House of Commons Hansard #29 of the 45th Parliament, 1st session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.) The word of the day was prices.

Topics

line drawing of robot

This summary is computer-generated. Usually it’s accurate, but every now and then it’ll contain inaccuracies or total fabrications.

Opposition Motion—Food Taxation Members debate food affordability and rising grocery prices, with Conservatives arguing that Liberal policies, including industrial carbon taxes, inflation, and packaging taxes, are increasing costs. They highlight soaring food bank use and higher Canadian food inflation compared to the US. Liberals counter that global factors and climate change contribute to prices, while their government implements social programs, tax cuts, and housing initiatives to improve affordability and support farmers. The Bloc criticizes both sides for simplistic solutions, calling for increased senior benefits and addressing grocery chain competition. 59400 words, 7 hours in 2 segments: 1 2.

Statements by Members

Question Period

The Conservatives heavily criticize the Liberal government's reckless spending and exploding deficits, which they link to skyrocketing grocery prices and food inflation. They demand an end to taxes on food and call for the Prime Minister to fire the Public Safety Minister over lost 600 foreign criminals, a failed gun buyback program, and inaction against international organized crime, also urging reform of the bail system.
The Liberals focus on presenting a generational budget to build the strongest economy in the G7, while defending investments in the school nutrition program and dental care. They highlight the gun buyback program, enhanced border security, and reforms for Canada Post's viability.
The Bloc condemns the Canada Post reform for reducing services for seniors, people with disabilities, and rural Quebeckers. They also demand the government make Hells Angels patches illegal to combat organized crime, contrasting it with Bill C-9.
The NDP criticizes job losses and the government's failure to renew the home retrofit program or invest in green jobs.

Adjournment Debates

Federal Bail Reform Andrew Lawton criticizes Liberal bail policies as being soft on crime, citing repeat offenders being released. Jacques Ramsay defends the government's actions, blaming the provinces for issues in the justice system, and promises stricter bail and sentencing measures. Alex Ruff presses for a timeline.
Federal Procurement and Spending Kelly Block questions why Canadians get so little for the taxes they pay, citing GC Strategies and cost overruns. Jacques Ramsay says the government is committed to fairness and transparency in procurement, and has barred GC Strategies from contracts for seven years. Block says it's the same old pattern. Ramsay says the Auditor General is now satisfied.
Was this summary helpful and accurate?

Opposition Motion—Food TaxationBusiness of SupplyGovernment Orders

4:05 p.m.

Liberal

Kody Blois Liberal Kings—Hants, NS

Mr. Speaker, I would like to agree with my hon. colleague that Nova Scotia is a beautiful province. The hon. member for Acadie—Annapolis is an honourable gentleman, and we are great neighbours in Nova Scotia.

There are challenges across the country. No one stands here in Parliament and suggests that everything is perfect. We have a government that is trying to tackle the situation that is before us.

When the member opposite engaged with seniors in Nova Scotia, did she explain that she actually voted against programs that would have helped that senior to transition off a particular fossil fuel, like heating oil, to reduce her energy bill and to help make her life affordable? Did she explain to that senior why she thought it was a bad policy and why she voted against those affordability measures that matter for seniors across this country?

That would be my question back to the hon. member.

Opposition Motion—Food TaxationBusiness of SupplyGovernment Orders

4:05 p.m.

Bloc

Alexis Deschênes Bloc Gaspésie—Les Îles-de-la-Madeleine—Listuguj, QC

Mr. Speaker, I am pleased that we are able to talk about the cost of living, because it is true that there is a lot of financial insecurity. I may have said this before, but before I was a member of Parliament, I was a legal aid lawyer. I served the most vulnerable people. I am thinking of one of my clients, who was between 65 and 75, lived alone and was having a hard time paying her mortgage. I fought alongside her to make sure she did not lose her home and end up homeless. The problem was not that she did not want to pay her mortgage; it was that she did not have enough income. With the rising cost of living wreaking havoc on grocery prices, she did not have enough money left over.

I would like to know what my colleague thinks of our proposal to increase old age security for people aged 65 to 74.

Opposition Motion—Food TaxationBusiness of SupplyGovernment Orders

4:10 p.m.

Liberal

Kody Blois Liberal Kings—Hants, NS

Mr. Speaker, issues related to our seniors are, of course, very important in my riding. I imagine it is the same thing in my colleague's riding.

When it comes to seniors between the ages of 65 and 74, we promised to increase the guaranteed income supplement. We understand the importance of this program, particularly for low-income seniors in this category.

I agree it is important that we support our seniors. This government will deliver on that.

Opposition Motion—Food TaxationBusiness of SupplyGovernment Orders

4:10 p.m.

Liberal

Marianne Dandurand Liberal Compton—Stanstead, QC

Mr. Speaker, like my colleague, I have a keen interest in agriculture. I have had the privilege of going with him to meet with farmers in his constituency, one of those visits being after hurricane Fiona struck Nova Scotia in 2022.

I would like my colleague to tell us more about the impact climate change is having on farmers, the measures our government is taking and the effect this is having on food prices.

Opposition Motion—Food TaxationBusiness of SupplyGovernment Orders

4:10 p.m.

Liberal

Kody Blois Liberal Kings—Hants, NS

Mr. Speaker, my colleague is truly a champion for farmers and producers, both in the House of Commons and in her riding.

The government has put a concrete measure in place by enhancing risk management programs. The compensation rate for the AgriStability program has been increased from 80% to 90%. Other reference margin limits have also been eliminated.

We have a concrete plan and we have implemented concrete programs for our farmers because this issue is of the utmost importance. I should also point out that during the last election, the Liberal Party had a more concrete plan than the Conservatives with regard to agriculture.

Opposition Motion—Food TaxationBusiness of SupplyGovernment Orders

4:10 p.m.

Liberal

Marianne Dandurand Liberal Compton—Stanstead, QC

Mr. Speaker, I am grateful for the opportunity to speak in today's debate. I will be sharing my time with the member for Pickering—Brooklin.

My colleagues across the aisle and I share the same concern about the cost of living. This is something I hear about regularly in my riding of Compton—Stanstead. During the election campaign and over the summer, I visited all 36 municipalities in my riding. I covered 5,000 square kilometres. I met people who told me about their challenges and difficulties. I listened to several representatives of the organizations that support those folks. I can say that there are significant challenges. These encounters, the stories I heard and the hope of the people are why I got into politics in the first place and are what encourage me to continue the work begun by my predecessor.

I want our institutions to be there to support my constituents when they need it most, but also in the way they need it. As I travelled throughout my riding, I heard people there talk about how much they trust the Liberal Party's commitments and the leadership of the man who has become our Prime Minister. Last spring, my constituents clearly had two opposite choices: a serious party with responsible leadership and a solid plan to get through what we recognize and consider to be tough times, or a party that relies on division and partisan slogans. I want to sincerely thank the folks back home who gave me the largest majority ever seen in the riding of Compton—Stanstead. It is a vote of confidence on their part that I take very seriously, and I am committed to living up to their expectations.

Quite frankly, I think our government is giving Canadians the ambitious plan that they deserve and that will make life more affordable. We promised this plan during the election campaign, and we are following through. Our new government took office 151 days ago. Already, many concrete measures have been announced that will have a direct impact on my constituents and on all Canadians. We will continue to present new measures. For example, one of the major challenges we are facing is the cost of housing. We are clearly in the middle of a housing crisis. That is why we are implementing an ambitious new approach to increase the housing supply across the country, including outside major urban centres, in communities like the ones in my riding.

The Prime Minister recently announced a new federal agency with the mandate to build affordable housing at scale. That agency is called “build Canada homes”. With “build Canada homes”, we will fight against homelessness by building both supportive and transitional housing in partnership with the provinces, territories, municipalities and indigenous communities. Just last week, someone in Sherbrooke was telling me about how modular homes and modular housing could help unhoused individuals transition to other types of housing. That is the kind of project that “build Canada homes” could support. Meeting the needs of the people in our ridings is our goal.

This agency will also build community housing and very affordable housing for households with very low incomes and will partner with private developers to build affordable housing for the middle class. As I was saying, I am from a region that is located outside large urban centres. Something that we hear often is that programs do not reflect the reality of the regions. Sometimes too many units are built or the red tape is overwhelming for the municipalities. It is too much of a burden. Our new approach takes this reality into account. It considers the needs of smaller communities that have limited resources but that also need fewer units and that are just as important. There is no need to build hundreds of units or to complete endless paperwork. We have $13 billion that could be used to build housing both in Montreal and in Stanstead.

We also know that one of the key challenges in building more housing is having infrastructure that can support these homes. Municipalities have significant needs in terms of water and sewer systems. That is why we have committed an additional $1 billion to help them meet these challenges so that they can finally build housing for the people in our ridings.

I am confident that we will reach an agreement with the Government of Quebec so we can meet these commitments quickly and truly give our constituents some relief so that they can access affordable housing more quickly.

I would also like to mention that there are young people in our communities who dream of settling down and buying a new home, but who are having difficulty accessing these new properties. That is why we proposed eliminating the GST for first-time home buyers on new homes valued at less than $1 million. This applies to many homes in my region. We will also reduce the GST for first-time home buyers on new homes between $1 million and $1.5 million.

In addition, as requested by Canadians, we have put money back in their pockets by reducing taxes. Since July 1, all the people back home and across Canada who pay taxes have benefited from a 1% reduction on the lowest tax bracket. In concrete terms, this represents savings of up to $840 per year for a dual-income family. This tax relief benefits 22 million Canadians, who can now keep more of their paycheque and use it as they see fit.

One of the biggest concerns in my riding, which borders Vermont and New Hampshire, is trade tensions with the United States and the impact this may have on our local population. Businesses in my region are particularly concerned. They are afraid of losing contracts, having to cut shifts and experiencing the impact on jobs. It is therefore essential to continue to support these businesses in order to maintain jobs. We want exporters to be able to continue exporting and workers to be supported.

I have not heard about a lot of people losing their jobs since the dispute began. I find that reassuring. We rolled out a suite of economic support programs starting on day one. For example, we temporarily eliminated the one-week waiting period for EI benefits. We also temporarily suspended the rules governing severance pay so workers would not have to use up their severance pay before collecting their EI benefits.

We made it easier to access employment insurance by raising the regional unemployment rate for six months. We made it easier for employers and workers affected by tariffs to access the work-sharing program.

Our new government has also announced a series of targeted measures to support Canada's steel, aluminum and softwood lumber industries. For example, we are investing $70 million in labour market development agreements to provide training and income support to the nearly 10,000 steelworkers affected by the dispute.

The softwood lumber industry is very important in Quebec, and we are helping it transform and compete. We are providing up to $700 million in loan guarantees to address the immediate pressures facing the softwood lumber sector. We are building an economy that prioritizes the use of Canadian materials in construction. We changed the federal procurement process to require companies contracting with the federal government to source Canadian lumber. That is how our government is ensuring that Canadian workers benefit from our investments in these frankly turbulent times.

I hear my colleagues on the other side of the House denouncing the price of food. Yes, there is food inflation, but they seem to be forgetting that farmers are the first to be affected by climate challenges. Droughts and torrential rains take their toll on crops. When we want to help farmers become more resilient, the Conservatives are nowhere to be found.

When we table our ambitious budget on November 4, I hope that our colleagues on the other side of the House will support us in building the strongest economy in the G7, in keeping jobs in Canada, in helping this country become more independent and resilient, and in strengthening our economy.

Opposition Motion—Food TaxationBusiness of SupplyGovernment Orders

4:20 p.m.

Conservative

Marilyn Gladu Conservative Sarnia—Lambton—Bkejwanong, ON

Mr. Speaker, the member opposite mentioned farmers, so I wanted to remind her of the record of the Liberal government. She was not here to see it impose two levels of carbon tax, hundreds of thousands of dollars on farms, and the clean fuel standards still remaining without giving them any credit for the emissions reduction of the CO2 absorbed by their crops; the tariff on fertilizer; the restriction on fertilizers, so they cannot get the food yield they need; and all the tariffs China has put on pork, beef and canola, which the government has taken no action on.

That is the record of the Liberal government. What is the member going to do to actually help to bring the cost of food down?

Opposition Motion—Food TaxationBusiness of SupplyGovernment Orders

4:20 p.m.

Liberal

Marianne Dandurand Liberal Compton—Stanstead, QC

Mr. Speaker, I find it interesting that my colleague is talking this way about the Liberal record when the Liberals took office after a Conservative government that had made deep cuts to science, which helps our farmers have access to better technologies. The Conservative government had also made cuts to risk management programs and to the sustainable Canadian agricultural partnership. Our government rebuilt in the aftermath of these cuts and is now trying to help farmers become more resilient in dealing with climate change so that we can reduce the cost of food.

Opposition Motion—Food TaxationBusiness of SupplyGovernment Orders

4:20 p.m.

Bloc

Patrick Bonin Bloc Repentigny, QC

Mr. Speaker, I am very pleased to hear my colleague talk about climate change. I am pleased to hear her make the connection between the cost of food and extreme weather events such as heat waves and droughts, which have a major influence on inflation and the price of food. We in the Bloc Québécois are offering solutions. The government once pledged to abolish some of the oil and gas subsidies, but that did not happen.

In 2024, the oil and gas companies were given a total of $28.5 billion in subsidies. That money could be used to help people combat the rising cost of living. Does my hon. colleague think would be a good solution?

Opposition Motion—Food TaxationBusiness of SupplyGovernment Orders

4:25 p.m.

Liberal

Marianne Dandurand Liberal Compton—Stanstead, QC

Mr. Speaker, I always feel great pride when I talk about agriculture and how our farmers in Quebec are leaders in sustainable agriculture. They do a lot, and they get help from both the federal and provincial governments. They are facing great difficulties because of climate change. I believe that with the help of both levels of government, the determination of farmers, and numerous scientific initiatives such as living laboratories, which is an exceptional project, we can build a resilient agricultural sector. I hope this will continue in the years to come.

Opposition Motion—Food TaxationBusiness of SupplyGovernment Orders

September 25th, 2025 / 4:25 p.m.

Conservative

Matt Strauss Conservative Kitchener South—Hespeler, ON

Mr. Speaker, I come to the House as a physician. In medicine, if we refuse to treat the underlying cause of a problem, I promise it will get worse. It sounds to me, in the House, that the Liberals want to forever invent new and more complicated programs to treat the symptoms of this problem. The cause of this problem is a matter of first-year economics. To quote a first-year economics textbook, “Prices rise when the government prints too much money.”

Do the Liberals not acknowledge that their massive deficits are the cause of the affordability crisis? If they acknowledge this truth from a first-year economics textbook, why do they refuse to treat it or even talk about it?

Opposition Motion—Food TaxationBusiness of SupplyGovernment Orders

4:25 p.m.

Liberal

Marianne Dandurand Liberal Compton—Stanstead, QC

Mr. Speaker, one of the major causes of food inflation is climate change. My colleagues across the way seem unwilling to admit that. Climate change is having an incredibly significant impact on agriculture. I am anxious for my colleagues across the House to recognize that and to support our efforts to help farmers become increasingly resilient.

Opposition Motion—Food TaxationBusiness of SupplyGovernment Orders

4:25 p.m.

Bloc

Claude DeBellefeuille Bloc Beauharnois—Salaberry—Soulanges—Huntingdon, QC

Mr. Speaker, my colleague and I share the same passion for agriculture. As she so aptly puts it, climate change is changing farming.

Is it not time to tailor the support programs to individual farmers and stop implementing one-size-fits-all programs, given that each province is experiencing the effects of climate change differently?

Opposition Motion—Food TaxationBusiness of SupplyGovernment Orders

4:25 p.m.

Liberal

Marianne Dandurand Liberal Compton—Stanstead, QC

Mr. Speaker, I agree with my colleague. One of the major challenges facing the agricultural sector is ensuring that the provinces, the federal government and the territories agree on implementing programs that are important for Canada as a whole. I believe that everyone must come to an agreement so that the programs are tailored to the reality of each region.

Opposition Motion—Food TaxationBusiness of SupplyGovernment Orders

4:25 p.m.

Liberal

Juanita Nathan Liberal Pickering—Brooklin, ON

Mr. Speaker, I am happy to participate in the debate on the Conservative motion in relation to the action the government is taking to address food affordability and ensure that all Canadians have access to affordable food and other daily essential goods.

Our government believes that food affordability is a serious issue facing all Canadians today. Canadians are not experiencing inflation as a statistic; they are experiencing it in their grocery stores. This is the reason our focus has been to deliver on our commitment to improving affordability, with a strong focus on relieving the financial pressure Canadians are experiencing.

Our government has been actively engaged in and is committed to improving affordability for all Canadians, with a view to alleviating the financial stress they are experiencing. We introduced in Parliament Bill C-4, the making life more affordable for Canadians act, which would legislate a middle-class tax cut so dual-income households can save approximately $800 a year. Bringing down costs for Canadians is central to our plan outlined in the Speech from the Throne. This tax relief would benefit nearly 22 million Canadians and would help them keep more of their hard-earned paycheques to spend wherever it matters most to them.

We are also very mindful that addressing the growing cost of essential goods, including groceries, requires a strong consumer advocacy sector as well as timely and independent research on consumer issues. That is why our government has taken measures to invest in consumer advocacy work. The Canadian consumer protection initiative has enabled independent research in order to gain insights on retail pricing practices such as shrinkflation and skimpflation in the grocery sector. In a recent call focused on food, priority topics included affordability, sustainable consumption, barriers to competition in the grocery sector and consumer protection against junk fees and price gouging. In addition to independent research, this program supports the creation of resources to raise awareness about food, especially when it comes to sustainability issues.

In providing further funding for consumer advocacy, we are ensuring that consumer interest organizations are supported to meaningfully advocate for Canadians. Priority topics such as affordability, sustainable consumption, barriers to competition in the grocery sector and consumer protection against junk fees and price gouging were all identified as key priorities in its latest open call for proposals. With these priorities top of mind, a funded project from a previous call supported a national consumer movement that reached Canadians from coast to coast to coast, offering practical tools to decode grocery pricing strategies and empowering consumers to make informed choices at the checkout.

Our government has continued to reiterate its commitments to providing Canadians with the tools and data they need to make informed choices in the marketplace. Our government has made it a priority to maintain the food price data hub to give Canadians up-to-date and detailed information on food prices to help them make informed decisions about their grocery options. Additionally, the government's grocery affordability web page aims to create greater transparency around pricing to foster competition and help consumers increase their confidence in participating in marketplaces.

Most recently, the food price data hub published the latest consumer price index, CPI, data for August 2025, which indicates that inflation for groceries has fallen from a peak of 11.4% in January 2023 to 3.5% in August 2025. This means Canadians have seen a decline in food inflation since January 2023. While this is an encouraging trend, the Government of Canada continues to work hard to address affordability issues and take action to improve food affordability for all Canadians.

We have made headway in attaining the food price stability Canadians need and deserve. To ensure they continue to pay fair prices for groceries, we will maintain our efforts in funding the work of the organizations that advocate for their rights and the protection of their interests. We will continue to make sure that Canadians have the information they need to make informed choices at the grocery store. We will take action to improve competition and will hold companies accountable in the process.

That is why, in recent years, the Government of Canada has modernized the Competition Act, making amendments that affect how the Competition Bureau can investigate anti-competitive conduct and deceptive marketing. For example, making changes to the act requires that vendors be more truthful in their advertising, recognizing that displaying prices without additional fees included is a form of dishonesty. This practice of drip pricing makes it more difficult for consumers to make price comparisons and find the best value and punishes vendors that are more up front with the actual cost of goods.

In addition, amendments to the Competition Act through Bill C-56, the Affordable Housing and Groceries Act, will affect how the Competition Bureau can examine potentially anti-competitive arguments such as controls on the use of commercial real estate. The widespread use of competitive property controls can make it more difficult for firms to enter new markets or expand, reducing the choices available to Canadians consumers. Since these amendments passed, we have seen a number of concessions by major grocers, such as willingly removing some of the controls they had in place and opening up those markets. These are clear wins for both Canadian consumers and prospective new entrants in the grocery retail market.

We are aware, however, that food price stabilization can occur only when there is co-operation. This requires the complete engagement of the entire supply chain. Our engagement with industry has been focused on ensuring the continuous improvement of food affordability.

Through continued collaboration with provincial and territorial ministers of agriculture and widespread industry engagement, we were pleased to announce that in July 2024, all the large grocery retailers committed to the grocery sector code of conduct. The code is a positive step toward uniting supply chain partners under a set of ground rules and bringing more fairness, transparency and predictability to Canada's grocery supply chain and to consumers.

We recognize that global and external pressures like tariffs imposed by the United States are also contributing to cost and pricing increases that affect consumers, workers and businesses in Canada. These pressures reinforce the importance of a coordinated, long-term approach to food affordability and economic resilience. We will continue to work to develop a strong consumer advocacy culture and ensure that Canadians are equipped with the tools they need to navigate food prices and make sound purchasing decisions.

Our government remains dedicated to investigating harmful practices impacting Canadians, ensuring continued collaboration in areas of joint jurisdiction with provincial and territorial colleagues responsible for consumer protection, working to strengthen competition in Canada's grocery sector and continuing to provide Canadians with accurate and timely information on food pricing in Canada.

Opposition Motion—Food TaxationBusiness of SupplyGovernment Orders

4:35 p.m.

Conservative

Jeremy Patzer Conservative Swift Current—Grasslands—Kindersley, SK

Mr. Speaker, I heard the member talk in her speech about how the Liberals are working alongside industry. What we have seen from the government, as a result of the policy direction it has taken us in over the last 10 years, is that $63 billion in investment has left Canada so far this year.

I am just wondering what the member's plan is to try to bring that $63 billion back. I am wondering which bad Liberal policies from the last 10 years she is willing to scrap to get that money back.

Opposition Motion—Food TaxationBusiness of SupplyGovernment Orders

4:35 p.m.

Liberal

Juanita Nathan Liberal Pickering—Brooklin, ON

Mr. Speaker, Canadians provided the government with a clear mandate to provide a stronger and more resilient economy. While the opposition keeps talking about the Prime Minister's globe-trotting, he is going around the world trying to get more investment into the country.

Opposition Motion—Food TaxationBusiness of SupplyGovernment Orders

4:35 p.m.

An hon. member

It does not seem to be working.

Opposition Motion—Food TaxationBusiness of SupplyGovernment Orders

4:35 p.m.

Liberal

Juanita Nathan Liberal Pickering—Brooklin, ON

Mr. Speaker, we need to wait and see.

We have gotten about $60 billion in investments so far. Budget 2025 will build on these actions by seizing a generational opportunity to transform the Canadian economy through ambitious—

Opposition Motion—Food TaxationBusiness of SupplyGovernment Orders

4:35 p.m.

The Assistant Deputy Speaker John Nater

Questions and comments, the hon. member for Shefford.

Opposition Motion—Food TaxationBusiness of SupplyGovernment Orders

4:35 p.m.

Bloc

Andréanne Larouche Bloc Shefford, QC

Mr. Speaker, I thank the member, who is a new colleague of mine at the Standing Committee on the Status of Women. I welcome her to the committee.

Right now, I am genuinely deeply concerned about the federal government's attempts to interfere in Quebec's jurisdiction once again, instead of taking concrete action to lift women out of poverty. Here is an example. Some women stay in violent situations because they are afraid of ending up on the street, but funding for shelters was blocked this summer.

I would like to thank my colleague, the member for Abitibi—Témiscamingue, because he is the one who told me that Ottawa was withholding money for shelters where he is in Abitibi, in Rouyn-Noranda, and elsewhere in Quebec. The government was slow to get that money out the door. As a result, women and children were forced to return to their abusers.

Instead of trying to interfere in Quebec's jurisdictions, the government should transfer the money because we need it for our shelters. Health and social services are within Quebec's purview.

Opposition Motion—Food TaxationBusiness of SupplyGovernment Orders

4:35 p.m.

Liberal

Juanita Nathan Liberal Pickering—Brooklin, ON

Mr. Speaker, I agree wholeheartedly with what my colleague opposite is saying about women who are in abusive situations. As a former abuse counsellor, I completely understood what she is talking about.

I am, as is the government, determined to protect, in the upcoming budget, funding for women, women's sectors and organizations that are supporting women. We will wait to see that in the budget coming up in November.

Opposition Motion—Food TaxationBusiness of SupplyGovernment Orders

4:35 p.m.

Liberal

Marianne Dandurand Liberal Compton—Stanstead, QC

Mr. Speaker, the member's speech was very interesting. She is very active in her region, and she is very committed.

What are the initiatives from our government that the member thinks will have the biggest impact on affordability for her community?

Opposition Motion—Food TaxationBusiness of SupplyGovernment Orders

4:40 p.m.

Liberal

Juanita Nathan Liberal Pickering—Brooklin, ON

Mr. Speaker, I feel that food security and the role of the agriculture sector will have the biggest impact on my neighbourhood in Pickering—Brooklin. Half of my community is rural.

In the coming days and months, I am waiting to see what the government will do to strengthen Canada's food security by investing in greenhouses, hydroponics and controlled-environment agriculture that would allow us to grow more types of food here at home, which would definitely alleviate a lot of the lineups at food banks.

We must work to increase the resilience of food supply chains, support innovation and amend the mandate of the Canadian Food Inspection Agency with respect to security and cost of food in its regulatory decisions, without compromising health and safety.

Opposition Motion—Food TaxationBusiness of SupplyGovernment Orders

4:40 p.m.

The Assistant Deputy Speaker John Nater

It is my duty pursuant to Standing Order 38 to inform the House that the questions to be raised tonight at the time of adjournment are as follows: the hon. member for Elgin—St. Thomas—London South, Public Safety; the hon. member for Bruce—Grey—Owen Sound, Public Safety; the hon. member for Carlton Trail—Eagle Creek, Public Services and Procurement.