The House is on summer break, scheduled to return Sept. 15

House of Commons Hansard #14 of the 45th Parliament, 1st session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.) The word of the day was strategies.

Topics

line drawing of robot

This summary is computer-generated. Usually it’s accurate, but every now and then it’ll contain inaccuracies or total fabrications.

Albanian Heritage Month Act First reading of Bill C-209. The bill designates November every year as Albanian Heritage Month across Canada to celebrate the contributions and heritage of Albanian Canadians. 100 words.

Opposition Motion—GC Strategies Inc. Members debate the Auditor General's report finding GC Strategies was paid over $64 million with insufficient proof of work, particularly for the ArriveCAN app. A Conservative motion calls for the government to recover taxpayers' money within 100 days and impose a lifetime contracting ban on the company and its founders. The Liberal government acknowledges the findings, states it is taking action, including legal proceedings, and notes the AG made no new recommendations. Other parties support accountability and recovery but express skepticism about the timeline and government effectiveness. 57400 words, 7 hours in 2 segments: 1 2.

Statements by Members

Question Period

The Conservatives focus heavily on the ArriveCAN scandal, citing the Auditor General's report and $64 million paid with no evidence of work. They criticize ministers being promoted despite this and demand the money back. They also raise concerns about economic issues like inflation and the lack of a federal budget, government censorship laws, and foreign ship contracts.
The Liberals address the Air India crash and heavily focus on government procurement integrity, detailing actions against GC Strategies like legal action and barring future contracts. They emphasize accelerating economic growth, removing interprovincial trade barriers through the "one Canadian economy" act, fighting US tariffs, and supporting Canadians via tax cuts and social programs. They also mention national security and public safety.
The Bloc criticizes the Bill C-5 gag order and its impact on Quebec's jurisdiction. They accuse Quebec Liberals of stealing $814 million from Quebeckers on the carbon tax. They also condemn G7 invitations to human rights abusers.
The NDP criticize deepening military integration with the US on missile defence and condemn Bill C-5 for violating obligations and removing protections.

Main Estimates and Supplementary Estimates (A), 2025-26 Members debate the government's main estimates, questioning the President of the Treasury Board on planned spending. Topics include the national debt, deficit, consultant spending (particularly on ArriveCAN), public service growth, housing initiatives, national defence, indigenous services, and social programs. The Minister highlights priority investments and efforts to manage spending, often referring to the estimates document. 13800 words, 2 hours.

Was this summary helpful and accurate?

Opposition Motion—GC Strategies Inc.Business of SupplyGovernment Orders

5:10 p.m.

Bloc

Andréanne Larouche Bloc Shefford, QC

Mr. Speaker, when we looked at the GC Strategies issue during the last Parliament, I remember us coming to the realization that these firms could easily change names to win other contracts. This is what happened with GC Strategies, which was initially called Coredal Systems Consulting. We realized that it had been hired by the Department of Transport between 2010 and 2015 under the Conservative government.

Governments come and go and seem to repeat the same mistakes. This fuels public cynicism. What can be done today to address this? The solution would obviously be to repay the money, but beyond that, we must also ensure that this does not happen again in the future.

Opposition Motion—GC Strategies Inc.Business of SupplyGovernment Orders

5:10 p.m.

Conservative

Harb Gill Conservative Windsor West, ON

Mr. Speaker, this is about accountability and responsibility, and that totally rests with the Liberal government at this point. In order to regain trust, we have to show that we are responsible parliamentarians and pass this motion. All the public is seeing is more of the same, which is eroding trust in public institutions, in us as parliamentarians and in anybody who works for the government. Nobody out there believes us or anything we say. We have to mean what we say and hold people accountable, or else we will not have much of a democracy left anymore because we are going to get scam after scam. This is not acceptable.

The member's point is absolutely true. A lot of these agencies or companies start off with new names, and we just say, “Okay, it is good to go.”

Opposition Motion—GC Strategies Inc.Business of SupplyGovernment Orders

5:10 p.m.

Conservative

Chris Lewis Conservative Essex, ON

Mr. Speaker, I congratulate my hon. colleague from Windsor West. He is not only a colleague, but a riding neighbour.

Much of what my colleague spoke about affects my riding as well. I appreciated that he said it would be really difficult for him to meet his constituents and say that we do not need to fight for $64 million.

What kind of money would go toward projects if we continue to fight for this?

Opposition Motion—GC Strategies Inc.Business of SupplyGovernment Orders

5:15 p.m.

Conservative

Harb Gill Conservative Windsor West, ON

Mr. Speaker, the City of Windsor is still owed $1 million from the convoy issues that went on there. The Liberal government has not paid it. Some of the money that would be recovered from this enterprise would go to the City of Windsor to refill its coffers, because this is money it has already spent.

Opposition Motion—GC Strategies Inc.Business of SupplyGovernment Orders

5:15 p.m.

Liberal

Julie Dzerowicz Liberal Davenport, ON

Mr. Speaker, I will be sharing my time with the member for Mississauga Centre.

On behalf of the residents of my great constituency of Davenport, which is located in downtown Toronto, I am very pleased to join the debate on this opposition day motion about ArriveCAN contractor GC Strategies. It is truly an important matter for us to discuss.

Effective management in government procurement is a fundamental responsibility to Canadians. Every dollar spent by the government must reflect a commitment to transparency, accountability and value for money. Robust procurement practices ensure that taxpayer funds are used wisely. The practices must cultivate trust and deliver essential services to benefit communities. This is precisely what our government strives to achieve. We can always improve the way we work. If and when concerns are raised, we listen to them and we act.

That brings me to the audit tabled by the Office of the Auditor General on Tuesday regarding professional services contracts awarded to GC Strategies. I want to thank the Auditor General and her team for their hard work on this audit.

I can tell hon. members that public servants are committed to improving procurement practices. It is important for members to remember that the Office of Supplier Integrity and Compliance has declared GC Strategies ineligible from being awarded Government of Canada contracts for seven years, specifically from June 6, 2025, until June 6, 2032. This is a severe sanction. It reflects the seriousness of the misconduct of the supplier in its dealings with the federal government.

The Government of Canada has accepted all of the recommendations previously made by the Auditor General. In her most recent report, she made no new recommendations, but she urged the government to continue to implement previous recommendations, which is currently under way. I will go through some of the efforts that are happening right now.

Public Services and Procurement Canada, or PSPC, is in the process of transforming and modernizing how the department procures professional services by simplifying existing mandatory procurement tools. To date, the department has taken the following actions on previous recommendations from the Auditor General: improving evaluation requirements to ensure that resources are appropriately qualified; ensuring increased transparency from suppliers around their pricing and use of subcontractors; improving documentation when awarding contracts and issuing task authorizations; and finally, clarifying work requirements and activities and specifying which initiatives and projects are being worked on by contractors.

All these measures are meant to strengthen the integrity of the procurement system. They are meant to improve data collection. They are meant to increase transparency in procurement decisions. They are meant to clarify roles and responsibilities. Most of all, they are meant to strengthen oversight and accountability in procurement activities.

The Government of Canada has also taken steps to hold GC Strategies accountable. With regard to ArriveCAN, where specific allegations of misconduct have been made, the CBSA has launched an investigation that is still in process and has referred all allegations to the RCMP. The CBSA has already taken steps to strengthen the management and oversight of its work. One of these steps is to implement a procurement improvement plan. Anyone can see this plan on the CBSA website. The plan ensures that all CBSA procurement follows Government of Canada contracting rules, supports the agency's mandate and provides value for Canadians.

In addition, the CBSA has put in place an executive procurement review committee to approve contracts. This committee oversees contracts worth up to $1 million. Contracts larger than $1 million must receive approval from the agency's executive committee, which is made up of senior CBSA leaders. The plan also calls for employees with financial authority to stay up to date with mandatory procurement training, and all employees must disclose interactions with potential vendors. The CBSA has taken many other internal steps, including creating a branch dedicated to monitoring management activities and building a culture of service and program delivery excellence, including in procurement activities.

In recent years, the CBSA has been subject to several audits and reviews that covered procurement, including an internal audit of contracting and procurement. These projects resulted in 25 recommendations. As of June 2025, the agency has implemented 21 of them, with the remaining four in progress.

The government takes these matters very seriously. From the beginning, Public Services and Procurement Canada acted swiftly in response to the allegations against the company. In February 2024, GC Strategies was suspended from participating in procurement practices, including standing offers and supply arrangements. It was also barred from participating in new procurement opportunities undertaken by Public Services and Procurement Canada.

Furthermore, in March 2024, the security status of GC Strategies Inc. was suspended. At that time, PSPC informed the RCMP of its initial concerns related to some procurement irregularities. GC Strategies was declared ineligible pursuant to the ineligibility and suspension policy. This means that, as of June 6, 2025, GC Strategies is disqualified from receiving Government of Canada contracts for seven years, ending on June 6, 2032. This period is justified, based on the severity and the duration of the misconduct, as well as the significant impact on the federal procurement system. Our government has also launched legal action against GC Strategies to recoup payments made for work that was not completed.

I believe all of this illustrates how our government is committed to establishing and improving sound contract and procurement practices. Our new government believes that misconduct of any kind is completely unacceptable. In the last Parliament, parliamentarians, the Auditor General, multiple parliamentary committees and others undertook extensive work to examine and hold to account those who were found to have acted inappropriately.

With new safeguards in place, and serious action being taken to hold GC Strategies accountable, it is time for us to move forward and focus on the work ahead of us. I am thankful for the opportunity to have my say on behalf of the residents of my great riding of Davenport on this important debate that we are having today.

Opposition Motion—GC Strategies Inc.Business of SupplyGovernment Orders

5:20 p.m.

Conservative

Greg McLean Conservative Calgary Centre, AB

Mr. Speaker, I thank my colleague for her speech, but I have heard this speech several times today. It seems to be an excuse mechanism on why we do not need to deal with this as forcefully as we should.

This was $65 million of taxpayers' money that disappeared to a group, which was previously at the bar of the House of Commons. I remember, at that point in time, the Liberal Party across the way was trying to make excuses for why those people did not have to appear here, because they were under stress and might cry if they had to come before the House of Commons. This was a cover-up of the highest order to make sure there was no accountability, and this accountability has not been borne all the way through. These people have to be held to account. We have to get that $65 million back.

We have responsible government in this country. Does the member understand that responsible government means that somebody has to take accountability for the $65 million that was taken from taxpayers?

Opposition Motion—GC Strategies Inc.Business of SupplyGovernment Orders

5:25 p.m.

Liberal

Julie Dzerowicz Liberal Davenport, ON

Mr. Speaker, I know the hon. member has heard numerous speeches today. He might have to hear a few more speeches because we are reiterating, in the absolute strongest terms, that misconduct of any kind in the procurement process is never acceptable.

Absolutely, we have taken action. We have taken action directly against GC Strategies. We have revoked the security clearance of GC Strategies. We have terminated all contracts with GC Strategies. We have barred GC Strategies from future contracts with the Government of Canada. We have taken, and are taking, legal action against GC Strategies. On top of that, we are improving our overall procurement process. We are taking action.

Opposition Motion—GC Strategies Inc.Business of SupplyGovernment Orders

5:25 p.m.

Bloc

Claude DeBellefeuille Bloc Beauharnois—Salaberry—Soulanges—Huntingdon, QC

Mr. Speaker, I am pleased to rise today because it is a special day. It is June 12, “Quebec Buy Local Day”. Today is Quebec's first-ever buy local day and I am proud to take the floor and showcase my earrings. They were made by a creator in my riding, Verretuose. That was an aside to tell people to buy local.

Now, I have a question for my colleague, who is a very conscientious, thorough and hard-working member of Parliament. I listened to her speech, but there is one thing that caught my attention. If the scandal surrounding the ArriveCAN app had never come to light, if no one had leaked the information, we might never have known that the government and taxpayers were being robbed by companies that were taking advantage of the government's generosity and their close ties with the public service.

Can my colleague tell me whether she agrees and whether she thinks her government is doing enough to find the guilty parties to make them pay and to ensure that we are reimbursed?

Opposition Motion—GC Strategies Inc.Business of SupplyGovernment Orders

5:25 p.m.

Liberal

Julie Dzerowicz Liberal Davenport, ON

Mr. Speaker, I agree with the hon. member that we should always be shopping locally. As someone who lived in Quebec for four years, I am very fond of the great businesses there, and I think it is great that she shared with us today that she had bought something local from Quebec.

On just procurement and best practices, this is why we have an Auditor General. There are a number of oversight measures that we have in place in our government to ensure that, when things are not working, we try to root out the problem, and then, when we realize that things are not going well or things have gone badly, we take immediate action to correct it. That is what we—

Opposition Motion—GC Strategies Inc.Business of SupplyGovernment Orders

5:25 p.m.

The Assistant Deputy Speaker John Nater

Questions and comments, the hon. member for Winnipeg North.

Opposition Motion—GC Strategies Inc.Business of SupplyGovernment Orders

5:25 p.m.

Winnipeg North Manitoba

Liberal

Kevin Lamoureux LiberalParliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons

Mr. Speaker, in 2024, the Auditor General of Canada came forward and provided eight recommendations. Out of those eight recommendations, seven have been fully implemented. The eighth recommendation is well under way.

If we fast-forward to today, we now have the Auditor General, in essence, saying that we have the rules in place, but we need to ensure that there is public sector involvement in making sure that the rules are properly followed.

I look at the broader issue. We just finished the election. There are all sorts of things on Canadians' minds, and the Conservatives have chosen this as the issue of priority, according to Pierre Poilievre. Can the member provide her thoughts on that?

Opposition Motion—GC Strategies Inc.Business of SupplyGovernment Orders

5:25 p.m.

Liberal

Julie Dzerowicz Liberal Davenport, ON

Mr. Speaker, I was reading a few things, so I am not sure if I heard the question correctly.

I will say to the hon. member that our government is absolutely committed to ensuring that federal procurement is always conducted in an open, fair and transparent manner, and that we, at no point, will ever accept misconduct of any kind. We will constantly be improving our procurement process.

Opposition Motion—GC Strategies Inc.Business of SupplyGovernment Orders

5:25 p.m.

Liberal

Fares Al Soud Liberal Mississauga Centre, ON

Mr. Speaker, I would like to first take a moment to express my deepest condolences to all victims of the Air India tragedy. I want to notably offer my condolences to Dr. Patel, a member of our Mississauga community. To all those mourning this heartbreaking loss, our community grieves with them.

I am pleased to have the opportunity to rise in the House today to address the important motion put forward by the opposition.

First, I would like to echo the words of my colleagues here in the House that the government welcomes the Auditor General's findings in her report on professional services contracts and is committed to procuring professional services in a fair, open and transparent manner.

Let us be clear. This is not the first audit or investigation into the procurement of professional services, generally, or into GC Strategies, in particular. The government, and certainly the House, is well aware of the wholly unacceptable past issues that have been uncovered through these reports and investigations, and those bad actors have been held to account.

The latest report from the Auditor General addressed contracts awarded and payments made to GC Strategies and other companies incorporated by its co-founders. These contracts, which were awarded by numerous departments and agencies, did not provide value for money. That is not acceptable to all of us here who work to serve Canadians collectively.

I will note that the Auditor General's report did not make any new recommendations for the government when it comes to the procurement of professional services. The government is in complete agreement with the Auditor General when she encourages federal organizations to implement the recommendations from recent procurement audits.

Allow me to assure the House that, when these concerns were first discovered, this government took action to make sure unacceptable practices do not occur again. It put in place a number of measures to improve the oversight of federal procurement, including of professional services. The reason there are no new recommendations is because we have taken action, and continue to take action, to address earlier findings.

This motion is simply another round of political games by the opposition. Canadians elected our new government to move forward with an ambitious agenda, including tackling crime, strengthening the border and making life more affordable. I suggest that the opposition should also be focused on those things.

Moving on, the government is in agreement with the Auditor General that this is not about creating new rules and regulations, but about making sure that rules are followed and frameworks are adhered to so that we are providing the best value for money for Canadians. The rules are there. They must be followed. This government has taken action to make sure that happens. We are enhancing the evaluation requirements so that we can make sure the individuals who will be doing the work are properly qualified for the job. We know it is essential to have a clear line of sight on the work that is being done on behalf of hard-working Canadians to be sure we are getting the best value for money. That is why we now require suppliers to show greater transparency when it comes to their prices, as well as providing clear information on any subcontractors they may be using.

We are also improving our own documentation when awarding contracts and authorizing tasks. We are adding greater precision when specifying and documenting what needs to be done, as well as what projects and tasks contractors are working on.

As mentioned, the Auditor General took a close look at a number of contracts with GC Strategies. As my colleagues have stated, in March of last year, the company's security status was revoked, meaning it became ineligible for all federal procurement that had a security requirement. It was also removed from the Public Services and Procurement Canada's procurement instruments. Just last week, following a thorough assessment of the supplier's conduct, the office of supplier integrity and compliance deemed GC Strategies ineligible for any contracts or real property agreements with the Government of Canada for seven years. If the company were indeed convicted of fraud against the Crown in court, the company could lose its capacity to contract with it permanently.

When it comes to recovering funds that we have identified as fraudulent billing or overbilling, we are pursuing GC Strategies in court right now.

This new government will not let up when it comes to taking action to strengthen the integrity of the procurement process and making sure we are not conducting business with buyers of concern. It has a renewed focus on making government work better, and this work is very much part of that commitment.

It is essential that we make sure that the government is not only working more efficiently, but following the rules. Following the rules leads to efficiency, which means savings for Canadians. It means getting the very best value for money for Canadians.

More needs to be done to transform how government operates right across the board. That is why we have a new Minister of Government Transformation. To build the kind of Canada we need now, we must change the way we deliver for Canadians. This means not only improving productivity, but also focusing on maintaining service delivery standards. That will require us to look at new technologies, such as artificial intelligence, to change the way we manage many of our processes.

Right now, the government is transforming and modernizing how the federal government procures professional services by streamlining and simplifying existing mandatory procurement mechanisms. This modernization is in lockstep with our commitment to integrity as the work includes reducing risks in our buying processes, improving how we manage contracts and doing more to promote solution-based procurement approaches that ensure we are getting the best value for Canadians.

We are continuing to improve the procurement system to make sure that errors such as those reported by the Auditor General cannot happen again. This new government is committed to delivering for Canadians. I implore the opposition to end the political games and focus on the mission at hand, which is to build Canada strong.

Opposition Motion—GC Strategies Inc.Business of SupplyGovernment Orders

5:35 p.m.

Conservative

Billy Morin Conservative Edmonton Northwest, AB

Mr. Speaker, under this new government, under this new Prime Minister, consultant spending is up to $26 billion. It is up 37% or about $1,400 for each Canadian family. I am wondering if the member opposite can tell Canadians that he thinks it is value for money, while it is rising, and that spending $1,400 on consultants is good value for their money, especially those who are in line at food banks.

Opposition Motion—GC Strategies Inc.Business of SupplyGovernment Orders

5:35 p.m.

Liberal

Fares Al Soud Liberal Mississauga Centre, ON

Mr. Speaker, as this is only my second time rising in this House, I will take a moment to once again thank my constituents out in Mississauga Centre for putting their trust in me.

This past election, I heard from constituents day in, day out about a lot of issues and about their biggest priorities, things like affordability, health care and public safety. I also heard a lot about the confidence they have in this government to deliver. We are on the same page. This is problematic, which is exactly why we are acting, only we are doing it within the perimeters of the law. The way our government has responded—

Opposition Motion—GC Strategies Inc.Business of SupplyGovernment Orders

5:35 p.m.

The Assistant Deputy Speaker John Nater

Questions and comments.

The hon. member for Gaspésie—Les Îles-de-la-Madeleine—Listuguj.

Opposition Motion—GC Strategies Inc.Business of SupplyGovernment Orders

June 12th, 2025 / 5:35 p.m.

Bloc

Alexis Deschênes Bloc Gaspésie—Les Îles-de-la-Madeleine—Listuguj, QC

Mr. Speaker, earlier, I was telling the story of a law-abiding couple who made an honest mistake and yet were pursued relentlessly by the federal government. They still need to pay back that debt, so some clarity is in order regarding the legal action the government says it wants to take against GC Strategies.

Has a notice been sent? I might remind members that we have been waiting for this for over a year. Have negotiations begun? If not, has an application been filed in court?

Opposition Motion—GC Strategies Inc.Business of SupplyGovernment Orders

5:35 p.m.

Liberal

Fares Al Soud Liberal Mississauga Centre, ON

Mr. Speaker, with regard to ArriveCAN, where specific allegations of misconduct have been made, CBSA has launched an investigation that is still in process and has referred allegations to the RCMP.

Additionally, on March 15, 2024, Public Services and Procurement Canada terminated all contracts and supply arrangements awarded to GC Strategies and suspended its security clearances, rendering GC Strategies ineligible to participate in Public Services and Procurement tenders.

In June, the office of supplier integrity and compliance, OSIC, issued a seven-year ban on GC Strategies participating in government contracts. The OSIC process is independent and free from political interference. We will ensure that we hold all who break the law accountable.

Opposition Motion—GC Strategies Inc.Business of SupplyGovernment Orders

5:35 p.m.

Liberal

Kristina Tesser Derksen Liberal Milton East—Halton Hills South, ON

Mr. Speaker, I do want to offer my condolences on the loss of the member's community member. We are all with him.

Like many people in this House, I have a legal background. I know that when we encounter contractual disputes there is a clear legal process for parties who violate contracts, for parties who are bad-faith actors in contracts and even for parties who commit fraud.

Would my colleague like to comment on the importance of due process and the legal process that the government should follow in recovering losses and damages and in seeking a remedy?

Opposition Motion—GC Strategies Inc.Business of SupplyGovernment Orders

5:35 p.m.

Liberal

Fares Al Soud Liberal Mississauga Centre, ON

Mr. Speaker, my thanks to my dear colleague for the very kind words and the condolences provided.

I completely agree. Due process is a fundamental part of the system in which we operate. It is extremely important to bear in mind that earlier today we heard from the opposition that they are committed to fighting government overreach, yet while we stand here willing and committed to fight for the system that very much defines what we are as a country, they have a problem with it.

We are committed to continuing to do things in the way that we have, because we know it is the right way to serve Canadians.

Opposition Motion—GC Strategies Inc.Business of SupplyGovernment Orders

5:35 p.m.

Conservative

Larry Brock Conservative Brantford—Brant South—Six Nations, ON

Mr. Speaker, I know the member is new to the chamber, but perhaps he needs to reflect on the last 10 years of waste, corruption and scandal that he is now a part of. He talks about welcoming the Auditor General's report into the arrive scam issue, but he also needs to remember that, with regard to the first report that she gave, they opposed the inquest by the Auditor General in her report.

The question is very simple. We have heard all kinds of mixed messages about the status of litigation against GC Strategies. If the government has taken GC Strategies to court to recover monies on behalf of the Canadian taxpayer, when was the suit filed, how much is it for and where was it filed?

Opposition Motion—GC Strategies Inc.Business of SupplyGovernment Orders

5:40 p.m.

Liberal

Fares Al Soud Liberal Mississauga Centre, ON

Mr. Speaker, the truth is, we did hear from constituents and we did hear from Canadians this past election about the work that our government has been doing. Here we stand, re-elected as government, because Canadians have faith in the work that we will continue to do.

In addressing this question, I will reiterate that our government is committed to following due process, and we will do exactly that to deliver for Canadians.

Opposition Motion—GC Strategies Inc.Business of SupplyGovernment Orders

5:40 p.m.

Conservative

William Stevenson Conservative Yellowhead, AB

Mr. Speaker, I will be splitting my time.

As a chartered professional accountant, now the proud representative of Yellowhead, I rise today to speak in opposition to the government's blatant mismanagement and disregard for taxpayer money, specifically relating to the shocking findings concerning GC Strategies and the ArriveCAN contracts.

The Auditor General's report revealed that GC Strategies, a contractor for the ArriveCAN app, was paid an astonishing $64 million by the Liberal government. However, in many cases, there was no proof that any work was even completed. This is not just a minor administrative hiccup; it is a fundamental failure of oversight, responsibility and transparency. It is a betrayal of Canadians' trust and abuse of public funds.

Accountability is non-negotiable. When public funds are wasted, taxpayers suffer. I spent 26 years as a chartered professional accountant ensuring that every dollar was tracked, justified and accounted for. Governments should be held to the same standard, if not a higher one. What we see here is a government that appears to have turned a blind eye to due diligence.

How could a contract that was originally supposed to be worth $80,000 turn into tens of millions of dollars being paid out without clear evidence of work being completed? It was done without proper security clearances and without going through the proper bidding processes. Where were the checks and balances?

The Auditor General's report paints a picture of complacency or worse, wilful neglect. Canadians deserve better. They deserve transparency, accountability and a government that can manage its own spending. The Liberal government has already proven itself incapable of that task.

The motion calls on the government to get taxpayers their money back within 100 days. I would argue it is just the first step. The government must commit not only to recovering these funds but also to continuing to conduct full and public audits of contracts awarded from today onward and going back during the pandemic. The misuse of funds here is not an isolated incident.

The motion also calls for a lifetime contracting ban on GC Strategies, its subsidiaries, its founders Kristian Firth and Darren Anthony, and all affiliated entities. I support this wholeheartedly. The government has an obligation to protect taxpayers from repeat offenders, entities and individuals who have proven themselves untrustworthy and have abused public funds.

A lifetime ban would send a strong message that this behaviour will not be tolerated. Moreover, it would protect contractors who operate and interact with our federal procurement system with integrity from being undercut by companies that engage in such reckless practices. Public contracting must be a level playing field built on trust, performance and accountability.

Throughout the speeches today, I have heard members from the other side consistently say they will implement previous recommendations for better rules to make processes more transparent and accountable. I see two problems with that. First, the Auditor General's recommendations have been around for a few years. What is taking the Liberals so long to implement the plan?

Second, the Auditor General states there do not need to be any new recommendations. The government seems to be taking that as it does not have to start something new to follow the recommendations. The problem is that there are rules, but the government is not following them. All the government has to do to avoid a scandal is simply follow the rules.

There should not have been any shortcuts to fast-track funds to Liberal insiders. It seems that the government did not follow its own rules when it came to GC Strategies. Is anyone in the Liberal government going to be responsible for its mismanagement? Is the reason for the lawsuit against GC Strategies that the government can deflect its responsibility?

As a CPA, I had to deal with the CRA on a weekly basis. Sometimes we had agents who were experienced and knew what they were doing. Often, we would get agents who were relatively new and inexperienced. Sometimes that was an issue, but most often, CRA staff were required to follow a checklist. If someone did not fill in the details required, they would not go any further.

Those staff would say we could not continue without checking all the boxes, or the CRA employees would say without proof of someone's expenses, those individuals were guilty of putting the onus on taxpayers. There should be no difference in the procurement process. Vendors should prove they have done the work.

As a new MP, I am learning I cannot ever make assumptions that the Liberal government and departments will follow the rules and the checklist. This is a bit hypocritical when it comes to the government demanding Canadians follow the rules and punishing them if they do not.

When it comes to the Liberal government, when it is caught doing things wrong there are no consequences. As an MP from Alberta, a province that often feels ignored or sidelined by federal decisions, I want to stress the gravity of the issue for my constituents.

Albertans are hard-working people. They pay their taxes diligently and often in greater amounts relative to the other provinces, only to see their money squandered by a government that lacks fiscal discipline. Over and over again, Albertans get the short end of the stick when it comes to federal funding. This only highlights the countless ways the Liberal government has, time and time again, irresponsibly wasted taxpayer money.

As a CPA, I saw first-hand how a business could be destroyed by poor fiscal management. The same principle should apply to the government. Tax dollars are not unlimited; they represent the hard work of Canadians. When funds are wasted, it means fewer resources for other areas, such as health care, infrastructure and education.

The Auditor General's findings are alarming and unacceptable. Taxpayers deserve to have their money returned swiftly and fully. It is unacceptable that it has not yet happened, and it needs to be a priority of the House.

This scandal underscores a much larger problem of the government's mismanagement and lack of accountability. When Canadians hear that millions of tax dollars have been handed out with no proof of work done, it confirms their opinions that governments waste their tax money. People begin to question whether their voices matter, whether their hard work is respected and whether their government truly serves them or just serves special interests.

Rebuilding that trust is a long and difficult process. It requires not only ensuring the money is returned and punishing those responsible but also changing the culture within government. It requires shifting away from complacency and secrecy to transparency, accountability and respect for the taxpayer.

As a new Conservative MP, I also want to emphasize the critical role Parliament must play going forward. Holding the government to account is not simply an opposition duty; it is a duty to every Canadian. It is our responsibility to shine a light on mismanagement and to ensure that public money is spent wisely and for public good. This means we must strengthen parliamentary committees, empower the Auditor General with better resources and more independence, and demand timely responses from ministers when failures are uncovered. This is not about political point scoring; it is about restoring integrity to our democratic institutions.

Lastly, I want to remind the House that the stakes for Alberta are especially high. Our province has been hit by economic uncertainty from energy sector challenges, inflation and cost of living pressures. Every dollar wasted by the federal government is a dollar that could be invested in Alberta's infrastructure, health care and programs to support Albertans. Albertans are watching, Canadians are watching, and they are demanding action. They want a government that respects their contributions and uses public funds responsibly. They want a government that confidently says where public funds were spent and on what. Canadians across the country demand and deserve responsible government and responsible spending.

The Auditor General's report regarding GC Strategies is a wake-up call. It exposes serious flaws in the ways that government contracts are awarded and managed that cost Canadians millions and undermine faith in public institutions. I stand with this motion because taxpayers deserve to be repaid. The Liberal government must implement strict measures, including a lifetime ban on those responsible, to prevent this from ever happening again. I urge all members of the House to support this motion and send a strong message that the waste and mismanagement must end now.

Opposition Motion—GC Strategies Inc.Business of SupplyGovernment Orders

5:50 p.m.

Liberal

Arielle Kayabaga Liberal London West, ON

Mr. Speaker, the member mentioned a couple of things that I think are of importance. He talked about the fact that they want to send a strong message. I am curious to know what the member thinks about the fact that Canadians just sent a strong message to the entire country by re-electing the Liberal government to make sure that we continue to work for Canadians on things such as housing, child care benefits and dental care benefits, which I am sure many people in his riding have also benefited from.

Can the member comment on whether he is going to support the mandate that Canadians sent to this House to make sure that we can deliver on one Canadian economy, not 13?

Opposition Motion—GC Strategies Inc.Business of SupplyGovernment Orders

5:50 p.m.

Conservative

William Stevenson Conservative Yellowhead, AB

Mr. Speaker, the decision by the electorate on April 28 gave us a minority government, so there was not a strong mandate for the government on that end of it. The constituents in my riding sent a pretty strong message, with over 69% of them saying they were very much in favour of the—