The House is on summer break, scheduled to return Sept. 15

House of Commons Hansard #11 of the 45th Parliament, 1st session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.) The word of the day was chair.

Topics

line drawing of robot

This summary is computer-generated. Usually it’s accurate, but every now and then it’ll contain inaccuracies or total fabrications.

Opposition Motion—Food Inflation and Budgetary Policy Members debate a Conservative motion calling for a fiscally responsible budget before summer, arguing Liberal policies cause high food inflation and affordability issues like increased food bank usage. Liberals defend their record on affordability, citing tax cuts, social programs, and argue a fall budget is needed for accuracy, considering factors like US tariffs and defence spending. Other parties discuss corporate profits, industry conduct, and the impact of climate change. 50500 words, 6 hours in 2 segments: 1 2.

Statements by Members

Question Period

The Conservatives criticize the Liberal government for refusing to table a spring budget, which they argue is necessary to address the rising cost of groceries and inflationary spending. They highlight the severe housing crisis, the critical state of the military, and harmful anti-energy policies contributing to economic struggles and potential recession.
The Liberals defend their investments in affordability measures, including programs like dental care and a tax cut for 22 million Canadians, stating these help families and reduce poverty. They highlight a historic $9.3 billion defence investment to meet NATO targets and bolster sovereignty. They discuss their ambitious housing plan and introduce the one Canadian economy bill to remove internal trade barriers and build national projects, aiming for the strongest economy in the G7 and hosting the G7 summit.
The Bloc criticizes the Liberals for including energy projects in Bill C-5, which they argue harms the environment and bypasses assessments. They also question large spending, including defence investments, without tabling a budget or revealing the state of public finances.
The Green Party argues Bill C-5 is not ready for passage due to environmental and health concerns and should be redrafted.

Petitions

U.S. Decision Regarding Travel Ban MP Jenny Kwan seeks an emergency debate on the U.S. travel ban announced by President Trump, which she calls discriminatory and harmful to Canadians with ties to affected countries, urging Canada to respond. 300 words.

Main Estimates, 2025-26 Members debate Environment and Climate Change and Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship estimates. On environment, discussions focus on pipeline construction, carbon pricing's impact on affordability and competitiveness, and climate targets. The Minister defends policies, citing the need for clean growth and international trade competitiveness. On immigration, debate centres on immigration levels and their effects on housing and health care. The Minister defends plans to stabilize numbers, attract skilled workers, and improve system integrity amidst opposition concerns about system management and impacts. 29900 words, 4 hours.

Was this summary helpful and accurate?

Opposition Motion—Food Inflation and Budgetary PolicyBusiness of SupplyGovernment Orders

12:25 p.m.

Liberal

Ginette Petitpas Taylor Liberal Moncton—Dieppe, NB

Mr. Speaker, once again, let me congratulate you on your new role in the House.

I always appreciate the interventions of my hon. colleague from Laurentides—Labelle in the House. I look forward to working with her during the 45th Parliament.

The member mentioned that she had been involved in community work for the past two decades. I also engaged in community work as a social worker back home in the beautiful region of Moncton—Dieppe. That said, the member says that the government is handing out goodies. I dare say that, for the people back home, the tax cut that takes effect on July 1 is not a goody. It is real help.

Does my colleague not think that this tax cut will truly help families in Quebec and across Canada?

Opposition Motion—Food Inflation and Budgetary PolicyBusiness of SupplyGovernment Orders

12:30 p.m.

Bloc

Marie-Hélène Gaudreau Bloc Laurentides—Labelle, QC

Mr. Speaker, I always appreciate genuine collaboration.

I spoke of goodies because, when money is given away, what people do with it is beyond the government's control. I would like to see some concrete figures showing that any additional money given is used for survival purposes. The day I have those figures, I will discuss the matter again.

I would like to take this opportunity to talk about climate change. On Friday morning, Ottawa was the second-most polluted city in the world. That is a proven fact. I saw a photo and it looked apocalyptic. Nothing like it had been seen before.

I would therefore like to ask colleagues this: When was the last time that people had to wear N95 masks because of uncontrolled wildfires? Even Europe is affected.

Opposition Motion—Food Inflation and Budgetary PolicyBusiness of SupplyGovernment Orders

12:30 p.m.

NDP

Gord Johns NDP Courtenay—Alberni, BC

Mr. Speaker, I want to thank the Bloc for talking about small businesses. We know small businesses are facing an availability and affordability crisis when it comes to commercial insurance, and it can be quite hard to find an insurer at a price that a small firm can afford. In a recent report by the Canadian Federation of Independent Business, we learned that half of Canadian business owners “have experienced an increase of 10% or more in their...insurance premiums over the last 12 months”. The cost of insurance has been in the top three most impactful costs for businesses for months and months now.

Is it not time for the government to take a closer look at how insurance costs and accessibility are impacting small businesses in Canada and Quebec?

Opposition Motion—Food Inflation and Budgetary PolicyBusiness of SupplyGovernment Orders

12:30 p.m.

Bloc

Marie-Hélène Gaudreau Bloc Laurentides—Labelle, QC

Mr. Speaker, I would like to thank my colleague because I forgot to mention that. That is another concrete example. Just ask an actuary. When they plug in the numbers, they can see that it costs a lot more for people to insure their property these days.

Not only does the government need to table a budget, but it also needs to recognize that climate change is costing us a lot of money. That is what the Bloc Québécois is going to do. It will show how costly that is for all Quebeckers and Canadians.

Opposition Motion—Food Inflation and Budgetary PolicyBusiness of SupplyGovernment Orders

12:30 p.m.

Bloc

Sébastien Lemire Bloc Abitibi—Témiscamingue, QC

Mr. Speaker, it is not hard to put together a budget. It is a matter of determining where the revenue will come from, where it will be spent and how much is in the account. That is essentially what it boils down to. What will the government spend money on? We have heard quite a lot about that. The Liberals told us about it during the election campaign and in the Speech from the Throne. What will the government's revenue sources be? We know that the government is going to cut taxes, so there will be less revenue coming in.

However, we do not know anything about the state of the government's finances. I think that after 10 years, and given that the Minister of Finance has been here for three months, we should have that figure. We all remember the fiasco in December when the former Minister of Finance resigned. We already had a $50‑billion deficit at that time.

I would like to throw out a number based on the rule of three: Have we reached about $75 billion in debt?

Opposition Motion—Food Inflation and Budgetary PolicyBusiness of SupplyGovernment Orders

12:30 p.m.

Bloc

Marie-Hélène Gaudreau Bloc Laurentides—Labelle, QC

Mr. Speaker, if the government cannot prove that it has everything it needs to balance the budget or at least keep the deficit as low as possible, it is because it gives us the impression that it is the world's leading expert on the economy. Unfortunately, that does not hold water. People are worried, and we are wondering what will happen in the coming months with regard to our finances and the fiscal imbalance.

Opposition Motion—Food Inflation and Budgetary PolicyBusiness of SupplyGovernment Orders

12:30 p.m.

Conservative

John Barlow Conservative Foothills, AB

Mr. Speaker, it is a pleasure to rise in the House today. Since this is my first opportunity to give a speech in the House since the election, I want to thank the constituents of Foothills and the families in southern Alberta who once again elected me to represent them in the House of Commons. I am honoured that we received the second-highest number of votes in the country, almost 55,000. Only my colleague from Ponoka—Didsbury was able to surpass the wonderful people of Foothills. That certainly goes to show that our message as Conservatives standing up for Alberta resonates with my constituents in Foothills.

I want to state that I will be splitting my time with the hon. member for Cloverdale—Langley City. I welcome back to the House of Commons such an outstanding colleague here with me.

As the Conservative shadow minister for agriculture and agri-food, it is my duty to stand here and represent and be the voice for the hard-working farmers and ranchers and producers right across this country, as well as for those Canadians who have gone to the grocery store shelves over the last few months and have questioned how this could possibly be getting worse. People are asking this because the Prime Minister stated emphatically that he would be judged by the prices at the grocery store shelves. The Prime Minister said that, not the opposition. By his own metrics, by the Prime Minister's own statement, he has failed Canadians.

I admit that I rise today with some frustration, as certainly all of us in this House are hearing from our constituents who are frustrated with the price of groceries at the grocery store shelf, given the promises by the Liberal Prime Minister. It seems to us that they are the same old Liberals with the same old promises and the same old promises broken.

The average family is now spending close to $1,000 more a year on groceries: close to $16,000. These prices continue to rise: oranges are up more than 20%; apples, 20%; beef, more than 30%; rice, 14%, and the list goes on and on. As a result, Canadians are having to make very difficult choices every single month when they do their household budgets. I would expect that Canadians would want the government to follow their lead and actually have a budget showing Canadians where their tax dollars are going and just how bad the fiscal situation that the Liberals have left us is.

The Liberals are great at blaming someone else for their problems. The parliamentary secretary is still blaming COVID. I am sure the Liberals are going to be blaming Harper later today. However, the Prime Minister was the financial adviser for the previous prime minister, Trudeau, for more than five years. This is not a new group. The finance minister has been there for 10 years. The former finance minister has been there for 10 years. It is not like the Liberals do not have some data to go by. These are not new Liberals. However, despite the Liberals' refusal to table a budget, it is Canadians who are paying the price. They are paying the price at the grocery store shelf every single day.

The current Prime Minister said during the election that he was going to be different. Clearly, in only a couple of months, he is different; I would say arguably worse. He said that he would keep spending increases at 2%, that he would cap that, but his first group of estimates shows that he has increased spending more than 8%, by half a trillion dollars in more deficit spending. At a time when inflation and food security are top of mind, the government is continuing to throw gas on the inflationary fire. Not only are the Liberals breaking these promises; they are shattering them with this type of spending, and they refuse to hold themselves accountable, with their policies driving up food costs. If anything, the policies they continue to want to implement and continue to champion would only make matters worse. Ideological policies like front-of-pack labelling, a P2 plastics ban, a tariff on fertilizer, fertilizer and crop protection reductions and industrial carbon tax will all make life more difficult for farmers, manufacturers, truckers and retailers. All those costs get passed down to the consumer at the grocery store shelf.

I want to give a few examples of the incredible consequences these ideological policies will have on consumers. Michael Graydon, the CEO of Food, Health & Consumer Products of Canada, stated at the agriculture committee last year that the Liberals' nonsensical front-of-pack warning labels will cost the industry an additional $8 billion and that manufacturers will have no choice to pass on those additional costs to the consumers, driving up food prices at the grocery store.

An in-depth report by Deloitte stated that the impact of the Liberals' P2 plastics ban on Canadian producers and produce growers will be catastrophic; it will increase the cost of produce another 35%. That is over and above the inflationary increases that we are already seeing as a result of the Liberals' out-of-control spending. It will reduce the availability of fresh produce by 50%. It will cost growers and producers more than $6 billion in additional costs. It will increase food waste by 50%.

At a time when Canadians are wanting to support Canadian growers, Liberal policy is bankrupting Canadian producers. More than 44% of growers of fresh fruit and vegetables in Canada are already selling their products at a loss, and this is before the new ideological policies are being implemented.

Opposition Motion—Food Inflation and Budgetary PolicyBusiness of SupplyGovernment Orders

12:35 p.m.

An hon. member

Where do you get your numbers?

Opposition Motion—Food Inflation and Budgetary PolicyBusiness of SupplyGovernment Orders

12:35 p.m.

Conservative

John Barlow Conservative Foothills, AB

Mr. Speaker, I just said “Deloitte”. I think that is pretty reputable, as are Farm Credit Canada and the CEO of Food, Health & Consumer Products of Canada. The Liberals do not like to hear the numbers. They do not like to hear those stats because they are a direct result of punishing policies being implemented by the Liberal government.

However, my colleague across the way is going to love it, because the Liberals are not done yet. The Liberal government wants to reduce fertilizer use by 30% and crop protection products by 50%. These losses would lead to losses for farmers exceeding $50 billion and to a reduction of crop yields by 14 million tonnes.

Last, the impact of the Liberals' inflationary spending and regulations is taking a toll on the economic viability of Canadian farmers. I know that my colleague from Winnipeg North is going to hate this, but it comes from Statistics Canada and Farm Credit Canada: Last year was the most expensive crop in Canadian history. The results that just came out show that in 2024, Canadian farmers experienced a 25% decline in realized net income, a total loss of $3.3 billion. Farmers are losing about $3,000 every single month. This is the worst loss in realized net income since 2018.

In 2024, total farm operating expenses in Canada increased to $78.3 billion, a 2.4% increase from the previous year. These increases are coming from fertilizer, feed and machinery. Fertilizer prices soared by more than 50%. Feed costs are up 20%. Machinery expenses and fuel are up by 53%. I cannot stress this enough. These are very real consequences of ideological and punishing policies by the Liberal government that are putting the economic viability of our farmers at risk and driving up food costs for Canadians. Every single month we are seeing this.

I have to ask whether the discussion in Alberta next week at the G7 will be whether Canada actually belongs in the G7, when we are a partner that is punishing our farmers and putting food security, not only here at home but also globally, at risk. We are ignoring our most important allies, who have come to us wanting cheap, affordable and sustainable Canadian LNG, but the Liberal government has said there is no business case. We are eroding our reputation as a trusted partner to our G7 allies.

However, a lot of these things could be resolved if the Liberal government repealed its ideological policies and tabled a budget so Canadians can actually see the financial picture they are facing. If the government is not willing to do it, I suggest it steps aside, because the Conservatives are ready to do just that.

Opposition Motion—Food Inflation and Budgetary PolicyBusiness of SupplyGovernment Orders

12:40 p.m.

Liberal

Sima Acan Liberal Oakville West, ON

Mr. Speaker, we take inflation very seriously. That is why we are giving a tax break to support Canadians.

I would like to ask my colleague whether the Conservatives will support us to pass the legislation to bring middle-class tax cuts for nearly 22 million Canadians, to eliminate GST for the first-time homebuyers for new homes valued up to $1 million, to remove the carbon tax and to bring one Canadian economy.

Opposition Motion—Food Inflation and Budgetary PolicyBusiness of SupplyGovernment Orders

12:40 p.m.

Conservative

John Barlow Conservative Foothills, AB

Mr. Speaker, I appreciate the Liberal member's rattling off just about every policy in the Conservative campaign that the Liberals took, and I would encourage her to take all of them. Why stop with just a few? Why take the GST off new homes for first-time buyers only? Why not take the GST off new homes for every buyer so we can have more accessible homes for all Canadians, not just those who are buying a home for the first time?

Do not just go halfway; if you are going to take the Conservative platform, take it all. We will support you the whole way.

Opposition Motion—Food Inflation and Budgetary PolicyBusiness of SupplyGovernment Orders

12:45 p.m.

The Assistant Deputy Speaker John Nater

I would just remind members to address their comments through the Chair.

Questions and comments, the hon. member for Pierre-Boucher—Les Patriotes—Verchères.

Opposition Motion—Food Inflation and Budgetary PolicyBusiness of SupplyGovernment Orders

12:45 p.m.

Bloc

Xavier Barsalou-Duval Bloc Pierre-Boucher—Les Patriotes—Verchères, QC

Mr. Speaker, I listened carefully to the Conservative member's speech. I have to say that this does not happen every day, but I agree with much of what he said today. I would like to ask him about one thing in particular. Throughout the election, the Liberals sold us the new Prime Minister as a magician. He was going to solve our problems, he was extraordinarily talented, he could do anything, and everything was easy for him.

If the Prime Minister is so good and so extraordinary, how does my colleague explain the fact that he is unable to draw up a budget?

Opposition Motion—Food Inflation and Budgetary PolicyBusiness of SupplyGovernment Orders

12:45 p.m.

Conservative

John Barlow Conservative Foothills, AB

Mr. Speaker, I know that this is going to be shocking to my colleague from the Bloc, whom I respect a great deal, but the Liberals say one thing during a campaign and do something very different once they have been elected. The Liberals like to say that they are not ready and that it has been only three months.

The cabinet has been there for 10 years. It is not like the Liberals just came into a new House of Commons and have no idea what has been going on for the last 10 years. They have caused all the problems. Their overspending, high taxes and bad policies have put Canada in this financial situation.

I would argue that the Liberals do not want to table a budget because Canadians would be frightened to see the financial situation the Liberals have left us in.

Opposition Motion—Food Inflation and Budgetary PolicyBusiness of SupplyGovernment Orders

12:45 p.m.

Conservative

John Brassard Conservative Barrie South—Innisfil, ON

Mr. Speaker, I always find it comical, if not sad, when the Liberals are questioning data that comes from Statistics Canada or Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited, like they did with my hon. colleague.

I do want to talk about the $800 tax decrease that was announced. I want to counter that by saying that the average food costs are going to go up, per family, this year by $800. The average family in the country is going to spend $17,000 of its after-tax dollars on food.

Would the hon. member not agree that food insecurity is a major threat to many Canadian families, single moms and seniors?

Opposition Motion—Food Inflation and Budgetary PolicyBusiness of SupplyGovernment Orders

12:45 p.m.

Conservative

John Barlow Conservative Foothills, AB

Mr. Speaker, absolutely, I would argue that it is going to get worse. An $800 tax cut is wiped away by food inflation that is going up every single month; it has done so three months in a row. It is only going to get worse when the Liberals implement their policies like the front-of-pack labelling and the P2 plastics ban. Those two policies alone will increase food costs, potentially, by $14 billion. Those are additional costs that are going to be put on produce growers, manufacturers and retailers. They will pass on those costs to consumers, which will continue to drive up food costs.

We are in a food security crisis here at home, and the Liberals need to step up and do something about it.

Opposition Motion—Food Inflation and Budgetary PolicyBusiness of SupplyGovernment Orders

12:45 p.m.

Winnipeg North Manitoba

Liberal

Kevin Lamoureux LiberalParliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons

Mr. Speaker, think of the G7 countries or the G20 countries. Canada has always placed, in the last number of years, either first or third in terms of performance on issues like inflation and interest rates, yet the member continues to want, like a Conservative, to play down Canada. Yes, inflation is a serious issue; we understand that. When will the Conservatives start recognizing that Canada is the best country in the world to call home?

Opposition Motion—Food Inflation and Budgetary PolicyBusiness of SupplyGovernment Orders

12:45 p.m.

Conservative

John Barlow Conservative Foothills, AB

Mr. Speaker, I find it interesting that the member is the one who was questioning the data that is coming from Statistics Canada and Farm Credit Canada, the Liberals' own Crown corporation and their own agency. The statistics are coming from their own government. If they do not believe those statistics, maybe they should make some changes within their own bureaucracy. It is interesting that he is the one who talks about misinformation.

Opposition Motion—Food Inflation and Budgetary PolicyBusiness of SupplyGovernment Orders

12:45 p.m.

Conservative

Tamara Jansen Conservative Cloverdale—Langley City, BC

Mr. Speaker, the Prime Minister said he would be judged by the prices Canadians pay at the grocery store. Well, Canadians are holding him to that, and what they are seeing is shocking. Grocery prices are through the roof, food banks are overwhelmed, and more and more families are skipping meals, not because they want to but because they have to. In Cloverdale—Langley City, seniors who once relied on the food bank weekly now have to ration their visits to make room for new families in need.

Across the country, people are working full-time jobs and still cannot afford basic groceries. It has never been clearer that affordability is not just an issue but that it is a crisis. What is the government doing in response? It is making it worse with taxes on food production, with out-of-control inflationary spending and with a refusal to table a responsible budget.

Today I want to speak for the people who are being left behind and call on the government to start putting Canadians first. If we want to fix food prices, we need to start at the source: our producers, farmers right across Canada. The government will tell us that it has removed the carbon tax, but let us be honest; that is just spin. What the Liberals have removed are the visible portions of carbon tax, the part that showed up on our fuel bill, but the tax is still there, buried in the cost of producing and transporting food.

Farmers still pay the industrial carbon tax on natural gas, propane and heating, for everything from drying grain to heating barns. These are not luxuries; they are essential parts of growing and storing our food. That tax gets passed along to every Canadian family at the checkout counter. We must not forget that our competitors in the U.S. and Mexico are not paying these hidden taxes, and their production costs are already lower. Why are we punishing our farmers, putting us at a major competitive disadvantage?

In Cloverdale—Langley City, both the Cloverdale Community Kitchen and Langley Food Bank are overwhelmed. Demand is growing so fast that they have had to ask seniors to cut back their visits from weekly to every two weeks, just to make space for all the new families showing up. This is not just a local issue, though; across Canada, more than two million visits were made to food banks in a single month. That is double what we saw five years ago. One-third of the clients are children, and nearly one in five is a person who is employed but still cannot afford groceries.

This is what happens when government policy punishes the very people who produce our food. We cannot tax the farmer who grows the food and the trucker who ships the food, and then act surprised when Canadians cannot afford to eat the food. The government says it cares about affordability, but its actions are showing the exact opposite. It is time to stop making life harder for those who feed us. If we want to lower prices at the checkout, then we have to axe the industrial tax for farmers and Canadians across Canada. Let them do what farmers do best, which is to feed the country, and let Canadians finally catch a break at the grocery store.

The damage does not end at the farm gate. Once food makes it off the field, it runs headfirst into another Liberal-made problem: inflation driven by out-of-control spending. It is hard to believe, but the new Liberal government has managed to outdo even itself. The Prime Minister inherited a bloated, reckless government, and rather than tighten the belt, he made it worse. Despite his promise to spend less, his first major bill spends 8% more than Trudeau's last year in office. That is not restraint; it is a runaway train.

This is a half-a-trillion-dollar spending spree with no budget, and the consequences are very real. Experts are now warning that government borrowing is set to hit record highs, even higher than during the pandemic. That means higher interest rates, higher borrowing costs and more pressure on an already-fragile economy. While the government racks up debt, Canadians are paying the price at the checkout line. When the government spends beyond its means, it drives up inflation. That is not theory; it is a reality.

Every reckless dollar Ottawa spends makes that dollar in our wallet worth less. Just ask the single mom trying to buy fresh fruit for her kids, or the senior on a fixed income watching groceries eat through their pension. They budget before they spend, but somehow the “man with the plan” cannot do the same.

Let us not forget where those reckless dollars are going. Consultants are getting a record-breaking $26.1 billion in this plan, which works out to $1,400 per Canadian household. This is not for housing and not for food, but for consultants. To top it off, on the very same day the Prime Minister promised in his throne speech to cap operating spending at 2%, his government introduced a bill to increase spending by 8%. That was just two hours later.

Canadians are forced to make hard decisions every single day, cutting back on groceries and downsizing their lives, yet their government cannot even produce a basic budget to show how it is going to pay for it all. If we want to get food inflation under control and food prices down, it starts here. Stop the reckless spending. Put Canadians first, not consultants—

Opposition Motion—Food Inflation and Budgetary PolicyBusiness of SupplyGovernment Orders

12:55 p.m.

NDP

Gord Johns NDP Courtenay—Alberni, BC

Mr. Speaker, on a point of order, in fairness to the interpreters, somebody's phone is ringing in the chamber. I am seeing more and more of this behaviour. People are not turning off their phones, and I encourage you to speak to all members to remind them to turn their phones off. It is not fair to the interpretation staff.

Opposition Motion—Food Inflation and Budgetary PolicyBusiness of SupplyGovernment Orders

12:55 p.m.

The Assistant Deputy Speaker John Nater

I thank the hon. member for the intervention.

I will remind members to, first, turn off their phones and, second, which is not in this case, ensure they are not near any of the microphones that may be turned on.

I know hon. members are trying to find the ringing phone, but in the meantime we will resume with the hon. member for Cloverdale—Langley City.

Opposition Motion—Food Inflation and Budgetary PolicyBusiness of SupplyGovernment Orders

12:55 p.m.

Conservative

Tamara Jansen Conservative Cloverdale—Langley City, BC

Mr. Speaker, while inflation continues to drive food prices higher, the government still has not taken the one step that could start to restore confidence. We are coming perilously close to summer, and Canadians still do not have a budget. Parliament voted unanimously for the government to bring a budget forward in April. Instead, all the Prime Minister says he will do is take note of the vote. That is not leadership; that is disrespect, and it is not acceptable.

Here is why a budget matters, especially right now. Investors are concerned, and if they are concerned, we have a problem. Canada's debt issuance is set to surpass $628 billion this fiscal year, beating even the pandemic-era high. That is a massive pile of debt. As the government borrows more, markets demand higher interest to compensate for rising risk. Canada's 10-year bond yields have already jumped over 50 basis points since April, hitting around 3.3%.

Investors are getting nervous, and they are starting to demand higher returns before they will lend Canada money. That means long-term borrowing is going to get a lot more expensive, and fast. Without a budget, no one knows how much the government plans to borrow or what it will spend it on, and that makes investors nervous. When they see runaway spending and no plan to pay for it, they demand higher returns to cover the risk. That drives up interest rates, and the cost of borrowing goes through the roof.

When a government borrows more, it means less money left over for hospitals, schools and roads. Inflation drives up interest rates. Higher interest rates drive up food production costs. Debt servicing for the farm is already a major cost. It is one of the highest costs for farmers and they cannot afford more. When the government refuses to lead or even show a plan, every Canadian is left holding the bag, paying more at the grocery store, on their bills and in their taxes.

Across the country, Canadians are doing everything right. They work hard, they budget carefully and they make sacrifices, but the government taxes the farmer who grows the food and spends without restraint while inflation skyrockets. When Parliament demands a budget, the Liberals shrug and say they will take note. Well, Canadians deserve better than that. In Cloverdale—Langley City, I have seen seniors line up for food banks and parents skip meals. Families wonder how much longer they can keep stretching their dollar. They are not asking for much, just a government that lives within its means and helps them to do the same.

Let me close with this. No parent should have to choose between a power bill and putting food on the table. After years of broken Liberal promises, it is time to put Canadians first.

Opposition Motion—Food Inflation and Budgetary PolicyBusiness of SupplyGovernment Orders

12:55 p.m.

Winnipeg North Manitoba

Liberal

Kevin Lamoureux LiberalParliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons

Mr. Speaker, I disagree in many ways with the way the Conservative Party is approaching its opposition day. When we take a look at inflation or the issue of affordability, we see that our new Prime Minister and new cabinet have presented, as one of their first initiatives, a tax break for Canadians. This is in recognition of the issue of affordability. However, time and time again, we see Conservatives stand in their place and provide at times what could be interpreted as misleading information, as opposed to trying to recognize that Canada as a whole is doing relatively well.

Would the member not agree that in comparison to other G20 countries, Canada is doing relatively well, but we still need to be concerned about the issue of—

Opposition Motion—Food Inflation and Budgetary PolicyBusiness of SupplyGovernment Orders

1 p.m.

The Assistant Deputy Speaker John Nater

The hon. member for Cloverdale—Langley City.

Opposition Motion—Food Inflation and Budgetary PolicyBusiness of SupplyGovernment Orders

June 9th, 2025 / 1 p.m.

Conservative

Tamara Jansen Conservative Cloverdale—Langley City, BC

Mr. Speaker, while I appreciate the question, I ran out of time to spotlight another huge issue, red tape, which is really impacting food affordability.

Maurizio Zinetti, owner of Zinetti Foods in Cloverdale, recently approached me regarding an issue that will seriously impact food affordability. He reached out to share just how serious the impact of the new front-of-package labelling rules are for his business, and I have to say that I left that conversation very frustrated.

This is a Canadian-owned company doing everything right: producing high-quality food, employing Canadians and helping families across this country. Now, thanks to new packaging rules and regulations that are not even about food safety, he is staring down a $2.2-million compliance bill. He is not alone. Across the industry, the total cost of these regulations is expected to top $1.8 billion.