House of Commons photo

Crucial Fact

  • His favourite word was grain.

Last in Parliament November 2005, as Conservative MP for Wetaskiwin (Alberta)

Won his last election, in 2004, with 74% of the vote.

Statements in the House

Westray Mine March 3rd, 2000

Mr. Speaker, it is a pleasure for me to spend a few minutes on the private member's motion that is before us today. The motion is that that this House should be called upon to amend the criminal code or other appropriate federal statutes to be in accordance with recommendation no. 73 of the province of Nova Scotia's public inquiry into the Westray mine disaster.

This motion is certainly supportable because of the aspect of accountability for negligence. It makes good sense that people should not be asked to work in obviously unsafe conditions. If there is a requirement to work in an unsafe area, then the employee should have the right to refuse that work. If an employee is injured or killed in an unsafe work area and the employer could be shown to be negligent, I agree that he or she should be held accountable.

We have been waiting for some time for amendments to part II of the labour code which would deal with health and safety. I believe there will be provisions in that code which will come very close to achieving these ends. We have indicated that we will be supporting that legislation when it comes to the House.

The spirit and intent of the motion is to hold employers accountable for providing a safe workplace. I know that Mr. Speaker has been an employer for a good many years and has always striven to provide a safe workplace for his employees. No doubt his employees are his number one consideration. This is only reasonable.

We have to be very cautious and strike a balance. It is up to the employer to provide a safe workplace. There also should be a recommendation or at least an onus on the employee not to use the clause frivolously and only to protest about bona fide unsafe working conditions.

I have appreciated the opportunity to say a few words to the motion. I am certain that when Bill C-12, the amendments to the Canada Labour Code, comes before the House we will have a lot more to say.

Human Resources Development March 3rd, 2000

Mr. Speaker, the Minister of Human Resources Development never divulges any information in the House unless she has been caught. She revealed the internal departmental audit only after we asked for it under access to information legislation. She released a riding by riding list of grants and contributions only after she had been caught giving them to her own Liberal MPs. She told us about nine criminal investigations in the House yesterday after we had cornered her.

I ask her once again, where are the remaining police investigations taking place?

Petitions February 29th, 2000

Mr. Speaker, in the second petition my constituents urge parliament to fulfil the promise made in 1989 by the House of Commons to end child poverty by the year 2000.

Petitions February 29th, 2000

Mr. Speaker, my constituents, along with other Canadians, are horrified by pornography which degrades children and are astounded by legal determinations that possession of such pornography is not criminal.

Therefore, the petitioners call upon parliament to take all necessary measures to ensure that possession of child pornography remains a serious criminal offence and that federal police forces be directed to give priority to enforcing this law for the protection of children.

Committees Of The House February 11th, 2000

Mr. Speaker, therefore, I would like to ask for unanimous consent to move this motion in the name of the hon. member for Surrey Central.

Committees Of The House February 11th, 2000

Mr. Speaker, I rise on a point of order. The chair of course is the authority on procedure in the House, but it is my understanding that I could move this motion in the name of the hon. member for Surrey Central. Am I mistaken in that?

Committees Of The House February 11th, 2000

Mr. Speaker, I move that the first report of the Standing Committee on Scrutiny of Regulations presented on Friday, December 10, 1999 be concurred in.

Committees Of The House February 11th, 2000

Mr. Speaker, I ask for the unanimous consent of the House to adopt the first report of the Standing Committee on Scrutiny of Regulations presented on Friday, December 10, 1999.

Human Resources Development February 9th, 2000

Mr. Speaker, that is all very nice, but I submit it is also her duty to get the money back that Canadian taxpayers put in after an industry fails.

I have just given one example of 60,000 HRDC files. Access to information requests reveal that there are many other files under investigation.

Will the minister tell us just how many other files are under investigation? I would like to know how many other Pandas there are out there.

Human Resources Development February 9th, 2000

Mr. Speaker, the minister's own departmental audit uncovered about $1 billion in mismanaged HRDC grants and contributions. But this is just the tip of the iceberg.

The Canadian Aerospace Group International Inc. received $1 million from the transitional jobs fund to establish Panda Aircraft in North Bay, Ontario. When Panda ceased operations, the North Bay development group got its money back.

I would like to know about the Canadian taxpayers. Did they get their money back?