Madam Speaker, I will quickly read the Supreme Court decision in R. v. Comeau:
The need to maintain balance embodied in the federalism principle supports an interpretation of s. 121 that prohibits laws directed at curtailing the passage of goods over interprovincial borders, but allows legislatures to pass laws to achieve other goals within their powers, even though the laws may have the incidental effect of impeding the passage of goods over interprovincial borders.
Why am I reading the Supreme Court ruling? It is because the Supreme Court says there are barriers. It is true that Quebec introduced its own bill to break down some barriers. It is true that some regulations do create barriers. However, it is not true that every regulation adopted by a province's executive or legislature for a specific reason is a barrier, that it is its main purpose.
Right now, what the Government of Canada is trying to do is indirectly grab all of the regulatory power that is needed at times to maintain and strengthen Quebeckers' vision for society, particularly when it comes to the environment.