House of Commons Hansard #98 of the 45th Parliament, 1st session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.)
The word of the day was workers.
Topics
This summary is computer-generated.
Usually it’s accurate, but every now and then it’ll contain inaccuracies or total fabrications.
Procedure and House Affairs
Members present reports from the Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs concerning committee membership and election candidate criteria, while debating proposed measures regarding "longest ballot" organizations and nomination signature limits.
700 words.
Opposition Motion—Tariff-free Auto Pact
Conservative MP Kyle Seeback moves a motion criticizing the Liberal government’s handling of the auto industry, citing declining production levels and job losses. Conservatives propose a 'tariff-free auto pact' to double production via GST exemptions and a one-for-one sales rule. Liberals oppose the motion, arguing the plan is outdated and ignores current global trade realities. Meanwhile, the Bloc Québécois rejects it, highlighting concerns regarding climate goals and regional interests.
47900 words, 6 hours in 2 segments: 12.
The NDP condemns the government for cutting funding for accessible housing for wheelchair users. They also call for an end to arms exports to ensure Canada is not complicit in the civilian killings in the Middle East.
Supplementary Estimates (C), 2025-26
First reading of
Bill C-23.
The bill appropriates specified sums for federal public administration for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2026, advancing through the House of Commons for final approval on division.
.
Interim Supply
Members move and carry a motion on division to grant interim supply totalling $86.4 billion to fund government operations until March 31, 2027, as part of the budgetary process for the upcoming fiscal year.
600 words.
Interim Supply
First reading of
Bill C-24.
The bill receives first, second, and third reading in the House of Commons, is reviewed clause-by-clause as a committee of the whole, and is ultimately passed on division for federal public administration funding.
.
Amendments to Bill C-8
Laila Goodridge argues against the government’s challenge to amendments made by the Standing Committee on Public Safety regarding Bill C-8, asserting that the committee’s changes are procedurally sound and within the bill's scope.
1300 words, 10 minutes.
Respecting Families of Murdered and Brutalized Persons Act
Second reading of
Bill C-235.
The bill increases, at a judge's discretion, parole ineligibility periods to 40 years for offenders convicted of abduction, sexual assault, and murder. Supporters, primarily Conservatives, argue it prevents the retraumatization of victims' families. The Bloc Québécois opposes the measure, citing constitutional concerns regarding Supreme Court rulings on cumulative sentencing and potential wasted parliamentary resources, but the motion passes and proceeds to committee.
4200 words, 30 minutes.
Employment data and economic performance Garnett Genuis criticizes the government for significant job losses, particularly among youth, while dismissing ministerial excuses as inaccurate or logically inconsistent. Leslie Church defends the government's economic record, citing strong foreign direct investment projections and new training investments under Budget 2025 to support workers impacted by trade disruptions.
Economic performance and cost of living Kevin Waugh criticizes the government for Canada's shrinking economy, high inflation, and job losses, arguing that families need jobs rather than handouts. Leslie Church defends the administration's economic plan, citing new grocery benefits and targeted funding to support affordability, while blaming trade wars for recent economic challenges.
Benefits delivery modernization costs Sébastien Lemire criticizes significant cost overruns in the government's Cúram-based benefits delivery system, demanding an independent inquiry. Leslie Church defends the project as necessary to modernize outdated infrastructure, stating that the migration of OAS was completed under budget and is essential for reliable, secure service delivery to millions.
Mr. Speaker, the regions of Quebec have run out of patience. The Liberal government's inaction is costing them dearly. That is not according to me; it is according to mayors, business people and organizations in the Chaudière-Appalaches region who are here in Ottawa to sound the alarm. The Prime Minister promised to get rid of U.S. tariffs on steel and softwood lumber. He failed. He plunged the immigration system into total chaos. That is another failure. Now, jobs are being lost in every one of our regions.
How many more jobs will we have to lose before the Prime Minister keeps his promises to businesses in Beauce?
Mélanie JolyLiberalMinister of Industry and Minister responsible for Canada Economic Development for Quebec Regions
Mr. Speaker, my colleague referred to several cases related to sectors in Beauce that have been affected by U.S. tariffs. Canada Economic Development for Quebec Regions will work with the member. That said, I would like him and his caucus to do more to condemn the U.S. tariffs, because the silence on that side speaks volumes.
Mr. Speaker, business representatives from Saguenay—Lac-Saint-Jean are here in Ottawa because they cannot wait any longer. The Prime Minister was supposed to reach an agreement on aluminum tariffs with the Trump administration. One year later, there is nothing, nada. Meanwhile, 57,000 jobs were lost in Quebec in February. Workers in the aluminum industry are paying the price. Contracts are disappearing, uncertainty is setting in and the regions are suffering.
Why is the Prime Minister abandoning our workers and businesses in the regions?
Mélanie JolyLiberalMinister of Industry and Minister responsible for Canada Economic Development for Quebec Regions
Mr. Speaker, I will also have the opportunity to meet the same people my colleague will be meeting later today. I had the opportunity to work with him last week. Why? It is because we want to help workers in the aluminum industry. We know they are being hit with unjustified tariffs from the Trump administration. We are here to protect them. We are also in talks with several businesses in the region to provide support. We are having discussions and making decisions regarding major upcoming investments at Rio Tinto. We are there for Saguenay—Lac-Saint-Jean.
Mr. Speaker, on March 12, the Prime Minister was in Yellowknife to announce a historic plan to defend, build and transform the north, backed by more than $40 billion in investment. This is a question I wrote myself. It is very important.
Rebecca AltyLiberalMinister of Crown-Indigenous Relations
Mr. Speaker, for decades, communities across the Northwest Territories have been clear: The Mackenzie Valley Highway is essential for their future. This project would finally connect remote communities, lower the cost of goods, unlock critical minerals and create real opportunities for local businesses. We are also advancing the Taltson hydroelectric project and the Arctic economic and security corridor with indigenous partners.
With more than $40 billion in investments, we are building a stronger, more resilient and more connected north.
Links & Sharing
Immigration, Refugees and CitizenshipOral Questions
Tamara JansenConservative
Cloverdale—Langley City, BC
Mr. Speaker, I spoke with a man in my riding who works at a local cabinet manufacturing shop. He works hard and pays his taxes, but his hours were cut because students with expired visas take his shifts for cash under the table. This is the direct result of a system the previous Liberal immigration minister let spiral out of control, where international students came without proper oversight and thousands overstayed their visits.
Will the Liberal Prime Minister admit that this mess started under his previous minister? Canadians, like my constituent, are now paying the price.
Links & Sharing
Immigration, Refugees and CitizenshipOral Questions
Patty HajduLiberalMinister of Jobs and Families and Minister responsible for the Federal Economic Development Agency for Northern Ontario
Mr. Speaker, what the member alleges is hard to prove. What I will say is that what we can prove is that the investments we are making in workers, the investments we are making in major projects and the investments we are making in defence will lead to hundreds of thousands of jobs.
Do members know who is happy about that? It is the unions and the workers all across this country who are eagerly looking forward to building Canada strong under the Prime Minister.
Links & Sharing
Immigration, Refugees and CitizenshipOral Questions
Tamara JansenConservative
Cloverdale—Langley City, BC
Mr. Speaker, what we are seeing today did not come from one mistake. It came from years of mismanagement by multiple Liberal immigration ministers. One opened the floodgates without oversight. Another failed to enforce the rules, and now the current minister is continuing with more permits, with millions of visas sitting expired or unchecked. Even Liberal MPs have said this minister is not up to the job.
Through you, Mr. Speaker, I would ask the Prime Minister this. Why are three of the most ineffective immigration ministers in Canadian history still sitting around the cabinet table while Canadians face the consequences of their failures?
Links & Sharing
Immigration, Refugees and CitizenshipOral Questions
Mr. Speaker, many members on this side of the House have answered that question throughout this entire question period.
What I would say is that the number of repetitive questions from the Conservative benches are up. Do colleagues know what is down? The number of Conservative MPs sitting on that side of the House.
Links & Sharing
Immigration, Refugees and CitizenshipOral Questions
Costas MenegakisConservative
Aurora—Oak Ridges—Richmond Hill, ON
Mr. Speaker, after 10 years of disastrous Liberal policies, the immigration crisis is worse now than ever before. The Auditor General's latest findings revealed widespread fraud and dangerous gaps in the Liberals' oversight of foreign student work permits. In spite of this, the Liberals are pushing ahead with hundreds of thousands of new foreign work permits with no plan to remove the millions of existing expired foreign visa holders who remain in Canada. The Liberal Prime Minister needs to take responsibility for promoting the ministers who created this chaos.
Why are three of the most incompetent and destructive ministers in Canadian history still in his cabinet?
Links & Sharing
Immigration, Refugees and CitizenshipOral Questions
Wayne LongLiberalSecretary of State (Canada Revenue Agency and Financial Institutions)
Mr. Speaker, we are not going to take advice on jobs and the economy from a leader who has never worked one day in it. On this side of the House, we are going to continue to build the strongest economy in the G7. At home, we have cut taxes for 22 million Canadians. Abroad, we are signing new trade deals. Diversifying markets will result in thousands of jobs and tens of billions of dollars in investment.
It is time for that leader and that party to stop the same questions, the same rhetoric, and help us build Canada strong.
Links & Sharing
Immigration, Refugees and CitizenshipOral Questions
Costas MenegakisConservative
Aurora—Oak Ridges—Richmond Hill, ON
Mr. Speaker, successive Liberal immigration ministers have destroyed our once-respected immigration system. Yesterday, the Auditor General revealed that the Liberals only reviewed 2.6% of 153,000 suspected cases of foreign student work permit fraud. The Liberals have allowed hundreds of IRGC agents into the country. Yesterday, the immigration minister practised the art of deflection. It seems that when it comes to the safety of Canadians, the Liberal ministers play a game of “Who, me? Yes, you! Not me! Then who?”
Why are some of the most incompetent and destructive ministers in Canadian history still in cabinet?
Links & Sharing
Immigration, Refugees and CitizenshipOral Questions
Rechie ValdezLiberalMinister of Women and Gender Equality and Secretary of State (Small Business and Tourism)
Mr. Speaker, speaking of young people, young people in this country are ready to work, and we are making sure that the opportunities are there for them. Through Canada summer jobs, we have tens of thousands of young people who are getting a job for the first time, and they are getting experience right in their communities. We are investing $635 million in student work placements, so that post-secondary students can build their careers and jobs right here in this country.
That is what we are focused on. We are focused on youth who can gain the skills for the future to build Canada strong.
Mr. Speaker, let us talk about some auto facts. A decade ago before the Liberals took office, Canadian auto producers produced two million vehicles a year. After a decade of Liberal incompetence, that went down to 1.2 million. Now it gets worse, unfortunately, because since the new Prime Minister has taken office, auto exports are down a further 54%. It is a decimation. We have lost the Brampton plant. We have lost Paccar. We have lost the BrightDrop facility. We have lost the third shift at Oshawa.
This is all since the Liberals announced their so-called new auto policy. When will they realized it is garbage and move to our tariff-free auto pact?
In the interest of fairness, when that word was used before by another member, I expressed disappointment, and I will do the same, because I want to be consistent. I just do not think that elevates us in the eyes of the public.
Mélanie JolyLiberalMinister of Industry and Minister responsible for Canada Economic Development for Quebec Regions
Mr. Speaker, let us talk about facts. The proposal by the Conservatives is too little, too late. Why? They did not even consult workers when doing it. They have no measures for workers in their auto proposals, and actually, Unifor, which represents workers, is against it. Our auto proposal is actually supported by the Conservative Premier of Ontario. Premier—
I will give the member a few extra seconds, because it was very loud on the left, like it can be very loud at the back on the right. It is a good way for the Chair to learn the names of ridings when members do that.
Mr. Speaker, everyone is in favour of our auto strategy: the Conservative Premier of Ontario, Premier Ford, industry, unions, consumers, everyone, so why do they not get with the program and get on our side?
Mr. Speaker, it is actually shocking how uninformed the industry minister is when it comes to the auto strategy. They announced their auto strategy, and auto exports, since they announced it, are down 32%. This is a decimation. The reason this is happening is that there are tariffs on our autos at about 15%. The Liberals have been completely incapable of removing the tariffs. They have no plan to remove the tariffs. All they do is talk about something that might happen.
We have a plan that has been endorsed by the president of GM's Oshawa assembly plant and the Canadian Vehicle Manufacturers' Association. Why do they not get on board with the tariff-free auto pact?
Mélanie JolyLiberalMinister of Industry and Minister responsible for Canada Economic Development for Quebec Regions
Mr. Speaker, whatever that was, what the Conservatives forgot when thinking of our auto industry is actually 200,000 workers. Why? It is because they forgot about auto parts. Canada has been leading when it comes to auto parts. We have the three biggest companies in the world: Linamar, Martinrea and Magna. They forgot to protect the GM engine and transmission workers in Cambridge. They forgot the Ford engine auto workers in Windsor. They forgot the Honda engine workers in Alliston. They forgot. I could go on.
Mr. Speaker, the Liberals have thrown in the towel on Canada's auto sector. Since 2015, auto production is down by half, exports are down by 53% and over 5,000 auto jobs are gone. The Conservatives' auto pact would restore tariff-free access to the U.S., doubling auto production here at home.
Instead of giving up on our auto sector, will the Liberals stand with their auto workers and support our motion to boost production here in Canada?
Ryan TurnbullLiberalParliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Finance and National Revenue and to the Secretary of State (Canada Revenue Agency and Financial Institutions)
Mr. Speaker, we know nostalgia is not a strategy. We cannot go back to 1965, to a tariff-free auto pact.
What has Unifor said about the Conservatives' so-called plan? It said this plan cannot achieve its intended objectives, it is mathematically incorrect, and it may prevent potential future growth in our automotive industry. Unlike them, we actually sit down with the workers and the unions and consult them on the plans and strategies that we lead and move forward on implementing. We have offered liquidity support and financing for them to pivot, adjusted the availability standard for EVs, and much more.
Mr. Speaker, here is what the president of Unifor Local 222 said, “Finally, a...plan to protect the livelihood of thousands of Ontario Auto sector workers.” Under the Liberal plan, production is down and exports are down, but job losses are up.
The Conservative plan would double auto production here in Canada. The Canadian Vehicle Manufacturers' Association supports our plan. The local unions support our plan. The auto worker on the assembly line supports our plan. Will the Liberals?