House of Commons Hansard #156 of the 45th Parliament, 1st session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.) The word of the day was young.

Topics

line drawing of robot

This summary is computer-generated. Usually it’s accurate, but every now and then it’ll contain inaccuracies or total fabrications.

Petitions

Opposition Motion—Appearance of the Prime Minister before the Standing Committee on Finance Members debate a Conservative motion asking the Prime Minister to testify before the Finance Committee about deficits, debt interest and taxes. Conservatives cite rising borrowing costs and affordability pressures; Liberals defend strategic investment, affordability programs and Canada’s relative fiscal position. The Bloc supports inviting the Prime Minister, while questioning the government’s fiscal accounting and priorities. The motion calls for testimony on public finances. 49100 words, 6 hours in 2 segments: 1 2.

Statements by Members

Question Period

The Conservatives criticize rising debt and interest costs, question the government’s fiscal plans, and blame high immigration for housing shortages. They oppose the oil tanker ban, challenge the government’s handling of steel tariffs, and demand accountability for subsidies to employers of illegal workers and the Prime Minister’s wife’s ocean-envoy role.
The Liberals promote economic growth through market diversification, EU trade ties, major projects and investment, and tax incentives for businesses. They defend their fiscal record and support for families, while emphasizing housing construction and responsible immigration. They also highlight partnerships with Indigenous peoples, steel jobs, fisheries funding, and ocean protection.
The Bloc denounces the federal government for excluding Quebec’s premier from speaking at the Canada–Europe summit, arguing Quebec’s voice and interests must be represented on trade and jurisdictional issues. It also opposes Bill C‑39’s strike-breaking powers, warning they threaten workers’ rights and freedom of association.
The NDP defend the north coast tanker ban and call for Canadian shipbuilding investment to create union jobs.

Relieving Grieving Parents of an Administrative Burden Act (Evan's Law) Report stage of Bill C-222. The bill amends EI and the Canada Labour Code so parents who lose a child can continue parental benefits and retain job-protected leave, including additional bereavement support, without repeated reporting or a new claim. Speakers from multiple parties support the measure and call for further consideration of protections when a parent dies. 5200 words, 30 minutes.

Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities Members debate a committee report on youth unemployment, with Conservatives urging tax and red-tape cuts, targeted training, housing near jobs and immigration aligned with labour needs. Liberals cite summer jobs and skilled-trades initiatives, while the Bloc emphasizes Quebec’s jurisdiction over training and employment and calls for tailored solutions and EI reform. 20300 words, 2 hours.

Adjournment Debates

Calls for justice on MMIWG Elizabeth May questions the government’s urgency in implementing the 231 calls for justice, noting Indigenous women and girls remain at risk and many commitments are delayed. Ryan Turnbull says work has begun on nearly three-quarters of the calls and cites investments in Indigenous-led services, alerts, shelters and survivor support, while acknowledging more work is needed.
Manitoba major projects Grant Jackson says Manitoba is being overlooked, noting none of the 20 projects listed by the Major Projects Office are in the province, and demands concrete investment plans. Ryan Turnbull says Manitoba is a priority, points to the Port of Churchill transformative strategy, and says the government is ready to advance qualifying projects.
Canada Health Infoway audit Dan Mazier questions how much Canada Health Infoway is spending to defend against former CEO Michael Green’s lawsuit and asks whether the promised third-party audit has been hired. Ryan Turnbull points to the government’s announced review and audit, saying the Auditor General considers them sufficient and further work duplicative.
Was this summary helpful and accurate?

Indigenous AffairsAdjournment Proceedings

8:25 p.m.

Green

Elizabeth May Green Saanich—Gulf Islands, BC

Mr. Speaker, it is an honour to rise at this hour in Adjournment Proceedings to pursue a question I asked in question period on May 5.

We were nearly at the anniversary of June 3, 2019, the date of the long-fought-for report. It was such a traumatic experience just to get an inquiry into missing and murdered indigenous women and girls. That inquiry wrapped up, and as I asked my question on May 5, I noted that it was almost seven years ago that the report of the inquiry into missing and murdered indigenous women, girls and two-spirit plus people had been given to the government.

Back then, we hoped. The government of the day said it would do its very best and certainly was committed to achieving all of the calls for justice within the report. There were 231 calls for justice. In other reports, one might just call them recommendations, but I think it was powerful that they were called calls for justice. The horror of the number of missing and murdered indigenous women and girls in this country remains with us, because many of those women and girls are still missing, and many more have gone missing since we got the report back on June 3, 2019.

The response I got from the Minister of Crown-Indigenous Relations was compassionate, caring and thoughtful, as is she. She did not provide a number of how many of the calls for justice had been achieved. She did, of course, express the concern that justice, as she said, was “not with respect to just one project, but a life we need to continue to live”, and that violence against indigenous people must end. However, it remains the fact that here we are in late October 2026, and we still are dealing with the reality that women are missing and murdered.

I have a lot of friends from all kinds of backgrounds, close friends, but it is only among my indigenous women friends that it is rare to find a friend who is indigenous in this country who has not been beaten up and abused. One of my close friends, I thought I knew about her life until she said, “I never told you about the time I was left for dead in a dumpster.” She said it as if it was a sort of normalized experience for indigenous women and girls, and it is, in fact, far too common.

I tried to find a number for tonight's debate, from Statistics Canada and other sources, as to how many indigenous women and girls have gone missing since we got the recommendations, which have not been fulfilled. It was hard to find a number because Statistics Canada and sources do not necessarily agree, but it is a large number of women and girls from the indigenous communities of this country who have gone missing since the report came out.

I will quote, because it was at least authoritative, the Native Women's Association of Canada, which states, “Despite half a decade passing since the release of the National Action Plan, the implementation of the 231 Calls for Justice has been insufficient.” It states that “many federal commitments remain delayed, fragmented, or difficult to measure in ways that reflect the realities Indigenous communities [face] every day.”

What we are looking at is an ongoing crisis. We have recommendations that were really important and sweeping, such as bringing in a guaranteed livable income, such as ensuring that there is safe and efficient transportation in rural and remote Canada, a recommendation that would serve all parts of society in rural and remote Canada, where people cannot get from A to B unless they own a car, other than hitchhiking and putting themselves at risk.

It is now, with a few seconds left, time to ask again. What is the level of commitment of this government? Will we hear a commitment to achieve these recommendations?

Indigenous AffairsAdjournment Proceedings

October 27th, 2026 / 8:25 p.m.

Whitby Ontario

Liberal

Ryan Turnbull LiberalParliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Finance and National Revenue and to the Secretary of State (Canada Revenue Agency and Financial Institutions)

Mr. Speaker, the crisis of missing and murdered indigenous women and girls and 2SLGBTQIA+ people continues to affect survivors, families and communities across this country. Of the 231 calls for justice in the final report of the National Inquiry into Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women and Girls, 215 of them call on the federal government in some capacity or other. On June 3, we released the 2025-2026 federal pathway annual progress report, marking the fifth anniversary of “Federal Pathway To Address Missing And Murdered Indigenous Women, Girls And 2SLGBTQQIA+ People”, which is the Government of Canada's contribution to the national action plan.

As it stands now, the Government of Canada has made efforts to advance roughly three-quarters of the federal work outlined in the national inquiry's final report. This year, our government reported progress on 163 of the calls for justice. As I have mentioned, advancing the calls for justice is not a one-time effort or a checklist for one party to fulfill. Many calls for justice require sustained action and an ongoing commitment to collaborate with other governments, organizations and civil society, while continuing to follow the lead of survivors and their families.

On Red Dress Day this year, the Prime Minister was presented with a sacred bundle by the National Family and Survivors Circle. That sacred bundle carries teachings, responsibilities and spirit, reflecting the lived experiences of victims, survivors and their communities from the National Inquiry into Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women and Girls. Receiving that sacred bundle reaffirmed the Government of Canada's commitment to end the national crisis of missing and murdered indigenous women and girls and 2SLGBTQIA+ people.

Also, on Red Dress Day we announced an investment of $2.6 million over three years for the National Family and Survivors Circle Inc. to continue its vital work in centring survivors and families in the implementation of the calls for justice. We also announced an additional $300,000 investment to help support the next steps on a red dress alert pilot in Manitoba. We continue to invest in indigenous-led approaches that advance the calls for justice through Crown-Indigenous Relations and Northern Affairs Canada's supporting indigenous women's and 2SLGBTQI+ organizations program. Twenty-two projects have recently been approved to support indigenous-led solutions and advance indigenous-led priorities.

We also continue to support healing, wellness and community-led responses through the support of the contribution program for the well-being of families and survivors of missing and murdered indigenous women, girls and 2SLGBTQI+ people. At the same time, Indigenous Services Canada has been expanding access to safe, culturally appropriate spaces through the indigenous shelter and transitional housing initiative, which is part of the $724.1-million comprehensive violence prevention strategy. This investment will have supported the creation of 38 new shelters and 42 transitional homes across Canada, including in northern and urban communities.

There is no doubt that there is lots more work to do on this important call to action and the calls for justice. We look forward to collaborating and to continuing to treat this national crisis with the urgency it deserves.

Indigenous AffairsAdjournment Proceedings

8:30 p.m.

Green

Elizabeth May Green Saanich—Gulf Islands, BC

Mr. Speaker, I do not think the parliamentary secretary nor any minister would claim that this has been accomplished. I think we can agree that the work is, of necessity, going to be partial, but I am not convinced there is a sufficient level of urgency from the government for the fact that people, especially women and girls, continue to go missing all the time.

There is police training and the kinds of supports required under the calls for justice, including trauma-informed therapists going right away to help a woman who has been assaulted or attacked get through that process. Those kinds of steps were very specific in the report, and they really must be treated with urgency, because every single attack of a woman hitchhiking on a rural road is something that was avoidable, predictable and preventable.

Indigenous AffairsAdjournment Proceedings

8:30 p.m.

Liberal

Ryan Turnbull Liberal Whitby, ON

Mr. Speaker, I agree with the member opposite that the issue requires urgency and sustained effort. The crisis of missing and murdered indigenous women, girls and 2SLGBTQIA people demands urgent and sustained action, and we remain firmly committed to ending it. Of the 231 calls for justice, 215 are directly related to the federal government in some capacity, and we are acting on that responsibility. As I have said, almost three-quarters have been started and are in progress.

We are making targeted investments that translate into real support, safe places to go, and culturally informed care and services identified by communities themselves. This includes support for indigenous-led organizations, further investments in a red dress alert pilot and expanding shelters and transitional housing across the country. Everything we are doing is built on working together, being accountable and following the leadership of indigenous partners.

FinanceAdjournment Proceedings

8:35 p.m.

Conservative

Grant Jackson Conservative Brandon—Souris, MB

Mr. Speaker, I rise again to ask my fellow Manitoban, the Minister of Northern and Arctic Affairs, and Manitoba's only voice at the cabinet table, about the complete lack of major projects and development happening in Manitoba under the Liberal government.

The minister's response to my initial question about major projects coming to Manitoba, or the lack thereof, can be described as light at best. Where are the Manitoba Liberals? They are completely missing in action.

Conservatives in Manitoba understand the potential of our great province. We have been pushing opportunities at the Port of Churchill for years, including in multiple campaign platforms. We know that more opportunities exist in expanding our mining industry, and the same is true for the potential in value-added agriculture and processing. As the heart of Canada, Manitoba is geographically positioned to play an even greater role in our national defence industry as well.

Manitoba has all of this potential, yet where is the Liberal government's ambition for its development? On what significant new projects is it working on to bring growth and investment to Manitobans? So far, Manitoba has been a flyover province for the Liberal major projects announcement machine.

Will the minister get up and put on the record what her vision is for expanding major projects happening in friendly Manitoba?

FinanceAdjournment Proceedings

8:35 p.m.

Whitby Ontario

Liberal

Ryan Turnbull LiberalParliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Finance and National Revenue and to the Secretary of State (Canada Revenue Agency and Financial Institutions)

Mr. Speaker, I know I have colleagues on this side from Manitoba who are really fantastic. They work hard and represent some of the ridings in Manitoba quite well.

I will also say that this summer, in the pre-budget consultations, I had the opportunity to meet with Manitoba's finance minister and talk about many of the major projects in Manitoba. Our government is supportive and is serious about working with Manitoba to advance its interests, help grow its economy and take advantage of the significant opportunities that it sees for itself and for Canada as a whole.

Countries around the world are grappling with an affordability crisis, and Canada is no exception. Political unrest and ongoing conflicts on two continents are taking their toll. Here at home, our closest neighbour and largest trading partner has placed tariffs on many Canadian goods entering the U.S. market, placing jobs and prosperity at risk. The cumulative effect of this disruption is higher prices for many essential goods. This is having an impact on Canadians and the businesses that support them.

While the situation originated beyond our borders, our government is standing up for Canadians. We are taking strong, decisive action to address affordability concerns by introducing measures that lower costs and keep more hard-earned dollars in the pockets of Canadians.

One of the most recent of these involves the federal fuel excise tax on gasoline, aviation fuel, diesel fuel and others. In April of this year, we introduced a temporary suspension, lowering the tax per litre for gasoline by 10¢, while the tax on leaded gasoline fell by 11¢ per litre, and the tax on diesel and aviation fuel fell by four cents per litre. This temporary suspension was going to expire on September 7, Labour Day. Before it could end, however, we announced our intention to extend the temporary pause until January 31, 2027, and after that date, regular rates would be reduced by 50% until March 31, fiscal year end.

We have also taken action on grocery prices with the Canada groceries and essentials benefit announced at the beginning of the year. This benefit replaces the GST credit and provides tax-free quarterly payments to individuals and families with low and modest incomes to help manage the rising cost of living. In July 2026, there was a 25% increase to the benefit amount, which will remain for five years. Canadians can expect the amount of this benefit to be recalculated every July based on their adjusted family net income from the previous year.

We have also waived taxes on first-time home purchases at the federal level. That is significant. It is about $50,000 on a $1-million home.

These measures are on top of an income tax cut we announced last year where we lowered the tax rate for the first marginal personal income tax bracket from 15% to 14%, saving over 22 million Canadians money on their taxes. That is $840 for the average dual income family or $420 per individual.

We have cut taxes on income, housing and fuel, and offered a groceries and essentials benefit to help ease the pressures that families are under based on the cost of living. I would say that is progress.

In response to the member opposite's question about Manitoba, we are serious about building all across Canada and working with Manitoba every step of the way.

FinanceAdjournment Proceedings

8:40 p.m.

Conservative

Grant Jackson Conservative Brandon—Souris, MB

Mr. Speaker, what an embarrassingly out-of-touch response that was from the parliamentary secretary. I asked about specific, tangible, physical projects that the Liberal government is pursuing for my home province, and all the member had to offer was that he visited it one time and had a 30-minute chat with the finance minister at the provincial level. How typical of the out-of-touch Liberals to forget about the province of Manitoba.

Here are a couple of facts for the member. According to its own website, there are 20 major projects with the Major Projects Office. How many of those 20 major projects are in Manitoba? Not one. The port of Churchill plus is Manitoba's only specifically identified initiative, and the government classifies it as a “transformative strategy”, not a major project, with absolutely zero details listed. Meanwhile, other provinces have eight, three or two projects listed.

When will the Liberal government and the six Liberal MPs prioritize major projects in Manitoba?

FinanceAdjournment Proceedings

8:40 p.m.

Liberal

Ryan Turnbull Liberal Whitby, ON

Mr. Speaker, Manitoba is without exception a priority for this government, and I am sure it is a priority to the Premier of Manitoba. There are projects and opportunities that we recognize. The Major Projects Office has been set up to advance projects in the national interest that meet the criteria.

Transformative strategies are nothing to be ashamed of. Those are excellent projects as well, and there are quite a number of them. In fact, the projects across Canada that we are advancing, in partnership with first nations and the premiers of each province, are good news for this country's prosperity in the future. We look forward to expediting those projects as soon as the member and his colleagues bring forward more projects that we can advance.

HealthAdjournment Proceedings

8:40 p.m.

Conservative

Dan Mazier Conservative Riding Mountain, MB

Mr. Speaker, Michael Green, the former CEO of Canada Health Infoway, was fired after overseeing the $300-million PrescribeIT scandal. Despite his massive failure, he was awarded over $1 million in severance benefits, including another performance bonus after he was fired. Apparently, that was not enough for this failed PrescribeIT CEO. Court documents reveal that Mr. Green is now suing Canada Health Infoway for even more money, claiming that his massive payday was not enough.

How many taxpayer dollars are the Liberals allowing Canada Health Infoway to spend on this legal battle with its former CEO?

HealthAdjournment Proceedings

8:40 p.m.

Whitby Ontario

Liberal

Ryan Turnbull LiberalParliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Finance and National Revenue and to the Secretary of State (Canada Revenue Agency and Financial Institutions)

Mr. Speaker, just over a month ago, the member opposite posed a nearly identical question during Adjournment Proceedings. I will respond by giving him a nearly identical answer.

As the Minister of Health announced in June, our government believes that Canadians deserve transparency and openness when it comes to how taxpayer dollars are spent. That is to be expected. There were obviously concerns with whether Canadians had received value for money when it comes to Canada Health Infoway, which is why the Minister of Health announced a multiphase review that included both an independent audit and a third party review of the organization's governance and structure.

The member opposite was a member of the health committee when Liberal, Bloc and Conservative MPs unanimously called for the Auditor General to look at the organization in question. What was the Auditor General's response? She said that the reviews announced by the minister are enough for her and that any other work by her would be duplicative and of limited value. Let us allow that work to take place and make sure that the review and the audit show what is working and what is not so that we can be sure that we have modernized health data infrastructure that works best for Canadians.

HealthAdjournment Proceedings

8:40 p.m.

Conservative

Dan Mazier Conservative Riding Mountain, MB

Mr. Speaker, I am really glad the member mentioned the June story, because in June, the Liberals told The Globe and Mail that they were launching an independent third party audit of Canada Health Infoway after Conservatives exposed the $300-million PrescribeIT scandal. That was over 130 days ago.

Has the government actually hired a third party auditor, and if so, who did it hire?

HealthAdjournment Proceedings

8:45 p.m.

Liberal

Ryan Turnbull Liberal Whitby, ON

Mr. Speaker, again, let us review the facts. The member opposite was on HESA when that committee asked for the Auditor General to do an audit. The Auditor General said the work being done by the government to ensure that taxpayers are getting value for their money is enough for her. I trust that the Auditor General knows what she is talking about. It is too bad the member opposite does not have the same level of trust in her.

HealthAdjournment Proceedings

8:45 p.m.

The Deputy Speaker Tom Kmiec

The motion to adjourn the House is now deemed to have been adopted. Accordingly, the House stands adjourned until Wednesday, October 28, at 2 p.m., pursuant to Standing Order 24(1).

(The House adjourned at 8:45 p.m.)