House of Commons Hansard #160 of the 45th Parliament, 1st session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.) The word of the day was contract.

Topics

line drawing of robot

This summary is computer-generated. Usually it’s accurate, but every now and then it’ll contain inaccuracies or total fabrications.

Income Tax Act Second reading of Bill C-269. The bill proposes a permanent 30% non-refundable tax credit for Canadian businesses that recover industrial waste heat and convert it into electricity. Conservatives support studying it as a way to improve efficiency, reduce waste and boost competitiveness; the Bloc supports it in principle but seeks clearer targeting and safeguards. The Liberals oppose it as overly broad, costly and duplicative of existing incentives. 7700 words, 1 hour.

Opposition Motion—Federal Procurement Members debate a $12-million CRA security contract awarded to a Canadian subsidiary of a U.S. multinational instead of the Commissionaires, a Canadian non-profit employing veterans. Conservatives and Bloc members criticize the decision as inconsistent with the government’s Buy Canadian commitments and the Commissionaires’ employment mission, citing a bid difference under 1%. Liberals defend the competitive process, arguing the successful supplier has substantial Canadian operations and offered the best overall value. They also discuss veteran employment and procurement oversight. 38400 words, 5 hours in 2 segments: 1 2.

Statements by Members

Question Period

The Conservatives focus on affordability, urging the government to remove fuel taxes to lower costs for families and farmers. They criticize economic weakness and trade delays, question the use of American contractors over veterans, and call for tougher home-invasion laws and better management of the emergency medical stockpile. They also seek continued access to Indigenous mental-health care.
The Liberals emphasize affordability through tax cuts and benefits and promote a strong fiscal position ahead of Budget 2026. They defend clean-fuel support for canola farmers, seek a fair trade deal with the U.S., and tout tougher bail and sentencing laws to address home invasions. They also highlight Canadian procurement and support for workers.
The Bloc demands Quebec’s direct involvement and greater transparency in Canada–EU negotiations, including House debate and recognition of the Gérin-Lajoie doctrine. It also condemns plans to power energy-hungry data centres with natural gas, warning of climate impacts.
The NDP calls for union labour agreements on taxpayer-funded infrastructure projects to support skilled workers and deliver better results.

Special Economic Measures Act First reading of Bill S-214. The bill would amend the Special Economic Measures Act to allow the Governor in Council to dispose of foreign state assets seized without a judicial order. 100 words.

Petitions

Adjournment Debates

Indigenous rights and major projects Leah Gazan says First Nations oppose Bill C-39 and major-project designations because consultation is inadequate, arguing the law violates Indigenous and constitutional rights. Anthony Housefather says the government takes leaders’ concerns seriously, maintains its duty to consult and protect Indigenous rights, and aims to enable meaningful participation and economic benefits.
PrescribeIT spending and oversight Michael Cooper says the failed PrescribeIT project wasted $300 million, questions missing funds and executive bonuses, and asks why CEO Michael Green received a $1-million payout. Maggie Chi says independent reviews and a third-party audit of Infoway are underway and their results will establish accountability and value for taxpayers.
Oil and gas export financing Jacob Mantle urges the government to repeal its 2023 commitment to the Glasgow statement, arguing it prevents Export Development Canada from financing overseas oil and gas infrastructure that could expand markets for Canadian crude. Claude Guay highlights energy projects advancing in Canada and the Major Projects Office, but does not directly address whether the restriction will be lifted.
Was this summary helpful and accurate?

Opposition Motion—Federal ProcurementBusiness of SupplyGovernment Orders

5:10 p.m.

Liberal

John-Paul Danko Liberal Hamilton West—Ancaster—Dundas, ON

Mr. Speaker,

Jacques Cartier, right this way
I'll put your coat up on the bed
Hey man you've got the real bum's eye for clothes

It was interesting hearing the member opposite talk about fool's gold. I guess he is an expert in that, especially in conspiracy theories.

We are doing this study right now in the government operations and estimates committee, and the definition of what is Canadian has been explained to the member, I do even know how many times. It is a physical presence in Canada, tax registration and sourcing of Canadian goods and labour. It is pretty straightforward. It also follows well-established practices.

Would the member opposite agree that Canada's buy Canadian policy is important in the context of a global trade war?

Opposition Motion—Federal ProcurementBusiness of SupplyGovernment Orders

November 2nd, 2026 / 5:10 p.m.

Conservative

Dan Mazier Conservative Riding Mountain, MB

Mr. Speaker, I cannot believe the member actually just stated that. He is telling me that the government actually supports dealing the buy Canadian policy to companies such as Huawei. It simply has corporate affairs in here. It has been registered and identified as a national threat to our country, and it is okay for our government to be buying products from Huawei. Is that what the member is telling me?

Opposition Motion—Federal ProcurementBusiness of SupplyGovernment Orders

5:10 p.m.

Bloc

Mario Beaulieu Bloc La Pointe-de-l'Île, QC

Mr. Speaker, we in the Bloc Québécois agree with the part of the motion that deals with the buy Canadian policy. However, there is another part that runs counter to secularism or that supports the use of religious language by chaplains. There is also a part that mentions steel, aluminum and lumber in the preamble, but the motion does not address them further.

What exactly is the overall message of this motion?

Opposition Motion—Federal ProcurementBusiness of SupplyGovernment Orders

5:10 p.m.

Conservative

Dan Mazier Conservative Riding Mountain, MB

Mr. Speaker, the global message from the Liberal government is that it values veterans less than it values American companies, which is absolutely shameful and disgusting. I cannot imagine being a veteran here, going to defend our country and then coming back to a slap in the face. It is absolutely deplorable.

Opposition Motion—Federal ProcurementBusiness of SupplyGovernment Orders

5:15 p.m.

Conservative

Ellis Ross Conservative Skeena—Bulkley Valley, BC

Mr. Speaker, there are two issues we are talking about. One is an American company's getting a contract that is normally reserved for the veterans of Canada, those who served in our armed forces. However, more importantly, the non-profit Commissionaires uses the revenue to help veterans from the armed forces who otherwise would not have it. The company in question, Allied Universal, a United States-based company, is not going to provide that same service to our veterans. Can the member please comment on that?

Opposition Motion—Federal ProcurementBusiness of SupplyGovernment Orders

5:15 p.m.

Conservative

Dan Mazier Conservative Riding Mountain, MB

Mr. Speaker, the member asked a very good question. What kind of government that is supposed to be looking after our country and our veterans would consider that to be a good, very sound decision and as standing up for Canada? I can tell the House that a Conservative government would never make that kind of decision.

Opposition Motion—Federal ProcurementBusiness of SupplyGovernment Orders

5:15 p.m.

Winnipeg North Manitoba

Liberal

Kevin Lamoureux LiberalParliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons

Mr. Speaker, gross exaggeration is probably one of the ways I would describe many of the comments made by my friend across the way. The company he is shooting down employs Manitobans. The footprint in Canada is significantly large. The Commissionaires defend the commissionaires until the end. At the end of the day, I believe in the support they give.

However, the member should not give the false impression that the commissionaires are 100% veterans. They are not. It is probably closer to about 20%, and the company that has taken over the contract has rehired 30, maybe 33, of the 60 who were working there, a dozen of whom are veterans. Let us not grossly exaggerate the situation. Would the member not agree?

Opposition Motion—Federal ProcurementBusiness of SupplyGovernment Orders

5:15 p.m.

Conservative

Dan Mazier Conservative Riding Mountain, MB

Mr. Speaker, the member said “false impression”. My gosh, it is smoke and mirrors. The Liberals are masters at this. They are absolutely outraged. How dare we question one thing about this policy?

I went on for 10 minutes explaining to the Canadian public and to all those attending here today how much the government is misleading Canadians. It has to stop.

The bigger question is, what kind of government would do this to the Canadian people?

Opposition Motion—Federal ProcurementBusiness of SupplyGovernment Orders

5:15 p.m.

Liberal

Doug Eyolfson Liberal Winnipeg West, MB

Mr. Speaker, I would like to start by saying I will be sharing my time with the member for Surrey Newton.

I welcome the opportunity to debate the motion from the hon. member for Battle River—Crowfoot. At a time of open challenges to our economic security and sovereignty, I can think of few more pressing public policy issues than the question of where and when key government contracts go to Canadian firms and suppliers. This is at the root of the motion put to us today, and I can assure all members that the government shares this concern.

Since last December, the buy Canadian policy has been at the centre of a suite of measures introduced by the Government of Canada to stimulate the growth of Canada's builders and suppliers. Last September, we launched Build Canada Homes, a new federal agency that is building affordable housing at scale, fuelling a new and thriving housing industry. With an initial investment of $13 billion over five years, Build Canada Homes is investing in the development of public lands sites in partnership with Canadian builders, suppliers, other levels of government and indigenous communities. That investment is already making a difference, with multiple direct-build projects across multiple cities delivering up to 4,000 new homes on federal land, with at least 40% at below market rents.

There is also the Defence Investment Agency. The need for a more strategic and responsive approach to defence procurement has long been acknowledged in Canada, but only in the last year has real action been taken. Since its inception last October, the Defence Investment Agency has been delivering for the Canadian Armed Forces while driving investment, innovation and industrial growth by targeting procurements that support strategic defence sectors such as aerospace and advanced manufacturing. The agency is driving the creation of high-quality, skilled jobs to communities across Canada and bolstering our country's industrial capacity and technological competitiveness.

Finally, the Major Projects Office was introduced last year to put transformative, nation-building ideas on a viable path to fruition through the co-operation of federal departments, provinces and territories, indigenous peoples and industry. The goal is to identify projects with maximum benefit for Canadians. For example, just last month, the government announced that the new west coast pipeline, known as Pacific link, would be listed as a project of national interest.

Whether it is the need for affordable housing, state-of-the-art defence capabilities or major infrastructure, these initiatives do not simply recognize the great reservoir of talent and experience within Canadian industry. They bank on it, and so does the buy Canadian policy. In fact, the policy is something of a common thread that runs through all these initiatives. The buy Canadian policy prioritizes Canadian suppliers and materials, strengthens supply chains and incentivizes Canadian content in strategic federal procurements. It applies to the ongoing work of the Major Projects Office, the Defence Investment Agency, Build Canada Homes and Crown corporations and their subsidies, as well as the hundreds of federal grants and contributions programs.

In just over eight months, between December and October, Public Services and Procurement Canada awarded over 1,600 new contracts, worth approximately $23.8 billion. Of these, roughly 1,340 contracts totalling $17.7 billion were awarded to suppliers operating in Canada. These efforts are transforming local communities across the country with long-term, well-paying job opportunities for skilled workers.

Last February, Kitchener's Colt Canada was awarded a $307-million contract to supply the Canadian Armed Forces with assault rifle systems under the Canadian modular assault rifle project. By investing in local expertise, we are ensuring that the forces are ready for the challenges ahead.

In August, the government awarded a $768.6-million construction services contract to PCL Constructors Canada for the full construction of a new federal regulatory science facility at the Canadian Food Inspection Agency's Ottawa laboratory in Nepean, Ontario. On average, the site will employ about 250 workers a day.

Also last summer, the government announced an investment of $2 billion over four years to General Dynamics Land Systems-Canada to build 190 armoured combat support vehicles. This strategic partnership is truly a pan-Canadian feat of co-operation, with several companies supporting the effort.

Ryan Manufacturing in Richmond, BC, will supply military-grade cable and wire harness assemblies. InterPro in Regina, Saskatchewan, will supply advanced armour. Thales Canada in Saint-Laurent, Quebec, will supply thermal imaging systems. IMP Aerospace and Defence in Enfield, Nova Scotia, will supply other specialized components. The difference under the buy Canadian policy is that Canadian suppliers are now prioritized as a matter of practice. Suppliers must demonstrate that they meet the policy requirements, including through eligibility and Canadian content attestations, and the government has put compliance and monitoring mechanisms in place.

The buy Canadian policy goes beyond giving preference to Canadian suppliers. In strategic federal procurements covered by the policy, bids receive additional evaluation points for higher proportions of Canadian content and value added activities, such as manufacturing and research development. This encourages businesses to source more from Canadian partners, extending opportunities to Canadian firms that supply components, materials and expertise. Our goal is to create an incentive for businesses to do more in Canada and to have more Canadian workers, more Canadian suppliers in their supply chains, more Canadian manufacturing, more Canadian research and development, and more investment in Canadian facilities and communities.

In conclusion, it was said once that the world needs more Canada. With these policies and programs, the government is taking the position that Canada needs more Canada. International co-operation with trusted partners, both public and private, will always be a part of our efforts as a responsible federal government, but if the last two years have taught us anything, it is that our future is best placed in our own hands. We have made significant progress in less than a year, but this is not the finish line. We will continue expanding opportunities for Canadian businesses, strengthening Canadian supply chains and ensuring that federal government procurement serves as an economic lever for this country, because federal procurement is more than just purchases; it is an opportunity to build Canadian capacity, support Canadian workers and invest in Canada's economic future.

This is the essence of the buy Canadian policy, and I look forward to seeing where it takes us in the years ahead.

Opposition Motion—Federal ProcurementBusiness of SupplyGovernment Orders

5:25 p.m.

Conservative

Brad Vis Conservative Mission—Matsqui—Abbotsford, BC

Mr. Speaker, I would like to thank the member from Winnipeg for outlining, in general terms, the buy Canada policy. In reality, many small businesses across our country do not know where to start or where to go to apply for a government contract. In addition to that, the red tape to enter into an agreement is still very challenging for many of the small businesses that are facing the uncertainty referenced in his speech.

In good faith, what areas can the government improve in procurement to actually see small businesses take up the government contracts? Since the announcements from the secretary of state for small business have come into force, we have not seen the increase in those contracts going to Canadian firms.

Opposition Motion—Federal ProcurementBusiness of SupplyGovernment Orders

5:25 p.m.

Liberal

Doug Eyolfson Liberal Winnipeg West, MB

Mr. Speaker, the hon. member's question is a very good question. It is a very timely question. We do know that, when a new program is introduced, there are questions. We need to be expanding what we are doing and the information we make available, but the offices of members of Parliament are already available. My own office, and I am sure the hon. member's office as well, is assisting small businesses in the riding to take advantage of these important government programs.

Opposition Motion—Federal ProcurementBusiness of SupplyGovernment Orders

5:25 p.m.

Bloc

Marie-Hélène Gaudreau Bloc Laurentides—Labelle, QC

Mr. Speaker, I listened carefully to my colleague's speech. He is well aware that the government has a long-standing relationship with this organization, whose social mission is to help our veterans transition to civilian life is. The response we are hearing is that this decision was a matter of efficiency, taken in response to the current context, and that few thousand people is minor. The government upended an arrangement that had existed for over a hundred years.

How does my colleague think a veteran would react to hearing that?

Opposition Motion—Federal ProcurementBusiness of SupplyGovernment Orders

5:25 p.m.

Liberal

Doug Eyolfson Liberal Winnipeg West, MB

Mr. Speaker, I appreciate my colleague's valuable work with me on the health committee.

Yes, we do have a social contract with our veterans, and there are established practices, but of course we talk about things that have been going on for over 100 years. A hundred years is a long time. There are going to be changes in our processes. Our government procurement decisions have to be made with the best decisions for all stakeholders in Canada at the time.

Opposition Motion—Federal ProcurementBusiness of SupplyGovernment Orders

5:25 p.m.

Liberal

Marianne Dandurand Liberal Compton—Stanstead, QC

Mr. Speaker, I would like to follow up on a question from the opposition regarding the claim that the government does not support small businesses and that they do not have access to federal contracts.

I believe that the small business procurement program, which was introduced over the summer, helps by simplifying procurement processes, scaling contracts for SMEs and supporting small businesses in gaining access to contracting opportunities.

I would like to ask my colleague whether he himself takes steps in his riding to assist businesses seeking to obtain contracts with the federal government.

If so, what exactly is he doing?

Opposition Motion—Federal ProcurementBusiness of SupplyGovernment Orders

5:25 p.m.

Liberal

Doug Eyolfson Liberal Winnipeg West, MB

Mr. Speaker, the hon. member is absolutely right. The process is being streamlined. I, like I am sure almost every MP in here, have people working in my office who work directly with constituents, including constituent companies. When they call us, they want to know what is available. We make sure that they know the programs that are available and exactly how the process works. If they have problems with the process, we can help them navigate those and call the relevant departments for clarification.

Opposition Motion—Federal ProcurementBusiness of SupplyGovernment Orders

5:30 p.m.

Liberal

Sukh Dhaliwal Liberal Surrey Newton, BC

Mr. Speaker, I rise in the House today to reaffirm the Government of Canada's commitment to the buy Canadian policy. We are incredibly proud of how this initiative is transforming government procurement, giving Canadian businesses, workers, manufacturers and suppliers greater access to opportunities and delivering real results for Canada.

The government will always stand with Canadian workers and Canadian businesses, and that is how we will build the strongest economy in the G7. We remain committed to prioritizing Canadian suppliers and Canadian-made goods and services in federal procurement.

This is a pledge we have made to Canadians and it is unwavering. Since the buy Canadian policy came into force in December 2025, it has been reshaping how the federal government spends by prioritizing Canadian content, materials, suppliers and workers at every opportunity. From steel and aluminum to wood products, the government's purchasing of goods and services is being used as a powerful tool to back key industries and strengthen domestic supply chains.

The rollout of the buy Canadian policy marked a major step toward building a more resilient Canadian economy. It was designed to ensure clear advantages are available to suppliers who invest, innovate and produce here at home. By prioritizing Canadian suppliers, Canadian materials and Canadian content in federal procurement, we are becoming our own best customer by reducing reliance on any single trading partner and building—

Opposition Motion—Federal ProcurementBusiness of SupplyGovernment Orders

5:30 p.m.

The Deputy Speaker Tom Kmiec

I have to interrupt the member.

The member for Laurentides—Labelle is rising on a point of order.

Opposition Motion—Federal ProcurementBusiness of SupplyGovernment Orders

5:30 p.m.

Bloc

Marie-Hélène Gaudreau Bloc Laurentides—Labelle, QC

Mr. Speaker, I am very sorry to have to interrupt my colleague, but the interpretation has stopped. It is important for me to be able to understand what he is saying.

Opposition Motion—Federal ProcurementBusiness of SupplyGovernment Orders

5:30 p.m.

The Deputy Speaker Tom Kmiec

I believe the member has a mobile device, perhaps either in his pocket or on the table, that is interfering with interpretation. I will ask him to put it away or put it on airplane mode.

The member can restart, and we can give him back about 20 seconds' worth of time so that interpretation can work again. I will ask him to keep the mobile device away from the speakers.

Opposition Motion—Federal ProcurementBusiness of SupplyGovernment Orders

5:30 p.m.

Liberal

Sukh Dhaliwal Liberal Surrey Newton, BC

Mr. Speaker, by prioritizing Canadian suppliers, Canadian materials and Canadian content in federal procurement, we are becoming our own best customer. By reducing our reliance on any single trading partner and building resilience through strong domestic demand, we are bolstering Canada's economy. The policy on prioritizing Canadian suppliers and Canadian content in strategic federal procurements initially applied to procurements valued at $25 million or more. In June, we lowered that threshold to $5 million, significantly expanding its reach.

We are also putting Canadian materials at the centre of major federal construction and defence projects. For procurement of $25 million or more, the policy requires Canadian-produced steel, aluminum and wood. We are making it easier for Canadian small businesses to compete for federal opportunities through the small business procurement program, which will simplify procurement processes and introduce new digital tools.

Ultimately, the test of this policy is whether federal spending creates economic activity here at home. In the spirit of the buy Canadian policy, the government continues to work to identify opportunities for Canadian suppliers to benefit from federal procurement policies and ultimately support Canadian workers, Canadian businesses and Canadian communities. This includes attracting investments that deliver tangible and lasting benefits to Canadian communities and supply chains.

This is about driving growth, creating opportunities and enhancing prosperity for all Canadians. In the current situation we are in, this has never been more important, particularly when it comes to protecting Canada's sovereignty. We know that the world has changed and that Canada must change with it. That is why Canada is also making generational investments to rebuild and reinvest in the Canadian Armed Forces. These investments are guided by Canada's first-ever defence industrial strategy, a whole-of-government approach to transform Canada's defence industry. The strategy will prioritize Canadian suppliers and materials, invest in Canadian innovation and streamline defence procurement. It is supported by the new Defence Investment Agency.

Between December 2025 and October 1, 2026, Public Services and Procurement Canada awarded a total of 1,644 new contracts worth roughly $23 billion. Of these, 1,342 contracts, representing about $17.7 billion, were awarded to suppliers operating here in Canada. That is the kind of progress we want to build on.

With regard to today's motion, the Canada Revenue Agency, following a fair and open procurement process, decided to award the contract to a company that operates extensively in Canada and employs Canadian security guards, supervisors and managers. This brings me to an important point of what we mean when we talk about a Canadian supplier.

Being a Canadian supplier is not simply a question of who owns the shares of a company. We also need to look at where the economic activity takes place. Under the buy Canadian policy, the definition of Canadian supplier is based on substantive economic activity in Canada. That includes having a place of business here, being registered here, filing taxes here, conducting ongoing activities and employing people in Canada to deliver goods and services. That distinction matters.

A company can be part of a global enterprise and still employ thousands of Canadians. It can pay taxes here. It can operate facilities here. It can conduct research and development here, and it can purchase from Canadian suppliers and invest in Canadian communities. Those jobs are Canadian jobs. Those investments are investments in Canada, and that economic activity matters to Canadians and Canada.

Buy Canadian is not simply about where a company's headquarters is located. It is about where the jobs are, where the investment is, where the innovation happens, where the supply chain is built and ultimately, where the economic benefits land. We continue to work closely with businesses, suppliers and stakeholders to develop and refine procurement measures that support Canadian industry, strengthen supply chains and drive our country's economic growth.

Our government will always stand with Canadian workers and Canadian businesses, and we will build a stronger economy in the G7. We will always support our veterans with job opportunities.

I want to assure this House that we are fully committed to our buy Canadian policy, the substantial opportunities it is providing for Canadians and the powerful benefits for our country. We are transforming our economy through buy Canadian. We are supporting our industries today while keeping a clear focus on this sustainable future. That is our promise to Canadians, which is one that we are delivering on.

Opposition Motion—Federal ProcurementBusiness of SupplyGovernment Orders

5:40 p.m.

Conservative

Brad Vis Conservative Mission—Matsqui—Abbotsford, BC

Mr. Speaker, the member outlined, in reference to some of the criticisms of the program, namely, the change of threshold from $25 million down to $5 million, but there are still certain policies related to the buy Canada policy at large that need to be addressed, largely related to subcontracting. Some have labelled it a superficial economic illusion that dilutes the intended benefits of this policy we all support.

Is the government open to changing some of the subcontracting policies to allow for that work to stay in Canada and not be sent offshore to non-Canadian entities when the policy in and of itself is to support Canadian small businesses and Canadian companies?

Opposition Motion—Federal ProcurementBusiness of SupplyGovernment Orders

5:40 p.m.

Liberal

Sukh Dhaliwal Liberal Surrey Newton, BC

Mr. Speaker, the member understands very well that I come from a small business, and 85% of the businesses in my constituency, in fact even in his constituency, are small businesses. That is where our government's focus is: lowering that threshold from $25 million to $5 million, and now we are looking at other ways the government can provide support.

He and I have to keep advocating and making sure that our government does what is necessary for small businesses to succeed. That is what I will continue to fight for, and that is what I have been fighting for in the many years I have been in Parliament.

Opposition Motion—Federal ProcurementBusiness of SupplyGovernment Orders

5:40 p.m.

Bloc

Mario Beaulieu Bloc La Pointe-de-l'Île, QC

Mr. Speaker, since the Prime Minister took office, six of the top 10 federal suppliers are headquartered in the United States. It has been reported that billions of dollars in contracts are still going to American companies, contracts worth a total of $7.8 billion, according to the Toronto Star. It has been reported that the percentage of contracts awarded to American companies is increasing. IBM was cited as an example of buying Canadian earlier because that company has a subsidiary in the member's riding.

How are these contracts divvied up? In my colleague's opinion, what criteria should be used to ensure the government actually does buy Canadian?

Opposition Motion—Federal ProcurementBusiness of SupplyGovernment Orders

5:40 p.m.

Liberal

Sukh Dhaliwal Liberal Surrey Newton, BC

Mr. Speaker, as I mentioned earlier, most of these projects have gone to Canadian companies. If we look at the numbers I talked about, between December 2025 and October 1, 2026, Public Services and Procurement Canada awarded a total of 1,644 contracts worth roughly $23 billion. Of these, 1,342 contracts, representing about $17.7 billion, were awarded to suppliers operating in Canada. That is the kind of progress we want to build on, and we will continue to build on having more contracts going to Canadian suppliers in the coming days, weeks, months and years.

Opposition Motion—Federal ProcurementBusiness of SupplyGovernment Orders

5:40 p.m.

Liberal

Terry Beech Liberal Burnaby North—Seymour, BC

Mr. Speaker, when I first came to the House in 2015, I remember that the defence budget was less than 1% of GDP. Now it is over 2%. Of course, the economy has also grown in that perspective, which means it is actually a tripling of the defence budget. We have similarly seen increases in the Veterans Affairs budget. I think everyone in the House agrees we need to build Canada strong, we need to hire more Canadians and we need to buy more in Canada.

Would my friend, like to comment on the significant investments and the improvements we have made both for Canadian defence and for Canadian veterans?