Mr. Speaker, on Thursday, October 1, 2026, representatives of the Government of Canada held a technical briefing for the media, under embargo, to provide an update on the west coast oil pipeline, now known as “Pacific Link”.
Despite our request, no technical briefings were offered to members. According to multiple Speakers' rulings, when embargoed technical briefings on bills introduced in the House are arranged for journalists, the government is required to do the same for parliamentarians. At some point in their tenure, all Speakers have ruled on closed-door briefings, embargoed matters, media leaks or disclosures concerning bills not yet tabled in the House.
The Speaker has ruled on several occasions that providing legislative information to the media before it has been tabled in the House constitutes a contempt of Parliament. For example, the fourth edition of House of Commons Procedure and Practice, published in 2025, states in footnote 125 that, during the debates of March 19, 2021:
...a question of privilege was raised regarding a briefing the Department of Justice held for members of the media on a bill not yet introduced in the House, while denying Members access to the same information. Speaker Milliken ruled that the provision of information concerning legislation to the media without any effective measures to secure the rights of the House constituted a prima facie case of contempt.
However, what about a case such as this, where there were closed-door technical briefings that provided privileged information to members of the media? Information was shared regarding proposals and policies about which the opposition will be asked to give its views.
We understand that the government can make announcements outside Parliament Hill, but the fact remains that this approach prevents opposition members from obtaining the same information as the media and, as a result, from informing members of changes in government policies that have an impact on the government's budget.
The October 1 announcement will have a major impact on taxpayers' wallets. We need to ensure that the opposition's role in the House, which is to demand transparency and accountability, is upheld. We understand that in the context of the changes made under Bill C-5, the One Canadian Economy Act, and Bill C-39, the building Canada strong act, several projects will be fast-tracked by invoking the concept of a project of national interest, which will require more detailed explanations from the government and its officials, both on Parliament Hill and beyond.
Under the circumstances, it is critical that opposition members have access to briefings, as journalists do, before any projects are announced, out of respect for the primacy of the House of Commons. Chances are good that this way of doing this will become the norm and that Bill C-39 will centralize power in the government's hands by bypassing the House of Commons.
It is time for the Speaker to look into this issue and find a way for the opposition to obtain essential information in a timely manner.