline ConstructionBusiness of SupplyGovernment Orders

10:20 a.m.

Winnipeg North Manitoba

Liberal

Kevin Lamoureux LiberalParliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons

Mr. Speaker, let us be very clear on this point: The Conservative Party, while in government, built zero inches of pipeline to tidewater. That is the reality.

Fast-forward to today. We have the Province of Alberta signing a memorandum of understanding with the federal government that is supported by a number of premiers, and we have the Conservatives cherry-picking to try to sow division among Canadians. I find it distasteful, and so do Canadians.

Will the member and the Conservative Party fully endorse the memorandum of understanding today?

Opposition Motion—Pipeline ConstructionBusiness of SupplyGovernment Orders

10:25 a.m.

Conservative

Tim Uppal Conservative Edmonton Gateway, AB

Mr. Speaker, the real question is, will they support this motion?

The wording from this motion is directly from their MOU with Alberta. The fact of the matter is that they have left a veto in the hands of the Premier of British Columbia. Only the federal government has the full authority, under the Constitution, to build this pipeline and take oil to the Pacific Coast.

We need to have that pipeline built. The federal government can get it done.