The House is on summer break, scheduled to return Sept. 15

House of Commons Hansard #4 of the 45th Parliament, 1st session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.) The word of the day was riding.

Topics

line drawing of robot

This summary is computer-generated. Usually it’s accurate, but every now and then it’ll contain inaccuracies or total fabrications.

Canada Health Act First reading of Bill C-201. The bill amends the Canada Health Act to include community-based mental health, addictions, and substance use services as insured services, aiming to address the disparity between physical and mental health care coverage. 300 words.

Department of Foreign Affairs, Trade and Development Act First reading of Bill C-202. The bill amends the Department of Foreign Affairs, Trade and Development Act to protect the supply management system, aimed at benefiting producers and consumers and supporting regional economies. 100 words.

Resumption of Debate on Address in Reply Members continue debate on the Speech from the Throne, discussing the new government's priorities and opposition concerns. The Prime Minister's plan outlines economic transformation, affordability measures like tax cuts and housing support, strengthening sovereignty, and reducing operating spending growth. Conservatives criticize rising government spending, the absence of a spring budget, and policies on crime and energy, while advocating for lower costs and public safety. Bloc members stress the need to respect provincial jurisdictions and protect supply management. Debate also touches on housing affordability, immigration levels, and the opioid crisis. 56600 words, 8 hours in 2 segments: 1 2.

Statements by Members

Question Period

The Conservatives criticize the government's half-trillion dollar spending bill introduced with no budget, highlighting increased spending on consultants. They raise concerns about the housing crisis, high mortgage payments, energy policies like Bill C-69 and the production cap, and the Prime Minister's financial interests. They also address public safety.
The Liberals highlight measures to make life more affordable, including a tax cut for 22 million Canadians and eliminating GST for first-time homebuyers. They aim to build Canada's economy, the strongest in the G7, address the trade war with the US, and strengthen public safety and border security. They also emphasize the importance of Quebec.
The Bloc criticizes the government's disregard for Quebec's jurisdiction and its environmental assessment powers. They also condemn the Liberals' increased spending without tabling a budget, demanding transparency.
The NDP address the climate crisis, wildfires impacting Indigenous peoples, and their rights and consent on projects.
Was this summary helpful and accurate?

Resumption of Debate on Address in ReplySpeech from the Throne

11:20 a.m.

Conservative

Scot Davidson Conservative New Tecumseth—Gwillimbury, ON

Mr. Speaker, I support all tax cuts, but quite frankly, this tax cut is just not enough. I alluded in my speech to the rural top-up. This is money that my constituents have spent and paid. They are owed this money, and the government has failed to do anything about it. Now my constituents are getting letters from the CRA demanding this money back. We have Order Paper questions to the government on it. People in Toronto Centre, in downtown Toronto, were paid the rural top-up, yet we denied the Chippewas of Georgina Island, in the middle of Lake Simcoe, the rural top-up for the carbon tax.

Resumption of Debate on Address in ReplySpeech from the Throne

11:20 a.m.

Conservative

Doug Shipley Conservative Barrie—Springwater—Oro-Medonte, ON

Mr. Speaker, my colleague and I have ridings that are very similar, and I found what he said very similar to what I was hearing at doors. He mentioned a story about a young gentleman driving truck who could not get out of his parents' basement and was struggling. I heard those stories repeatedly at doors also.

I wonder if the member could tell me how we are going to restore hope now. What are we going to tell people who see what is in place and who are still going to be struggling for the next few years? What is the member telling his constituents with regard to how we can be here and fight for them every day to make sure life becomes more affordable?

Resumption of Debate on Address in ReplySpeech from the Throne

11:20 a.m.

Conservative

Scot Davidson Conservative New Tecumseth—Gwillimbury, ON

Mr. Speaker, what we are going to do as His Majesty's loyal opposition is make the government the best it can be.

As my colleague said, we heard this time and time again at the doors: People are flat broke, and the government continues to spend. If we think of a family now with a leased car, mortgage payments, insurance, cellphone bills and grocery bills, they just cannot do it. We have to make the supposed new Liberal government understand this. It cannot just be a rebranding exercise. Canadians are depending on us to help them.

Resumption of Debate on Address in ReplySpeech from the Throne

11:20 a.m.

Bloc

Maxime Blanchette-Joncas Bloc Rimouski—La Matapédia, QC

Mr. Speaker, I salute my colleague and congratulate him on his re-election.

The Conservative Party prides itself on being the best at cutting spending. One big expense was incurred over the last few days, when the foreign monarch Charles III came for a visit.

I would like my colleague to give me a simple answer. Does he agree with the idea of spending millions of dollars calling in a foreign sovereign to stop the Americans from threatening to annex us?

Resumption of Debate on Address in ReplySpeech from the Throne

11:20 a.m.

Conservative

Scot Davidson Conservative New Tecumseth—Gwillimbury, ON

Mr. Speaker, what a great day it was to see the King. I walked to the Senate; I did not take the bus, and to see the crowd, to see the Canadian flags, I thought he inspired Canadians. This truly is the true north strong and free. It will never be the 51st state. I would invite the King back. I would love to see him again.

Resumption of Debate on Address in ReplySpeech from the Throne

11:20 a.m.

NDP

Gord Johns NDP Courtenay—Alberni, BC

Mr. Speaker, as a rural MP like me, my colleague knows that local governments are responsible for about 60% of infrastructure costs, yet they only collect about 10% of overall revenue. I know this as a former municipal councillor from Tofino.

I will give an example. The Village of Cumberland, in my riding, is dealing with cost overruns due to supply chain inflation, and they see the federal government as a critical partner for accomplishing that infrastructure as the major tax collector. They cannot get flexibility from the federal government when there are cost overruns.

Does my colleague agree that the government needs to create more flexibility and needs to be a stronger partner? We are on the eve of FCM. It is important for municipalities to know.

Resumption of Debate on Address in ReplySpeech from the Throne

11:25 a.m.

Conservative

Scot Davidson Conservative New Tecumseth—Gwillimbury, ON

Mr. Speaker, my hon. colleague cares about the environment. We are going to work on plastics again, and I want to thank him for that.

My comment is on the Liberal housing decelerator fund. Is it decelerator or accelerator? I cannot remember. This is the problem: It does not build houses. We have municipalities that lack infrastructure and have crumbling infrastructure.

Resumption of Debate on Address in ReplySpeech from the Throne

11:25 a.m.

Conservative

Andrew Lawton Conservative Elgin—St. Thomas—London South, ON

Mr. Speaker, it is a tremendous honour to be here to make my first speech in this Parliament, my first speech ever as a member of Parliament. Getting here was, as for all members of Parliament, a challenge. We navigated a very tough campaign. I have to give particular thanks to the people I would not be here without. One of them is in the House today, my wife Jennifer, without whom I would not be the man I am today. I am so tremendously grateful that she has been by my side for this journey. I also want to thank my parents, Jim and Trish, who instilled in me the values of hard work, with the encouragement and motivation to be anything I could be. That is a path that has brought me to where I am today in front of you, Mr. Speaker. I thank all of them.

To the people of Elgin—St. Thomas—London South, I am very aware as I enter this chamber that this seat does not belong to me. It belongs to the people of my riding. I vow and pledge to be a faithful custodian of this seat, however long I have the honour of sitting in it, and to serve and represent my constituents.

One thing I love about my riding is how much of the wide array of Canada is embodied in it. We have rural communities and small towns. We have the fast-growing city of St. Thomas. We have the incredibly vibrant community of London. My riding is home to beachside villages and fisheries. We have small businesses and manufacturing powerhouses. We have 1,400-plus farms, ranging from small family farms that feed the communities around them to large agricultural enterprises whose harvests end up on plates around the world.

The county of Elgin and the riding of Elgin—St. Thomas—London South are a success story, and it is my honour to represent them in this chamber as their member of Parliament. The community is incredibly vibrant. From Rodney to Straffordville, from Port Glasgow to Port Burwell and from Eagle and Iona Station to my beloved Lawton's Corners, my riding is made up of incredible communities filled with incredible people. I get to represent them, everyone, regardless of how they voted, the farmers, the artists, the entrepreneurs, people who have just made Canada their home for the first time and people who helped settle this country and settled the community generations ago.

It is people in these rural and smaller communities in particular who have felt most neglected by the last 10 years of the Liberal government. It was their struggles that motivated me to jump into politics. As a journalist and broadcaster, I could not spend an election with the stakes so high on the sidelines. I had to have a hand in the solutions.

Like most in this chamber, I spent the campaign knocking on doors. I spoke to thousands upon thousands of people in my riding, and I want to share a few of the stories that stood out and that I carry with me today.

One was about a retired teacher from St. Thomas, a woman who said she had voted Liberal every single election in her entire life. I asked her, “Why not now?” and she said, “I just cannot.” Now, a good politician probably would have taken the vote and walked away, but as a journalist I asked one further question: “Why?” She said that her sons are 28 and 30 years old and live with her, and that unless things change, they are never going to be able to move out.

That one conversation I had is so similar to countless more of people whose families could not develop and thrive the way that most Canadians dream, the way that people in my riding dream, because of Liberal government policy, which has made home ownership a fantasy rather than a dream and an aspiration.

There was a business owner in Aylmer in the machining sector who felt the combination of taxes, regulations, red tape and, yes, the carbon tax made it so unaffordable to do business in his own community that he would be better off to just shut down and retire or move to another country, like the United States. That was before the threat of tariffs. We were already on a weakened economic footing because of the last 10 years of the Liberal government.

I met one couple in London that did everything right. They worked, saved what they could and supported their children, but now their landlord is selling the house they rent. They were convinced, with the prices of rent and the unaffordability of a home, that they were going to be homeless. This is not what should happen in a country that has as much to offer as Canada.

These are the stories that stay with me. These are the stories that are etched on my heart as I enter this chamber. These are the stories that motivate the work I seek to do here as a member of Parliament. However, these struggles and these stories did not disappear on election day. These people are still out there. Their struggles are still out there and they deserve action. That is exactly why it is incumbent on us in this House to provide and deliver.

I got into politics to serve these people. I got into politics to serve these constituents. I also got into politics to make Canada a freer place. In the last decade, the Liberals have put freedom in their crosshairs in more ways than I could list in the time I have here.

The Liberals have tried, in their paternalistic fashion, to censor what Canadians see and say online. The Liberals have told parents how to raise their children. They profess to support press freedom while banning independent journalists from even reporting on them, something that is a fundamental charter right in this country.

The Liberals have threatened the charitable status of houses of worship and have at the same time turned a blind eye to rampant vandalism and the arson of churches. For some, turning a blind eye was not enough. They actively or tacitly condoned such actions. This is a party that has imposed Laurentian elite policies on communities that never asked for them and that I can tell members, having gone through this election, do not want them.

I am here to tell the Liberals that their assaults on freedom will not stand. I am putting them on notice right now. I am here because I love my country. Unlike the Prime Minister, who picks whichever passport is most convenient in a given moment, I actually love Canada. Canada is the only country I have ever called home. It is the only country that I have any desire to be a citizen of. It is an honour and a privilege to be a Canadian.

I have always been proud of my country. I have always stood for my country. Unlike Liberals, who wrap themselves in the flag when it is politically convenient, I am not a fair-weather patriot. We will always, on this side of the aisle, stand up for Canada, be proud in our Canadian identity and be proud of our country. This means being proud of the institutions of this place, being proud of our history, being proud of the people who built this country and standing for those who seek to celebrate and preserve Canada. That is what brings me here. That is what I will do as a member of Parliament.

I do not like the fair-weather patriots, those with their new-found celebration of Canadianism, with their flags still creased and wrapped in plastic, practically, as they seek to lecture Canadians on what it means to be an elbows-up Canadian. I will always wave and have always waved the Canadian flag proudly, and I will not stand by while those who were denigrating people for doing that years ago claim to have the moral high ground on what it means to be a Canadian now.

This is a chamber that gives those who sit in it a tremendous honour to be part of the direction this country is going to take. I do not enter into that lightly. I am honoured to be here. I am grateful to my constituents and pledge to serve them and all Canadians. May God bless the work we do in this House and may God bless Canada.

Resumption of Debate on Address in ReplySpeech from the Throne

11:35 a.m.

Liberal

Kevin Lamoureux Liberal Winnipeg North, MB

Mr. Speaker, I appreciate the fact that the member is new, but I still find it somewhat shameful for him to try to imply that members of the Liberal caucus are not strong nationalists, do not feel very proud and do not have a great deal of pride in our country.

In fact, I think Canadians spoke very loud and clear. When it comes to protecting the interests of our nation, they turned to the Liberal Party and the Prime Minister we have today because of the high level of comfort we were able to express in the policy positions that we were taking. Those are the results. Never before has a political entity received as many votes from Canadians as this Prime Minister and this party did in the last election.

I will quote from a mandate letter: “Spending less on government operations so that Canadians can invest more in the people and businesses that will build the strongest economy in the G7.” Does the member not believe that this is a goal worth achieving?

Resumption of Debate on Address in ReplySpeech from the Throne

11:35 a.m.

Conservative

Andrew Lawton Conservative Elgin—St. Thomas—London South, ON

Mr. Speaker, I am actually proud to say I agree with the member that building a strong economy is incredibly important. Where I differ from the member is on whether the Liberal Party, with all the carnage it has unleashed on Canada, is capable of doing that or is committed to doing it.

Resumption of Debate on Address in ReplySpeech from the Throne

11:35 a.m.

Bloc

Rhéal Fortin Bloc Rivière-du-Nord, QC

Mr. Speaker, this is an interesting debate. Yesterday, I heard my leader ask the Prime Minister several questions about the throne speech. I also heard my colleague from Drummond ask, as my leader did yesterday, whether the Liberals or the Conservatives can offer any assurances that the measures resulting from the throne speech will be implemented with proper respect for the jurisdictions of Quebec and the other provinces.

Although I listened to the ensuing procedural arguments, I did not hear an answer. Could we have that answer?

Resumption of Debate on Address in ReplySpeech from the Throne

11:35 a.m.

Conservative

Andrew Lawton Conservative Elgin—St. Thomas—London South, ON

Mr. Speaker, while I would love to be sitting here as a government member of Parliament, I cannot address the member's question in terms of what the government will do, but I can say, and it is a very important point, that the breakdown in federalism in Canada, especially for the last several years, has been a consequence of the Liberal government, in which I do not believe there has been anything but continuity, to get to where we are today. What the government has done to provinces has actually created points of friction that do not need to be there.

I can say that when the Conservatives move over to that side of the aisle, which I hope for the sake of Canada will happen quite soon, we will absolutely respect provincial jurisdiction. More importantly, we will stand up for measures that support what Canada and Canadians deserve.

Resumption of Debate on Address in ReplySpeech from the Throne

11:35 a.m.

Conservative

Kelly McCauley Conservative Edmonton West, AB

Mr. Speaker, let me start by congratulating you on your new role. I hope you will succeed in bringing integrity and decorum back to the position.

I want to read for my colleague a heading in the throne speech from the government: “Building Canada Strong by spending less and investing more”. The government tabled the estimates yesterday with a 30% increase in spending for management consultants, giving an extra $6 billion over last year, which was a record year, for Liberal friends at McKinsey and scoundrels such as those at GC Strategies. I am wondering whether my colleague considers spending $6 billion more, $2,400 per household in Canada, as actually spending less.

Resumption of Debate on Address in ReplySpeech from the Throne

11:35 a.m.

Conservative

Andrew Lawton Conservative Elgin—St. Thomas—London South, ON

Mr. Speaker, I congratulate my hon. colleague on his re-election.

One of the things we put forward during the campaign, as part of the measures we need to take to get our books back in order as a country, was taking aim at the consultants who are getting rich off the taxpayer's back. I have been through a household budget in my own home, and if I ever saw a line item for $2,400 for McKinsey or other consultants, that would be the first thing to go.

I do not know why the government is applying a different standard to every Canadian's books than those Canadians would be providing themselves. I think this speaks to the broader point, which is that, despite the plan of having a plan, and the proclamation that it was going to get things in order, this is not a government that is following through on that, from its very first communication in this Parliament.

Resumption of Debate on Address in ReplySpeech from the Throne

11:40 a.m.

Liberal

Giovanna Mingarelli Liberal Prescott—Russell—Cumberland, ON

Mr. Speaker, I will be sharing my time with the member for Taiaiako'n—Parkdale—High Park.

Since this is my first time speaking in the House of Commons, I would like to take this opportunity to congratulate you on your election to the Chair. I would also like to congratulate all my colleagues here in the House of Commons on being elected. I am proud to join them as a member of Parliament in the 45th Parliament.

Before I begin, I would like to acknowledge that the Parliament buildings are located on the unceded territory of the Algonquin Anishinabe people. My riding of Prescott—Russell—Cumberland is on the traditional territory of the Haudenosaunee, or “People of the Longhouse”.

I have the privilege of rising here today thanks to the trust of more than 39,000 voters in Prescott—Russell—Cumberland. I am deeply grateful to them. I want to assure the House that I will represent all the people in my riding, which covers 3,000 square kilometres, to the best of my ability.

I would to thank my husband, Brandon Lee; my family, including my mother, Jean Anderson; my father, Angelo Mingarelli; my brothers and sisters; my many relatives; volunteers; and campaign team, including the former members of Parliament for Prescott—Russell—Cumberland, Francis Drouin and the Hon. Don Boudria, who have supported me throughout this journey.

I am proud to have made history this election by being the first woman ever elected in federal history in Prescott—Russell—Cumberland in the 75 years of the riding's history. I would like to acknowledge the late Marlene Catterall, a Governor General's award-winning women's rights activist and former member of Parliament for Ottawa West—Nepean. Marlene brought me into politics on Parliament Hill when I was in my teens, as a co-op student. She taught me the importance of always treating people with dignity, respect and kindness. Marlene passed away last year, and the final conversation we had before she died was that I would be running to be the candidate in Prescott—Russell—Cumberland. She was very proud.

Since my time on the Hill, I have had the honour of working with members of Parliament from all stripes on multipartisan issues relating to women's and youth political, economic and social empowerment. For example, I have been very active in the global kindness movement. Canada is consistently ranked as one of the kindest countries in the world. We are in fact the only country to recognize Kindness Week, which is the third week of February, and that is something I think we can all unite around.

With that said, I am delighted to contribute to the debate of this week's throne speech. I must acknowledge what an honour it was to be present during the royal visit of King Charles and Queen Camilla and the reading of the throne speech in the Senate chamber by the King.

I would like to speak to the importance of the sovereignty message the King brought to Canadians this week in the throne speech. It could not have been timelier, given the challenges our country is facing in a world that is more divided and dangerous than any point since the Second World War.

The King reminded Canadians that his late mother, Queen Elizabeth II, opened a new Canadian Parliament in 1957 at a time when the Second World War was still dominant in people's minds and the Cold War was intensifying. Freedom and democracy were under threat then as they are now. Democracy, the rule of law and freedom are values Canadians hold dear and are values our government is determined to protect through these challenging times. These are persistent themes throughout our government's throne speech.

The speech specifically cites the work under way between our Prime Minister and the President of the United States in defining a new economic and security relationship between Canada and the U.S., one that is “rooted in mutual respect and founded on common interests, to deliver transformational benefits for both sovereign nations.” It is a powerful message from the King and one that Canadians welcome in these difficult times.

This message is particularly important for farmers, for steel workers and for the many businesses and families in my riding, Prescott—Russell—Cumberland, that depend on the close economic ties between our two countries to make a living.

Our government is determined to maintain supply management, a system that ensures our country's food security. This is great news for dairy farmers like the Patenaude family and their 450 Holstein cows at the Gillette farm in Embrun, as well as thousands of other dairy and poultry farmers in my riding and across Canada.

Then there are the hundreds of steelworkers at Ivaco Rolling Mills in L'Orignal. Almost 70% of its steel is sold to the United States. People are legitimately concerned about the unfair steel tariffs imposed by the United States. These tariffs have already done a lot of damage to the company, which announced that it is laying off 104 workers. Its employees' livelihood is in jeopardy. Our government will vigorously defend workers and Canadian steel.

We are getting rid of internal trade barriers to create a single Canadian economy out of our 13 provinces and territories. This will make it easier to sell steel and countless other products within Canada. These barriers to trade and labour mobility cost the country up to $200 billion a year. A bill will be introduced to eliminate all federal barriers to internal trade and labour mobility by Canada Day.

Our government is working closely with the provinces, territories and indigenous peoples to develop projects of national importance that will unite the country, strengthen our ties with the world and create well-paying jobs for generations to come.

In the throne speech, the government committed to building a more affordable Canada, because the economy is only truly strong when it serves everyone. The average income in Prescott—Russell—Cumberland is approximately $56,000. Like many Canadians, my constituents are struggling to get ahead. That is why the government is responding by reducing middle-class taxes, which would save two-income families up to $840 a year. It would cut the GST on homes sold at or under $1 million, for first-time homebuyers, delivering savings of up to $50,000. It would lower the GST on homes between $1 million and $1.5 million and provide significant financing to builders of affordable homes.

The government will also protect the programs that are already saving families thousands of dollars every year, such as child care and pharmacare. In addition to these programs, the government has recently expanded the Canadian dental care plan to cover about eight million Canadians, saving the average person more than $800 per year.

As a trilingual Ontarian who speaks English, French and Italian, I am honoured to represent the beautiful riding of Prescott—Russell—Cumberland, which has a proud and diverse cultural heritage. I would like to point out that 60% of my constituents speak French as their mother tongue. In fact, it is the only riding with a francophone majority in the entire province of Ontario.

Protecting our cultural heritage begins with our public institutions and ensuring adequate services in both official languages. I am proud to be part of a government that understands and respects this reality. That is why our government will support CBC/Radio-Canada with an annual increase in funding and will encourage the use of Canada's two official languages by investing in Canada's cultural and creative industries. It is essential for Franco-Ontarians, and for all francophones outside Quebec, to preserve their language and their cultural heritage.

The throne speech presents a vision for Canada that renews a sense of national pride, unity and hope while recognizing our historical foundations as we continue to work towards truth and reconciliation as a country.

I look forward to working with all my colleagues in the House. We will not always agree, but, as our new Speaker said during his speech to the House, it is possible to skilfully and convincingly refute an argument without resorting to personal invective or intimidation. We must work to find the balance between respect and order on the one hand and vigorous debate that clarifies issues on the other. I personally commit to treating every member of the House with dignity, respect and kindness.

Again, I have striven my entire professional career to work across party lines to achieve results. I commit to continuing that work and to doing whatever is required in our shared goal, together, to improve the lives of all Canadians, including every resident of Prescott—Russell—Cumberland.

Resumption of Debate on Address in ReplySpeech from the Throne

11:50 a.m.

Conservative

Brad Vis Conservative Mission—Matsqui—Abbotsford, BC

Mr. Speaker, I congratulate the member for Prescott—Russell—Cumberland on her maiden speech in the House of Commons.

During the election, there was much consensus on the fact that Canada needs to build. We need to build energy infrastructure. We need to build more homes. We need to do a lot more than we have seen in the last 10 years. However, the Liberal candidate in my riding spoke about Liberal ridings' getting more. He said, in fact, that voting Liberal in Mission—Matsqui—Abbotsford would get the riding more federal dollars. I do not believe that is the case.

I would like the member to clarify her vision for the allocation of infrastructure dollars. Should Liberal ridings get more than Conservative ridings, or should decisions be made on a needs-based approach?

Resumption of Debate on Address in ReplySpeech from the Throne

11:50 a.m.

Liberal

Giovanna Mingarelli Liberal Prescott—Russell—Cumberland, ON

Mr. Speaker, I believe that all provinces and communities are treated with equal respect and that the intention is to deliver services as required.

Resumption of Debate on Address in ReplySpeech from the Throne

11:50 a.m.

Bloc

Rhéal Fortin Bloc Rivière-du-Nord, QC

Mr. Speaker, I would like to thank the voters of Rivière-du-Nord for their renewed trust. I assure the House, as I assure my constituents, that I will do what it takes to be worthy of it.

I would also like to congratulate my colleague on her recent election, and you on your election and appointment as Speaker of the House. I am confident that it is a wise appointment.

The throne speech talks about creating a single Canadian economy. I heard my colleague talk about the people of Prescott—Russell—Cumberland. I wonder if these people support the fact that the economic authority of the Government of Ontario might one day come under that of the federal government.

Are her constituents comfortable with this declaration giving the federal government some sort of precedence over their provincial government in Ontario?

Resumption of Debate on Address in ReplySpeech from the Throne

11:50 a.m.

Liberal

Giovanna Mingarelli Liberal Prescott—Russell—Cumberland, ON

Mr. Speaker, I did talk a lot about the importance of a Canadian economy during the campaign, and the voters of Prescott—Russell—Cumberland are convinced that a Liberal government will treat them with respect and protect not only the national economy, but also the local economy of Prescott—Russell—Cumberland.

Resumption of Debate on Address in ReplySpeech from the Throne

11:50 a.m.

Liberal

Sean Casey Liberal Charlottetown, PE

Mr. Speaker, I would like to begin by congratulating you on your much-anticipated ascension to the Speaker's chair. As a former occupant of that lucky seat, as we have talked about many times, it was absolutely bound to happen. It has, and that is a good thing.

This is my first time on my feet in this Parliament. I would also like to thank the good people of Charlottetown for sending me back to Parliament for the fifth time, with the largest majority in the history of the riding.

I would like to congratulate and welcome the member for Prescott—Russell—Cumberland on her maiden speech here in Parliament. I was particularly impressed with how she spoke on a range of topics: supply management, bilingualism, the importance of Radio-Canada and civility.

While I would very much like the member to expand further on that last point, I think it has been broached pretty thoroughly in recent days. Could she talk a bit about the importance of supply management in her riding, its place in the upcoming trade war and the possible resolution of it?

Resumption of Debate on Address in ReplySpeech from the Throne

11:50 a.m.

Liberal

Giovanna Mingarelli Liberal Prescott—Russell—Cumberland, ON

Mr. Speaker, indeed, supply management is very important, especially to the farming community in Prescott—Russell—Cumberland. We have dairy farmers, poultry farmers, egg farmers, etc. They are deeply concerned about supply management because it directly affects their ability to sell their products across Canada.

The Prime Minister has been clear that supply management is off the table in any future negotiations with the United States. In fact, it is such a high priority for me that my first act of business as a member of Parliament, after my swearing-in last Friday, was to visit a dairy farm and meet with all the farmers who supported me in Prescott—Russell—Cumberland, along with our Minister of Agriculture, Minister Heath MacDonald. The farmers were very happy about that. It was a further demonstration of how seriously our government is taking supply management.

Resumption of Debate on Address in ReplySpeech from the Throne

11:55 a.m.

The Speaker Francis Scarpaleggia

Just a reminder before we continue that we cannot refer to members of the House by proper names. It is through the Speaker that we must address other members.

The hon. member for Taiaiako'n—Parkdale—High Park.

Resumption of Debate on Address in ReplySpeech from the Throne

11:55 a.m.

Liberal

Karim Bardeesy Liberal Taiaiako'n—Parkdale—High Park, ON

Mr. Speaker, I am thankful for the opportunity to rise in this House for the first time as the newly elected member for Taiaiako'n—Parkdale—High Park.

We come here representing different regions and communities; having different ethnic, religious or sexual identities; and carrying different ideologies and styles. However, I believe, in this Parliament, we come here for a common purpose: a stronger Canada, a more sovereign Canada and a stronger voice for our constituents in that Canada.

As we all know, we do not get here alone. I would like to thank those who helped put me in this chair, the people's chair: our campaign team, led by Christopher Knipe, James Janeiro and Maha Jawass.

I thank the members of the House who believed in me, even before my team and I did the hard work. Special thanks go to the Minister of Transport and Internal Trade, as well as the members for Fredericton—Oromocto, Toronto—St. Paul's, York South—Weston—Etobicoke and Spadina—Harbourfront.

I thank my family, my wife, my daughter and my son. Their love and support makes all this effort worthwhile, even if it also causes them grief. Most of all, I thank the volunteers and voters. They recognized what was at stake in the election. I will talk about that a little later.

I thank my family, my wife, daughter and son. It is thanks to their love, support and belief in me that I can do this work, work that makes their busy lives busier and takes a toll on them, all of their families and our families. This includes those members of our families who gave us love but are no longer here with us. I thank the volunteers on my campaign, from all parties and no party, and all the constituents of Taiaiako'n—Parkdale—High Park. They saw, with great clarity, what was at stake in this election, that we needed to put new energy, new focus and new determination into this project called Canada, and they responded in record numbers.

I would like to pay tribute to my predecessor, Arif Virani, for his 10 years of service to our riding. Arif was and is a tireless, fierce defender of our community for justice and human rights. He helped make our judicial system more responsive and representative. He championed safer spaces online. His achievements on behalf of the riding and its people are many: making sure there was enough federal funding for Dunn House in Parkdale, the first hospital-led supportive housing initiative in Canada; speaking out against Russian aggression in Ukraine, making sure Canada was there to support Ukraine's cause for freedom; and the cause of self-determination for Tibet. Let us also honour his service in the House and its community here, whether it was for the Canadian Parliamentary Friends of Tibet internship program or the House soccer league. I hope we will continue this work or continue to emulate it in our own ways.

I will tell everyone a bit about Taiaiako'n—Parkdale—High Park. It is small geographically, a little more than four kilometres by four kilometres nestled among railway tracks, the Humber River and Lake Ontario in west Toronto, but it contains multitudes. Taiaiako'n was a Haudenosaunee village on the banks of the Humber River and part of the Toronto Carrying Place trail linking Lake Ontario to the Upper Great Lakes, inhabited from at least 6000 BCE, near what is now Baby Point.

Parkdale was first a village, then a country retreat and, for decades since, a home for waves of people coming from all over the world to find community and opportunity in Toronto. High Park is the site of 57 Iroquois burial mounds, and it is the lungs and beating heart of our community. It is a home to cherry blossoms, baseball leagues and birders and a host to visitors from all around the world.

Many of us came from away, and many had a tough journey, fleeing communist regimes in Poland and Tibet, Ukraine and Vietnam, the Balkans and the Baltics. Immigrants from around the world, people in distress, have discovered our precious little corner of west Toronto to find and build community, to be just a bit freer.

Something very special happened in the last six months in Taiaiako'n—Parkdale—High Park, and perhaps this experience was shared by other members of the House: People of all parties and of no party woke up to the threat to Canada's freedom, and they came together for Canada. It is a different kind of threat to freedom than the member for Elgin—St. Thomas—London South was talking about, because in the threat to freedom, they chose to connect. They chose to build bridges, to bridge divides. They chose, in fact, to consider not just their own interests but the interests of others in their riding, the national interest, because they saw that everyone's freedom was on the line. They saw what the Prime Minister described so well, that we are at a hinge moment in our history.

That hinge point woke people up to the fact that many in our community were already not free enough, that we need to build a stronger, more secure Canada for and with them. People woke up to the fact that in our community, there are people who fear persecution for their religious, ethnic or racial identity; their country of origin; or their sexual or gender identity. They woke up to the fact that even if they were not in one of those communities, their fight was our fight. They woke up to the fact that the fight of artists and creators of our community, who have been yearning for support for their work and to assert Canadian cultural sovereignty, is our fight.

They woke up to the fact that auto workers and resource sector workers are under threat, and even if they did not work in those sectors, even if they drove a European car, a Tesla or no car at all, their fight was our fight. They woke up to the fact that in terms of action on the existential threat of climate change, even if they will never live to see the worst of it if we do not act, this fight was our fight. For the people in our community with addictions, on fixed incomes and with multiple needs, even if that was not them or a family member, their fight was our fight. For the people, especially young people in our community who are yearning to live and stay here, their fight for housing was our fight.

When the throne speech speaks to one economy, it is because people in Taiaiako'n—Parkdale—High Park have woken up to the fact that, for too long, the parochialism that occasionally slips into this chamber and into public policy across Canada has made us weaker. When the throne speech speaks to affordability, it is because we all need a focused, common approach to relieve our financial burdens. When it speaks to housing, it is because people need the freedom of an affordable place to live. When it speaks to a united Canada, it is because we have woken up to the fact that we need a new awakening, a new era of nation building. As the throne speech points out, that means our national institutions, such as the CBC, our national parks and Via Rail, need to be made stronger, and we need new nation building infrastructure to connect our electricity and energy systems and our economies from coast to coast to coast. When it speaks to the strongest economy in the G7, it is because people have woken up to what the Prime Minister said so well just a few minutes ago: We need a strong economy to support the strong social programs on which we rely, which are such an important part of our national identity. When the throne speech reasserted Canadian sovereignty, with the King on the throne in the Senate chamber a few days ago, it did so with a chorus of people in Taiaiako'n—Parkdale—High Park who yearn for an alternative to American domination.

People are waking up to the fact that bridging these divides is quite simply what we must do to make ourselves free, that freedom comes from interconnection, not from retreat. The people who taught me this more than anything are the people who got involved in our campaign from all parties and from no party, people bridging divides. There were volunteers like Mark Badhwar, who last got involved in Brian Mulroney's leadership campaign and was awakened to the opportunity for Canada to diversify its economy. There were people like Brenda McLaughlin, the uber volunteer of our riding in the Runnymede area, a stalwart in her community, who came out early on so many mornings to speak to voters at subway stations across the riding. There were people like Soroush Zinsaz, a recently arrived dentist from Iran, who worked in his bakery. He spent his shifts not yet practising his profession but selling baked goods to the people in the Bloor West Village. There were people like Amy and her twin sons, Louis and Felix, in grade 7, who took their first big steps in civic engagement by talking to people of all ages and stages.

All of these volunteers were motivated to talk to their fellow Canadians, or in Soroush's case, the people he plans on having as fellow Canadians. All of them chose to connect across difference. The easier choice was to disconnect. The easier choice was to doomscroll, but they chose to connect, as did Canadians from coast to coast.

In this election, Canadians turned out in record numbers to assert Canadian sovereignty and Canadian freedom. Freedom is on the march, and we are here to champion it in this caucus, and I hope in every seat in this House, to protect it and uphold it. Let us get to work.

Resumption of Debate on Address in ReplySpeech from the Throne

Noon

Conservative

Kelly McCauley Conservative Edmonton West, AB

Mr. Deputy Speaker, let me be the very first to congratulate you on your new role. I note for everyone that the current Deputy Speaker used to sit beside me in the House, and I think he went out of his way to become the Deputy Speaker just so that he would not have to sit with me anymore.

I would like to thank my colleague for his speech and congratulate him on winning and on his maiden speech.

Yesterday, at CANSEC, which is basically the defence contractors conference, the Minister of Defence spoke glowingly about the need to find money to spend on defence. This is wonderful, but he gave an example of another country that cut 22% of its public service; he spoke glowingly of another country that eliminated national holidays.

Could my colleague comment on the Minister of Defence's comments? Is that their plan here, and if not, how are they going to find money for all the added defence spending the government has planned?

Resumption of Debate on Address in ReplySpeech from the Throne

12:05 p.m.

Liberal

Karim Bardeesy Liberal Taiaiako'n—Parkdale—High Park, ON

Mr. Speaker, I was not at that particular event, so I cannot comment on it specifically. However, I can tell the member that in this caucus, as he will see in the platform, we need to do a lot at the same time. We need to act with speed and with urgency.

The commitment around defence spending is robust and has a lot of elements to it, and we are going to work very hard towards that. I look forward to hearing more from the Minister of National Defence on that.